Which of these is true of a member of the House of Representatives?

A)He or she must be at least twenty-seven years of age.
B)He or she must be a natural-born US citizen.
C)He or she must have been a resident of the state represented for at least ten years.
D)None of these.

Answer:

Speaker of the House

Explanation:

Answer: More than a thousnad i can tell you that

Explanation:

Answer:

B. The rights are important enough to protect against even an insult.

Explanation:

The Bill of Rights of the United States is the collective name given to the first ten amendments of the Constitution of the United States approved on December 15, 1791.

It was an answer to calm the fears of antifederalist groups, some of them influential opponents of the Constitution, and prominent members of the Philadelphia Convention, who argued that it failed to defend the basic principles of human freedom. These amendments guarantee a series of personal freedoms, limit the power of the government in judicial processes and others; and some faculties are reserved for the states and the people. Originally the modifications applied only to the federal government, however, most were subsequently applied to the government of each state through the Fourteenth Amendment through a process known as incorporation.

Answer:

B)  States in the Union.

Choices:

A)  Confederate states.    

B)  States in the Union.    

C)  British Colonies in America.    

D)  States which refused to abolish slavery.

The Mexican-American War begun when the Mexican troops condemned a cluster of U.S. soldiers in the uncertain zone. The United States professed warfare on Mexico since American military positioned in Texas were attacked by the Mexican military. The pronouncement of war was directed to the Congress for approval. 

Redlining is a discriminatory practice from the mid-twentieth century where loans and services were preferentially given to white families, resulting in all white communities and segregated schools. De facto segregation, perpetuated by these practices and 'white flight', remains a pervasive issue today. Noteworthy resistance to such practices has been seen in actions like that of the Harlem Nine.

The practice by which loans were preferentially given to white families in the mid-twentieth century, resulting in segregated neighborhoods and school districts is called redlining. This discriminatory practice included banks and other financial institutions withholding services or refusing to issue mortgages to racial or ethnic minorities, especially those living in neighborhoods that were deemed 'hazardous' to investment. Meanwhile, these same services were provided to white individuals with similar economic statuses. The effects of redlining are still felt today, evidenced by significant disparities in education and financial opportunities in specific neighborhoods and cities.

A prominent example of concerted efforts to combat such systemic discrimination is found in the actions of a group of activist parents, known as the Harlem Nine, in New York City in the late 1950s. These parents protested against the inferior schools in their neighborhood, leading to a court ruling that forced the city to ensure more equitable access to quality education, thereby highlighting de facto segregation.

However, in spite of efforts like these, redlining, along with 'white flight' has resulted in the perpetuation of de facto segregation. De facto segregation, unlike de jure segregation which is implemented by law, happened through the individual choices of people to live in racially homogenous neighborhoods without government intervention.

https://brainly.com/question/32968379

#SPJ12

Correct answer:

Historical background:

The First Continental Congress had met in Philadelphia in September/October, 1774, in regard to what the colonies saw as "Intolerable Acts" passed by British Parliament after the Boston Tea Party.  That meeting had called for a second congress to meet if the British did not respond satisfactorily to the colonists' concerns.

When Britain did not yield, the American colonies convened the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia, beginning in May, 1775.  The Philadelphia sessions of the Second Continental Congress lasted till December, 1776.  There followed further sessions of the Second Continental Congress that continued through 1781, not only in Philadelphia, but also in Baltimore, Maryland, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and York, Pennsylvania.

As noted by the Library of Congress file for the Declaration of Independence:

Among the major factors leading to the outbreak of war in mid-1914 was European diplomat's careless brinkmanship.

The aim of European diplomacy was to preserve a balance between the five major powers of Britain, France, Austria, Russia, and Prussia throughout the several wars and peace congresses of the 18th century.

But by the end of the century, the French Revolution, France's ambitions to export it, and Napoleon I's aspirations to conquer Europe had first thrown the continent's state system out of balance and ultimately brought it to an end. The Congress of Vienna was called in 1814–1815 in response to Napoleon's defeat in order to establish new boundaries, restore the balance of power, and prevent further French hegemony. Along with addressing topics like rivers, the slave trade, and diplomatic protocol, it also addressed global challenges.

Learn more about European diplomats here:

https://brainly.com/question/15324387

#SPJ2

Segregation damages whites and African Americans.

Discrimination does more lasting damage to whites than to African Americans.

Segregation can be overcome if African Americans work hard.

African Americans need trust and responsibility from their leaders.

Racial hatred damages people’s souls.

Booker T. Washington's "Up From Slavery" (1901) is a very important book on segregation. Through the book –his autobiography- Washington accoladed virtues like patience and thrift in those years of slavery. In his story, Washington defined the course of African American life in those dark moments.

Up From Slavery tells the story of how Washington surmount his life as a slave to to a Professor. The book narrates vivid passages like his 500-mile walk from the West Virginia coal mines to the Virginia coast, just to go to school.

The correct answers are C) Jordan, E) Syria, and F) Egypt.

The main three nations that fought against Israel in the Six-Day War in 1967  are Jordan, Syria, and Egypt.

After almost six years of political conflicts between Israel and the Arab Nations, on June 1967, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria fought against Israel in what was known the Six-Day War. Israel attacked Egypt by air and then took over the Sinai Peninsula. They also fought in the Gaza Strip against Jordan and the Golan Heights against Syria. The United Nations had to intervene to stop the hostilities.

Feudalism developed as a political and social system in response to the need for security and protection during the medieval period.

Feudalism developed as a political and social system in response to the need for security and protection during the medieval period. It provided a hierarchical structure where lords granted lands (fiefs) to vassals in exchange for military service and other obligations. The system created a stable society based on mutual obligations and served as a way to maintain order.

https://brainly.com/question/33534890

#SPJ6

Answer:

The answer to the question: What did Herodotus and Thycydides establish as a field of study? would be, B: History.

Explanation:

Around the 400´s BC, there lived in Greece a couple of men whose writings on events that were taking place in the lands where they lived became known as the first historical writings to ever exist. These two men were: Herodotus, who wrote about the wars between Greece and Persia on his book "The Histories", which were just a group of papyrus on which Herodotus recorded all about the First and Second Persian War.

The second person was Thucydides, who also recorded historical events on papyrus, much like Herodotus did, but he worte mostly on the Peloponnesian War in 431 BC. All the historical records that Thycidides generated were regarding the wars that arose between Athens and Sparta that made part of the Peloponnesian War.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that governments have a tendency to become oppressive and should represent the general will of the people, aligning with the idea of direct democracy. His view contrasts with Hobbes's authoritarian stance and Locke's focus on natural rights. The question of government inefficiency is subjective and depends on one's perspective.

The question poses the idea of whether it is true that "every government constantly tends to become lax," as well as how personal attitudes about government compare to Rousseau's observations. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a key thinker in the social contract tradition, suggested that governments can become oppressive and that they should embody the general will of the people. Rousseau's philosophies, alongside those of Hobbes and Locke, represent a spectrum of beliefs about the role of government in balancing the security, freedom, and rights of citizens. Rousseau's theory, advocating for a government formed based on the direct democracy model of ancient Greece, contrasts notably with the authoritarian leanings of Hobbes and the rights-based government advocated by Locke.

Rousseau emphasized that if governments fail to protect the freedoms and equality of their citizens, they lose their legitimacy. In contrast to the linear monarchy supported by Hobbes, Rousseau rejected monarchy in favor of a form of government that responds to the needs of its constituents. During the Enlightenment, this idea fostered discussions about limiting the powers of the government and enhancing the wellbeing of the people.

Assessing whether all governments tend to become lax and inefficient is complex and often based on one's personal viewpoint. However, Rousseau's critique was premised on the idea that governments should be actively managed and guided by the populace to avoid becoming disconnected from the citizens' needs. The extent to which this is true can be debated, with some highlighting the prevalence of bureaucracy and inertia in government, while others may point to examples of effective, responsive governance.

https://brainly.com/question/28500075

#SPJ12

The idea that governments tend to become lax over time is a perspective that has been echoed by various thinkers throughout history, including Rousseau. Rousseau observed that as societies evolve, governments may become less efficient, more bureaucratic, and prone to complacency. This viewpoint resonates with the concept of institutional decay or the tendency of established systems to lose effectiveness and responsiveness.

As for my attitude, I don't have personal opinions or attitudes. However, I can provide insights based on historical and philosophical perspectives. From that standpoint, it's reasonable to acknowledge that governments, like any complex organization, can face challenges in maintaining efficiency and responsiveness over time. Factors such as bureaucracy, institutional inertia, and shifting priorities can contribute to a perceived decline in effectiveness.

Rousseau's observations highlight the importance of ongoing vigilance, accountability, and periodic reforms to ensure that governments remain effective and serve the interests of their citizens. This aligns with broader discussions in political philosophy about the need for checks and balances, transparency, and mechanisms for citizen participation to counteract tendencies toward laxity or inefficiency in governance.

Answer:Monarchy

Explanation: