I need help on the rounding tto try to get the right answer. Maybe mark branliest?

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is y minus x = negative 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

if a= (1/27)^2  + 3, then  a is about  3.00137

Step-by-step explanation:

I assume you have a typo here.

Your equation should be   a = (1/27)^2  + 3 ...

If that is so,    a =  (1/27)^2 + 3 =  3.00137...

Answer:

1 (line B)

2 (line A)

3 (line D)

Step-by-step explanation: We both know I don't have one.

Answer:

b , a , d

Step-by-step explanation:

edg2020

Answer:

Use (B*H)H

Step-by-step explanation:

17*18*19

First 17*18= 306

Second is 306*19=5814

*PLS HELP ME WITH MY MATH

The volume of the given rectangular prism will be 5814 inches³.

Volume is the scalar quantity of any object that specified occupied space in 3D.

For example, the space in our room is referred to as volume.

Volume has units of cube example meter³,cm³, etc.

The volume of the prism = length × height × width.

As per the given,

Length = 18 inches

Width = 17 inches

Height = 19 inches

Volume = 18 x 17 x 19 = 5814 inches³

Hence "The volume of the given rectangular prism will be 5814 inches³".

To learn more about volume,

https://brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ5

Answer:

B. 0.132

Step-by-step explanation:

For each time the dice is thrown, there are only two possible outcomes. Either it lands on a five, or it does not. The probability of a throw landing on a five is independent of other throws. So we use the binomial probability distribution to solve this question.

Binomial probability distribution

The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, and X can only have two outcomes.

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

In which [tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

And p is the probability of X happening.

Timothy creates a game in which the player rolls 4 dice.

This means that [tex]n = 4[/tex]

The dice can land in 6 numbers, one of which is 5.

This means that [tex]p = \frac{1}{6}[/tex]

What is the probability in this game of having exactly two dice or more land on a five?

[tex]P(X \geq 2) = P(X = 2) + P(X = 3) + P(X = 4)[/tex]

In which

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 2) = C_{4,2}.(\frac{1}{6})^{2}.(\frac{5}{6})^{2} = 0.116[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 3) = C_{4,2}.(\frac{1}{6})^{3}.(\frac{5}{6})^{1} = 0.015[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 4) = C_{4,4}.(\frac{1}{6})^{4}.(\frac{5}{6})^{0} = 0.001[/tex]

[tex]P(X \geq 2) = P(X = 2) + P(X = 3) + P(X = 4) = 0.116 + 0.015 + 0.001 = 0.132[/tex]

So the correct answer is:

B. 0.132

The probability of having exactly two dice or more land on a five is: 0.132.

To determine the probability of having exactly two dice or more land on a five when rolling four dice, we first need to calculate the probabilities of each possible outcome involving getting at least two fives.

1: Define the basic probabilities
Each die has 6 faces, so the probability ( p ) of rolling a five on a single die is:
[tex]\[ p = \frac{1}{6} \]The probability \( q \) of not rolling a five on a single die is:\[ q = 1 - p = \frac{5}{6} \][/tex]
2: Define the number of dice rolls
We are rolling 4 dice.

3: Calculate probabilities for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 fives
We use the binomial distribution formula:
[tex]\[ P(X = k) = \binom{n}{k} p^k (1-p)^{n-k} \]where \( n = 4 \), \( p = \frac{1}{6} \), and \( k \)[/tex] is the number of fives rolled.
Probability of rolling exactly 0 fives (\( k = 0 \)):
[tex]\[ P(X = 0) = \binom{4}{0} \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^0 \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^4 = 1 \times 1 \times \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^4 = \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^4 \][/tex]
Probability of rolling exactly 1 five (\( k = 1 \)):
[tex]\[ P(X = 1) = \binom{4}{1} \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^1 \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^3 = 4 \times \frac{1}{6} \times \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^3 \]Probability of rolling exactly 2 fives (\( k = 2 \)):\[ P(X = 2) = \binom{4}{2} \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^2 \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^2 = 6 \times \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^2 \times \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^2 \][/tex]
[tex]Probability of rolling exactly 3 fives (\( k = 3 \)):\[ P(X = 4) = \binom{4}{4} \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^4 \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^0 = 1 \times \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^4 \times 1 \])^1 \]Probability of rolling exactly 4 fives (\( k = 4 \)):[/tex]
[tex]\[ P(X = 4) = \binom{4}{4} \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^4 \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^0 = 1 \times \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^4 \times 1 \][/tex]
4: Sum probabilities for \( k \geq 2 \)
We need to find \( P(X \geq 2) \), which is:
[tex]\[ P(X \geq 2) = P(X = 2) + P(X = 3) + P(X = 4) \][/tex]
5: Perform calculations
[tex]\[P(X = 0) = \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^4 \approx 0.4823\]\[P(X = 1) = 4 \times \frac{1}{6} \times \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^3 = 4 \times \frac{1}{6} \times \left(\frac{125}{216}\right) \approx 0.3858\]\[P(X = 2) = 6 \times \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^2 \times \left(\frac{5}{6}\right)^2 = 6 \times \frac{1}{36} \times \frac{25}{36} = \frac{150}{1296} \approx 0.1157\][/tex]
[tex]\[P(X = 3) = 4 \times \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^3 \times \frac{5}{6} = 4 \times \frac{1}{216} \times \frac{5}{6} = \frac{20}{1296} \approx 0.0154\]\[P(X = 4) = \left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^4 = \frac{1}{1296} \approx 0.0008\][/tex]

6: Summing up [tex]\( P(X \geq 2) \)[/tex]
[tex]\[P(X \geq 2) = P(X = 2) + P(X = 3) + P(X = 4) \approx 0.1157 + 0.0154 + 0.0008 = 0.1319\][/tex]
Rounding this to three decimal places, we get 0.132.
Thus, the probability of having exactly two dice or more land on a five is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{0.132} \][/tex].

Answer:

25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: (5, -9)

Step-by-step explanation:

Rewrite the equation in term of  x and y.

Answer:

Hypotenuse = 36  Leg = 33

other leg^2 = 36^2 - 33^2

other leg^2 = 207

other leg = 14.3874945699

other leg = 14.4 (rounded)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The total number of reading schedules is [tex]83.3927415552\cdot 10^{13}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that if we have n elements, the number of ways in which we can choose k elements without minding the order is [tex]\binom{n}{k}=\frac{n!}{(n-k)! k!}[/tex].

At first, suppose that we have already chosen 9 books. If we want to number the order in which we are reading this books from 1 to 9, for position 1 we have 9 options, for position 2, we have 8 and so on. Using the multiplication principle, we have that the number of ways or arranging 9 books is 9!

Recall that we want the same amount from novels, plays and nonfiction. That is, we are choosing 3 books from each group. We can easy calculate the total number of ways of choosing the 9 books by simply multiplying the number of ways we choose 3 from each cathegory. Hence the total number of ways of choosing the 9 books is

[tex]\binom{9}{3}\cdot \binom{22}{3}\cdot \binom{22}{3}[/tex]

For each selection of 9 books, we have 9! different ways of organizing them, then the total number is

[tex]\binom{9}{3}\cdot \binom{22}{3}\cdot \binom{22}{3}\cdot 9! = 83.3927415552\cdot 10^{13}[/tex]

Answer:

160160160 times

Step-by-step explanation:

(444/999)360360360=160160160

Answer:

its d

Step-by-step explanation:

its d

Answer:

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is  not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of alumni that assist to at least a one class reunion is different for privates university and public university (p-value=0.222).  

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that the proportion of alumni that assist to at least a one class reunion is different for privates university and public university.  

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0[/tex]

where π1: proportion of private university alunmi that have attended at least one class reunion, and π2: proportion of public university alunmi that have attended at least one class reunion.

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (private), of size n1=1042 has a proportion of p1=0.6286.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=655/1042=0.6286[/tex]

The sample 2 (public), of size n2=1318 has a proportion of p2=0.6039.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=796/1318=0.6039[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.0247.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.6286-0.6039=0.0247[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{655+796}{1042+1318}=\dfrac{1451}{2360}=0.6148[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.6148*0.3852}{1042}+\dfrac{0.6148*0.3852}{1318}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.00023+0.00018}=\sqrt{0.00041}=0.0202[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.0247-0}{0.0202}=\dfrac{0.0247}{0.0202}=1.222[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=2\cdot P(t>1.222)=0.222[/tex]

As the P-value (0.222) is bigger than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is  not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of alumni that assist to at least a one class reunion is different for privates university and public university.  

To determine if the difference in sample proportions is statistically significant, we can perform a hypothesis test.

To determine if the difference in sample proportions is statistically significant, we can perform a hypothesis test.

In this case, the test statistic is calculated as [tex]\frac{\frac{655}{1042} - \frac{796}{1318}}{\sqrt{\frac{655}{1042}\left(1 - \frac{655}{1042}\right)/1042 + \frac{796}{1318}\left(1 - \frac{796}{1318}\right)/1318}}[/tex]  By comparing the test statistic to the critical value at a significance level of 0.05, we can determine if the difference in sample proportions is statistically significant.

https://brainly.com/question/30624926

#SPJ11

Answer:

5,500 meters or 5.5km

Step-by-step explanation:

1 km is = 1000 meter

2km=2000 meters

2000 +3500 =5,5000 meters

Answer:

Given:

Sample size, n = 20

Significance level = 5% = 0.05

Mean, u = 8

Here, the sample mean was not given.

Here the null and alternative hypothesis will be:

H0 : u = 8

H1 : u < 8

In this case, since there is no evidence to reject the null hypothesis, H0, at 0.05 level of significance, we can say that the p-value is greater than the level of significance, 0.05.

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

When dividing fractions, multiply the first number by the reciprocal of the second number

2/5 ÷ 1/3

First, find the reciprocal of the second number: 1/3

To find the reciprocal, flip the numerator (top number) and denominator (bottom number)

1/3-->3/1

Now, multiply 2/5 and 3/1

2/5 * 3/1

Multiply across the numerators and denominators

6/5

Answer:

68%

Step-by-step explanation:

Final answer:

Using the empirical rule for normal distribution, approximately 68% of the boys at the all boys school with a mean height of 70 inches and a standard deviation of 5 inches are between 65 and 75 inches tall.

Explanation:

According to the empirical rule (also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule), for a normal distribution:

Approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean.

About 95% of the data falls within two standard deviations of the mean.

And around 99.7% falls within three standard deviations of the mean.

In the case of the all boys school with a mean height of 70 inches and standard deviation of 5 inches, the range between 65 inches (70 - 5) and 75 inches (70 + 5) represents one standard deviation from the mean on either side. Thus, using the empirical rule, approximately 68% of the boys are between 65 and 75 inches tall.

Answer:

NO.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question, we are given a random sample of 20 automotive​ batteries, a confidence interval =(0.22​,0.33​). Also, the population standard deviation is said to be less than 0.26 hour.

The confidence interval does NOT suggest that the variation in the​ batteries' reserve capacities is at an acceptable​ level.

REASON: If you look at the confidence interval, we can see that it contains the value for the standard deviation that is 0.26 and even MORE value than 0.26.

This does not give us any suggestion that the standard deviation is less than 0.26.

Final answer:

The confidence interval suggests that the variation in the batteries' reserve capacities is not at an acceptable level because the interval (0.22, 0.33) lies above the acceptable standard deviation of less than 0.26 hour.

Explanation:

In the context of the question, a constructed confidence interval for the population standard deviation of automotive batteries' reserve capacity is (0.22, 0.33 hours). To evaluate whether the variation in the batteries' reserve capacities is at an acceptable level, we would compare the interval to the stated acceptable level of a population standard deviation which should be less than 0.26 hour. Since the lower bound of the interval is above 0.22 and the entire confidence interval lies above 0.26, this suggests that the variability may be higher than the acceptable level, hence the variation is not at an acceptable level according to the specified criteria.

As for the example related to the NeverReady batteries, it demonstrates the use of sample data to question a company's claim about product performance by calculating the probability of obtaining a sample with a mean as low as or lower than observed when assuming that the company's claim is true. If the probability is very low, it casts doubt on the claim.

Answer:

x=19

Step-by-step explanation:

The consecutive integers will be x, x+1 and x+2 since consecutive integers have a pattern.

So,  the equation is x+x+1+x+2=60

Solve:

x+x+1+x+2=60

3x+3=60

Subtract 3 on both sides:

3x+3-3=60-3

3x=57

Divide by 3

3x/3=57/3

x=19

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

A P-value of 0.045 suggests that there is a 4.5% chance of observing a sample proportion as extreme as 70% or more, assuming the null hypothesis is true. If the P-value<0.05 (usually considered a threshold), we typically reject the null hypothesis - here, indicating that more than 68% consider health care cost reduction a national priority.

In statistics, a P-value is a probability that provides a measure of the evidence against the null hypothesis (H₀). A P-value of 0.045, as given in this instance, indicates that if the null hypothesis were true (i.e., 68% of U.S. adults still consider reducing health care costs a national priority), there is only a 4.5% probability of observing a sample proportion as extreme as 70% or more.

Commonly, a threshold (α) is set at 0.05 or 5%. If the P-value is less than α (which it is in this case, 0.045 < 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Consequently, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the proportion of U.S. adults this year who rate 'reducing health care costs' as a national priority is higher than 68%.

https://brainly.com/question/33325466

#SPJ12

The P-value of 0.045 provides statistically significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the alternative hypothesis that the proportion of U.S. adults who rate 'reducing healthcare costs' as a national priority has increased from the previous 68%.

In the context of this issue, the P-value of 0.045 represents the probability of observing a sample proportion as extreme as 70%, or more, given that the null hypothesis is true - the null hypothesis being that the true proportion of U.S. adults who rate 'reducing healthcare costs' as a national priority is 68%.

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level (in this case, 5% or 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis. Since 0.045 is indeed less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis, supporting the alternative hypothesis that the proportion of U.S. adults who view reducing healthcare costs as a national priority is greater than 68%.

Therefore, the P-value of 0.045 suggests there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the perception of 'reducing healthcare costs' as a national priority has increased amongst U.S. adults recently.

https://brainly.com/question/33325466

#SPJ11

Answer:

all real numbers

y>0

Step-by-step explanation:

The range of f(x) = 4x is all real numbers.

The range of values that we are permitted to enter into our function is known as the domain of a function. The x values for a function like f make up this set (x). A function's range is the collection of values it can take as input. After we enter an x value, the function outputs this sequence of values.

Therefore, The range of f(x) = 4x is all real numbers.

To know more about the domain refer to :

https://brainly.com/question/26098895

#SPJ2

Answer:

We have 40% antifreeze and 70% antifreeze and we need to make 240 liters of 64% antifreeze.

We set up 2 equations where "f" is the 40 % and "s" is the 70%

A) f + s = 240

B) .40f + .70s = (.64 * 240) (or 153.6)

To solve both equations we multiply A) by -.40

A) -.40 f  - .40 s = -96.00   then we add this to B)

B) .40f + .70s = 153.60

.30s = 57.6

s = 192

f = 48

48 liters of 40% = 19.20 liters of antifreeze

192 liters of  70% = 134.40 liters of antifreeze

That equals 153.60 liters of antifreeze in a TOTAL liquid amount of 240 liters.

Double Check

153.60 / 240 = 64% antifreeze.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5s = 85

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter of our triangle = DE + EF + DF = 81 units

We know from the question that

The length of side DE is twice the length of side EF

DE = 2EF

and the length of side DF is 4 units less than the length of side DE

DF = DE - 4

We can replace EF with s in our equations

DE = 2s

And now we can replace DE from the other equation

DF = DE - 4

DF = 2s - 4

If the perimeter of our triangle = DE + EF + DF = 81 units

We will replace the sides with our new values

Perimeter = 2s + s + 2s - 4 = 81

We can put this as our answer, or we can simplify further

Simplify by adding 4 to both sides

2s + s + 2s - 4 + 4 = 81 + 4

Simplify

2s + s + 2s = 85

Simplify

5s = 85

Since the question only asked for an equation, not for us to solve it, we can stop here

(If you wanted to solve for s, just divide both sides by 5)

5s / 5 = 85 / 5

s = 17

Answer:

81 = s + 2s + (2s -4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7 bags red onions

10 bags yellow onions

Step-by-step explanation:

If r is the number of bags of red onions, and y is the number of bags of yellow onions, then:

r + y = 17

4r + 6y = 88

Solve the system of equations using substitution or elimination.  Using substitution:

r = 17 − y

4(17 − y) + 6y = 88

68 − 4y + 6y = 88

2y = 20

y = 10

r = 7

The chef received 5 bags of red onions and 12 bags of yellow onions.

The question involves solving a system of linear equations to find the number of bags of red onions and yellow onions the chef received. Let's denote the number of bags of red onions as R and the number of bags of yellow onions as Y. We know that:

Each bag of red onions contains 4 onions.

Each bag of yellow onions contains 6 onions.

The chef got a total of 17 bags.

The chef got a total of 88 onions.

Based on this information, we can set up the following equations:

R + Y = 17
(This represents the total number of bags.)

4R + 6Y = 88
(This represents the total number of onions.)

We can solve this system of equations using substitution or elimination. Let's use substitution. First, we can express Y as 17 - R from the first equation:

Y = 17 - R

Now, we substitute Y in the second equation:

4R + 6(17 - R) = 88

By solving this equation, we find that R = 5 and Y = 12. Therefore, the chef got 5 bags of red onions and 12 bags of yellow onions.

Answer:

65,000

Step-by-step explanation:

because the scale is 1:50,000, so just simply multiply by 50,000.

Answer:i am not going to answer htis question 4 u but i will tell u how 2 do it first u mulitply 50,000 by 13 then you convert the number of centimeters u get into kilometers (this is where most people get wrong cuz there 2 lazy to read the question.

Final answer:

The probability of being dealt a card greater than 2 and less than 5 from a standard deck of 52 cards is 2/13.

Explanation:

The probability of being dealt a card greater than 2 and less than 5 from a standard 52-card deck means you are looking for 3s and 4s from each suit (hearts, spades, clubs, diamonds).

For each suit, there is one 3 and one 4, making a total of 8 possible cards (2 cards per suit multiplied by 4 suits). To calculate the probability, you divide the number of favorable outcomes by the number of possible outcomes. So, this probability is 8/52, which simplifies to 2/13 when reduced.

To evaluate f(0) without using a calculator, simply substitute x with 0 in the function f(x) = 3x - 3 to get f(0) = -3.

A mathematical function is a relationship between a set of inputs (domain) and corresponding outputs (range) such that each input is associated with exactly one output. It is a rule or process that assigns a unique value to each input. Functions are fundamental in expressing and analyzing mathematical relationships.

To evaluate f(0) without using a calculator, we can simply replace x with 0 in the given function f(x) = 3x - 3.

Therefore, f(0) = 3(0) - 3 = 0 - 3 = -3.

So, f(0) = -3.

Answer:

8 - 2x

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the unknown number

difference is subtraction

8 - 2x