Terry and pat have been in a committed romantic relationship for five years. increased conflict has characterized their relationship recently. both have become less invested in the relationship and have sought out others to fulfill some of their needs for affection, inclusion, and control. they don't rely on each other much or expect much from each other. the couple's choices reflect which of the five features that contribute to destructive conflict

The best answer for this question would be:

A) It can be copied, distributed, and displayed as long as the author is credited. 

This is on point because public domains, can be used by any public and given that there are free themes that any author can choose from. Although for the best possible use they offer a paid version of the public domain.  

The correct answer is - It has been made available to the general public for any use at no charge

The kind of market that the following factors provided above is similar to a market or store that has one of focuses on one type of food or materials being sold. It is because suicide prevention, substance abuse treatment and eating disorder clinics falls in one category where in all are therapy or helpful treatments in helping mentally ill individuals.

Final answer:

Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory of personality is built on the premise that unconscious drives are at the heart of human motivations and personality.

Explanation:

Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory of personality is built on the premise that unconscious drives influenced by sex and aggression are at the heart of human motivations and personality. According to Freud, our personality develops from the conflict between our biological aggressive and pleasure-seeking drives and our internalized social controls over these drives. The dynamic interactions of the id, ego, and superego are central to this conflict and form the basis of our mental life. Freud understood the unconscious mind as a repository of feelings, thoughts, urges, and memories that are outside of our conscious awareness yet influence us significantly. These unconscious elements can manifest through dreams, slips of the tongue, and free association. Freud posited that the ego works to balance the instinctual desires of the id with the moral demands of the superego within the constraints of reality.

Seems like the question is missing options here, I will explain the simple answer below. The answer is:
1) The deity commands things that are already moral, 

2) The deity could have commanded anything and that thing would have been moral.

The choice offers a dilemma that why a deity had commanded something which already was moral, if not then why the deity did not command that thing to be moral.

Final answer:

Parents may not be actively involved in their child's special education due to economic and time constraints, uninvolved parenting styles, or because they prefer nontraditional education approaches. Situational factors, such as caring for multiple children or working long hours, can hinder involvement. Additionally, choices regarding the specific needs of special education students also affect parental engagement.

Explanation:

One reason that parents may not be actively involved in their child's special education is due to the demands and stresses of daily life, particularly in households of low socioeconomic status. These families may face challenges such as working long hours, caring for multiple children, dealing with poor study environments, or contending with language barriers that make engagement with their child's education more difficult.

Additionally, factors like severe depression, substance abuse, or an extreme focus on work can lead parents to adapt an uninvolved style of parenting. Such parents may meet their child’s basic needs but lack the capacity to provide emotional support or to navigate the complexities of the special education system. As stated in Mills v. Board of Education (1972), it's crucial that all children, including those with special needs, have access to quality education, suggesting that systemic factors like administrative inefficiency or insufficient funding should not disproportionately affect these children.

Moreover, some parents may opt for a nontraditional approach to education, perhaps because they do not agree with standard curriculums or educational policies, such as the increased use of standardized testing. School choice advocates argue that giving parents and students more options can lead to a more effective educational experience. Lastly, when presented with decisions based on a child's specific needs, such as whether a deaf child should be mainstreamed or attend a specialized school for the deaf, parental involvement is crucial and can vary depending on the parents' own experiences and knowledge.

Final answer:

Navi is likely experiencing an anxiety response and psychological stress due to receiving disturbing news, with her body's stress response causing lingering physical and emotional symptoms.

Explanation:

Based on the scenario provided, Navi appears to be experiencing an anxiety response to the disturbing news, which has been subsequently compounded by her husband's phone call. The lingering feeling that something is 'not quite right' without being able to pinpoint it suggests a state of psychological stress or unease, potentially leading to somatic symptoms such as a faster heart rate or nausea. The continued effect Navi experiences may be a manifestation of emotional distress, which can be triggered by a perceived threat or unsettling information and persist even when the immediate memory of the event is not at the forefront of one's mind. In such cases, the body's stress response is activated, often resulting in physical reactions that serve as a reminder of the emotional turmoil.

The McAllister family rule aligns with Lull's assertion that television viewing can interfere with a student's ability to prepare for academic activities. It emphasizes that a self-imposed curfew is useful in preventing potential distractions.

The McAllister family rule of no television viewing after eight o'clock on school nights represents a form of self-regulation meant to curb potential distractions that could affect school performance. Both 'Lull's rule' statements, that 'Viewing television interferes with a student's ability to prepare for the upcoming exam' and that 'Students who watch more television perform more poorly on their exams', are relevant considerations. However, the McAllister family's rule seems to align more directly with the first statement, underlining the idea that students need time for homework and studying rather than watching TV.

https://brainly.com/question/5625125

#SPJ12

The  Lull's rule that is represented by the McCallister family's rule is No television after 8 P.M. on school nights.

To understand which of Lull's rules is represented by the McCallister family's rule, we need to consider the content of the rule. The McCallister family's rule states that there will be no viewing of television after eight o'clock on school nights. This directly corresponds to one of Lull's rules, which is specifically aimed at regulating television viewing during times that could interfere with other activities, such as sleep or schoolwork.

Lull's rules are a set of guidelines proposed by communication theorist James Lull to help families manage their television viewing habits. These rules are designed to encourage more meaningful interactions and activities within the family. The specific rule that aligns with the McCallister family's rule is the one that restricts television viewing after a certain time on school nights, which is No television after 8 P.M. on school nights.

The other options provided do not match the McCallister family's rule as they either pertain to different times of the day, different days of the week, or involve other conditions:

a. No television until homework is done: This rule focuses on completing homework before any television can be watched, which is a different condition from the McCallister family's rule.

b. Television is allowed only on weekends: This rule restricts television viewing to weekends, which does not align with the McCallister family's rule that allows television viewing before eight o'clock on school nights.

d. No television during meal times: This rule pertains to not watching television during meals, which is unrelated to the time-based restriction of the McCallister family's rule.

Therefore, the rule that best matches the McCallister family's rule is No television after 8 P.M. on school nights

According to Carnegie, there are three ways in which we can manage the wealth we have left over.

1.- The first and most imprudent: You can leave the families of the deceased.

2.- Regarding the second mode: It can be bequeathed for public purposes.

3.- Or, finally: It can be administered during its life by its owners.

Studying crime is important to understand its causes and trends, develop prevention strategies, and anticipate future crimes. For example, studying crime data can help policymakers focus on improving the economy to reduce crime rates. Geographic profiling can also be used to predict the locations of future crimes.

Studying crime is an important part of trying to stop it because it provides valuable insights into the causes and trends of criminal behavior. By understanding why people commit crimes, researchers and law enforcement agencies can develop effective strategies to prevent future crime.

For example, by studying crime data, researchers have found that there is a correlation between unemployment rates and crime rates. If unemployment increases, the crime rate is also likely to increase. This knowledge can help policymakers focus on creating more job opportunities and improving the economy, which in turn can reduce crime.

In addition, studying crime patterns and behaviors can help law enforcement agencies anticipate and prevent future crimes. For instance, geographic profiling is a technique used to identify spatial patterns in criminal behavior. By mapping serial offenses and analyzing the modus operandi of offenders, analysts can predict where an offender is likely to commit additional crimes and even identify their potential residence.

Final answer:

Nancy can run and hit a baseball without constant visual checks due to proprioception, muscle memory, and coordination, honed through repeated practice allowing her body to sense and control movements efficiently.

Explanation:

The ability for Nancy to run without watching her feet and hit a baseball without focusing on the bat is due to a combination of proprioception, muscle memory, and coordination. These skills are developed over time through practice and experience. Proprioception refers to the body's ability to sense its position in space, muscle memory is the result of consistent repetition of certain movements, and coordination involves the harmonious function of sensory information with muscle action to perform tasks efficiently.

Proprioception allows Nancy to know where her limbs are without visually monitoring them. This sense, along with the muscle memory she has developed from repeated practice, allows her to perform complex tasks like running or swinging a bat effectively. Furthermore, her coordination skills enable her to synchronize her visual focus with her body movements to hit a moving object like a baseball.

Nancy's proficiency in these physical tasks also requires an ability to concentrate and a level of imagination, as perceiving the ball's trajectory and timing the swing require cognitive as well as physical abilities.

Arguments supporting the unenforceability of the covenant can reference the Shelley v. Kraemer (1948) case, where the Supreme Court ruled that courts cannot enforce agreements between private citizens that violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. This precedent, alongside the Court's progressive stance on civil rights, as seen in Loving v. Virginia (1967), illustrates why such covenants are not legally enforceable.

Arguments that would support Schlack's argument that the covenant is not enforceable can draw upon the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Shelley v. Kraemer (1948). In this landmark case, the Court ruled that while restrictive real estate covenants, which were agreements between private citizens to not sell property to certain ethnic minorities, did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment on their face, their enforcement by courts would. This is because the enforcement of such covenants by state courts, which are government institutions, would violate the Fourteenth Amendment's prohibition against denying people equal protection of the law. Essentially, the Court held that the government could not be involved in enforcing discrimination.

Furthermore, the evolution of the Supreme Court into a more progressive force for civil rights underscores the broader legal context in which such covenants have been rendered unenforceable. The Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia (1967), which struck down laws against interracial marriage, is another example of this trend. These cases illustrate a legal framework in which covenants or laws that promote discrimination, even if entered into by private parties, cannot be legally enforced if they engage state entities in a way that violates constitutional protections.

Two methods in ensuring that a person is a not socially engineered is when the person does not have the will or motivation in to tricking a person in a way of having to break security or rules, another thing is not having the will of trying to hack or learn information that are confidential.

Peggy's interest in chemistry experiments is a reflection of her changing interests. By conducting experiments, she can observe and analyze chemical reactions to better understand the principles of chemistry.

Peggy's interest in chemistry experiments is a reflection of her changing interests. Chemistry is a branch of science that deals with the composition, structure, properties, and reactions of matter. By conducting experiments, Peggy can observe and analyze chemical reactions to better understand the principles of chemistry.

For example, when Peggy combines two or more substances, she may observe a chemical reaction such as a color change, the formation of a gas, or the release of heat or light. These reactions occur because the substances undergo a rearrangement of atoms, forming different compounds.

Overall, Peggy's interest in doing chemistry experiments is a fantastic way for her to explore the fascinating world of chemicals and their interactions.

Enslaved people used the principles of the revolution to fight for their freedom, sometimes through rebellions like the one in Haiti during the French Revolution and sometimes through aid to the British in the American Revolution. However, despite some achievements, the overall institution of slavery was often reinforced during the Revolutionary era.

The enslaved people used the principles of the revolution to challenge the existing system of bondage and to pursue their own aspirations for freedom. They fought alongside the British during the American Revolution hoping to gain freedom, and some were successful. Many also used the ideals of revolution, such as liberty and equality, to argue for their own manumission or freedom. For instance, during the French Revolution, enslaved people in the French colony of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti) staged a successful rebellion based partly on these revolutionary principles. They not only sought and achieved independence from France but also ended slavery.

Enslaved people also used other methods of resistance to undermine the institution of slavery. These small acts of resistance may not have resulted in mass uprisings but they were nonetheless significant. For example, in the United States, the fear of slave uprisings kept white slaveholders in a constant state of anxiety and vigilance.

Despite the progress, the Revolutionary era had its limitations. While some enslaved individuals were freed as a result of the revolutions, the overall institution of slavery was often reinforced, particularly in the newly formed United States of America. Therefore, the use of revolutionary principles by enslaved people was a complex and nuanced process that resulted in both victories and setbacks in their fight for freedom.

https://brainly.com/question/10622527

#SPJ12

The correct explanation is that the slaves employ the principles of the revolution by using the revolutionary ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity to argue for their own freedom and rights.

Slaves, recognizing the inherent contradiction between the revolutionary ideals and their own condition of bondage, seized upon these principles to assert their humanity and claim the right to be free.

For example, in the case of the Haitian Revolution (1791-1804), enslaved Africans in the French colony of Saint-Domingue were inspired by the French Revolution's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.

Similarly, in the United States, enslaved people like Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman used the principles of the American Revolution to argue against slavery and to work towards its abolition.

In essence, slaves employed the principles of the revolution by:

1. Identifying the contradictions between revolutionary ideals and the reality of slavery.

2. Using revolutionary language and documents to assert their rights and humanity.

3. Organizing and participating in rebellions and abolitionist movements that were often inspired by revolutionary ideals.

4. Advocating for the extension of citizenship and legal rights to all individuals, regardless of race or previous condition of servitude.

Relying solely on individual experience and perception to understand the world risks resulting in an incomplete or skewed perception of reality, an overestimate of knowledge (Dunning-Kruger Effect), and the retention of potentially false beliefs.

When we rely solely on our individual experiences and perceptions to understand the world, we run the risk of forming an incomplete or skewed understanding. This is due to several key factors:  

In conclusion, an individualistic approach to understanding the world without checks and feedback can lead to a misunderstanding of reality, overestimation of our knowledge, and holding onto unverified beliefs.

https://brainly.com/question/27164706

#SPJ12