Final answer:
John Dewey argued that schools should relate learning to students' interests and life experiences to create a more engaging and practical education, option C is correct.
Explanation:
The individual who argued that schools should relate learning to the interests, problems, and concerns of students was John Dewey. Dewey was a philosopher, psychologist, and educational reformer whose ideas have been influential in education and social reform. He believed in a pragmatic approach to education, where the curriculum was centered around the experiences and interests of students. Dewey emphasized the importance of hands-on learning and the development of critical thinking skills through interaction with the world. This approach contrasts with traditional rote learning methods and highlights the importance of preparing students to be active and engaged members of society.
Which of the following ethnic groups were in conflict in Bosnia? Serbs, Croats, and Muslims Catholics, Serbs, and Mongols Turks, Muslims, and Mongols Croats, Persians, and Muslims
Answer: Serbs, Croats, and Muslims.
Explanation: The civil war in Bosnia was primarily ethnic, in which three ethnic groups took part, i.e. three constituent peoples in Bosnia. These are Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks. Usually, these three people are connected with their religions, and it is said that it was a conflict between the Orthodox, the Catholics and the Muslims. Basically, it was a conflict between three ethnic groups with a negligible number of fighters-volunteers from foreign countries, and this number is not taken into consideration.
Why were japanese americans held in internment camps answers?
A. many american feared they were involved in spying on the US
B. at least one japanese american spy had sent photos of pearl harbor
c. many japanese americans had been caught spying on the united states
D. some japanese americans had been found guilty of planning an attack
What ideas about government might the ancient greeks and romans have contributed to the world?
Answer:
Democracy and bicameral legislature, respectively.
Explanation:
Several ancient Greek cities were ruled by a democratic political system, especially in the period between the 8th century BC to the 6th century CE. The most famous of these Greek democracies was the Athenian model. Under this system, all adult male citizens were entitled to taking part in the management of government affairs. Citizens gathered at an assembly, and open discussions between citizens took place, after which they voted on the best course of action. Official posts were given to citizens by a lottery. This is one of the earliest and most well known examples of direct democracy in the world. Athenian democracy is often used as an example of a succesful democratic system.
The Roman Republic (527 BC - 27 CE) had a fairly advanced political system with a bicameral legislature. The legislative branch, tasked with law making, was divided in two. An upper house, the Senate, was comprised of the most esteemed and well renowned Roman citizens. The Senate was tasked with managing affairs of state such as war and foreign policy. The lower houses were the Legislative Assemblies of the Republic. These bodies were examples of direct democracy, as citizens themselves participated in their local assemblies. Legislative Assemblies managed all the affairs outside the Senate's reach. Most modern legislatures are bicameral, and the upper house in many states are called senates, after their Roman counterpart.
how long did the watergate investigation take
what did lincoln steffens write about
Answer:
Lincoln Steffens wrote about corruption in municipal government in different cities of the United States.
Explanation:
Lincoln Steffens was a Muckraker of the progressive Era in the Early 20th century, he was also a leftist and a world-class researcher that had very nice connections in the municipal government of different cities which helped him to reveal certain corrupt nets and the wrongdoings of influential personalities in the seek of justice and morality, civility, and righteousness. He wrote different books and articles to narrate his researches and the events related to them
How were the French Revolution and the American Revolution different?
A) the French revolutions were protesting a foreign colonial government while the American revolutionaries were fighting against their own government
B) the French Revolution was led by powerful aristocrats while the American Revolution was started by the common people
C) The American Revolution was a violent military conflict while the American Revolution was an intellectual and political debate led by Enlightenment thinkers
D) The American Revolution succeeded in establishing the long-term representative government while the French Revolution eventually produced a dictatorship
Answer:
The American and French Revolutions Compared. One of the many differences between the American and French Revolutions is that, unlike the French, Americans did not fight for an abstraction. ... However, the French Revolution was about who should rule at home. They fought for “liberty, equality, and fraternity.”
Explanation: it is on google
Constitutional and absolute monarchies are similar because both have
Answer:
A royal family is the common thing between the absolute and constitutional monarchies.
Explanation:
Absolute monarchy
In absolute monarchy the head of the state is supreme and possesses all the powers. The differences between the absolute and constitutional monarchies emerged during sixteenth and seventeenth centuries in Europe. Absolute monarchy is also called undemocratic monarchy. in this the king or queen hold absolute power. They are responsible for all the economic and political decisions , they also aren't legally bound. they gain power through marriage or lineage. Brunei,Saudi Arabia and Oman are absolutist monarchy. Absolute monarchy emerged due to the decline of church powers and holy wars.
Constitutional monarchy
In constitutional monarchy the head of the state is elected monarch. Constitutional monarchies are also known as liberal monarchy and have limited powers because they rule with the parliament. The parliament is also responsible for the political and economic policies. constitutional monarch is legally bound. U.K, Canada, Australia and Jordan are constitutional monarchy.
Anti-Federalists were strongly opposed to
The Anti-Federalists opposed ratification of the US Constitution.
The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states. Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA. They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.
The Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided some reassurance to Anti-Federalists after the fight over ratification. The US Constitution was ratified in 1788. The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.
in two sentences describe how president roosevlets portrays nazi germany and its allies
The largest Nazi ghetto—the ghetto—was located in , and held around 400,000 prisoners within an area of 1.3 square miles. NextReset
Answer:
The largest Nazi ghetto—warsaw-was located in -poland- , and held around 400,000 prisoners within an area of 1.3 square miles.
Explanation:
Why did the united states join world war 1?
Answer:
Germany's resumption of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in 1917 became the primary motivation behind Wilson's decision to lead the United States into World War I.
Explanation:
The industrial revolution brought enormous cultural and economic changes to the world. Which of these changes do you think were most significant? Write abput whether the most important influences of the industrial rev. were cultural or economic.
The 1960 Presidential debate between John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon proved to be detrimental to John F. Kennedy.
The 1960 Presidential debate between John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon had a detrimental impact on John F. Kennedy, despite Nixon being seen as the winner by experts. Kennedy's appearance and delivery on television resonated with viewers, emphasizing the importance of media in politics.
Explanation:The 1960 Presidential debate between John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon had a detrimental impact on John F. Kennedy. Despite Nixon being seen as the clear winner by policy experts and debate analysts, Kennedy's appearance, delivery, and overall demeanor on television allowed him to leave a lasting impression on the audience. This showcased the significance of crafting a public image and taking advantage of media exposure in politics.
Learn more about Impact of televised debates on politics here:https://brainly.com/question/32793277
#SPJ12
What did the state law say that violated roe v wade?
how do the presidential roles of chief executive and chief of state differ?
A. The commander in chief role deals only with the military, while the chief executive role is broader.
B. The chief executive role is clearly defined in the constitution, while the commander in the chief role is unwritten.
C. The chief executive role involves foreign affairs, while the commander in chief roles involves domestic issues
D. The commander in chief role is only assumed in peacetime, while the chief executive role is the only assumed during wartime
The correct answer is A. The difference between both roles is that the commander in chief role deals only with the military, while the chief executive role is broader.
A commander in chief is the person who has the supreme command of the armed forces of a nation. In most countries this position is exercised by the head of state or the head of government through the minister of defense or similar position.
The chief executive is the person who exercises the direction of the executive power and is responsible for the Government of a State or a territorial subdivision of this (state, province, or other). In countries with presidential systems, such as the United States, the chief executive corresponds to the President, who also and simultaneously is the head of state.
Answer:
A. The commander in chief role deals only with the military, while the chief executive role is broader.
Explanation:
• President, usually, is the designation used to identify the person leading a meeting, a work session or an assembly. Currently, the term "isolated" refers to the public official, elected for a specific period, who holds the executive power of a State or a region.
• The supreme authority of a State is called as head of State. It is who represents the unity of a country and its continuity before the State itself and internationally. It is said, therefore, that he is the representative and responsible of the country before the people and the world. The specific functions of the heads of state vary according to the political system of each State.
• The head of government is the person who exercises the direction of the executive power and is responsible for the Government of a State or a territorial subdivision of this (state, province, or other). The process of electing heads of government varies according to the country and depends, among other factors, on the form of government used in that country.
Emigration was seen as a way of relieving some of England's {blank} problems.
Which of the following was a contributing factor in economic crisis of 2008
how did the Marshall Plan help promote the Truman Doctrine in Western Europe after World War II
How did president reagan finally resolve the air traffic controllers' strike? he caved in to their demands. he sent the matter to arbitration. he fired all striking controllers. he stopped domestic aviation?
Answer:
He fired all striking controllers.What was significant about the writings/speeches of MLK?
which economist is considered to be the founder of modern day capitalism?
A. Smith
B. Keynes
C. Ricardo
D. Marx
One important result of the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 was that __________.
What did the supreme court decide in korematsu v. united states (1944) regarding the internment of those with japanese ancestry living in the united states?
What major reforms passed during wilson’s first administration?
What pushed citizens to replace their absolute monarchies with constitutional monarchies?
The shah of iran paid for his program of modernization _____.
Answer: With profits from the oil industry.
Explanation:
The Shah of Iran applied a systematic program of modernization, but he found strong opposition from the clerics who had been losing strength and power as Iran grew further secular and liberal. The oil boom of the ’60s and ’70s, particularly following the oil crisis that developed after the October war of 1973 between Arab states and Israel, gave the Shah a large number of profits for structural investments and military modernization.
The *blank* forced conquered peoples to pay tribute to the the monarch
Which explains how mass media has changed the role of the presidency?
The case of marbury v. madison (1803) established that the constitution mandated that the supreme court and not congress nor the president of the united states had the authority to commit the united states to entangling alliances. to impeach federal executive branch officers for "high crimes and misdemeanors." to determine the meaning of the constitution. to purchase foreign territory for the united states. to impeach other supreme court justices.
How did the rise of Mali contribute to the fall of the empire of Ghana
Final answer:
The fall of the Empire of Ghana was influenced by the rise of the Mali Empire, particularly under the leadership of Sundiata Keita and Mansa Musa, who consolidated control over trade and accessed new gold deposits. The wealth and influence Mansa Musa brought to Mali highlighted Ghana's decline. Mali's emerging power, along with the internal and external pressures faced by Ghana, hastened its fall and eventual replacement by the rising Mali Empire.
Explanation:
The decline of the Empire of Ghana was marked by political disintegration and the emergence of several small kingdoms around 1200 CE. The rise of the Mali Empire, founded by the Mandinka people and later led by celebrated rulers such as Sundiata Keita and Mansa Musa, contributed to Ghana's fall. The rising power of Mali was evident in its consolidation of control over the lucrative trade routes and the discovery of new gold deposits along the Niger River which further shifted economic power in their favor. The impact of Mansa Musa's wealth was such that during his pilgrimage to Mecca, his distribution of gold significantly affected economies along the way, elevating the status and power of Mali and contributing to the eclipse of Ghana's influence in the region.
Ghana's weakening was also due to internal strife, succession issues among rulers, and pressures from hostile neighbors like the Tuaregs and the Songhai, who would later rise in power. The decline of the Empire of Ghana correlates with the ascendancy of Mali, and both the access to new goldfields and the control of trade routes played pivotal roles in this transition.
In the fifteenth century, Mali's decline initiated with internal challenges, rebellions, dynastic disputes, and external pressures, including the rise of the Songhai Empire, setting the stage for Mali's own destabilization and eventual collapse. Despite Mali's significant integration in Muslim trade networks and its cultural and economic achievements, the vulnerabilities arising from a series of ineffective rulers post-Mansa Musa left the empire weakened, unable to retain the cohesive control it once had.