Which details most reveal the setting of the passage?
Select three options.
"the ruins of a great temple in the mid-city"
"rats are unclean, and there must have been many tribes
of them"
O "in the heart of a ruin, behind a door that still opened"
"they had a very sweet taste"
"the drink of the gods was strong and made my head
swim"

Answer:

After World War II, the federal government took control of millions of acres of New Today, New Mexico has more scientific and technical workers per capital than any and their cultural assimilation into New Mexican life and the economy.

The legislative branch of government is responsible for making laws

Answer:

the legislative branch makes laws

Exlanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Demobilization generally refers to the army being reduced or disbanded altogether. It comes about because it (the army) is no longer needed to fight a way.

Demobilization can also refer to a construction site where men and equipment are no longer needed.

The answer is pretty tricky because neither of these definitions are listed. D is a consequence of demobilization. It is a result of demobilization. I would pick it, but don't be surprised if you get it wrong. Bring up your objection and then be quiet.

Answer:D

Explanation:

After World War II the major difference between the United States and the Soviet Union would divide the world into two blocks: American capitalism vs Soviet communism.

The United States got out of WWII as a winner and entered into an economic golden age. It had a boom of jobs and standards of living increased.

However, the Soviet Union also had good rising numbers on its economy, and its economy directly questioned the existence of the capitalist economy.

Capitalism versus communism dispute would define most of the 20th century into what was called the Cold War.

Answer:

A. The United States had a puppet government, whereas the Soviet Union wanted to contain Communism.

Explanation:

Answer:

Diagram B

Explanation

The feudal period of Japanese history was a time when powerful families (daimyo) and the military power of warlords (shogun), and their warriors, the samurai ruled Japan.

During that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence. Society was divided into two main classes in Feudal Japan, the nobility and the peasants.

Japan was dominated by strong families (daimyo), warlords (shogun), and their warriors, the samurai, during the feudal period of its history.

Thus, the correct option is diagram B.

The terms "feudalism" and "feudal system" were typically used to describe the early and middle Middle Ages, which covered the time from the 5th century, when the Western Empire's central political authority vanished, to the 12th century, when kingdoms started to emerge as efficient centralized governmental units.

Feudalism was a social structure in which lower-ranking individuals provided security and land to lower-ranking individuals in exchange for their labor and support.

The feudal system was similar to an ecosystem in that it would collapse if one level were to be missing. The four basic components of the hierarchy were the Monarch, Lords/Ladies (Nobles), Knights, and Peasants/Serfs. Everyday life at every level was dependent on one another.

Lords, vassals, and fiefs were the three main components of feudalism; the arrangement of these three components reveals how it was structured. Land was owned by a lord, who was a noble, and was known as a fief. A vassal was someone who was given control of the land by the lord.

Learn more about feudal period, here

https://brainly.com/question/28524143

#SPJ3

Answer:

Your setting an example for others to follow

Explanation:

Answer:

Your answer would be Precedent!

Explanation:

earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Example : "there are substantial precedents for using interactive media in training"

Evidence for past asteroid impacts on Earth includes mass extinctions linked to impact events, geological activity showing signs of impact craters, and changes in global temperature following these events.

Scientists have several types of evidence that suggest Earth has been hit by large objects, like asteroids, in the past. These include:

Layer of volcanic ash and earthquake activity, while indicative of geological processes, are not direct evidence of impacts from space. A layer of burned organic matter suggests wildfires resulted from an impact event, but it is not a definitive indication on its own.

The correct answer is Cash-crop farming

Explanation: Their main economic activity was logging, whaling, and fishing.

Answer:

The image above is an example of urbanization.

Explanation:

This image is characterized by its highlighting of the lines that are formed by houses equal in shape and size. You can get at what it's trying to express when you notice how these lines and the houses are harmonical and standardized.

The artist chose to paint it in a point of view from the sky so houses aren't very different from one another. The artist is making standardized urbanization, represented by the lines that are streets, the center of attention in his illustration.

The highlighting of the lines made by dwellings of equal shape and size distinguishes this image. When you see how these lines and the homes are harmonical and standardized, you can figure out what it's trying to say.

So, the above image represents Urbanization as Option C.

The other options are incorrect as:

Thus Option C is the correct option as the image above represents Urbanization.

For more information about Urbanization refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/16966131

Answer:

In this battle the patriots crossed the Delaware River on Christmas night, 1776, in a successful surprise attack on Hessian mercenaries.

I think that's what you mean.

Answer:

In the case Texas v. Johnson (1989), burning of the American flag was considered a form of symbolic speech that is protected by the Constitution. The Supreme Court argued that some actions may anger people, but social outrage alone can´t be a justification for limiting freedom of speech.

Example: The Iowa state legislature passes a new libel law that is contested by local associations of journalists. They say some aspects of it will limit freedom of speech and freedom of the press. They organize protests and even promise to take the issue to the Supreme Court if necessary. As part of their street protests, they gag themselves with white handkerchiefs and march in silence. This is symbolic speech.

I agree with the argument of the Supreme Court that symbolic speech has to be equally protected by the First Amendment as far as no life or property is in danger. To limit or punish some forms of protest just because a social group or large numbers of people don´t like it,  may have serious consequences for citizens´freedoms and rights, it may open the door to future restrictions.

Explanation:

Symbolic speech, like burning the flag, is protected by the First Amendment, as it conveys powerful messages and promotes debate.

Points supporting the protection of symbolic speech like flag burning under the First Amendment:

1. Expression of Political Dissent: Burning the flag is a potent form of political protest, conveying dissatisfaction with government policies and actions.

2. Visual Impact: Symbolic speech often carries a more powerful and memorable message than verbal or written communication alone, making it effective in drawing attention to issues.

3. First Amendment Rights: Upholding symbolic speech as protected under the First Amendment ensures that individuals can freely express dissenting opinions without fear of censorship or punishment.

4. Promotion of Debate and Change: Symbolic speech encourages public debate and discussion on important societal issues, fostering a healthy democracy where diverse viewpoints can be expressed.

5. Preservation of Liberties: Limiting symbolic speech would undermine freedom of expression guarantees, potentially silencing dissent and reducing the robustness of public discourse.

6. Historical Precedent: The Supreme Court's decision in Texas v. Johnson affirmed that symbolic speech is a form of protected expression, acknowledging its role in democratic societies.

By recognizing and protecting symbolic speech such as flag burning, society upholds fundamental principles of free speech, ensuring that individuals can freely express their beliefs and contribute to the ongoing dialogue about social and political change.

The correct answer is The religions of the people of Europe became more diverse

In the sixteenth century the Catholic Church had its political and spiritual power challenged. At a time when various social, economic and cultural changes were taking place in Europe, the power of the Church no longer represented the longings, especially of the nobility and the emerging bourgeoisie. Members of the church itself, such as Friar and Professor Martin Luther, proposed a comprehensive religious reform that gave rise to Protestant religions.

Explanation:

Captain Preston’s Unknown Biography

Captain Thomas Preston was the key figure in the fatal incident known as the Boston Massacre and the subsequent trials. In fact Preston’s name is one of the most mentioned in the historic texts, second perhaps only to Crispus Attucks who became a well known American hero. But unlike Attucks whose biographies can be found in abundance, we know practically next to nothing about Preston. The only hard facts that we know are the details of the Massacre itself that were well documented due to the scrutiny they received in the trial.

The idea found in the passage connects to Greco-Roman ideas through the shared emphasis on self-examination, ethical living, and skepticism of absolute knowledge. Philosophers like Seneca and Marcus Aurelius spoke similarly about human imperfection and moral scrutiny, while Socratic and Pyrrhonian thoughts mirrored the questioning of one's own judgments.

The passage in question reflects on the moral implications of judging others and condemns hypocrisy. In the context of Greco-Roman ideas, this notion relates to the philosophical thoughts from that era which emphasized self-awareness, self-improvement, and the reflection on one's own faults before criticizing others. Stoic philosophers such as Seneca and Marcus Aurelius discussed themes related to the imperfections of human nature and ethical self-examination. Similarly, Socratic philosophy focused on the pursuit of moral truth and the recognition of one's own ignorance as a step towards wisdom.

Furthermore, the Pyrrhonian skepticism mentioned argues that nothing can be known for certain, which includes the act of judgment itself. This skepticism towards absolute knowledge or judgment also echoes the theme of questioning one's own beliefs and judgments that were present in ancient philosophical thought.

In the Christian context, judging others is cautioned against in passages like Matthew 7:1-5, which teach the importance of treating others as one would like to be treated and acknowledging one's own flaws. This is akin to certain ethical and moral stances in Greco-Roman philosophy, indicating a historical continuum between ancient thought and early Christian teachings concerning self-awareness and judgment.

Answer:

The ongoing protests in Hong Kong clearly shows how people in the country are deeply concerned about their future. When people protest, they are asking for change and in Hong Kong's case, the protests continue because the government is not listening to them. People are scared that through the "extradition bill," the country's right of autonomy will be lost. This is making the people more aggressive in their demonstration, thus affecting tourism. I hope that the government will listen to them and will appeal to their needs, for when a country is chaotic, everything is at stake.

Explanation

The core issue of the protest was the extradition bill, which will amend or change the Fugitive Order Offender's Ordinance. This means that once the bill becomes a law, the offenders will be sent to other jurisdictions outside of Hong Kong. This has a chance to affect the judicial independence of Hong Kong.

Answer:

I took a test with this question, the answers are the Magna Carta 1215, Northwest Ordinances (1785 & 1787), the Virginia Declaration of rights, and the English Bill of Rights 1689.

The Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights, and Virginia Declaration of Rights set legal precedents for the US Bill of Rights, providing the framework for individual rights recognized by the government.

The documents that set legal precedents for the US Bill of Rights include the Magna Carta (1215), the English Bill of Rights (1689), and the state constitutions like the Virginia Declaration of Rights. The Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights were crucial in listing specific rights that needed to be recognized by government leaders, contributing to the development of the concept of individual rights that heavily influenced the US Bill of Rights. The Virginia Declaration of Rights, which preceded the US Constitution, outlined protections and liberties for individuals that were incorporated into the Bill of Rights. It's important to note that while other documents such as the Articles of Confederation, Northwest Ordinances, US Constitution, The Olive Branch Petition, and Declaration of Independence played significant roles in American history, they did not directly establish the legal framework of the Bill of Rights as the aforementioned documents did.

Answer: C Morality outweighs human laws.

Explanation:

Just took the test

Morality outweighs human laws is the best universal theme represented in the excerpt.

Universal theme Which is best to represented in the excerpt is Morality outweighs human laws.

To learn more about Morality outweighs human laws refer:https://brainly.com/question/23975859

#SPJ2

Answer:

The answers are:

1-The case: -Hernandez v. Texas (1954)

2-School affirmative action programs cannot use quotas to admit minority applicants.

Explanation:

1-The Supreme Court used the principle of equal protection--Hernandez was convicted of killing a man in cold blood in Jackson County, Texas, but his legal team found that not one of the roughly 6,000 jurors selected over the previous 25 years had a Hispanic last name. Americans, Hernandez's lawyers claimed he had been deprived of equal protection because discrimination prevented him from being tried by a jury of his peers.

Chief Justice Earl Warren said: "The Fourteenth Amendment is not directed solely against discrimination due to a 'two-class theory'—that is, based upon differences between 'white' and Negro."

Equal protection applies to different ethnic groups; it is unfair to try a defendant before a jury that deliberately excludes members of the defendant's ethnic group.

2-The Supreme Court  used the equal protection clause to limit a program that benefited marginalized  groups in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.

Allan Bakke, who had twice unsuccessfully applied for admission to the medical school, filed suit against the university. Citing evidence that his grades and test scores surpassed those of many minority students who had been accepted for admission, Bakke charged that he had suffered unfair “reverse discrimination” on the basis of race.The Supreme Court,  agreed that the university’s use of strict racial quotas was unconstitutional and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke

The Supreme Court used the Equal Protection Clause to expand civil rights in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, which affirmed same-sex marriage rights. Conversely, in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Court limited the use of racial quotas in university admissions, impacting affirmative action programs.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has played a crucial role in expanding civil rights for marginalized groups in the United States. A case in which the Supreme Court used this principle to expand civil rights was Obergefell v. Hodges. This landmark 2015 decision recognized the right to same-sex marriage nationwide, affirming that marriage is a fundamental right inherent to the concept of individual autonomy.

However, the Supreme Court has also used the Equal Protection Clause to scrutinize and sometimes limit programs intended to benefit marginalized groups. In the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case of 1978, the Court ruled that a university's use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unconstitutional, thereby limiting the scope of affirmative action programs. The decision still allowed for race to be considered as one factor among others in admissions decisions, but it could not be the sole basis for an admissions decision.

Answer:

The American Dream by the end of 1960 looks like all the citizens are being treated equality irrespective of race and religion, everybody is free and there is peace residing everywhere. All the citizens get to take part in this dream.

Explanation:

By the end of the 1960s, the American Dream began to be viewed through a lens of inclusion, with civil rights movements challenging the status quo and advocating for equal opportunities. Yet, systemic inequalities still limited access to this dream for many, especially minorities and women, showcasing the gap between the ideal and reality.

The concept of the American Dream has always been intertwined with ideas of success through hard work and opportunity. By the end of the 1960s, this dream had become progressively more inclusive, albeit complex, as civil rights movements pressured society to open up these opportunities to a broader spectrum of people. However, despite the lofty ideals, the reality was that not everyone had equal access to this dream due to systemic inequalities.

Different groups such as African Americans, women, and other minorities were actively fighting for their rights, seeking inclusion in what was seen as the American Dream—the ability to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, regardless of one's background. The late 1960s was a time of significant social and political upheaval, with movements that sought to redefine who gets to participate in this dream, emphasizing the notion that it should be accessible to all, not just a select few based on race, gender, or social standing.

Despite these efforts, socio-economic barriers remained a significant hurdle for many Americans. By the end of the decade, it was clear that the American Dream was more attainable for some than others, highlighting a need for ongoing reforms and efforts to level the playing field.

Milesian school of thought did Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes establish.

Answer: Option B

Explanation:

Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes were the first three Ionian philosophers. They showed great interest in the environment and they possessed a wide knowledge in the field of Science. They were trying to make the people comprehensive of the things happening around them.They were the creators of the Milesian school of philosophy.

They all belonged to the city of Miletus of Greece. Their works were identified by the successors who quoted about their contribution to Science. They believed that there was an external motion which led to the creation of the world. Thales was famous by the way he accurately predicted the eclipse. Anaximander was the first man to frame a map. Anaximenes had a good influence on Pythagoras.

Thesis:

The Presidential Plans for Reconstruction reflected the belief that the primary goal of post-Civil-War was to reunite the nation because both Presidents during that time adopted a lenient policy to let Southern States back into the Union and the Presidents of that era fought against the Senate's harsher policies regarding Reconstruction.

Evidence:

10% Plan made by Lincoln and continued by Johnson.

Pocket Veto by Lincoln on Senate, Johnson impeached by Senate

Both Presidents at the time adopted a lenient policy to allow Southern states back into the Union, and the Presidents of that era fought against the Senate's harsher policies regarding the Presidential Plans for Reconstruction expressed the notion that the fundamental purpose of post-Civil War restoration should be to unify the country.

Evidence and facts about Lincoln:

For more information about Lincoln refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/19776914

The correct answer is Great Migration

Explanation: It occurred mainly from the South to the North, which is the most developed in the region. The process was strained as a result of growing social as well as economic inequalities, which increasingly generates labor shortages and sufficient resources for all.

Answer:

if the options were:

a.  primitive       c.  behind the Europeans

b.  the best in the world       d.  nonexistent

The Answer is B, It was considered the best in the world

Explanation:

Bronze, an alloy of copper and tin, was a hugely important metal during the Shang period. Shang metal workers developed a highly sophisticated method for casting bronze and used it to make ceremonial objects and weapons. Bronze swords and spearheads were stronger than other available metals, giving Shang soldiers an advantage in battle.

The U.S. took the decision to construct the Panama Canal because of C. The needs of the U.S. Navy after the Spanish-American War.

During the Spanish - American War, the U.S. realized that they would need to move warships from the east coast to the west coast and vice versa in times of war.

The Panama Canal was going to be the best way to do this as it would cut the journey across coasts by a significant margin and so it was built.

In conclusion, option C is correct.

Find out more on the Panama Canal at https://brainly.com/question/18016002.

Answer:

Almost from the very beginning of their rule, the Bolsheviks  attempted to formally withdraw Russia from the WWI. They wanted to consolidate power because it was seen as a priority over the continuation of a conflict they judged to be an "imperialist" war. They negotiated the peace treaty of Brest-Litovsk which supposed colossal territorial losses for Rusia: they handed over Finland, Poland, Ukraine , the Baltic republics and Transcaucasia to the Central Powers; Russia ceded one third of the tsarist empire´s population, one-third of its agricultural land and three-quarters of its industries. The Russian withdrawal practically meant the end of the Eastern Front, thus elevating the pressure on France, Britain and other allies on the Western Front. It also helped ignite the White counterrevolutionary movement.

Explanation:

Louis XIV curtailed rebellion by requiring his nobles to live at his court, invading their privacy by screening their correspondence, rewarding loyalty with favors, and requiring them to support the arts.

King Louis XIV of France employed several methods to curtail rebellion and assert his control over the French nobility. The first was to require his nobles to live at his court at Versailles. This helped keep a close eye on their activities and eliminated their power base in the provinces.

The second was to read incoming and out-going mail. This measure violated their privacy and kept them from plotting against him.

Third, he would give favors to those who were loyal to him, creating a reward system that encouraged allegiance to him. Fourth, he required his nobles to support the arts, which was not only a crucial aspect of his public image plan, but a way of diverting their time and wealth away from potential rebellion.

https://brainly.com/question/14268678

#SPJ12

Military spending played a significant role in influencing the end of the Cold War. Characterized by primarily spending money on technology and innovations to compete with each country, the United States and USSR strained their economies. The USSR specifically struggled with this because while it struggled with economic pressures on its own, America's military pressured it into exacerbating (elevating) the initial problem. An overarching desire for political reforms alongside internal troubles weakened the Soviets. This failure to maintain economic stability led to the collapse of the USSR, effectively ending the Cold War.

Military spending strained economies, intensified tensions, and spurred diplomatic efforts, leading to arms reduction treaties and the end of the Cold War.

Military spending played a significant role in influencing the end of the Cold War. The arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union led to an escalation of military expenditures by both superpowers, placing a strain on their economies. The economic burden of maintaining large military arsenals contributed to economic stagnation and hardship in both countries. Additionally, the arms race intensified international tensions and raised the specter of nuclear conflict, increasing the urgency for diplomatic efforts to reduce military tensions.

As economic pressures mounted and the costs of the arms race became increasingly unsustainable, both the United States and the Soviet Union sought opportunities for diplomatic engagement and arms control agreements. The willingness of political leaders on both sides to negotiate and compromise eventually paved the way for significant arms reduction treaties, such as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which helped to de-escalate military tensions and ultimately contributed to the peaceful resolution of the Cold War. Therefore, military spending influenced the end of the Cold War by highlighting the need for diplomatic solutions and arms control measures to mitigate the risks of nuclear confrontation.

Answer:

The difference between Roosevelt's big stick policy and Wilson’s missionary diplomacy is that Roosevelt designed the policy keeping in mind the importance of Latin America and Wilson's diplomacy was not even ready to recognize Latin America.

Explanation:

While both Roosevelt's Big Stick policy and Wilson’s Missionary Diplomacy aimed to establish the United States as a global player, their methods varied. Roosevelt relied on the legitimate threat of military force to ensure diplomacy, while Wilson aimed to make decisions based on moral obligations, intervening only when necessary.

Both Roosevelt's Big Stick policy and Wilson’s Missionary Diplomacy were approaches to foreign policy, aiming to establish the United States as a global player. They do, however, differ significantly with respect to their guiding principles and methods of implementation. Roosevelt relied on the maxim "speak softly and carry a big stick", using the legitimate threat of military force to ensure diplomacy and negotiate beneficial agreements while keeping the US out of military conflicts. On the other hand, Wilson's Missionary diplomacy policy aimed at intervening only when there was a moral obligation to do so, shaping a foreign policy grounded on ideals of morality rather than self-interest or force. However, circumstances often compelled Wilson to act more conventionally in defense of U.S. interests, and the policy proved hard to enforce consistently.

https://brainly.com/question/14213522

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is:

Racism was used as a tool for both parties.

Explanation:

For Imperialist-Thought that white men were superior and felt especially superior to those who they were trying to conquer.

For Anti-Imperialist-Afraid of diversity and thought that establishing overseas colonies will be a drain on our government and offer few economic or military advantages in return.

Racism was evident in imperialist ideology, where European empires justified colonization through beliefs in racial superiority, and in anti-imperialist viewpoints which sometimes held racist disdain for non-European combatants. This racism impacted military strategies, labor exploitation, and arbitrary border creation, leading to lasting issues in post-colonial states.

Racism played a significant role in both imperialist and anti-imperialist ideologies during the era of European expansion and World War I. Imperialism facilitated the spread of racist ideologies as European powers competed to build overseas empires, often justified by beliefs in racial superiority. European nations, such as the British and the French, favored the pseudo-scientific concept of scientific racism, which posited that some races were innately superior to others. This was displayed during events like the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair, which aimed to show the 'progress' of indigenous people under the control of Western powers. Conversely, anti-imperialist views, while opposing empire-building, sometimes also sprang from a racist disdain for the involvement of non-European combatants in conflicts such as World War I.

The violence labor exploitation and forced imposition of arbitrary borders during colonial rule directly showcased racial discrimination. This not only created immediate suffering but also left a lasting impact on post-colonial nations. Furthermore, during the conflicts such as World War I, racism affected military strategies and the treatment of colonial troops, who were often discriminated against and used as expendable forces. Racism on the Pacific front in World War II between Americans and Japanese was characterized by vicious propaganda and the dehumanization of the enemy, further illustrating how racism permeated military engagement and international relations.

https://brainly.com/question/30997601

#SPJ3