Which statement best describes the Vikings?

The Vikings built many permanent settlements in Europe.
The Vikings preferred to attack by land rather than by ocean.
The Vikings were known for their seamanship.
The Vikings helped cause the fall of the Roman Empire.

I believe this question has already been asked and answered. Here is the link just for reference though: :)

https://brainly.com/question/2533159

Answer:

Like ingredients in a salad, individuals can contribute to the whole while maintaining their own cultural identity

Explanation:

When you see a melting pot, the ingredients most of the time have had to loose their characteristics and merge with the whole in order to create something new they are put through boiling water, but in a salad every ingredient can come as it is and make it better and more beautiful, that is why the metaphor has been changed to give space in the metaphor for everyone to keep their culture and still add to the whole.

The correct answer is C: The wealth that could be made through trade was a motive for European exploration between 1400 and 1800 where a number of geographical and technical factors combined made the Europeans the most likely people to explore the Atlantic and develop its commerce. A school of historians maintains that Europeans undertook this exploration for the pure joy of discovery and to break the Islamic dominance on the Eastern Trade.

The medieval artisan enjoyed benefits such as higher wages post-Black Death and some work autonomy but faced challenges like guild restrictions and limited social mobility. The Late Middle Ages brought some relaxation of guild rules but barriers to becoming a master artisan persisted.

Benefits and Challenges of Medieval Artisans

The medieval artisan played a crucial role in society, producing goods needed by all levels of social strata. There were several benefits of being an artisan during this period. Artisans could sometimes command higher wages after the Black Death due to labor shortages. They also had a certain amount of autonomy over their labor and could potentially enjoy the social interactions and respect that came from skilled work. However, this autonomy was often mitigated by the control of guilds.

One of the challenges facing artisans was the restrictive nature of guilds, which limited advancement for those outside the familial circle, creating a barrier to becoming an independent master. Additionally, social mobility was limited, and despite the possibility of elevated social status, only a few could rise to the level of the elite. Artisans also had to navigate the complexities of a burgeoning middle class without the protective cushion of great wealth. Furthermore, working conditions changed with the advent of mechanization, leading to less control over the labor process.

Freedom and opportunity began to evolve in the Late Middle Ages as guilds started to relax some restrictions, potentially allowing enterprising individuals more latitude to apprentice and learn trades. However, the highest rungs of mastery often remained out of reach.

https://brainly.com/question/869454

#SPJ3

Both Toltec, as well as the Aztec empire, were very advanced if we talk about mathematical and architectural systems as well as road systems. Both of these empires were known to be separated from the western world for thousands of years but despite that, they were able to construct vast roads and temples and that was considered as quite a feat during that time.

Further Explanation:-

The Toltec culture was known to be an archaeological culture that was dominated by a state-centered in Tula during the initial post-classic period of Mesoamerican Chronology. Whatever is known about the culture of the Aztecs is based on the learning of the culture of Aztecs. Aztec was known to be as another Mesoamerican culture and it postdated the Toltecs and also admired Toltecs as their predecessors. Later stages of Aztec culture saw the Toltecs as their cultural as well as Intellectual predecessors and they described the culture of Toltecs as the epitome of civilization.  

The history of both these empires was somewhat similar to each other as both of these empires were considered very advanced in their architectural systems and roads and that was because of their temples which were very architecturally to the point and vast roads. Toltec empire is also described in the Aztec oral as well as photographic history and it gives the lists of rulers and the exploits they did.  If we talk about modern scholars, then that is the matter of debate whether the Aztec narratives with regards to history to Toltec should be given credit for actual historical events or not? There is another controversy that is related to Toltecs and that is how one can understand the reasons which were behind the similarities in architecture between the archaeological site of Tula and Mayan.

Learn more:

1. What was the impact of political and legal ideas contained in Justinian's code?

https://brainly.com/question/5344838

2. Why did Europeans ship goods to Africa during triangular trade?

https://brainly.com/question/3791549

Answer details:

Grade – High School

Subject – History

Chapter – Toltecs, and Aztecs

Keywords –Toltecs, Aztecs, Similarities, history, Predecessors, Empire, Narratives, Debate, Scholars, History, Admired, Intellectual.  

The Supreme Court case Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842) involved in the kidnapping of fugitive slaves.  "Popular sovereignty" was the belief that settlers to a territory should decide for themselves whether or not to permit slavery. 1842 - A slave had escaped from Maryland to Pennsylvania, where a federal agent captured him and returned him to his owner. 

Answer:

The slave expresses that remained in the Union, Maryland, Missouri, Delaware, and Kentucky (called, fringe states) were situated in the U.S. Congress. When the Emancipation Proclamation was issued in 1863, Tennessee was at that point in Union control.

Explanation:

The  Incomparable Court case Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842) engaged with the capturing of  outlaw slaves.  "Well known  power" was the conviction that pilgrims to a region ought to choose for  themselves regardless of whether to allow bondage. 1842 - A slave had gotten away from  Maryland to Pennsylvania, where a government operator caught him and returned him  to his proprietor.

Wertheimer explained the phi phenomenon as an illusion of motion created by the alternate appearance and disappearance of objects near each other, exemplifying Gestalt psychology's emphasis on holistic perception.

Max Wertheimer, one of the founders of Gestalt psychology, explained the phi phenomenon as a form of perceptual illusion where we experience the sensation of motion caused by the appearance and disappearance of objects that are in close proximity to each other. Unlike the related beta effect, where motion is perceived when still images are presented successively, each with the object in a different place, the phi phenomenon arises from the momentary hiding and revealing of an image, creating the impression of a moving zone or cloud of background color surrounding the flashing objects. This illusion demonstrates the Gestalt principle that human perception often involves organizing visual elements into unified wholes that are "more than the sum of the parts."

Answer:

Option A.

Explanation:

The Hittites, is the right answer.

Hammurabi who ruled Babylonia between c. 1792 BC to c. 1750 BC was the sixth emperor of the First Dynasty of Babylonia. He was the one who issued the Codes of Hammurabi and conquered the territories of Elam, Eshnunna, Larsa and Mari. The coup de grace for the dynasty of Hammurabi transpired in the year 1595 BC when Babylon was plundered and captured by the mighty Hittite Empire, whereby terminating all Amorite federal occupancy in Mesopotamia.

Because he believed that such a centralized institution was not beneficial to his ideal of an agrarian lifestyle.

Or in the choices given, the answer is He thought it was unconstitutional. 

Answer:

he thought it was unconstitutional

Explanation:

because

Abraham is the father of all three

From 1919 to 1939, Asia, Africa, and Latin America saw significant economic and industrial growth, nationalist movements challenging European domination, and increased urbanization. These changes marked a period of rapid transformation and resistance against colonial powers.

Characteristics of Asia, Africa, and Latin America (1919-1939):

The period from 1919 to 1939 was marked by significant changes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. These regions experienced economic and industrial growth, leading to environmental degradation. Nationalist movements arose, challenging European control and influence.

Economic and Industrial Growth:

During this period, rapid economic development and industrial growth were seen across various regions, including non-European parts of the globe. Despite this growth, the industrialized regions of Europe, North America, the USSR, and Japan still dominated the world's GDP, controlling about 75 percent of the global economy.

Nationalist Movements:

Nationalist sentiments surged in these regions, leading to uprisings and resistance against European colonial powers. This era saw a weakening of Europe's control as countries strove for independence and self-governance.

Urbanization:

Population growth and advancements in technology, medicine, and agriculture led to increased urbanization. People began migrating from rural areas to cities, which expanded rapidly during this period.

Answer:

Immigration to the United States virtually ceased with the outbreak of the revolution.

Explanation:

The answer is true i did it on a quiz and got 100%

I belive that the answer is true because the was a portable device, used for scooping up water, that helped the Chinese improve their farming.