How did the Jews of Poland differ from those in Germany and the rest of Western Europe

Answer:

The ongoing protests in Hong Kong clearly shows how people in the country are deeply concerned about their future. When people protest, they are asking for change and in Hong Kong's case, the protests continue because the government is not listening to them. People are scared that through the "extradition bill," the country's right of autonomy will be lost. This is making the people more aggressive in their demonstration, thus affecting tourism. I hope that the government will listen to them and will appeal to their needs, for when a country is chaotic, everything is at stake.

Explanation

The core issue of the protest was the extradition bill, which will amend or change the Fugitive Order Offender's Ordinance. This means that once the bill becomes a law, the offenders will be sent to other jurisdictions outside of Hong Kong. This has a chance to affect the judicial independence of Hong Kong.

Answer:

The correct answer is: Congress accused president Johnson of abusing his presidential powers, and Johnson thought that congress overstepped its authority in carrying out radical reconstruction.

Explanation:

After Abraham Lincoln was killed, in 1865, Andrew Johnson was elected as the president of the U.S. Shortly after that, he started with his plan for the South’s reconstruction. When the Congress met to evaluate the situation, one of the assumptions was that President Johnson was overstepping his boundaries, as the Republicans thought the reconstruction of the South was not his job, but the job of the Congress.

Congress made a plan to distribute the land between freedmen and create schools, but this bill was vetoed by President Johnson. He said this was a violation of the separation of powers, as he considered it expensive and unconstitutional.

Answer:

Leonardo's ability to observe and study, then demonstrate those things in his art, he was pretty much the definition of a Renaissance man.  Defined: Renaissance man: a person with many talents or areas of knowledge.

Answer: Leonardo´s versatility is the best example of what we usually call "renaissance man". He excelled in many areas and did so well that he is frequently considered genius.

Explanation: There were other people like Leonardo, but Leonardo continues being famous. Versatility and genius where theory/experiment and practice meet, where fantasy/imagination and praxis and utility meet is the best reflexion of that time (renaissance). Psychologically speaking renaissance is considered a period or re-awakening, extroversion. People like Pico della Mirandola or Paracelsus still fascinate us.

Answer:supply and demand

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Demobilization generally refers to the army being reduced or disbanded altogether. It comes about because it (the army) is no longer needed to fight a way.

Demobilization can also refer to a construction site where men and equipment are no longer needed.

The answer is pretty tricky because neither of these definitions are listed. D is a consequence of demobilization. It is a result of demobilization. I would pick it, but don't be surprised if you get it wrong. Bring up your objection and then be quiet.

Answer:D

Explanation:

Answer: C Morality outweighs human laws.

Explanation:

Just took the test

Morality outweighs human laws is the best universal theme represented in the excerpt.

Universal theme Which is best to represented in the excerpt is Morality outweighs human laws.

To learn more about Morality outweighs human laws refer:https://brainly.com/question/23975859

#SPJ2

Answer:

Your setting an example for others to follow

Explanation:

Answer:

Your answer would be Precedent!

Explanation:

earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Example : "there are substantial precedents for using interactive media in training"

Answer:

Diagram B

Explanation

The feudal period of Japanese history was a time when powerful families (daimyo) and the military power of warlords (shogun), and their warriors, the samurai ruled Japan.

During that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence. Society was divided into two main classes in Feudal Japan, the nobility and the peasants.

Japan was dominated by strong families (daimyo), warlords (shogun), and their warriors, the samurai, during the feudal period of its history.

Thus, the correct option is diagram B.

The terms "feudalism" and "feudal system" were typically used to describe the early and middle Middle Ages, which covered the time from the 5th century, when the Western Empire's central political authority vanished, to the 12th century, when kingdoms started to emerge as efficient centralized governmental units.

Feudalism was a social structure in which lower-ranking individuals provided security and land to lower-ranking individuals in exchange for their labor and support.

The feudal system was similar to an ecosystem in that it would collapse if one level were to be missing. The four basic components of the hierarchy were the Monarch, Lords/Ladies (Nobles), Knights, and Peasants/Serfs. Everyday life at every level was dependent on one another.

Lords, vassals, and fiefs were the three main components of feudalism; the arrangement of these three components reveals how it was structured. Land was owned by a lord, who was a noble, and was known as a fief. A vassal was someone who was given control of the land by the lord.

Learn more about feudal period, here

https://brainly.com/question/28524143

#SPJ3

Answer:

The correct answer is B. 775

Complete the question and statement:

Evaluate S5 for 400 + 200 + 100 + … and select the correct answer below.

A) 25

B) 775

C) 1125

D) 500

Source: Previous question that can be found at brainly

Explanation:

This is a series of 5 terms, which first term is 400 and start decreasing by the half of the previous term. We're being asked for find the 5 terms and the sum of those 5 terms.

1. Let's five the 5 terms:

400, 200, 100, 50 and 25.

2. Let's five the sum of those 5 terms:

Sum = 400 + 200 + 100 + 50 + 25

Sum = 775

The correct answer is B. 775

The idea found in the passage connects to Greco-Roman ideas through the shared emphasis on self-examination, ethical living, and skepticism of absolute knowledge. Philosophers like Seneca and Marcus Aurelius spoke similarly about human imperfection and moral scrutiny, while Socratic and Pyrrhonian thoughts mirrored the questioning of one's own judgments.

The passage in question reflects on the moral implications of judging others and condemns hypocrisy. In the context of Greco-Roman ideas, this notion relates to the philosophical thoughts from that era which emphasized self-awareness, self-improvement, and the reflection on one's own faults before criticizing others. Stoic philosophers such as Seneca and Marcus Aurelius discussed themes related to the imperfections of human nature and ethical self-examination. Similarly, Socratic philosophy focused on the pursuit of moral truth and the recognition of one's own ignorance as a step towards wisdom.

Furthermore, the Pyrrhonian skepticism mentioned argues that nothing can be known for certain, which includes the act of judgment itself. This skepticism towards absolute knowledge or judgment also echoes the theme of questioning one's own beliefs and judgments that were present in ancient philosophical thought.

In the Christian context, judging others is cautioned against in passages like Matthew 7:1-5, which teach the importance of treating others as one would like to be treated and acknowledging one's own flaws. This is akin to certain ethical and moral stances in Greco-Roman philosophy, indicating a historical continuum between ancient thought and early Christian teachings concerning self-awareness and judgment.

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

The answer is A because, back when Einstein and Newton and Benjamin Franklin were alive It was illegal to study against the churches established rules and regulations.

Hope this helps :))

The Scientific Revolution notably started from the Year 1543 to 1687.

During this period, emphasis are placed on systematic experimentation as the valid research method.

However, the church reacted strongly against the scientists who challenged established religious beliefs because the revolution threaten the existence of the religion.

Learn more about the Scientific Revolution here

brainly.com/question/18140730

Answer:

In the case Texas v. Johnson (1989), burning of the American flag was considered a form of symbolic speech that is protected by the Constitution. The Supreme Court argued that some actions may anger people, but social outrage alone can´t be a justification for limiting freedom of speech.

Example: The Iowa state legislature passes a new libel law that is contested by local associations of journalists. They say some aspects of it will limit freedom of speech and freedom of the press. They organize protests and even promise to take the issue to the Supreme Court if necessary. As part of their street protests, they gag themselves with white handkerchiefs and march in silence. This is symbolic speech.

I agree with the argument of the Supreme Court that symbolic speech has to be equally protected by the First Amendment as far as no life or property is in danger. To limit or punish some forms of protest just because a social group or large numbers of people don´t like it,  may have serious consequences for citizens´freedoms and rights, it may open the door to future restrictions.

Explanation:

Symbolic speech, like burning the flag, is protected by the First Amendment, as it conveys powerful messages and promotes debate.

Points supporting the protection of symbolic speech like flag burning under the First Amendment:

1. Expression of Political Dissent: Burning the flag is a potent form of political protest, conveying dissatisfaction with government policies and actions.

2. Visual Impact: Symbolic speech often carries a more powerful and memorable message than verbal or written communication alone, making it effective in drawing attention to issues.

3. First Amendment Rights: Upholding symbolic speech as protected under the First Amendment ensures that individuals can freely express dissenting opinions without fear of censorship or punishment.

4. Promotion of Debate and Change: Symbolic speech encourages public debate and discussion on important societal issues, fostering a healthy democracy where diverse viewpoints can be expressed.

5. Preservation of Liberties: Limiting symbolic speech would undermine freedom of expression guarantees, potentially silencing dissent and reducing the robustness of public discourse.

6. Historical Precedent: The Supreme Court's decision in Texas v. Johnson affirmed that symbolic speech is a form of protected expression, acknowledging its role in democratic societies.

By recognizing and protecting symbolic speech such as flag burning, society upholds fundamental principles of free speech, ensuring that individuals can freely express their beliefs and contribute to the ongoing dialogue about social and political change.

Answer:

The image above is an example of urbanization.

Explanation:

This image is characterized by its highlighting of the lines that are formed by houses equal in shape and size. You can get at what it's trying to express when you notice how these lines and the houses are harmonical and standardized.

The artist chose to paint it in a point of view from the sky so houses aren't very different from one another. The artist is making standardized urbanization, represented by the lines that are streets, the center of attention in his illustration.

The highlighting of the lines made by dwellings of equal shape and size distinguishes this image. When you see how these lines and the homes are harmonical and standardized, you can figure out what it's trying to say.

So, the above image represents Urbanization as Option C.

The other options are incorrect as:

Thus Option C is the correct option as the image above represents Urbanization.

For more information about Urbanization refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/16966131

Answer:Clans where a group of people who worked together to gain or achive something.

Explanation: Clans where a group of people who worked together to gain or achive something.

Answer:

The family was the basic unit of Quapaw social organization. Groups of families related through the males were joined into clans. Clans were named for animals, heavenly bodies, or natural phenomena like thunder. Clan members believed they were descended from a common ancestor that gave them a strong sense of shared identity and mutual obligation

Explanation:

The legislative branch of government is responsible for making laws

Answer:

the legislative branch makes laws

Exlanation:

Answer:

Pretty sure its D, sorry if I'm wrong!

The correct answer is letter D

Explanation: Donatello (1386-1466) was an Italian sculptor, one of the great artists of Renaissance art. It was a predecessor of the naturalism and glorification of the naked. He has done works in Florence, Rome, Naples, Siena and Padua.

Like every Renaissance sculptor, Donatello dedicated himself to the representation of saints, who assume human dimensions, expressions, and feelings, such as the 1408 marble sculpture of St. John to the niche of the central portal of the Cathedral of Florence.

Answer: Donatello

Explanation:

Answer:

The difference between Roosevelt's big stick policy and Wilson’s missionary diplomacy is that Roosevelt designed the policy keeping in mind the importance of Latin America and Wilson's diplomacy was not even ready to recognize Latin America.

Explanation:

While both Roosevelt's Big Stick policy and Wilson’s Missionary Diplomacy aimed to establish the United States as a global player, their methods varied. Roosevelt relied on the legitimate threat of military force to ensure diplomacy, while Wilson aimed to make decisions based on moral obligations, intervening only when necessary.

Both Roosevelt's Big Stick policy and Wilson’s Missionary Diplomacy were approaches to foreign policy, aiming to establish the United States as a global player. They do, however, differ significantly with respect to their guiding principles and methods of implementation. Roosevelt relied on the maxim "speak softly and carry a big stick", using the legitimate threat of military force to ensure diplomacy and negotiate beneficial agreements while keeping the US out of military conflicts. On the other hand, Wilson's Missionary diplomacy policy aimed at intervening only when there was a moral obligation to do so, shaping a foreign policy grounded on ideals of morality rather than self-interest or force. However, circumstances often compelled Wilson to act more conventionally in defense of U.S. interests, and the policy proved hard to enforce consistently.

https://brainly.com/question/14213522

#SPJ11

New kingdom rulers wanted to build empires and they did so through the creation of armies.

Explanation:

New kingdom is a period that prevailed in the ancient Egypt and it was a period when the kingdom was filled with wealth and prosperity. It was during new kingdom, Pharaohs launched wide expeditions and conquered many lands. It started to broaden its empire. They used gold mines of Nubia to fill their treasury and thus rulers began to create huge armies.

Egyptian army mostly comprised of heroic archers, many armed archers and mighty archers who are graded according to their skills and abilities. Pharaohs were attributed with divine entities that many considered them to be supreme.

Answer:

new kingdom

Explanation:

Answer:Causes Of The Great Depression

Please note that this website was written by Jennifer Croft, who also wrote:

–a site for a consultant who trains HR people on StrengthsFinders

–a site for cabinet painters in Denver, Colorado

–a site for dentists in Mesa, Arizona who specialize in sedation dentistry

–a site for dentists in Denver, Colorado who offer sedation

The stock market crash on October 29, 1929 set in motion a series of events that led to the Great Depression, but in fact, the American economy and global economy had been in turmoil six months prior to Black Tuesday, and a variety of factors before and after that fateful date in October caused and exacerbated the Great Depression.

Click here for facts about the causes of the Great Depression.

False Sense Of Prosperity Before The Great Depression

The 1920s, known as “The Roaring Twenties” marked a time when America was overdependent on production, automobiles were the leading industry, and there was a great disparity between rich and poor. More than 60% of the population was living below poverty levels, while a mere 5% of the wealthiest people in America accounted for 33% of the income, and the richest 1% owned 40% of the nation’s wealth. This uneven distribution of wealth was mirrored in the unequal distribution of riches between industry and agriculture.

Global Crisis And The Great Depression

While America prospered during the 1920s, most of Europe, still reeling from the devastation of World War I, fell into economic decline. America soon became the world’s banker, and as Europe started defaulting on loans and buying less American products, the Great Depression spread.

Speculation And Overleverage In The Great Depression

With only loose stock market regulations in place before the Great Depression, investors were able speculate wildly, buying stocks on margin, needing only 10% of the price of a stock to be able to complete the purchase. Rampant speculation led to falsely high stock prices, and when the stock market began to tumble in the months leading up to the October 1929 crash, speculative investors couldn’t make their margin calls, and a massive sell-off began. While the great rise in the stock market (from 181 points in early 1928 to 381 points in September 1929) was fueled by optimism and false hope, the plunge was flamed by stark fear.

Stock Market Crash Of The Great Depression

On September 3, 1929, the Dow Jones was at a high of 381 points, and on October 29, 1929, it had fallen to 41 points after a week of panic selling.

Bank Failures And The Great Depression

Once the stock market crashed, fearful that banks would fail, millions of Americans began to withdraw their money. Virtually overnight, they put thousands of banks in peril. The more money Americans withdrew, the more banks failed, and the more banks failed, the more money Americans withdrew. By 1933, more than 11,000 of the nation’s 25,000 banks had collapsed.

Lack Of Available Credit During The Great Depression

With massive draws on funds during the Great Depression, banks had no money to lend, and this lack of available credit led to a further worsening of economic conditions.

People Stopped Spending Money During The Great Depression

When the stock market crashed, and the banks failed, and unemployment levels reached higher and higher points, people understandably stopped spending money, which also deepened the economic crisis as demand for products and services ground to a halt.

High Unemployment Rates During The Great Depression

When consumer spending plummeted during the Great Depression, unemployment rose, reaching its highest level in 1933, when 25% of the workforce was idle.

Dust Bowl During The Great Depression

A drought that lasted from 1930 to 1936, known as the Dust Bowl, aggravated the problems of the Great Depression. More than a million acres of farmland were rendered useless because of severe drought and years of overfarming, and hundreds of thousands of farmers joined the ranks of the unemployed.

Explanation:

The main causes of the Great Depression were economic instability masked by the stock market, international economic woes due to decrease in GDP and recalling of loans, poor income distribution, and over-speculation in industry especially on railroads.

There were several causes of the Great Depression, which began in 1929 and affected the global economy. Mainly, these causes can be categorized into four groups.  

https://brainly.com/question/35058605

#SPJ3

Answer:

The answers are:

1-The case: -Hernandez v. Texas (1954)

2-School affirmative action programs cannot use quotas to admit minority applicants.

Explanation:

1-The Supreme Court used the principle of equal protection--Hernandez was convicted of killing a man in cold blood in Jackson County, Texas, but his legal team found that not one of the roughly 6,000 jurors selected over the previous 25 years had a Hispanic last name. Americans, Hernandez's lawyers claimed he had been deprived of equal protection because discrimination prevented him from being tried by a jury of his peers.

Chief Justice Earl Warren said: "The Fourteenth Amendment is not directed solely against discrimination due to a 'two-class theory'—that is, based upon differences between 'white' and Negro."

Equal protection applies to different ethnic groups; it is unfair to try a defendant before a jury that deliberately excludes members of the defendant's ethnic group.

2-The Supreme Court  used the equal protection clause to limit a program that benefited marginalized  groups in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.

Allan Bakke, who had twice unsuccessfully applied for admission to the medical school, filed suit against the university. Citing evidence that his grades and test scores surpassed those of many minority students who had been accepted for admission, Bakke charged that he had suffered unfair “reverse discrimination” on the basis of race.The Supreme Court,  agreed that the university’s use of strict racial quotas was unconstitutional and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke

The Supreme Court used the Equal Protection Clause to expand civil rights in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, which affirmed same-sex marriage rights. Conversely, in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Court limited the use of racial quotas in university admissions, impacting affirmative action programs.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has played a crucial role in expanding civil rights for marginalized groups in the United States. A case in which the Supreme Court used this principle to expand civil rights was Obergefell v. Hodges. This landmark 2015 decision recognized the right to same-sex marriage nationwide, affirming that marriage is a fundamental right inherent to the concept of individual autonomy.

However, the Supreme Court has also used the Equal Protection Clause to scrutinize and sometimes limit programs intended to benefit marginalized groups. In the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case of 1978, the Court ruled that a university's use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unconstitutional, thereby limiting the scope of affirmative action programs. The decision still allowed for race to be considered as one factor among others in admissions decisions, but it could not be the sole basis for an admissions decision.

Answer:

The answer is:

Racism was used as a tool for both parties.

Explanation:

For Imperialist-Thought that white men were superior and felt especially superior to those who they were trying to conquer.

For Anti-Imperialist-Afraid of diversity and thought that establishing overseas colonies will be a drain on our government and offer few economic or military advantages in return.

Racism was evident in imperialist ideology, where European empires justified colonization through beliefs in racial superiority, and in anti-imperialist viewpoints which sometimes held racist disdain for non-European combatants. This racism impacted military strategies, labor exploitation, and arbitrary border creation, leading to lasting issues in post-colonial states.

Racism played a significant role in both imperialist and anti-imperialist ideologies during the era of European expansion and World War I. Imperialism facilitated the spread of racist ideologies as European powers competed to build overseas empires, often justified by beliefs in racial superiority. European nations, such as the British and the French, favored the pseudo-scientific concept of scientific racism, which posited that some races were innately superior to others. This was displayed during events like the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair, which aimed to show the 'progress' of indigenous people under the control of Western powers. Conversely, anti-imperialist views, while opposing empire-building, sometimes also sprang from a racist disdain for the involvement of non-European combatants in conflicts such as World War I.

The violence labor exploitation and forced imposition of arbitrary borders during colonial rule directly showcased racial discrimination. This not only created immediate suffering but also left a lasting impact on post-colonial nations. Furthermore, during the conflicts such as World War I, racism affected military strategies and the treatment of colonial troops, who were often discriminated against and used as expendable forces. Racism on the Pacific front in World War II between Americans and Japanese was characterized by vicious propaganda and the dehumanization of the enemy, further illustrating how racism permeated military engagement and international relations.

https://brainly.com/question/30997601

#SPJ3

Answer:

It is important to consider historical evidence when making a historical interpretation because everything needs evidence to make your points, without it there would be no use. Historical evidence will also help when deciding your statement and get more accurate/better results.

Explanation:

The correct answer is The religions of the people of Europe became more diverse

In the sixteenth century the Catholic Church had its political and spiritual power challenged. At a time when various social, economic and cultural changes were taking place in Europe, the power of the Church no longer represented the longings, especially of the nobility and the emerging bourgeoisie. Members of the church itself, such as Friar and Professor Martin Luther, proposed a comprehensive religious reform that gave rise to Protestant religions.

Answer:

Supply chain management

Explanation:

Supply chain management is the management of the flow of goods and services and includes all processes that transform raw materials into final products. It involves the active streamlining of a business's supply-side activities to maximize customer value and gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.

When a company attempts to do all of these at the same time then it is said to have carried out a supply chain management.

When the production, transportation, and the sale of a product are controlled by one company it is called a Monopoly.

A monopoly is a form of business where one single company has the autonomy of manufacturing, transporting, and selling a product.

The business entity dominates the market and controls the market price of the product.

Most of the media companies in the world today operate as monopolies because they have singular control of all the processes in the production, distribution, and sale of their products.

Learn more about Monopolies here:

https://brainly.com/question/13276400

Both the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act were passed in response to the problem of d. Business combinations limiting competition

Both the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act, enacted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States, were responses to the problem of business combinations and monopolies that were limiting competition in the marketplace. These laws aimed to prevent and regulate practices that stifled competition, such as price-fixing, monopolistic mergers, and unfair business practices.

By doing so, they sought to promote fair competition, protect consumers from monopolistic power, and maintain a level playing field in the economy. These acts remain crucial tools in antitrust regulation and are still relevant today in addressing anti-competitive practices.

https://brainly.com/question/13800256

#SPJ2

Answer:mugal empire

Explanation:

Answer: The west covered a large territory and was at more risk of foreign invasion

Answer:

In this battle the patriots crossed the Delaware River on Christmas night, 1776, in a successful surprise attack on Hessian mercenaries.

I think that's what you mean.

Enactment of poll taxes and literacy tests on African Americans was to create voting barriers.

Explanation:

Southern state legislatures mostly employed literacy tests  as part of the voting procedure in order to stop African american from voting. As slavery was well prevalent inn southern states, many slave labors were illiterates and they could not read and write. This was an added advantage to stop them  from voting as they were discriminated on the base of race and ethnicity.

Poll taxes were also inflicted on African Americans in order to not  provide them with suffrage and enfranchisement rights. They were not granted citizenship and they were segregated everywhere which is the worst part inn the American history.

Thesis:

The Presidential Plans for Reconstruction reflected the belief that the primary goal of post-Civil-War was to reunite the nation because both Presidents during that time adopted a lenient policy to let Southern States back into the Union and the Presidents of that era fought against the Senate's harsher policies regarding Reconstruction.

Evidence:

10% Plan made by Lincoln and continued by Johnson.

Pocket Veto by Lincoln on Senate, Johnson impeached by Senate

Both Presidents at the time adopted a lenient policy to allow Southern states back into the Union, and the Presidents of that era fought against the Senate's harsher policies regarding the Presidential Plans for Reconstruction expressed the notion that the fundamental purpose of post-Civil War restoration should be to unify the country.

Evidence and facts about Lincoln:

For more information about Lincoln refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/19776914