Which of the following is a rule for correctly dividing words?
A. Do not divide one-syllable words. B. Divide words between syllables. C. Divide compound words between the words that form the punodwoɔ
D. All of the above​

Answer:

I think it is D

Explanation:

I do hope this helps! Have a wonderful rest of your day!

Answer:

There are two version of Sojourner Truth speech because the popular speech "Ain't i a woman" was first published twelve years after the speech itself by Frances Gage in 1863. while the second version was published a month after the speech was given in the 'Anti-Slavery Bugle' by Rev, Marius Robinson.

Explanation:

Sojourner Truth is one of the most powerful advocates of human right in the nineteenth century. she was born into slavery in the year 1797. After changing her name from Isabella Baumfree to Sojorner Truth, she became involved in the anti-slavery movement and the women's right movement.

Sojourner Truth made her famous speech "Ain't i a woman" at the women's right convention in Akron, Ohio in the year 1851. She advocates for the rights of women and African-Americans.

There are two versions of Sojourners Speech because Marius Robinson and Sojourner Truth were known to be good friends. So, the second version of Truth's speech was published with permission from Sojourner.

Sojourner Truth was known to be a women's rights activist and an American abolitionist. She was born a slave in New York but got freedom in 1826.

We see that a version of her speech was written by Marius Robinson.

Learn more about Sojourner Truth on https://brainly.com/question/963143

Answer:

1. This is to do something stupid.

2. Charlie is a 32-year-old man with an I.Q. of 68, who has struggled his whole life toward the goal of "being smart." This goal is actually his mother's obsession.

Explanation:

Answer: she is very intelligent

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

B) The name of the one was Obstinate and the name of the other Pliable. Now, by this time, the man was a good distance from them; but, however, they were resolved to pursue him, which they did, and in a little time they overtook him.

Explain:

The names of characters from Bunyan's The Pilgrim's Progress reveal their characteristics.

Obstinate is the synonym of stubborn, meaning refusing to change one's course of action or opinion. Obstinate is one of Christian's neighbors in the City of Destruction. Together with Pliable, he runs after Christian to bring him back but stubbornly refuses to join him on his journey, unlike Pliable, who does so despite thinking it's nonsense.

Pliable means easily bent and easily influenced. Pliable follows Christian on his journey until both of them fall into the Slough of Despond. Pliable manages to escape from the slough and returns home. His name also fits his character - he does things for a little while and then gives up on them, lacking will.

Answer: the second one

Explanation:

Answer:

PLS MARK BRAINLIEST

Why is the young Gatsby drawn to Daisy? Because she's beautiful, she's the 1st "nice" girl he had known, he loves her house, how she lives, and the fact that men already loved her increased her worth. ... They aren't worth the trouble and headache they've brought Gatsby with their selfishness and drama.

Young Gatsby was drawn to Daisy Buchanan due to several factors. He was attracted to her social status and saw her as a gateway to the upper class.

Daisy's beauty and charm also captivated him, making her physically appealing. Gatsby romanticized Daisy, viewing her as an idealized figure who represented happiness and fulfillment of his dreams.

Their past connection further intensified his longing for her. However, Gatsby's attraction to Daisy was rooted in his idealized perception of her, which ultimately led to complications in their relationship.

Read more on the Gatsby here https://brainly.com/question/26090930

#SPJ6

Answer:

immoral people are happier, they have more intrinsic and extrinsic rewards. What kind of ... How does plato respond to the immoralists position? what is wrong with their outlook in his view? ... Negatives, - dont always get exactly what you want.

Explanation:

Final answer:

The term 'immoralists' suggests those who live against societal norms, yet it's not inherently negative. Morality is subjective, and ethical discussions, such as harm-based morality and individual behavior versus moral permissibility, highlight the complexity of determining what is considered morally right or wrong. Engaging in ethics involves considering our duties to others and the environment.

Explanation:

The term "immoralists" might suggest individuals who reject or live in opposition to societal moral norms. However, the concept is more nuanced and does not inherently label these individuals as "bad" or "immoral" in a conventional sense. When discussing morality and immorality, it's crucial to understand that perspectives on good and evil are quite subjective and can vary greatly across cultures, historical periods, and individual beliefs. Moral relativism, the idea that moral principles are not universal but are instead conditioned by cultural and personal contexts, plays a significant role in this discussion.

The question of whether human beings are fundamentally corrupt or if certain groups are destined to be ruled due to inherent inferiority touches on a range of ethical theories, including harm-based morality, which posits that actions causing harm to others or violating their rights are morally wrong. This principle directly challenges views that deem certain groups as inferior or deserving of harm. In the realm of ethical debate, such as the abortion controversy, the actions of individuals (whether considered good or bad) do not conclusively determine the morality of an issue, illustrating the separation between individual behavior and moral permissibility.

Addressing moral questions requires engaging in ethics, examining not only interpersonal ethics, which involve our duties to other people, but also environmental ethics, concerning our responsibilities towards the environment, including all living beings and ecosystems. This comprehensive approach acknowledges the complexity of moral considerations, pointing out that assessing moral actions extends beyond human interactions to how we treat our planet and all its inhabitants.

Answer:

first person point of view

Answer:

the first persons point of view

Explanation:

Point of view (POV) is what the character or narrator telling the story can see (his or her perspective). The author chooses “who” is to tell the story by determining the point of view. Depending on who the narrator is, he/she will be standing at one point and seeing the action.

Answer:

They both have expressed the experiences of blacks in their arts uniquely and practically.

Explanation:

Langston Hughes was a prominent figure during the Harlem Renaissance. Harlem Renaissance was an artistic movement that began in Harlem. This movement brought the resurrection of African-American arts with it, which was infused with the cultural tradition of African Americans.

Ice-T, the stage name of Tracy Lauren Marrow is an American rapper. Tracy's interest in heavy metal music aroused when he went on living in his aunt's house after his parents passed away and he shared the room with his cousin, who loved rock music.

The one similarity that both Langston and Ice-T have common in them is that they openly expressed the practical life of blacks in their arts.

Langston in his works has practically and uniquely expressed the life of blacks, the frustrations, and the real-life of blacks.

Whereas, Ice-T, co-founder of Original Gangster, has expressed about the experiences of the life of blacks post-industrial. They both spoke in an uncompromising tone about the blacks in their arts.

So, they both have expressed the frustrations and reality of the blacks in their arts.

Langston Hughes and Ice-T both address the African-American experience in their works, focusing on themes like racial inequality, social justice, and cultural pride.

Final answer:

The keyword 'outcome' is used to identify a problem and solution essay, as it signals the results or consequences of solutions discussed in the text.

Explanation:

The keyword that helps the reader identify a problem and solution essay is 'outcome'. In texts discussing problems and their solutions, the term 'outcome' is often used to represent the results or consequences of applying a particular solution. A problem and solution essay typically describes a particular problem, proposes one or multiple solutions, and then discusses the expected outcomes or results of implementing these solutions.

Learning outcomes include being able to describe the problem, discuss the process of identifying a problem and proposing a solution, and articulating how proposals to solve these problems reach their intended audience. A good way to think about this is to look for parts of the essay that state the issue and then present ways to resolve it, along with the anticipated results of these actions.

Answer:

B. Or

Explanation:

Since you can't do both(Disneyland and party), it's an either/or situation

Answer:

Or

Explanation:

you might have ____ OR you might have____

Answer:

C). Jones High School Senior Wins NASA Award.

Explanation:

Credibility is one of the crucial aspects to be maintained by a news source as it not only builds audience's trust by offering factual, objective, and authoritative information that is verifiable and reliable but also establishes its reputation.

As per the question, the headline 'Jones...Award' signal that the key concern of the news source is to sustain credibility as it presents the verifiable information in an objective and factual manner(without including any opinion or bias). This authoritative and substantial representation makes the claim reliable and help establish the credibility among the audience. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

Answer:

Smith!

Explanation:

Answer:

C; They have both been born of a woman.

Explanation:

In the text, Macbeth writes "Was he not born of woman? The spirits that know All mortal consequences have pronounced me thus: 'Fear not, Macbeth. No man that's born of woman Shall e'er have power upon thee..." This is exemplifying how Macbeth is trying to convince himself that they aren't to be feared. Also, A, B, and D can't be the answer because neither makes any sense. Hope this helped :)

The correct option is C. i.e. They have both been born of a woman. Macbeth reassures himself that Malcolm and Macduff are not a threat because the prophecy states that no man born of a woman can harm him. Macbeth's confidence is rooted in the supernatural assurance given by the witches.

In Act V of Shakespeare's Macbeth, Macbeth reassures himself that Malcolm and Macduff are not a threat to him by reminding himself of the prophecy stated by the witches: 'Fear not, Macbeth. No man that's born of woman Shall e'er have power upon thee.' Thus, he believes that neither Malcolm nor Macduff can harm him because they were both born of a woman.

Here is why other options are incorrect:

Answer: It separates items in a long list of expectations without slowing the pace of the paragraph.

Explanation:

Answer:

B. It separates items in a long list of expectations without slowing the pace of the paragraph.

Explanation:

I just got it correct on e2020

Answer:the answer is D

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is D

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

He uses phrases like "The way to dusty death. Out out brief candle" "Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player"  which both have the meaning of "you always lose in life, then you die."

Final answer:

Macbeth's reaction to his wife's death reveals a nihilistic outlook where he sees life as a meaningless path to death, not expressing anguish but a desolate reflection on inevitability.

Explanation:

Macbeth's reaction to his wife's death, as expressed in the 'Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow' soliloquy, reveals a desolate outlook on life. Far from being anguished by her loss, Macbeth reflects on the inevitable and meaningless passage of time, leading to death. He describes life as a meaningless path to death, indicating his nihilistic view that life's events are trivial and lead to an inevitable end. The metaphor of life as a 'poor player' suggests that he views life as a fleeting and inconsequential performance.

Answer:

The author adds that as repetition as a context tool to keep the audience engaged.

Explanation:

Repetition is where things occur over and over and it is also known as a literature context tool.

The author's repetition of ""we eat"" could serve several purposes depending on the context of the text.

Here are some possible explanations for this stylistic choice:

1. Emphasis: The repetition of ""we eat"" might be used to emphasize the frequency or the importance of eating in the narrative or the argument being presented. It could be highlighting how central the act of eating is to the characters or to the point the author is making.

2. Rhythm and Flow: In literary works, repetition can create a particular rhythm or cadence that can make the text more engaging or memorable. It can also mimic the sounds and rhythms of natural speech, making the narrative more relatable or authentic.

3. Motif: The phrase ""we eat"" could be a motif that represents something larger, such as community, sustenance, or the human condition. By repeating it, the author might be reinforcing this motif throughout the work.

4. Dramatic Effect: Repetition can build tension or suspense, especially if it's used in a climactic moment of the story or argument. It can signal to the reader that something significant is happening or about to happen related to the act of eating.

5. Thematic Significance: The repetition might be reflecting a theme, such as gluttony, survival, or the social aspects of eating. It could be drawing attention to how characters interact with food and what that says about them or their situation.

6. Structural Device: Authors sometimes use repetition to structure their work, with certain phrases or words serving as anchors for different sections of the text. ""We eat"" could be such a device, helping to organize the narrative or the argument.

7. Irony or Sarcasm: If the context is such that the repeated phrase ""we eat"" is juxtaposed with a situation where eating is not possible or is problematic, the repetition could be ironic or sarcastic, highlighting the disparity between the desire or need to eat and the reality of the situation.

8. Mnemonic Tool: In non-fiction or instructional writing, repetition can serve as a mnemonic device to help readers remember key points or instructions.

9. Cultural or Historical Reference: The repetition might be referencing a specific cultural or historical context where eating has a particular significance, such as during times of famine or in rituals.

10. Stream of Consciousness: If the work employs a stream of consciousness narrative style, the repetition could reflect the characters' thoughts or obsessions, giving insight into their mental state.

In conclusion, the repetition of ""we eat"" could be a deliberate literary device used by the author to convey a variety of meanings and effects, depending on the context of the work. It is important to consider the broader themes, narrative style, and the author's intent when interpreting such a repetition.

Answer:

B. Reading alone would be a more solitary experience, while reading with the class would be a more lively experience

Explanation:

The inference shows that B. Reading alone would be a more solitary experience, while reading with the rest of the class would be a more lively experience.

An inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced from the information given in a literary work.

In this case, reading Dickens's A Christmas Carol to yourself, as opposed to reading it in class, with different students playing parts in the play is different as reading alone would be a more solitary experience, while reading with the rest of the class would be a more lively experience.

Learn more about inference on:

https://brainly.com/question/25280941

Answer:

if e could invite him to the birthday i think

Explanation:

Final answer:

Auggie teaches his mom about empathy and understanding others through inviting people to his birthday party.

Explanation:

Auggie teaches his mom about empathy and understanding others when he invites people to his birthday party. In the book 'Wonder' by R.J. Palacio, Auggie is a boy with a facial deformity who has been homeschooled his whole life. When Auggie decides to attend a mainstream school, he faces many challenges and experiences bullying from some of his classmates. However, he also makes friends who appreciate him for who he is. By inviting people to his birthday party, Auggie's mom learns that it's important to see beyond appearances and to value people's qualities and characters.

Answer:

Again, hope I'm not too late but the answer is indeed A.

Explanation:

"Over the past fifty years, Cinco de Mayo has spread from Mexican American communities across the United States. The holiday has introduced Mexican culture to a wider audience. Many students learn about the holiday in school and through public festivals. People with and without Mexican heritage look forward to Cinco de Mayo as a day to celebrate Mexican food, music, clothing, and other traditions."

The author support the ---------------- the author explains that Cinco de Mayo is now celebrated by people who are not from Mexican descent. Thus, option (A) is correct.

An author is a person who writes books, articles, or other written works, such as poetry, plays, or essays. The term can also refer to someone who creates or originates something, such as an idea or a plan.

An author is typically recognized as the creator of a specific work and is usually credited as such. The work of an author can have a significant impact on society and culture, shaping ideas and influencing public discourse.

The author explains that Cinco de Mayo is now celebrated by people who are not from Mexican descent is the way -------------------------- across the United States. Therefore, option (A) is correct.

Learn more about an author here:

https://brainly.com/question/28623865

#SPJ2

Answer:

a

Explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

The Allied strategy to defeat Japan in the Pacific Ocean was a strategy called island hopping. After the attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the American military in the Pacific was severely depleted. ... In both instances, the Japanese were defeated.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Allied strategy to defeat Japan in the Pacific Ocean was a strategy called island hopping. After the attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the American military in the Pacific was severely depleted. As a result, the Japanese were able to capture much of the central and much of the western Pacific Ocean area. Once we were able to rebuild our military, which was done much faster than most people expected, we were able to counter these Japanese attacks.

Two very critical battles in the Pacific Ocean were the Battle of Guadalcanal and the Battle of Midway Island. At Guadalcanal, the Japanese were hoping to position themselves so they would have a direct path to Australia and to New Zealand, which Japan hoped to capture. At Midway Island, the Japanese were hoping to secure that island so it could attack and capture Hawaii. In both instances, the Japanese were defeated. Japan lost several of its aircraft carriers at the Battle of Midway Island. As a result of the Japanese defeats at Guadalcanal and at Midway Island, Japan would not go on the offensive again during the war. Japan would now be in a retreating mode.

Once we won these battles, we could then begin to implement our strategy of island hopping. We would slowly retake islands in the Pacific that Japan had captured, often with a very high cost in terms of loss of life and equipment, until we got close enough to Japan to consider either continual bombing of Japan and/or an invasion of the Japanese islands. Several key battles occurred with this island hopping strategy. Examples of some these battles included those at Tarawa, Guam, the Philippines, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa. As a result of this successful strategy, we were now in a position to take the final steps to defeat Japan in World War II.

Explanation:

Answer:

By making the speaker seem more human and relatable

Explanation:

Nonverbal cues, such as making eye contact, help speakers connect with their audience by making them appear more human and relatable, showing engagement, sincerity, and confidence, thereby facilitating a stronger and more meaningful interaction.

The use of nonverbal communication such as making eye contact is a powerful tool in effective communication, particularly when a speaker is addressing an audience. This type of nonverbal communication aids in creating a connection by making the speaker appear more human and relatable. When a speaker maintains eye contact with their audience, it shows that they are engaged, sincere, and confident in the information they are sharing. This can make the audience feel more involved in the discussion and can help to build trust and rapport between the speaker and the listeners, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the communication.

https://brainly.com/question/33004637

#SPJ2

Answer:his father compares the music to how they play basketball

Explanation:

he says this song is fast and free like you and jb on the court.Therefore that is comparing them from the music to how they play basketball

Daisy may ask 'Who is Tom?' to distance herself from associations with certain characters or to highlight her interest in the person inviting her. Winterbourne's obsession with her innocence is due to his fascination with her unconventional behavior, symbolic of the broader themes of societal norms and the scrutiny of women during that era.

When Daisy asks, "Who is Tom?" it appears to be a moment of feigned ignorance or strategic avoidance. In the social context of the novel, such a question might suggest Daisy's attempt to distance herself from associations with certain characters or to emphasize her interest in the person inviting her, rather than their connections.

The excerpts provided do not directly relate to the specific scene where Daisy would say this line, but they reflect the complexity of Daisy's character and her interactions with others. Daisy's character often navigates social situations with an air of casual indifference or intentional naivety, which serves both to protect her own interests and to challenge the expectations of those around her.

Understanding Winterbourne's Obsession

Winterbourne's obsession with Daisy's innocence stems from his fascination with her unconventional behavior and what it signifies about her character. He is seeking to understand whether she is simply naïve and pure-hearted, or if she is willfully flouting societal norms. This preoccupation is indicative of the broader themes in the story, such as the clash between American and European societal norms and the scrutiny of female behavior during the period.

In Gatsby chapter 5, Daisy's "Who is Tom?" isn't literal. It's a frisky way to say she'll come to tea alone. She wouldn't forget her husband, but it hints at her desire to meet Gatsby without Tom's control. It's a playful jab and a way to express interest in Gatsby.

In Chapter 5 of The Great Gatsby, when Daisy asks "Who is Tom?" after Nick invites her to tea, it's not a genuine question about her husband's name. It's a cleverly veiled message. We know this because forgetting her husband's name wouldn't be realistic for Daisy.  Instead, this question serves a few purposes. Firstly, it adds a layer of teasing to her response to Nick's invitation.

By acting playfully forgetful, she subtly suggests she'll come for tea alone, separate from Tom's controlling presence.  Secondly, it can be seen as a subtle rebellion against Tom. Pretending to forget him highlights her desire for a space free from his dominance.  Overall, Daisy's question is a witty way to express her interest in Gatsby and the meeting without being overly forward. It's a playful at Tom's control and a way to show her excitement about meeting Gatsby on her own terms.

The complete question is-

In "The Great Gatsby" Chapter 5, Why does Daisy say, "Who is Tom?" when Nick invites her to come to his house for tea?

Answer:Climax is often identified as the highest point of interest in a story. It is the moment the rising action begins to transition in the falling action of the story's plot. At this point, the conflict is at the highest point of tension.

Answer:

Clarify what the disagreement is.

Establish a common goal for both parties.

Discuss ways to meet the common goal.

Determine the barriers to the common goal.

Agree on the best way to resolve the conflict.

Acknowledge the agreed upon solution and determine the responsibilities each party has in the resolution.

The correct option is examples.

An example of something in a particular situation, object, or person which shows that what is being claimed is true.

There are three main categories of evidence that are essential to gain the audience's confidence in the writer's assertions. These categories are Fact, Judgment, and Testimony.

Learn more about the example here https://brainly.com/question/380037

#SPJ2