What was a similarity between the united states troops sent to the spanish-american war and the troops sent to fight in world war i?

Answer:

In the early 1950s, Kim Il-sung traveled to Moscow and Beijing to seek support for the impending war. The Soviet Union was heavily involved in the militarization of North Korea and its plans for an offensive against the south. Mao Tse Tung transferred 50,000 People's Liberation Army soldiers along with their armaments to North Korea. Months before the first attacks in the North, the CIA noted a huge military mobilization by the North Korean military, but thought it was only a "defensive measure" and concluded that an invasion was "unlikely."

Under the pretext of retaliating for alleged small incursions of southern soldiers on the border, the North Korean army crossed the 38th parallel border with heavy artillery protection on June 25, 1950. The North Koreans had stated that troops of the South Korean army, under the command of President Syngman Rhee, had crossed the border first and, therefore, they intended to arrest and execute Rhee. The armed forces of both countries had already attacked the border before the war on a small scale.

On June 27, facing a successful initial offensive by northern troops, South Korean President Rhee ordered the evacuation of the capital Seoul. Before fleeing, he ordered what became known as the Bodo Alley Massacres on June 28, where at least 100,000 suspected Communist sympathizers were executed without trial.

Mohandas Gandhi popularly known as "Mahatma" or "Bapu" in Indian subcontinent was a prominent leaders of India who was born in 1869.
When the British imposed tax and made it compulsory for every Indian to buy salt, a basic dietary ingredient in Indian cuisines, Gandhi started a "Civil Disobedience" or as he called it "Satyagraha" by symbolically violating the laws of British Raj and put pressure on the government to repeal the taxation as well as providing with  other facilities. This started in March 1930.

The correct answer to the student's question about Mohandas Gandhi's plan of civil disobedience is A. People should refuse to obey unjust laws nonviolently. This method is marked by peaceful protests, such as the historic Salt March of 1930, and his philosophy that civil disobedience is a duty against a corrupt state.

Mohandas Gandhi, also known as Mahatma Gandhi, was the archetype of nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience. His plan of civil disobedience involved people refusing to obey laws they felt were unjust, without resorting to violence. Gandhi's civil disobedience was a method of protest designed to resist colonial policies through peaceful means such as boycotts, marches, and strikes.

Gandhi encouraged the Indian people to partake in nonviolent actions to reveal the injustices of the British rule. He believed that through persistent and peaceful opposition, India could gain independence, which it eventually did in 1947. His approach not only empowered Indians during their struggle for independence but also inspired civil rights movements around the world, including the African-American civil rights movement in the United States.

Therefore, the correct answer to the student's question is A. People should refuse to obey laws that they felt were unfair, as this encapsulates Gandhi's vision of civil disobedience. His philosophy was rooted in the belief that civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when confronted with a corrupt or lawless state.

Complete question as follows:

What was Mohandas Gandhi’s plan of civil disobedience?

A. People should refuse to obey laws that they felt were unfair.

B. Violent demonstrations were needed in India until the British left.

C. It was best to go along with British laws to avoid making the colonial authorities angry.

D. The best way to change laws was through passing legislation in the Indian National Congress.

The reason why Jefferson begins his speech with points about human rights before having to discuss and address the colonists’ specific grievances is because he wants to prepare in contrast with the rights of which colonists claims to have with relation to the behavior of their king.

Answer:    Jefferson is preparing to contrast the rights that the colonists claim with the kings behavior

Explanation:  For Jefferson to justify the colonists' grievances, he first discussed and outlined the human rights on which the claims were based. If human rights were ignored, the complaints would be unfounded, considering that the behavior of kings was based on divine mandate and absolutism. So human rights needed to be emphasized, and disregard for these rights caused complaints by the colonists, Human rights are derived from the natural rights that are inherent in all human beings, and if they are denied there are legitimate grounds for complaint.

The war started poorly for Britain because they are unfamiliar with the land; that is why they became easy targets for ambush by French troops and Native Americans. The result, they suffered many deaths from the plague and scurvy, and at the hands of France in North America during 1754–55; and in the loss of Menorca in 1756.

The actual senate is about having a council of citizens which has functions in the government with high deliberative compared to the Hamilton’s senate is about having lower quota in each states assigning them to their designated seats without having equality.

Alexander Hamilton’s vision for the Senate, as articulated in his writings and during the Constitutional Convention, differed in several significant ways from the actual structure and function of the Senate as established by the U.S. Constitution. Here are the main differences:

Hamilton's envisioned Senate was intended to be more aristocratic and stable with life terms and significant influence, while the actual Senate features elected representatives with limited terms, ensuring greater accountability and democratic representation.

1. Term Length:

  - Hamilton’s Vision: Hamilton advocated for senators to serve for life, similar to the British House of Lords.

  - Actual Senate: Senators serve six-year terms, with elections staggered so that approximately one-third of the Senate is up for election every two years.

2. Mode of Selection:

  - Hamilton’s Vision: Senators would likely have been appointed, either by state legislatures or some other method that insulated them from direct public influence.

  - Actual Senate: Initially, senators were chosen by state legislatures. The 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, changed this to direct election by the people of each state.

3. Purpose and Role:

  - Hamilton’s Vision: Hamilton saw the Senate as a stabilizing force in government, providing continuity, experience, and a check against populism and the potential excesses of the House of Representatives.

  - Actual Senate: While the Senate does act as a stabilizing force, it is also designed to represent states equally, regardless of population size, balancing the interests of smaller states against larger ones.

4. Aristocratic vs. Democratic Elements:

  - Hamilton’s Vision: Hamilton’s model leaned towards an aristocratic element, where senators would be part of an elite ruling class with significant influence and less susceptibility to popular whims.

  - Actual Senate: The Senate, although originally somewhat insulated from direct democracy, is now directly accountable to voters, ensuring a more democratic process.

5. Size and Representation:

  - Hamilton’s Vision: Specific details about the size were not Hamilton's primary focus, but the emphasis was on a smaller, more exclusive body.

  - Actual Senate: The Constitution established two senators per state, creating a balance between large and small states and ensuring each state’s equal representation.

Summary

Hamilton’s ideal Senate was characterized by life terms, insulation from direct public influence, and a stabilizing, aristocratic role within the government. In contrast, the actual Senate features fixed six-year terms, direct elections, and a design that balances representation between states, ensuring greater democratic accountability.

Expansion through trade and commerce and direct colonization and settlement are the two types of Phoenician expansion. The nature and extent of Phoenician expansion in the Mediterranean is that it is known for trading, posts for trading are established and 300 colonies are also established. They is also known for the Phoenician triangle and North African cost. Phoenicians are also known as the carriers of civilization and they spread Alphabet to the areas all over the Mediterranean.

The issue of building roads and canals historically centered on the debate over the use of federal money for internal improvements, touching upon the constitutionality and economic implications of such projects, and whether they should be publicly or privately managed.

Throughout American history, beginning under Jefferson and continuing notably during the presidencies of Madison and Jackson, there was ongoing controversy about whether it was appropriate to use federal money to build infrastructure. Central to the debate was the constitutionality of federal involvement in internal improvements, as seen with the Bonus Bill backed by Calhoun and Clay, which proposed using revenue from the Second National Bank.

Infrastructure development carried implications for economic growth and urbanization, affecting the costs and time of shipping, the transition to smart cities, and the management of social and environmental externalities. Furthermore, projects like the Erie Canal showcased the partnership between private interests and the state in large-scale infrastructure projects.

Final answer:

The word 'detrimentally' in the context of pesticide use refers to causing harm or damage. Pesticides are meant to control pests but can have harmful effects on health, beneficial organisms, and the environment, and their overuse can lead to ecological challenges.

Explanation:

In the given sentence, "Many people can be detrimentally affected by the use of pesticides on crops to help prevent them from bug infestations," the best definition for the underlined word detrimentally is 'in a way that causes harm or damage.'

Pesticides, which include insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides, are substances intended for controlling pests that damage crops, humans, or other animals. However, while they can prevent bug infestations and protect agricultural production, their use can adversely affect living beings and the environment.

This includes potential harm to human health, non-target species including beneficial insects like honeybees, and risks to ecosystems such as soil diversity, streams, and lakes.

Answer:

D. a political system with all economic and political power resting in the hands of the central government.

Explanation:

I guess the question is referring to the problem when the Puritan "Separatists" reached the Massachusetts Bay in 1620, they did not posses any rights by law nor did they have any kind of established government etc.
They solved this problem with a compact called "Mayflower Compact", which proposed that people can follow a kind of government for the time being. The law will be the law of majority and it was a type of self-government. 

The revolts in the colonies of Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York were mainly triggered by discontent against British control, tussles over Native American land, and divided local populations. These rebellions were largely resolved through suppressive actions, the execution of rebellion leaders, changes in British control measures, and through forums like the Continental Congress which laid the groundwork for American independence.

Between 1660 and 1700, various revolts and rebellions occurred in the colonies of Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York for a variety of reasons. Poor relationships with neighboring Native American tribes and resistance against British control were among the primary causes.

In Virginia, a significant event in 1676 known as Bacon's Rebellion occurred. The rebellion was initiated by Nathaniel Bacon, who was against the governor's policies regarding fair access to Native American land. However, by the end of 1676, those loyal to the governor managed to suppress the rebellion, with several leaders executed and Bacon dying of dysentery.

In the middle colonies, such as Maryland and New York, deeply divided populations with varying degrees of loyalty to Great Britain often clashed, leading to conflicts. Furthermore, British attempts to consolidate control, such as through taxation laws, exacerbate resistance from colonies seeking to maintain their autonomy and incited various rebells.

Massachusetts also experienced its share of revolts, a significant instance being the American Revolution after the passage of the Intolerable Acts in 1774. This led to the creation of extralegal assemblies, laying out plans to resist these Acts. Mechanisms including the First Continental Congress were used to discuss the colonies' response to these acts.

The rebellions were resolved gradually, with consequences for both sides. While some colonies gained more liberties, the hardship of war left many areas divided and in tatters. The British, too, faced consequences, leading to shifts in the perception of colonists and their status within the British Empire.

https://brainly.com/question/30498627

#SPJ12

Answer:

1. The Maya lived in individual city-states, while the Aztec were unified under one leader.

2. a location for governement events,and homes for royal families

Explanation:

I just did this test and got these two answers correct.