Answer:
The United States had as its first response the solidifying of the records
Explanation:
The United States had as its first response the solidifying of the records of the Japanese in America, the suspension of business exercises and the shipment of provisions, as England did, this would hinder the section of cash and oil from abroad and financially choke out the domain of Japan that would barely have 3 years of supply, on the off chance that it didn't go into war, this irritated the Japanese who might then assault Pearl Harbor and cause the sending of American troops to South Vietnam, taking an interest in a war, that at first, it didn't relate to them.
The way George Washington dealt with the Whiskey Rebellion is significant because he
gave Congress the absolute control in issues over taxation.
allowed the states to determine what was best.
used the power of the Federal government to enforce law.
increased the power of state legislatures to deal with such issues
Answer: used the power of the Federal government to enforce law.
The Whiskey Rebellion was a tax protest in the United States between 1791 and 1794 during the presidency of George Washington. The "whiskey tax" was the first tax imposed by the newly formed federal government, and was intended to generate revenue for the war debt of the Revolutionary War.
Washington responded by sending peace commissioners to negotiate with the rebels, while also calling on governors to enforce the tax. The rebellion was significant because it demonstrated that the new federal government had the will and ability to suppress resistance to its laws.
Explain the reasons political parties disagree about the role and powers of the federal government and issues such as the national bank, tariffs, and federally funded internal improvements from `824-1840
I have a Brainliest help me please
What is an example of social darwinism
Social Darwinism applies 'survival of the fittest' to society and was used to justify the social inequality by assuming that the wealthy were biologically 'fittest.' Herbert Spencer and others popularized it, but it was discredited in the mid-20th century and not supported by Darwin himself.
Social Darwinism is a theory that applies Darwin's principle of 'survival of the fittest' to societal structures, implying that societies evolve with the 'strong' prospering while the 'weak' remain disadvantaged. An example of social Darwinism is the belief that helping the poor or less fortunate goes against the natural order because it hinders the 'natural' competition and evolution of society.
This idea was championed by political philosopher Herbert Spencer and became particularly influential in the late 19th century.
Spencer coined the phrase 'survival of the fittest,' and along with others like William Graham Sumner, argued that societal advancement would occur if those less capable did not receive artificial assistance. This controversial viewpoint suggested that success in society was an indication of biological fitness and was used by the wealthy to justify their position in the social hierarchy.
However, critics argued that opportunities were not evenly distributed, debunking the fairness suggested by social Darwinism.
The prominence of Social Darwinism saw its decline in the mid-20th century, especially as eugenicists misused it to reinforce their racist ideologies.
Darwin himself disagreed with the application of his theory of natural selection to human societies, making it clear that social Darwinism was a distortion of his scientific work.
Which virtues on franklin's list gave him the most trouble?
The virtue of humility gave Benjamin Franklin the most trouble, as it was added to his list later after a friend pointed out his prideful behavior. Franklin believed personal virtues like humility, frugality, and diligence were essential for success and integral to republican virtue. However, his virtues list primarily focused on individual morals and behaviors without fully considering broader societal influences.
The virtues that gave Benjamin Franklin the most trouble were presumably those he later added to his list, such as humility, which was suggested to him by a Quaker friend after Franklin was told that he appeared proud and somewhat insolent in conversation. Franklin's list of virtues, initially containing twelve, was an effort to guide personal behavior towards moral perfection, with the additional thirteenth virtue of humility addressing his own self-recognized failings.
Franklin's acceptance of humility into his virtues reflects the challenging nature of achieving true modesty and meekness, especially for individuals who are accomplished and hold themselves in high regard. The broader question of how Franklin's virtues addressed topics such as the inheritance of wealth versus acquiring it through hard work delves into his belief in the importance of personal virtues like frugality, diligence, and a strong moral compass to achieve success in life.
Franklin's virtues were not exclusively meant for personal development but also served as a foundation for republican virtue. In his view, these virtues supported the idea of a populace capable of self-governance and civic responsibility, which is the backbone of a successful republic. While Franklin focused on individual behaviors and qualities such as sincerity, temperance, and tranquility, he may not have fully addressed the societal factors that could influence a person's ability to live up to these ideals, such as inherited wealth or differing social conditions.
What did napoleon announce on the third sunday after snowball's expulsion?
Which event on the timeline do you think is the most important for jewish history? why?
Answer:
was Israel becoming a nation, the. to mind was, “Why did the first book of Psalms end with chapter 41 instead of chapter 480. Now, you have two consecutive patterns; from 1935 to 1941 and. This timeline effect is not given to us so we can predict the future.
Explanation:
The ________ is the oldest and largest of the african american groups that have fought for equality at the polls, in housing, on the job, in education, and in other facets of american life.
How did Abraham Lincoln’s 10% Plan compare to the Radical Republicans’ plan for Reconstruction?
How did civilians help jews during holocaust in poland?
Describe how napoleon's invasion and conquest of spain in the peninsular war of 1808 triggered the revolutions in latin america
Answer:
In the process of Independence of the Latin American countries, the influence of the wars waged by the army of Napoleon Bonaparte was of vital importance. You can even say that the movements of the French leader's troops in the Iberian Peninsula were one of the triggers of the revolutions in the area.
In 1808, Napoleonic forces invaded Spanish territory and King Ferdinand VII abdicated before the French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. Ferdinand VII was arrested, which generated a power vacuum in the Spanish crown. The invasion and the subsequent power vacuum led Spain to war. This was the Spanish War of Independence.
As a result of all these facts, the people in the Spanish colonies of America, already influenced by the ideas of the French Revolution, began to glimpse that there was a way to suppress colonialism and achieve independence in the long term. In this context, the first government boards appeared in the main Latin American cities. Thanks to these meetings, which initially recognized the royal authority in Ferdinand VII, the beginning of the independence process in the Hispanic colonies was favored.
these were the king that ruled the italian peninsula from 600-265bc
From 616-439 all the rulers in order
Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, Servius Tullius, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus,
Titus Lartius Flavus,
Manius Valerius,
Aulus Postumius Albus Regillensis,
Manius Valerius Maximus,
Gaius Aemilius Mamercus,Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus,
The kings who ruled the Italian peninsula from 600-265BC were primarily the Etruscan and Roman monarchy. The Etruscan kings dominated from 600-509BC. The Roman monarchy lasted from 753-509BC with seven different kings.
Explanation:The rulers of the Italian peninsula from 600-265 BC were mainly the Etruscan kings and the Roman Kings. The Etruscans dominated from 600 to 509BC, and the most famous of these kings was Lucius Tarquinius Superbus. After the end of Etruscan rule, the Roman Republic era began, but before that, Rome was ruled by Roman kings. The Roman Monarchy period, which lasted from 753-509 BC, had seven kings in total, of which the last three were Etruscan. The Roman kings included Romulus, Numa Pompilius, Tullus Hostilius, Ancus Marcius, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, Servius Tullius, and Lucius Tarquinius Superbus.
Learn more about Etruscan and Roman kings here:
https://brainly.com/question/180958
#SPJ3
After 13 years of civil war, who succeeded julius caesar
What contributions did bernardo de galvez make to the american revolution?
In the speech, Lewis referred to a “great father” and “great chief.” Who was this? Why do you think Lewis used these terms?
In the speech, 'the great father' refers to the President of the United States and 'the great chief' refers to respected Native American tribal leaders. Lewis uses these terms to convey respect for positions of power and acknowledge governance systems.
In the speech references, 'the great father' and 'the great chief' likely denote the President of the United States, also known as the Great White Father, and respected leaders among the Native American tribes, respectively. Lewis uses these terms to underscore the significance of the figures in positions of power and to convey a sense of reverence and authority that is culturally significant within Native American communities. Furthermore, these terms serve to acknowledge the system of governance and social hierarchy that is in place, with the 'Great White Father' as a symbol of federal authority and the 'great chief' representing local tribal leadership.
In 1791, the conflict over the bank of the United States led to the foundation of two rival political parties. What where these two parties
Answer:
Diplomatic ties to Great Britain
Explanation:
The Maryland state law involved in the Supreme Court case of McCulloch v. Maryland
Final answer:
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a landmark Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy and recognized implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause. The decision prevented Maryland from taxing the Second Bank of the United States and set precedent for the broad exercise of federal legislative powers.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court case of McCulloch v. Maryland was a foundational case in United States constitutional law that determined the scope of the federal government's legislative powers and the relationship between the federal government and the states. The state of Maryland had placed a prohibitive tax on the Second Bank of the United States, which Maryland wanted to drive out in favor of state-chartered banks. James McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States, refused to pay the tax, leading to a chain of court cases that culminated in the Supreme Court.
Two significant constitutional questions arose from this case:
The legitimacy of Congress chartering a bank, given it was not an enumerated power in the Constitution.
The ability of a state to tax a federal operation.
The Court's decision, delivered by Chief Justice John Marshall, first affirmed that under the Necessary and Proper Clause, Congress had implied powers to create the bank, even if not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. Second, the Supremacy Clause was cited to strike down Maryland's tax, asserting that the states could not tax or impede valid exercises of power by the federal government.
This historic decision in 1819 established the principle of federal supremacy over the states and underscored the breadth of congressional powers through the interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Which example violates this portion of amendment 1
Answer:
D) a governor declares a new state religion
Explanation:
This is against the Free Exercise Clause, where it allows individuals to choose for themselves what religion they shall believe in based on their conscience, but restricts any state or government religion being created or made final, because that would restrict religious freedom. Via Amendment I.
A governor declares a new state religion this example violates this portion of amendment 1. Option (d) is correct.
What do you mean by Portion?"Share" or "an entity cut (or as if cut) away from the total" are common definitions of the word "portion." However, the definition of part is "a vital component of the whole."
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or abridging the freedom of speech, of the press, or the right of the people to congregate in peace and petition the Government for a redress of grievances," states the Constitution.
This is against the Free Exercise Clause, which prevents any state or government religion from being founded or made official since it would limit religious freedom. It lets people to choose for themselves what religion they shall believe in based on their conscience. through Amendment I.
Therefore, Correct option is (d). A governor declares a new state religion
Learn more about Portion, here;
https://brainly.com/question/15228292
#SPJ2
Your question is incomplete, may be your question is;
Which example violates this portion of Amendment I?
(a) A student is allowed to read the Bible in class.
(b) A woman is allowed to hold a religious meeting in a park.
(c) A mayor attends a different church than his employees.
(d) A governor declares a new state religion.
In the early 1800’s the need for a water route help farmers ship their products to market was one reason for the ?
How did fdr's new deal attempt to solve the problems of the great depression?
Answer:
yes yes yes yes tea
Explanation:
get your stuff together
Where did british troops hope to separate new england from the middle states?
What countries coal industries shut down during ww2?
Which early president passed the unpopular alien & sedition acts, which restricted people speaking out against the government and allowed him to deport foreigners?
Answer:
President John Adams
Explanation:
These four laws were passed by congress in 1798. This caused a widespread fear that war with France would break out.
What sparked Lenin's turn toward communism?
A. The lives of peasants
B. The lives of factory workers
C. The killing of his siblings
D. All of the above
What is the central idea of helen keller strike against war?
What geographic features helped make philadelphia and new york centers of trade?
how might the constitution be seen as fulfilling jefferson vision in the declartion
The U.S. Constitution embodies the democratic ideals, belief in the natural rights of all men, and the concept of participatory democracy as envisioned by Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence. Contradictions regarding slavery were recognized but not fully resolved due to political compromises. Finally, the inclusion of mechanisms for constitutional amendments reflects Jefferson's idea of needing flexibility to adapt to changing times.
Explanation:The U.S. Constitution can be seen as fulfilling Thomas Jefferson's vision as expressed in the Declaration of Independence in several ways. First, Jefferson's belief in natural rights, as stated in the Declaration of Independence with the momentous phrase, 'all men are created equal', and are entitled to 'Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness' was embodied in the Constitution and its amendments, despite its imperfect application especially in the context of slavery.
Secondly, Jefferson's vision of a participatory democracy, the belief in majority rule and his trust in the ordinary citizen were in essence reflected in the Constitution's principles. However, it must be pointed out that Jefferson's vision extended primarily to the white male population. Also, although Jefferson recognized the contradictions of his time, such as the coexistence of the fight for liberty and the institution of slavery, practical political compromises were made during the framing of the Constitution.
Lastly, the Constitution includes mechanisms for amendments that resonate with Jefferson's idea of periodic constitutional conventions. This characteristic demonstrates a trust in the people's ability to revise laws as needed, embodying the flexibility Jefferson hoped for.
Learn more about Jefferson and the U.S. Constitution here:https://brainly.com/question/32837031
#SPJ3
the passage of the 17th amendment was the successful fulfillment of which goal of the progressive movement?
A. direct election of U.S. senators
B. restoration of tribal lands to Native American ownership
C. suffrage for woman
D. an end to Jim Crow laws throughout the South
What methods did frederick douglass used to improve american life?
Final answer:
Frederick Douglass used his powerful speaking skills and published his autobiography, 'Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave,' to improve American life by raising awareness about the horrors of slavery and inspiring others to fight for freedom.
Explanation:
Frederick Douglass used various methods to improve American life, particularly in the fight against slavery. One of his key contributions was his powerful speaking skills, which he used to provide public lectures on slavery, electrifying his listeners and raising awareness about the horrors of slavery. He also published his autobiography, 'Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave,' in which he exposed the brutalities of slavery and identified by name the whites who had mistreated him. This book became a powerful tool in the abolitionist movement, spreading awareness and inspiring others to fight for freedom.
does the second amendment allow us to own gun and carry guns regardless of how we use it
Final answer:
The Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own and carry guns, primarily for self-defense within the home, as interpreted in key Supreme Court cases District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010). However, this right is subject to limitations, such as restrictions on felons, the mentally ill, and firearm possession near schools and government buildings.
Explanation:
The interpretation of the Second Amendment has been a subject of controversy and debate. The core of the amendment, as part of the United States Bill of Rights created on December 15, 1791, stipulates, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This has been interpreted in recent significant Supreme Court cases, notably District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010), to protect an individual's right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
However, these rights are not without limitations. The Supreme Court has explicitly mentioned that this right does not extend to felons, the mentally ill, firearm possession near schools and government buildings, or the commercial sale of firearms. Thus, while the Second Amendment does protect the right of individuals to own and carry guns, there are specific legal stipulations on how these rights can be exercised, highlighting that the right is not unlimited or unconditional especially in relation to how firearms are used.