Which statement about Alexander the Great is true? A. He was the king of Sparta who died fighting the Persians at Thermopylae. B. He founded the Olympic games as a way of uniting the Greek city-states in peace. C. He was an Athenian general who defeated the Persian army at the Battle of Marathon. D. He became king of Macedonia at age 20 and built the world's largest empire before he died in Babylon 13 years later.

Some reasons that state why it is important for the government to divide its responsibilities among its different branches are as follows,

What is the significance of government responsibilities?

Government is the most powerful authority of the society, and as a result of this, it has to fulfill some responsibilities that come along with the powers that it has. Moreover, there are different branches in the government which are designated for performing their respective responsibilities.

Designation of such responsibilities among different branches brings specialization in doing the designated tasks, which makes the governance of the society efficient. This in turn brings overall development at a faster rate in the society.

Therefore, the significance of government responsibilities has been aforementioned.

Learn more about the government responsibilities here:

https://brainly.com/question/12764142

#SPJ2

Answer:

A type of nativism still exists in states that are worried about illegal immigrants coming across US borders.

Explanation:

edmentum

The unwritten laws of British society still forbade women from making a visible contribution to public life.

Society is defined as a big social group occupying the same physical space or social region, often under the same political authority and with the same dominant cultural expectations as the group as a whole. Every human being must have society in order to live a full life. It both liberates and restricts men's activities.

The women's suffrage movement fought for women's voting rights in the United States for many years. It took activists and reformers nearly a century to obtain that right, and the struggle was not without difficulty: disagreements over tactics often put the movement at risk of collapse.

Thus, the unwritten laws of British society still forbade women from making a visible contribution to public life.

To learn more about society, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/9321341

#SPJ6

Final answer:

The struggle for women's suffrage was lengthy due to cultural norms, overshadowing social movements, and differing methods within the movement. It took generations of activism, with advances in women's education and involvement in reform efforts, leading up to the passing of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920.

Explanation:

The quest for women's suffrage was a long and arduous journey that spanned over seventy years. The Industrial Revolution highlighted the disparities in society, with many women stepping into roles outside the home and demanding equal opportunities in education and the workforce. Nonetheless, the struggle for the women's right to vote faced numerous challenges.

Cultural norms of the time often viewed women as extensions of their husbands, not requiring separate political identities or voting rights. The early efforts unfortunately coincided with other major social movements, like the abolition of slavery, which sometimes overshadowed the push for female enfranchisement. Women activists who contributed to these social causes believed women's suffrage would naturally follow, but they found themselves fighting for another fifty years before the Nineteenth Amendment was passed in 1920.

Various tactics were employed, from peaceful speeches and legal proposals at the state level to more radical approaches like demonstrations outside the White House. Suffragists across different classes formed coalitions, like the Women's Christian Temperance Union and the National American Women's Suffrage Association, which furthered the cause. However, it wasn't until the Progressive Era, when women increasingly took leading roles in advocating for social reform, that both Progressive women and men began to rally behind women's suffrage for its contribution to a just society.

Ultimately, the success in obtaining the vote was not merely the outcome of the Nineteenth Amendment; it was built upon decades of smaller victories at local and state levels, rooted in women's advancements in education and involvement in other political causes. The passage of the amendment was the culmination of generations of activism and gradual societal change recognizing women's equality.

Zimbwabe is the answer hope it helps

The seceding states believe they had to leave the Union  in order to form what would become the "Confederate States of America".

On December 20, 1860, South Carolina became the first state to secede from the federal Union. The election of Abraham Lincoln as president in 1860 sparked calls for secession throughout the slave holding South.

The political and economic conflicts between the northern industrialized states and the southern agricultural states reached a fever pitch as states already leaning towards secession conducted official ballots and left the Union in order to create what would become the "Confederate States of America".

With the vote of President Abraham Lincoln, an anti-slavery activist, the South believed that their lifestyle and economic growth, which at the time was entirely based on slavery, were under threat, and thus seceded in order to avoid the anti-slavery laws that were about to be passed, and thus keep their slaves.

Learn more about Union here:

https://brainly.com/question/749754

#SPJ2

It is D i just took the test

Americans were making more money than before

The top excuse for not wearing a seatbelt is I forgot and then another one is I am only going a short distance. The correct option is (C & A).

The main purpose of seat belts is to shield occupants from harm in the event of an accident. Newton's first rule of motion states that when an automobile stops or crashes,

A person in a moving vehicle may be pushed forward by the inertia of motion if the vehicle comes to a sudden halt, which could result in injury.

When used appropriately, seat belts are intended to distribute the force of a collision across the body's stronger bone structures, such as the shoulder, rib cage, and pelvis.

Additionally, seat belts stop passengers from being ejected from the vehicle, which carries a significant risk of fatality and serious injury.

Therefore, the top excuse for not wearing a seatbelt is I forgot and then another one is I am only going a short distance.

To know more about the wearing a seatbelt, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13782011

#SPJ2

Final answer:

The top excuse for not wearing a seatbelt is 'I am only going a short distance,' but evidence from the NHTSA shows that increased seat belt usage could significantly save lives and reduce injuries. Misconceptions about seat belts and personal freedom often outweigh these facts. Mandatory seat belt laws have decreased accidents, and cognitive dissonance can sometimes lead to a change in behavior.

Explanation:

The top excuse for not wearing a seatbelt is often 'I am only going a short distance'. This is a common rationalization, but it ignores the fact that many accidents happen close to home and even at low speeds, seat belts can save lives. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has provided data that strongly supports the use of seat belts. For instance, they noted that if seat belt usage rose to 90 percent in every state, approximately 1,652 lives could be saved and 22,372 serious injuries could be avoided annually. Despite such compelling evidence, individuals may come up with various reasons to avoid wearing seat belts, such as discomfort, skepticism about its benefits, or a desire for personal freedom without government mandates.

Moreover, some people may hold misconceptions about seat belts, such as fearing entrapment in a submerged vehicle. However, such scenarios are extremely rare, and seat belts are designed to release even under pressure, allowing occupants to escape. Also, wearing a seat belt can prevent head injuries, keeping a person conscious and able to escape from the car.

Ultimately, mandatory seat belt laws have been proven effective, as states with such regulations have seen a decrease in fatal and injury accidents. It's also important to note that wearing seat belts is not just about personal safety; it's about reducing the burden on society from accidents that result in long-term medical care. Cognitive dissonance may occur when individuals who are presented with strong evidence yet resist wearing seat belts start to experience a mental conflict, which could lead to a change in behavior if they are open-minded.

Answer:

C. His age during reign

Explanation:

Tutankhamun helped restore traditional Egyptian religion and art, both of which had been set aside by his predecessor, Akhenaten. He issued a decree restoring the temples, images, personnel, and privileges of the old gods.

Answer:

Explanation:

Classical or classic in those context refers to brilliant and unique eras, like top quality. So, basically, you can define classical as something special, or in this case special historic eras, because during those periods something was outstanding.

Answer:

B. The science that studies how metals work

Explanation:

in the name it says Metallurgy, so in tern its a fair estimate that it has something to do with metal

By spreading the fear if foreign countries

Answer: Environment

Hope this helps!

Correct two answers which are secondary sources:

The other items listed are all primary sources.

Primary sources are things that come from persons directly involved in the events or lives being studied.  So, any diary entries or letters (like the diary of Anne Frank or a letter by a soldier) would count as primary sources.  So would any official proclamations or letters or government documents -- such as the Constitution of France.

Secondary sources are written by historians or others after their study of primary sources.

Final answer:

The Fourth Amendment implies a right to privacy by protecting individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, a concept reinforced by other amendments and court interpretations.

Explanation:

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, implying a right to privacy, particularly in one's home and personal property. Although the Constitution does not explicitly mention a right to privacy, this concept has been inferred and established through historical court interpretations of various amendments, including the Fourth Amendment. The courts have recognized the right to privacy as fundamental, often citing the famous words of Justice Brandeis that the right to be let alone is "the most comprehensive of rights, and the right most valued by civilized men."

The Third Amendment, along with the Fourth, contributes to this broader conception of privacy within the home by prohibiting the quartering of soldiers in peacetime without the consent of the owner. Additionally, the Ninth Amendment supports a zone of privacy by stating that just because a right isn't listed in the Constitution doesn't mean the government can infringe upon it.

In essence, the Fourth Amendment reflects Madison's and the framers' intention to safeguard against governmental overreach into private lives, especially against law enforcement's intrusion without just cause, solidifying an implicit guarantee of a protected personal sphere—privacy.

The Fourth Amendment implies privacy because it protects the right of individuals to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.

This means that the government must have a good reason, often in the form of a warrant supported by probable cause, before it can intrude on someone's privacy.

The purpose of this amendment is to establish a general expectation of privacy and to guard against overzealous efforts by law enforcement to root out crime without proper justification.

This protection essentially reflects the broader concern of James Madison and the framers of the Constitution to provide a barrier between individuals and unwarranted governmental intrusion into their personal and private lives.