Which statement best describes the impact of western American settlement on natural resources?

A) Americans came to mine silver in California, then later searched for gold.
B) Americans depleted the forests as they cut down trees to build.
C) Americans bred animals for their fur, creating a new livestock industry.
D) Americans learned how to care for the land for future generations.

D) contact a Senator about a proposed logging bill.

Answer: An environmental lobbyist would be most likely to D) contact a Senator about a proposed logging bill.

Explanation: An environmental lobbyist is a person that works to convince politicians of passing environmentally friendly legislation or laws that benefit the environmental group to which the environmental lobbyist belongs. In that way, an environmental lobbyist is part of a group that is determined to make their interests prevail on the legislative and executive sectors of a government. In order to achieve the goals of his/her group, an environmental lobbyist generally arranges meetings with legislators or senators. For that reason, the option that presents something that an environmental lobbyist would most likely do is D. He/she would contact a politician to influence his/her vote on the implementation of a law related to logging, which is the activity of cutting trees and; therefore, an environmental issue.

Both. George Washington used the French navy to help trap the British into surrendering at Yorktown. So politics because he used the French and strategy because he used his knowledge of geography to trap the British between the French navy and his army.

Both, the military strategy and politics, were the key to the American victory in the Revolutionary War between the America and the colonial British. Both coincided to trap the British between the French and the Americans.

What is the significance of the Revolutionary War?

The Revolutionary War was the war that proved to have an indispensable effect in granting independence for the American society. It took place in the years towards the second half of the eighteenth century, and soon the Americans got their deserved independence.

The French and the American formed an ally where their political and military strategies were used to trap the colonists between them, and were not able to focus on either of the sides. As a result, the Americans won the Revolutionary War along with the support of the French armies towards the end of the eighteenth century.

Therefore, the significance regarding the Revolutionary War has been aforementioned.

Learn more about the Revolutionary War here:

https://brainly.com/question/1466912

#SPJ5

The Allies had an enormous task ahead of them. That task was managing to supply their troops on the two fronts that were located on the different parts of the globe. The fight against the Axis was happening in Europe and Africa on one side and against Japan on the other. The war in Europe itself demanded a huge amount of not only supplies but also men and vehicles and weapons. Not to mention the supplies needed for the war in the Pacific.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

supplying the troops across a huge part of the globe

The slave revolt spearheaded by Toussaint L'Ouverture culminated in the formation of Haiti, marking the emergence of the inaugural independent Black republic.

The establishment of Haiti is attributed to the successful slave revolt led by Toussaint L'Ouverture, a prominent figure in the Haitian Revolution spanning from 1791 to 1804. This uprising proved triumphant against French colonial dominance in the region previously known as Saint-Domingue, subsequently renamed Haiti.

Toussaint L'Ouverture played a pivotal role in orchestrating and guiding the rebellion, rallying enslaved individuals for their freedom and autonomy. His military acumen and strategic approach effectively dismantled the oppressive system of slavery, leading to its abolition in Haiti and the foundation of the world's premier independent Black republic.

The Haitian Revolution reverberated beyond Haiti, serving as an inspiration for enslaved communities across the Americas to pursue their liberation. Moreover, the success of the revolution challenged prevailing notions of racial hierarchy and the institution of slavery.

In essence, Toussaint L'Ouverture's leadership in the slave revolt culminated in the inception of Haiti. The Haitian people, under his guidance, achieved independence and eradicated slavery, leaving an indelible mark on history.

The question probable may be:

Which nation was created as a result of the slave revolt led by Toussaint l'ouverture?

the answer is a !!!!!

the answer to this question is going to be  A) supported the United States during the Creek War of 1813-1814


hope this helps!!:)

what are the following???? Ill answer when u list em 

Limited the power of monarchs.

It limited the power of the monarchs.

The Ottoman Empire killed off non muslim people

Final answer:

The Ottoman Empire impacted the non-Muslims in eastern Europe by implementing the millet system, providing religious autonomy and tolerance. The Ottomans also recognized the importance of non-Muslim clergy, which fostered a more positive perception among the subjects.

Explanation:

The Ottoman Empire impacted the non-Muslim peoples of the empire in eastern Europe by implementing the millet system, which allowed dhimmis (Christians, Jewish people, and others) to govern their own affairs according to their own religious laws. This system provided a level of autonomy and religious freedom for the non-Muslim subjects. Additionally, the Ottomans recognized the importance of non-Muslim clergy in governing the empire and refrained from suppressing their religion. This led many peasants to view the Ottomans as more tolerant and better overlords compared to European soldiers.

Learn more about Ottoman Empire's impact on non-Muslim peoples in eastern Europe here:

https://brainly.com/question/30099010

#SPJ11

false. According to legend, it was built by the king Sargon the Great (who ruled 2334-2279 BCE) who unified Mesopotamia under the rule of his Akkadian Empire and set the standard for future forms of government in Mesopotamia.

The correct answer is F (False)

Explanation:

Gilgamesh was an important king and mythological figure in the Sumerian civilization that developed in Mesopotamia and was one of the earliest civilizations in the world. It is believed Gilgamesh lived around 2500 BC although there is limited information about him and his rule, except by the Epic of Gilgamesh and other texts inspired by him.

On the other hand, the Akkadian Empire was an empire that emerged around 2300 BC in Mesopotamia and included the Sumerians and Akkadians that had developed in the North. According to this, it is false Gilgamesh was the ruler of the Akkadian Empire because he was the ruler of the Sumerian civilization, also, the Akkadian empire was only formed in 2300BC years after Gilgamesh had lived and the Akkadians were a different civilization from the Sumerians.

Answer:

Option: Nubian society absorbed some aspects of Egyptian culture.

Explanation:

Nubia situated in the Nile Valley in the southern region of Egypt. Nubian and Egyptian had a peaceful interaction over the centuries. For the Nubian, Egypt remained a high status because of its stronger empire. Egypt was the source of rich culture and civilization that Nubian appreciated and eventually reproduced in many different ways.  

Answer:

Nubian society absorbed some aspects of Egyptian culture.

Explanation:

As a result of conquest and trade, Nubian rulers adopted many Egyptian traditions. They built palaces and pyramids modeled on Egyptian style. They used Egyptian titles and worshiped Egyptian deities.

Oregan territory and New Mexico, which expanded the border further south.

Answer:

Oregon and Texas

Explanation:

apex

mercantilism is a form of capitalism. :)

Capitalism your welcome:)

a delegation of the Cherokee nation composed of Messrs. John Ross Richard Taylor Danl. McCoy Samuel Gunter and William Rogers with full power and authority to conclude a treaty with the United States did on the 28th day of February 1835 stipulate and agree with the Government of the United States to submit to the Senate to fix the amount which should be allowed the Cherokees for their claims and for a cession of their lands east of the Mississippi river, and did agree to abide by the award of the Senate of the United States themselves and to recommend the same to their people for their final determination. And whereas on such submission the Senate advised "that a sum not exceeding five millions of dollars be paid to the Cherokee Indians for all their lands and possessions east of the Mississippi river."

he Massacre of Vassy, as this became known, provoked open hostilities between the two religions. The Bourbons, led by the prince of Condé, and proclaiming that they were liberating the king and regent from ‘evil’ councillors, organised a kind of protectorate over the Protestant churches and began to seize and garrison strategic towns along the Loire. Although the Huguenots had begun to mobilise for war before Vassy[17], Condé used the massacre as evidence that the Edict had been broken lending further weight to his campaign, and as hostilities broke out, the Edict was in fact revoked, under pressure from the Guise faction. 

The major engagements of the war occurred at Rouen, Dreux and Orléans. At the Siege of Rouen (May-October 1562), the crown regained the city at the cost of Antoine de Navarre, who died of his wounds. The Battle of Dreux (December 1562), saw the capture of Condé by the Guises and Montmorency, the governor general, by the Bourbons. In February 1563, at the Siege of Orléans, Francis, Duke of Guise was shot and killed by the Huguenot Poltrot de Méré; the Guise considered this an assassination on the orders of the duke’s enemy, Admiral Coligny, as it was outside of direct combat. The popular unrest caused by the 'assassination', coupled with the fact that Orléans was holding out in the siege, led Catherine to mediate a truce and the Edict of Amboise (1563). 

he "Armed Peace" (1563–67) and the "second" war (1567–68) 

The Edict of Amboise was generally regarded as unsatisfactory by all concerned, the Guise faction being particularly opposed to what they saw as dangerous concessions to heretics. Nonetheless the crown looked to re-unite the two factions in its efforts to re-capture Le Havre which had been occupied by the English as part of the Treaty of Hampton Court between the Huguenot leaders and Elizabeth I. The English were successfully expelled that July and the next month Charles IX declared his legal majority, ending Catherine de' Medici’s regency. His mother continued to play a principal role in politics, however, and she joined her son on a Grand Tour of the kingdom between 1564 and 1566, designed to reinstate crown authority. 

Reports of iconoclasm in Flanders led Charles IX to lend support to the Catholics there, leading to fears among the French Huguenots of a Catholic re-mobilisation against them. Philip II of Spain’s reinforcement of the strategic corridor from Italy north along the Rhine added to these fears and political discontent grew. Protestant troops then made an unsuccessful attempt to capture and take control of King Charles IX in the Surprise of Meaux, a number of cities, such as La Rochelle, declared themselves for the Huguenot cause and Catholics, both laymen and clergy, were massacred the following day in Nîmes in what became known as the Michelade. 

This provoked the Second War, the main military engagement of which was the Battle of Saint-Denis where the crown’s commander-in-chief and lieutenant general, the seventy-four year old Anne de Montmorency died. The war was brief, ending in another truce, the Peace of Longjumeau (March 1568), which granted significant religious freedoms and privileges to Protestants. 
The "third" war (1568–70) 

In reaction to the Peace, Catholic confraternities and leagues sprang up across the country in defiance of the law throughout the summer of 1568. Huguenot leaders such as Condé and Coligny fled court in fear of their lives, many of their followers were murdered, and in September the Edict of Saint-Maur revoked the Huguenots' freedom to worship. In November William of Orange led an army into France in order to support his fellow Protestants, but the army being poorly paid, he accepted the crown’s offer of money and free passage to leave the country. 

Nevertheless the Huguenots gathered together a formidable army under the command of Condé, aided by forces from south-east France, led by Paul de Mouvans, and a contingent of fellow Protestant militias from Germany — including 14,000 mercenary reiters led by the Calvinist Duke of Zweibrücken.[18] After the Duke was killed in action, his troops remained under the employ of the Huguenots who had raised a loan from England against the security of the queen of Navarre’s crown jewels [19]. Much of the Huguenots' financing came from Queen Elizabeth of England, who was likely influenced in the matter by Sir Francis Walsingham.[18] The Catholics were commanded by the Duke d'Anjou (later King Henry III) and assisted by troops from Spain, the Papal States and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany.[20] 
The Protestant army laid siege to several cities in the Poitou and Saintonge regions (to protect La Rochelle), and then Angoulême and Cognac. At the Battle of Jarnac (16 March 1569), the prince of Condé was killed, forcing Admiral de Coligny to take command of the Protestant forces, nominally on behalf of Condé’s 15 year old son, Henry, and the sixteen-year old Henry

at the same time, the Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are different kinds of documents with different purposes. The Declaration was designed to justify breaking away from a government; the Constitution and Bill of Rights were designed to establish a government. The Declaration stands on its own — it has never been amended — while the Constitution has been amended 27 times. (The first ten amendments are called the Bill of Rights.) The Declaration and Bill of Rights set limitations on government; the Constitution was designed both to create an energetic government and also to constrain it. The Declaration and Bill of Rights reflect a fear of an overly centralized government imposing its will on the people of the states; the Constitution was designed to empower the central government to preserve the blessings of liberty for “We the People of the United States.” In this sense, the Declaration and Bill of Rights, on the one hand, and the Constitution, on the other, are mirror images of each other.

The answer is The Surface Mining Control & Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA).

Sudbury, Massachussets had a church, cemetery, businesses and residences and was right on a railway and at the intersection of three roads so all these factors contributed to a stable society by virtue of the available infrastructure and the composition of the town.

One was weird and the other one was pretty

The differences between the Toyota Land Cruiser PZJ77V-MNU models from 1993 and 1992 are not explicitly detailed in the question, but we can infer some changes based on common practices in the automotive industry and known updates to the Land Cruiser series around that time.

Here are some potential differences:

. Engine Updates: Toyota often updates engines for new model years with improvements in power, efficiency, or emissions. The PZJ77V-MNU is equipped with a 4.2L inline-six diesel engine, and there may have been minor tweaks to this engine between 1992 and 1993.

2. Transmission: There could have been changes to the transmission, either in the gear ratios or the type of transmission offered (e.g., an upgrade from a 4-speed to a 5-speed automatic or improvements in the shifting mechanism).

3. Interior Updates: Changes in the interior are common from year to year. These could include updates to the upholstery, dashboard design, instrumentation, or added features such as improved air conditioning, better sound insulation, or additional airbags for safety.

4. Exterior Changes: Cosmetic changes might include new paint colors, changes in grille design, wheel design, or the addition of features like fog lights or side steps.

5. Suspension and Handling: Improvements in the suspension setup for better ride quality or off-road capability could have been made. This might include changes to the spring rates, shock absorbers, or the addition of sway bars.

6. Electrical System: Updates to the electrical system could include improved wiring, better lighting (such as the introduction of projector headlamps), or the addition of features like central locking or power windows.

7. Safety Features: Enhancements in safety features are typical as new regulations come into effect or as manufacturers seek to improve their vehicles' safety ratings. This could include the addition of ABS, traction control, or reinforced body structures.

8. Optional Equipment: Changes in the availability or packaging of optional equipment could make a difference between the two model years. For example, certain features that were optional in 1992 might have become standard in 1993.

9. Production Changes: There might be subtle changes in the production process that affect the quality or the specifications of certain parts.

10. Model Year Specific Updates: Sometimes manufacturers will release a mid-generation update that includes a variety of the above changes. This could be in response to consumer feedback or competition in the market.

To get the exact differences between the 1993 and 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser PZJ77V-MNU, one would typically consult a detailed vehicle comparison from a reliable automotive resource or Toyota's own historical documentation for the Land Cruiser model. These resources would provide specific information on what changed from one model year to the next.

620,000 I know this cause I googled it and also compared to revolution war there was only 4,000... So big difference

The Civil War resulted in approximately 800,000 soldier deaths and up to 8 million civilian deaths, making it the deadliest conflict in American history with more casualties than all other American wars combined. Subsequent wars like Vietnam and Korea had far fewer American casualties. The Civil War's impact was followed by a significant struggle for civil rights, particularly for Black Americans.

The number of casualties in the Civil War alone by 1921 was staggering, with about 800,000 soldiers having lost their lives, and as many as 8 million civilians died due to war, starvation, and disease. When comparing these numbers to other American wars, the Civil War had unique and grim statistics. Approximately 220,000 men were killed or died of wounds and about 400,000 succumbed to infectious diseases. The Union suffered 364,511 deaths, while the Confederate losses were at least 260,000. This count of over 620,000 American men dead as a result of the Civil War is more than all American war casualties combined up to this day. In contrast, 57,000 men died in Vietnam, 33,700 in Korea, and 25,000 in the American Revolution.

In a broader context, more than 100 million soldiers and civilians are estimated to have died during all international and civil wars of the twentieth century. However, the Civil War remains the deadliest conflict in American history, followed by a long struggle for civil rights and constitutional freedoms, particularly by Black Americans. Even World War II, with an estimated 60 million fatalities globally, didn't surpass the domestic toll of the Civil War in terms of American lives lost.

Final answer:

The integration of Southeast Asia and Swahili East Africa into the Indian Ocean world shared similarities and differences. Both regions were important hubs in the East-West trade network, connected by maritime routes. However, Southeast Asia had stronger connections with China and India, while Swahili city-states had closer ties to Arabian Peninsula and Persian Gulf.

Explanation:

--Comparison of Integration into the Indian Ocean World

The integration of Southeast Asia and Swahili East Africa into the Indian Ocean world shared similarities and differences. Both regions were important hubs in the East-West trade network, connected by maritime routes. They traded valuable goods such as spices, textiles, and precious metals. However, Southeast Asia had stronger connections with China and India, while Swahili city-states had closer ties to Arabian Peninsula and Persian Gulf.

--Contrast of Integration

In terms of integration, Southeast Asia experienced a more direct influence from China and India. For example, Indian merchants established early trade settlements in Southeast Asia, introducing Indian culture, religions, and languages. Chinese merchants also played a significant role in trade and cultural exchanges.

On the other hand, Swahili East Africa had a greater influence from Arabia and the Middle East. Muslim traders from Arabia and Egypt settled along the Swahili coast, blending their culture with local Bantu communities. This resulted in the development of a unique blended language, culture, and urban trade society.

A if a legitimate heir was produced then yes, it is true.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

yes i know this was already answered :/ but i just wanted to help ^u^

Originally, Blacks could not fight in the armies. This was later changed due to how desperate they were for manpower. 
Limited drinking time in British pubs.
No whistling for a taxi.

Hope this Helps! :)

New York, Virginia, Connecticut, Massachusetts

In analyzing the adoption and implementation of the Northwest Ordinance in the newly established territories, the conflicts in terms of which states would receive what portion of land became a heated topic among the states of New York, Virginia, Massachusetts, and Connecticut.

Grand Banks is what you put in the blank.

They filled the jobs that had been previously held by men. 



i might be wrong but try it

Answer: Millions of women took jobs previously occupied by men.

EXPLANATION

Women took to industrial jobs to support the war effort.

In folk magic and mythology, crossroads may represent a location "between the worlds" and, as such, a site where supernatural spirits can be contacted and paranormal events can take place. Symbolically, it can mean a locality where two realms touch and therefore represents liminality, a place literally "neither here nor there", "betwixt and between".

I believe it would be the spy system. During the war, some americans were for and against the war and independence. To keep in the know of what the british were planning, there was an elaborate spy system to spread information on the british troops where people acted as they were for british rule. :)

hope this helps!!

-they announced they had missles that carried nuclear weapons

-launched the first man-made satellite into space

-when the us tried to launch one they failed

Answer:

All of the Above <--------- Apex

A system that allows each branch of government to limit the powers of each other branches in order to prevent abuse of power. I hope this help's you. Good luck!

The Second Continental Congress created a weak central government under the Articles of Confederation because they wanted to stop abuse of power and tyranny by the central government.

Further Explanation:

One of the most significant reasons behind America's decision to declare independence was the perceived tyranny of the central government of Britain. Before 1776, the American colonists felt that the British government (i.e. King George III, British parliament) was being tyrannical by implementing taxes without the colonists consent and punishing the colonists through laws like the Coercive Acts (aka Intolerable Acts).

These actions by the British government made it so that the American colonists resented a strong central government. This resulted in America's first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, having an extremely weak central government. Ultimately, this constitution would fail and be replaced by the US Constitution still in use today.

Learn More:

Explanation of why colonists resented British government and taxes- https://brainly.com/question/512584

Key Details:

Topics: American History, American Constitution

Grade Level: 7-12

Keywords: Second Continental Congress, Articles of Confederation, central government

its c. they have to give 25% of their income but thats zakat not from the pillars