Which three statements describe economic or social factors that led to Latin American revolutions?
Slaves in Haiti revolted against plantation owners.
The strict social hierarchy imposed by European rulers limited people’s social status.
The low taxes made merchants and farmers go out of business.
Large numbers of indigenous people died from disease.
News of successful revolutions around the world inspired Latin American revolutions.

Answer:

Frederick Douglas

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass was one of the most eminent African-Americans of his time, and the most influential in American history. Son of a slave with a white man, Douglass lived the experience of the servitude and, being instructed, escaped from this sort of life, adopting a new name like a free man. Ten years after this, he published his first autobiography that led to go on a tour in Europe, which changed his thinking to a more pragmatic one.

Answer:

14th amendment

Explanation:

Answer:

Because Herbert Spencer stated that the strongest civilizations would conquer the weak

Explanation:

Militarism, an ideology that prioritizes military might and readiness for war, significantly contributed to World War One. Dominant European nations, driven by imperial pride and a competitive arms race, were primed for conflict, and so a small confrontation escalated into the war.

Militarism is a philosophy or system that places great importance on the military and war, and it was one of the main causes of World War One. The dominant nations of Europe, fuelled by imperialistic goals, competitive pride, and a lack of understanding about the horrifying effects of modern war, embarked on a race to arm themselves more heavily than their neighbors.

For instance, Germany and Great Britain engaged in a naval arms race, as each sought to have a more potent and large naval force. This increased tension and feelings of hostility among countries.

Moreover, the military mindset influenced the public and the policies of the European powers, who were all prepared and ready for a war. This meant that a small conflict could easily escalate into a full-scale war because these nations would use their military might to resolve disputes, which is precisely what happened in World War One.

https://brainly.com/question/16007242

#SPJ6

Sample response: Joe obviously faces impacts of unemployment, possible punishment, and perhaps having a criminal record affecting his future. The business has lost an employee and may not be able to recover all the money. Customers of the business may see prices rise because the business needs to regain profits that were lost because of the theft. The whole community may share the cost of Joe's actions.

Even if Arab empire continue to decline or has declined, Islam continue to spread because of the Ottoman Empire in which because of the empire’s expansion, it led the Islam to spread to specific places sycg as the pacific ocean, atlantic and meccan.

Answer: D. To prevent the creation of monopolies.

Explanation:

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the US Congress in order to prohibit trusts and in consecuence to prevent the creation of monopolies. It was named for Senator John Sherman also Secretary of the Treasury under President Hayes.

Trusts are an arrangement between stockholders from diferentes companies who transfer their shares to a set of trustees. Stockholders receive the title to a specific share of the earnings of the jointly managed companies. The problem with trusts was that they dominated several industries creating monopolies as a result.

Answer:    Gutenberg’s printing press enabled the flow of knowledge and literacy throughout Europe

Explanation:  Gutenberg's printing press is an invention that has inevitably contributed to the Renaissance. The ability to print books and their distribution contributed primarily to the literacy of the public, and in this way directly promoted the ideas of the Renaissance. The easy, fast and true dissemination of information has allowed a real social and cultural revolution. Thus, in the spirit of the Renaissance, in addition to the emergence of widespread books and other scientific and cultural works, people could learn new ideas of humanism, natural laws, etc. Also, the Bible was widely available, so people themselves could be convinced of what the Bible says and bring judgement on it themselves. In one word, the culture of choice and the diversity of ideas has become available.

What was the most important document published in 1776? The Declaration of Independence is the easy answer for Americans, but many would argue that Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" had a bigger and more global impact.

On March 9, 1776, "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations" (commonly referred to as simply "The Wealth of Nations") was first published. Smith, a Scottish philosopher by trade, wrote the book to upend the mercantilist system. Mercantilism held that wealth was fixed and finite and that the only way to prosper was to hoard gold and tariff products from abroad. According to this theory, this meant nations should sell their goods to other countries while buying nothing in return. Predictably, countries fell into rounds of retaliatory tariffs that choked off international trade. (For related reading, see: The Basics Of Tariffs And Trade Barriers.)

The core of Smith's thesis was that humans' natural tendency toward self-interest (or in modern terms, looking out for yourself) results in prosperity. Smith argued that by giving everyone freedom to produce and exchange goods as they pleased (free trade) and opening the markets up to domestic and foreign competition, people's natural self-interest would promote greater prosperity than with stringent government regulations. Smith believed humans ultimately promote public interest through their everyday economic choices. “He (or she) generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention,” states Smith in “An Inquiry Into The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations” (1776). This free-market force became known as the invisible hand, but it needed support to bring about its magic.

The automatic pricing and distribution mechanisms in the economy—which Adam Smith called an "invisible hand"—interacts directly and indirectly with centralized, top-down planning authorities. However, there are some meaningful conceptual fallacies in an argument that is framed as the invisible hand versus the government.

The invisible hand is not actually a distinguishable entity. Instead, it is the sum of many phenomena that occur when consumers and producers engage in commerce. Smith's insight into the idea of the invisible hand was one of the most important in the history of economics and remains one of the chief justifications for free market ideologies. The invisible hand theorem (at least in its modern interpretations) suggests that the means of production and distribution should be privately owned, and that if trade occurs unfettered by regulation, in turn, society will flourish organically. These arguments are naturally competitive with the concept and function of government.

The government is not serendipitous; it is prescriptive and intentional. Politicians, regulators and those who exercise legal force (such as the courts, police, and military) pursue defined goals through coercion. However, in contrast, macroeconomic forces—supply and demand, buying and selling, profit and loss occur voluntarily until government policy inhibits or overrides them. In this sense, it is more accurate to suggest that government affects the invisible hand, not the other way around.

However, it is the absence of market mechanisms that frustrates government planning. Some economists refer to this as the economic calculation problem. When people and businesses individually make decisions based on their willingness to pay money for a good or service, that information is captured dynamically in the price mechanism. This, in turn, allocates resources automatically towards the most valued ends.

When governments interfere with this process, unwanted shortages and surpluses tend to occur. Consider the massive gas shortages in the United States during the 1970s. The then newly-formed Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had cut production to raise oil prices. In response to this, the Nixon and Ford administrations introduced price controls to limit the cost of gasoline to American consumers. The goal was to make cheap gas available to the public.

Final answer:

Adam Smith criticized the mercantilist system for its heavy government regulation of trade, arguing it stifled economic growth. He believed in minimal government intervention, allowing market forces and competition to drive prosperity and efficiency in the economy. Smith's ideas marked a significant shift towards the principles of free trade and market regulation.

Explanation:

According to Adam Smith, government regulation of trade under the mercantilist system significantly limited economic growth. Smith critiqued mercantilism, asserting that it was based on the flawed premise that economic gain for one nation necessitated loss for another.

He championed the idea that trade should be mutually beneficial, fostered by the forces of supply and demand rather than restrictive governmental policies. Government regulations such as monopolies, high tariffs, and bans on certain imports were aimed at protecting domestic industries but, according to Smith, these measures ultimately harmed the economy by keeping prices artificially high and stifling efficiency and innovation.

Smith argued for minimal government intervention in the economy, believing that economic growth was best achieved through competition and the natural regulation of market forces. He contended that the government's role should be limited to providing essential services that supported business, like national defense and infrastructure, rather than interfering in the market dynamics. This perspective laid the groundwork for the classical liberal economics that emphasized the benefits of free trade and the self-regulating nature of the market.

I think your answer would be C.

The support for independence from Britain by most colonists without Thomas Paine's publication of Common Sense is uncertain. While it is clear that there was a growing dissatisfaction among colonists with their subservient status in the British Empire, Paine's pamphlet played a significant role in convincing many individuals to support independence.

The support for independence from Britain by most colonists without Thomas Paine's publication of Common Sense is uncertain. While it is clear that there was a growing dissatisfaction among colonists with their subservient status in the British Empire, Paine's pamphlet played a significant role in convincing many individuals to support independence. Common Sense made a powerful argument for breaking away from Britain and establishing a republican form of government. Paine's simple and direct language appealed to ordinary people, spreading his ideas widely across the colonies.

https://brainly.com/question/13176604

#SPJ2

the answer is  They would be put up for sale at an auction. Unless they were already bought.

1- The correct answer is C. Marcus Garvey advocated for black-owned businesses and separation from whites, as a way for social and economic improvement of African-Americans in the United States

2- The correct answer is D. Carrie Chapman made an emphasis on achieving suffrage in her home state of Iowa as a way of promoting women's suffrage in the rest of the country.

3- The correct answer is D. An example of an argument in support of American imperialism was businessmen urging the United States to compete with other nations for natural resources.

Businessmen asked the government for an active international participation in order to obtain cheap raw materials, with which to reduce production costs in order to compete in the international market with the other foreign companies.

4- The correct answer is A. The chief result of American participation in World War I was that the US forces ended the stalemate and led to an Allied victory.

The entrance of the United States into the war tipped the balance for the Allies, which until then could not break the parity with the Central Powers. But the American economic and warlike capacity, once placed at the service of the war, allowed to change the course of the war and granted a quick victory to the Allies.

5- The correct answer is B. A major reason for the United States Senate's failure to ratify the Treaty of Versailles was that they objected to the League of Nations, fearing that it would supersede American authority.

Thus, one of its main negotiators, such as the United States, promoted by President Wilson, finally did not adhere to the Treaty.

Answer:

compound interest

Explanation: