The Battles of Antietam and Gettysburg resulted in some of the highest casualties of the war. What factor most likely influenced these casualty rates in both battles?

A Their closeness to the Union capital
B their closeness to major sea ports
C Their closeness to Northern trade interests
D Their closeness to the Confederate capitol

This paper discusses the responses of the Christians and Muslims during the Black Death. According to research Muslims tended to stay more calm and relaxed. While Christians started getting upset, this led to pointing fingers. In particular, this paper states exactly how the Muslims reacted versus the way the Christians reacted towards the cruel Black Death.

plz mark me!!!!

I believe that the answer is c. conspicuous consumerism!

Answer:

c. conspicuous consumerism

Explanation:

One of many explanations is that of conspicuous consumption, the definition of which establishes that people buy products or brands for reasons of personal image - they are products that show others their high status. This is the case of those who buy a Rolls Royce car to show others their fortune.

The origin of the concept of conspicuous consumption, that is, notorious, is of an economist Thorstein Veblen, from the end of the 19th century. It is a consumption similar to that of tribal chiefs, who wear a crown or a cape or necklaces that distinguish them from rest, showing their social position.

You can imagine current cases of such products - those products that base their consumption on the possibility of identifying their buyer in a high place in the social hierarchy: a Rolex, for example, or a Bentley. Even attending certain restaurants and clubs.

A fundamental basis for these “Veblen products” is their scarcity — only a few can have them, usually because of a very high price. In the moments in which these products become more accessible brands, they will lose their perceived value.

The correct answer is A: It defends citizens against unreasonable search and seizure.

two characteristic of the committed of correspondence are connection and equivlent  

My answer is A. the German army

Adam Smith (1723 – 1790) was a Scottish economist. He was deeply critical of Christianity because of his own observation of hypocrisy within Protestantism.

In 1759, Smith published The Theory of Moral Sentiments, which established Smith’s reputation in his own days, is concerned with the explanation of moral approval and disapproval. He based his explanation on sympathy as a fundamental human motive.

In 1776, he published The Wealth of Nations that became the foundation of modern economics.

There has been considerable controversy as how far there is contradiction between Smith’s emphasis on sympathy in his Theory of Moral Sentiments and the key role of self- interest in The Wealth of Nations.  

Smith’s idea of letting an economy without government intervention, called today Laissez faire was not about the government granting special economic privileges to powerful manufacturers and merchants. Mercantile monopolists and their allies in Parliament today, are the great enemies of Smith’s “free market mechanism”.

Adam Smith's writing was controversial because it challenged the mercantile system and outlined a free market approach that reduced the role of government. His ideas are still debatable today due to questions about the universality of rational choice theory and ethical concerns linked to the free market's impact on marginalized groups. The lasting impact of Smith's thought can be seen in historic changes in economic policies and ongoing debates about capitalism.

Given the historical context of Smith's time, his writing might have been controversial because it challenged the established mercantilist economic order, which stressed a favorable balance of trade and had enriched Europe's ruling classes. Adam Smith's ideas, particularly in The Wealth of Nations, proposed a free market economy that diminished the role of government, emphasizing instead the invisible hand of the market, leading to a natural order of prosperity. His perspectives attracted critics among conservative government leaders and those who benefited from the mercantilist system.

Today, Smith's theories are still debatable because critics point to occasions where rational choice theory does not always apply, as individuals don't always make the best decisions. Moreover, there are concerns about the moral implications of a free-market system, particularly how it has historically sacrificed the lives and wellbeing of marginalized groups for the profit of elites. These critiques continue as economic and social policy discussions evolve, reflecting on how a capitalist system serves various segments of society.

Additionally, Adam Smith's work as a philosopher during the Scottish Enlightenment and interactions with key figures like David Hume shaped his thinking, which had long-lasting effects, inspiring leaders like Thomas Jefferson to promote economic liberalization. Yet, the relevance of his ideas and their implementation remain a point of debate in contemporary society, as the balance between market freedom and regulation is often contested.

Answer:

Its location near Celtic and Germanic tribes

Explanation:

The Romans had big challenges ahead of them in order to expand, and after that to be able to control that territory if they expand, and the main reason for that were the Celtic and Germanic tribes around them. Both, the Celtic and the Germanic tribes, were tribes that often engaged in war, they were strong warriors, had numbers on their side, and were not people that were going to allow easily someone to control them and restrict their freedom. The only advantage the Romans had was that their military was all professional, had good training, excellent tactics, and acted well as a unit. In order to be able to cope with these tribes, the Romans attacked one tribe at a time, thus avoiding fighting against all at once, and eventually it led to their success. It has to be mentioned though that there were numerous Celtic rebellions against the Romans with lot of casualties, and also the biggest and most embarrassing defeat of the Roman army was from the Germanic tribes that slaughter 3 legions of Roman soldiers.

Not necessarily, He had provoked the attack.

Answer:

no

Explanation:

Although there were 2 houses in Parliament, the House of Lords was made up of Nobles and could veto any bill passed by the House of Commons. So, they could basically do whatever they wanted.  

- Also, less than 5% of the people could vote

- Catholics and non-Anglican Protestants could not vote or serve in Parliament

I hope this helps :)

During the early 1800s, Britain was far from being a democracy due to restricted suffrage, the influence of the aristocracy, and political corruption.

During the early 1800s, Great Britain was far from being a democracy due to several factors.

Overall, these factors contributed to a lack of representation, limited political participation, and a system that favored the interests of the elite over the majority of the population.

https://brainly.com/question/7129906

#SPJ3

They used triangular sails that allowed these ships to travel better.

Hope this helps!

(if you could rate/thank me that would be awesome)

We can only theorize about how the life would be if the humans appeared earlier on the Earth, as we can not create a perfect and accurate picture of how would the things have been.

If the humans were developing in the same manner as we had, than we can say that the humans would have been much more advanced. The technology would have much better, probably missions to the other planets would have been regular. The population would probably be higher, with most of the population being concentrated in highly advanced megalopolises.

The environment though would probably be in a terrible condition, with enormous loss in biodiversity across the globe, decline in the forests, and much emptier (with life) oceans. On the other hand, there's every chance that with the more advanced technology multiple animals and plants would have been resurrected, even some extinct very long time ago.

If humans had entered the fossil record sooner, our understanding of evolution and human origins might be more comprehensive, potentially accelerating advancements in genetics, anthropology, and paleontology.

Our knowledge of evolution and the history of life on Earth would probably be more complete and in-depth if humans had been present earlier in the fossil record. This earlier existence might have offered insightful information on the patterns and timing of species diversification, the occurrence of extinctions, and the evolution of important adaptations.

Furthermore, there's a chance that our comprehension of the evolution of humans and the ancestry of Homo sapiens has increased, which could result in breakthroughs in disciplines like palaeontology, anthropology, and genetics. Our understanding of our role in the natural world and the interdependence of all life forms may have been shaped by prior human interference in the fossil record, which may also have had an impact on scientific paradigms and cultural narratives.

during the world war 1 all the men had gone to fight the war and there were games and all kinds of things women could try doing that the men did.

Based on the information in the excerpt, the United States brought Nazi leaders to military tribunals in Germany AFTER the end of World War II. (a)

BUT ... To our country's lasting shame, the horrors being inflicted on racially-selected segments of Germany's civilian population were well known to the US DURING the war, but our government did little or nothing to impede this barbaric activity and preserve civilian lives.  

For example, the railroad tracks that guided the cattle-cars full of Jews to their torture, starvation, and death at Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, and Bergen-Belsen could have been disabled with a few well-placed bombs, easily, cheaply, and with minimal military risk.  But they were not.

The ovens in the concentration camps, or the camps themselves, could have been rendered operationally useless with a few well-placed bombs, easily, cheaply, and with minimal military risk.  But they were not.

Final answer:

The United States' reaction to the Holocaust included joining other nations to hold Nazi leaders accountable at the Nuremberg Trials and prosecute them for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Explanation:

The United States reacted to the events of the Holocaust by joining other nations in holding Nazi leaders accountable for their actions. After the war, the Allied powers, including the United States, established the International Military Tribunal to try German officials for war crimes. The evidence gathered by Allied forces, who uncovered the atrocious extent of the Holocaust upon liberating concentration and death camps, led to the Nuremberg Trials. Over the course of 1945 to 1946, Nazi leaders were charged with crimes against humanity, and the trials sought justice for the millions of lives lost in the Holocaust.

While the U.S. did not prioritize the rescue of Jews during the war, once the full horror of the Holocaust was revealed, there was a concerted effort to prosecute and hold accountable those responsible for the atrocities. Through legislation and the creation of new legal categories for crimes, the U.S. participated in the postwar response to the Holocaust, setting precedents in international law for responding to crimes of this magnitude.

I believe the correct answer is a supply and demand

The correct  answer is A. Supply and demand influences the economic decisions of businesses and individuals.

A market economy is an economic structure in which the forces of supply and demand determine the costs of goods and services. In other words, firms and people base their economic decisions on what they think will be most profitable. In a market economy, neither pricing nor resource distribution are regulated by the government.

Option B is inaccurate because in a market economy, pricing of goods are not set by the government. Because no one in a market economy is told by the government what kind of labor they must do, Option C is untrue. Option D is erroneous because, in a market economy, the most successful companies are not under government control.

To know more about businesses:

https://brainly.com/question/15826679

#SPJ2

The correct answer is - market economy.

The market economy type is an economy type in which everything, or almost everything is in the hands of private owners. The government has little control over them, and the control is only in the legislative department, so that they can assure that criminal activities and neglect of the workers wouldn't take place.

In the market economy, the private businesses have the right to choose what they will produce, how will they do that, how many people will they employ, what amount of goods or services they will produce or provide. They also are able to trade not only on the home market, but all around the world where there is demand for their goods and services.

Answer:

Market Economy

Explanation:

This is 100% the right answer because I got this question on a test and this was correct.

~Please mark me brainliest :)

Hello there! Hows it going? I'll answer the question now.

So basically one way that you can use the First Amendment or an example would be protesting what you believe in. You can express your freedom of speech this way as long at it is not rude, offensive, racist, etc. Some could say women rights, or advocating for a new president, all ways of using fair speech within the margins.

Hope this helped! Bye!

aided by measuring certain radioactive isotopes. ... Radiocarbon dating involves determining the age of an ancient fossil or specimen by measuring its carbon-14 content. just google bruh

Answer:

the answer is C. Delegates were chosen by state legislatures, and each state had one vote in Congress.

Explanation:

Direct democracy or pure democracy is a form of democracy in which people decide on policy initiatives directly. This differs from the majority of currently established democracies, which are representative democracies.

A direct democracy is a system of government in which citizens make direct policy choices. In this system, people are empowered to vote on various decisions such as budgets, policy changes, constitutional amendments, and candidate approval or removal. However, this style of governance requires citizens to be active and sufficiently informed about the matters they are voting on, which can be demanding.

A direct democracy is a democratic system in which citizens have the power to make direct policy choices rather than leaving them to elected officials. In a direct democracy, unlike a representative democracy, people participate directly in making government decisions. This system of government facilitates policy decisions that go directly to the voters for a decision. These decisions can include voting on budgets, policy changes, constitutional amendments, and even candidate approval or removal. Direct democracy is not practiced at the federal level in the United States, but elements of it can be found at the state and local levels.

One of the well-known examples of direct democracy is ancient Athens, where male citizens were allowed to participate, debate, and vote on proposed laws. However, there are challenges with this system of democracy as well. It expects citizens to be active and informed about the matters they are voting on, which can be demanding and difficult. Despite the drawbacks, the concept of direct democracy enhances the power of citizens to actively influence lawmaking and is an important influence on political practices globally.

https://brainly.com/question/31006383

#SPJ12

Credit! Credit! Credit!

It's  like a mantra. Everyone had stocks in their name but it was mostly the banks that held the stock. A person buying stock in 1929 only had to put up 10% of the price of the stock. The bank held the other 90%

Can you imagine that? Alarm bells should be going off in your head. The banks were way over their heads with debt that wasn't theirs.

And what would the banks do should the market begin to fall? They could try selling the stock, but who would buy it? That only brought the price down lower until someone thought they were getting a stock at a reasonable price.

But the market was acting like it had an anvil attached to it and it kept on falling. And soon the person that bought the stock was looking for another person to buy it from him so he could get out.

That was a major problem that resolved itself by means of a depression.

Because the land was horribly treated, agriculture became an occupation that was neither safe not sustainable. Many farms were lost because the soil couldn't produce. The banks again had another problem. They had loaned out millions of dollars using land has collateral. The banks could foreclose but what does a bank do with land? Or cattle? Or horses? And if the bank tried to hang on, prices were so low for agricultural products that people could not make enough to make payments.

Meantime in the cities, was it any better? No! Twenty five % of the workforce was unemployed. Could they  buy the cars Ford was rolling off the assembly lines? Who needed Edison light bulbs when those factory workers were living in tents?

The economy of the 1920s had several weaknesses which included overproduction, income inequality, and a fragile banking system. These issues led to the eventual collapse of the stock market and contributed to the onset of the Great Depression. Other significant problems were an overreliance on the automobile and construction industries, as well as high levels of consumer debt.

One significant economic weakness of the 1920s was overproduction, where industries produced more goods than consumers could purchase, leading to a surplus and falling prices. This was particularly evident in the agricultural sector, where advancements in technology significantly boosted output but did not correspond to an increase in market demand, plummeting farm incomes. Another critical failure was the vast income inequality; the wealthiest Americans saw significant income increases, whereas the average worker's wage remained relatively stagnant, resulting in an uneven distribution of wealth that negatively affected overall economic demand. The banking system was also precarious, with many small banks operating with minimal regulatory oversight and engaging in risky investment practices. The stock market, fuelled by speculative investments and margin buying, was dangerously overvalued, which ultimately led to the 1929 crash.

Final answer:

John Locke is renowned for conceptualizing the 'tabula rasa' in human knowledge acquisition, advocating for the protection of natural rights 'Life, Liberty, and Property' within a government's duty, and formulating the social contract theory that opposes divine monarchy and supports representative government.

Explanation:

John Locke, a prominent Enlightenment thinker, is known for his significant contributions to several areas of philosophy and political theory. One of his key ideas, stemming from his work An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, is the concept of the tabula rasa, which asserts that the human mind starts as a blank slate, and knowledge comes through experience.

Additionally, Locke's political philosophy, written in Two Treatises of Government, introduces the principle that government should serve for the people's benefit and protect natural rights such as Life, Liberty, and Property. This idea underpins the social contract theory, supporting the argument that individuals consent to be governed in exchange for security and the protection of their rights. His thoughts on representative government and the separation of powers greatly influenced modern democratic societies, particularly evident in the founding documents of the United States.

Lastly, Locke's social contract theory is foundational in understanding political consent and legitimacy, opposing the divine right of kings and suggesting that if a government fails its duty, the people have the rightful power to overthrow it and establish new governance.

um....whats the document

I think the document was written because in the late 1600s when they landed in From the mayflower they didn’t have any rules since it was a new pack of land so they needed the documents to make more rules and they didn’t want it like Britain Britain what rules so they decided to change how the rules were and how they use them that way they were more helpful and protective

Humans and heroes are psychologically linked. That is why it is important to understand this universal influence.

Studies have shown that humans exhibit a positive outlook on heroes. And in turn, the existence of heroes instills positivity in people.

Good behavior, good morals, saving humanity, serving the nation, and protection against negativity, have become the reasons why people are looking up to heroes.

Even during their crucial life transitions, for example, while being in hospitals, humans imagine a version of their hero, that is their ideal self, inspiring and giving them hope.

These beliefs are universally spread and this is how heroes unify people through their thoughts.

To know more about heroes check:

https://brainly.com/question/2150743

Need more details please

22 people is the correct answer.

The NAACP played a pivotal role in the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s. One of the organization's key victories was the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education that outlawed segregation in public schools. ... At the same time, NAACP members were subject to harassment and violence.

Answer:

It worked for decades to lay the legal groundwork for desegregation.

Explanation:

PLATO USERS

The Dark Ages is a term often used synonymously with the Middle Ages. It refers to the period of time between the fall of the Roman Empire and the beginning of the Italian Renaissance and the Age of Discovery. ... Debate continues to rage among historians over whether the Middle Ages were, indeed, dark or not.

not really sure bro coulldnt tell ya

Answer:

Option: B. humanism

Explanation:

Renaissance changed Europe in every aspect, give rebirth in every possible way. During the Renaissance period, people started to question things around them and increased emphasis on the importance of education. Renaissance humanists began studying ancient Greek and Latin literature to gain knowledge and to overcome from the chaos they were facing during that period.

Economic and Population extending are high in many developing countries, and foreign developed countries that often have big demands for certain goods. Which means you’re business might be able to take advantage of global trade to grow.

Answer:

By transporting resources from distant locations.

Explanation:

Leo III was excommunicated. This broke the relations between the East and West and there were wars against the Byzantine ruler. The church no longer viewed the Byzantine emperor as the emperor of the entire Roman Empire.

So the answer is D. It heightened public disagreement with the church.

In 1968 and 1980, the same liberal, educated and urban swaths of the country voiced similar fear and despair about the outcome — a sense that the nation as they knew it could not survive. And yet here we are, decades later, still enamored with the republic they were sure was doomed.