Answer:
speaking out against the warprotesting the draftlimiting the production of war-related materials to protest the warThe correct answers are B) speaking out against the war and D) speaking highly of people who work against military recruiting.
During the time of war, Americans should be allowed to speaking out against the war and speaking highly of people who work against military recruiting.
It is understandable that during the time of war the government ask the people to support the war effort although it some times means to limit their freedom of speech and some other inconveniences.
Strategically wise, in those moments of the war, the government pays attention to people that speak out against the war for considering traitors. But the government should listen to what people say because it serves as a means to voice out people's anger and frustration, and that's it, People need a conduit to express what they feel because sometimes is most dangerous to keep the feelings and emotions inside and let hem go through other violent conducts.
description of bleeding kansas
Bleeding Kansas was demonstrative of the gravity of the era's most pressing social issues, from the matter of slavery to the class conflicts emerging on the American frontier. Its severity made national headlines which suggested to the American people that the sectional disputes were unlikely to reach compromise without bloodshed, and it therefore directly presaged the American Civil War. Kansas was admitted to the Union as a free state in January 1861, but partisan violence continued along the Kansas–Missouri border for most of the war. The episode is commemorated with numerous memorials and designated historic sites.
Bleeding Kansas, Bloody Kansas or the Border War was a series of violent civil confrontations in the United States between 1854 and 1861 which emerged from a political and ideological debate over the legality of slavery in the proposed state of Kansas.
the missouri compromise was considered a success because it
Temporarily balanced the interests of the North and South. It couldn't prevent the civil war though.
Answer:temporarily balanced the interests of the north and south
Explanation:
How is an interest group different than a political party? Congress: Select the best answer from the choices provided. A. Interest groups tend not to have a strong stand on social issues. B. Interest groups seek to influence government policy and legislation without being elected. C. Political parties tend to organize around one issue. D. Interest groups are public organizations.
B - Interest groups seek to influence government policy and legislation without being elected
Political parties seek to influence policy and legistation by being elected officials in charge of voting while interest groups want to do the same without being elected officials.
The correct answer is B) Interest groups seek to influence government policy and legislation without being elected.
An interest group is different than a political party in that interest groups seek to influence government policy and legislation without being elected.
Interest groups in the United States are powerful organizations formed by people who have similar interests. These groups have personal agendas and try to influence legislation using Lobbyist to negotiate with congressmen, They could be interested in business, in passing specific legislation, or any issue that needs the approval of government officials. Examples of these kinds of groups are the US Chamber of Commerce or the American Federation of Labor.
Which best describes the living preferences of most Americans during the 1920s?
A) rural life was appealing to most Americans.
B) People we’re leaving farms to look for better wages and opportunities in the city.
C) Small town life was an attractive option for the majority of people.
D) The concept or self-sustained loving was growing more popular.
Good Morning!
The best description for the housing model of the United States during the early twentieth century is that population began to leave the country more often, opting for life in large cities, where they sought better quality of life and better salary.
People were leaving farms to look for better wages and opportunities in the city.
Hugs!
B) people were leaving farms to look for better wages and opportunities in the city
WORTH 65 POINTS
Compare and contrast the ideas of Adam Smith and Karl Marx.
Karl max believed that capitalism will destroy itself while Adam Smith believed to allow individuals to pursue their economic life.
I remember reading about them and I think Adam wanted to allow everyone to pursue their economic life and Karl thought that capitalism will destroy itself. But they both focused on the role of labor in the development of an economy.
how did the whites and indians view one another
When Europeans first landed in the new world, they viewed the Native population as either a threat or a resources but not an equal.
The Native populations viewed the Europeans as a threat, resource, and on equal ground.
The result is history.
The fall of the Tang Dynasty began with _____.
lack of leadership
arguments over religion
fear of invasion
corruption from within
The point that is considered the starting point of the fall of Tang Dynasty is during Emperor Mu Zong reign, around the year of 821-824. He is known for his high-spending, alcoholics habits and as neglectful emperor.
The correct answer is The fall of the Tang Dynasty began with lack of leadership.
Answer: corruption from within
Explanation: As is often the case, the fall of the Tang Dynasty began with the rise of corruption from within. Emperor Xuanzong (712–755) severely neglected his duties; as a result, corrupt officials often ruled in his place. This eventually caused unrest among the population, and rebellions erupted. A series of uprisings followed, one after another, each weakening the empire.
what information did the lewis and clark expedition bring back
Lewis and Clark brought back different species of animals and plants. They were also to keep journals, which is why we know so much about their expedition.
The Lewis and Clark Expedition provided extensive geographical maps, identified new species, established relations with Native American tribes, and reinforced U.S. claims in the West. Their contributions played a significant role in spurring interest and further exploration of the American frontier.
Overview of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Discoveries
The Lewis and Clark Expedition, led by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark from 1804 to 1806, brought back valuable information following their exploration of the newly acquired American West. Among their contributions, they provided detailed geographical knowledge, including accurate maps, of the western territories. They documented and sketched new plant and animal species, engaged with about fifty Native American tribes, and solidified the United States' claims to the Oregon territory. Although they did not find the mythical Northwest Passage, their findings spurred further fur trade and United States' exploration and settlement of the West.
Significant Contributions of the Expedition
The success of the journey inspired both scholars and ordinary citizens, expanding the national interest in western lands and paving the way for future exploration and expansion.
Under the Constitution, the principle of "federalism" is the reason that power and responsibility are A. shared by state and national governments B. divided into three branches of government C. limited to what is listed in the amendments D. granted to the states through amendments
A - shared by state and national governments
Under the Constitution, the principle of federalisim is that power is shared between multiple levels (national, state, etc) to allow citiziens to have their voice heard.
The principle of "federalism" under the Constitution refers to power and responsibility being shared by state and national governments. Therefore, the correct answer to the question is Option A.
Federalism in the United States is a system where the national government and the state governments share power as outlined in the Constitution. The national government is granted specific powers, some of which are listed explicitly in the Constitution as the enumerated powers, implied powers, the power to tax, and the Supremacy Clause. On the other hand, state governments are empowered by the "Reserved Powers Clause." It is a key feature of federalism that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved to the states respectively. This division of power helps to prevent any one entity from gaining too much control and ensures a balance between different levels of government. Additionally, while the Constitution does define three co-equal branches of government (legislative, executive, and judicial) at both the federal and state levels, this separation of powers is distinct from the concept of federalism. Federalism specifically deals with the relationship between the national and state governments, rather than the distribution of powers among different branches within a single level of government.
What was the most likely result of colonial rulers deciding to invest very little in education?
The decision of colonial rulers to invest very little in education is most likely to result in a lack of leaders and workers with the necessary skills.
What took place during the colonial rulers?Environmental degradation, economic instability, ethnic conflict, and human rights violations are all effects of colonialism that can last far beyond the time that one group ruled a region.
There are very likely to be fewer leaders and workers with the necessary skills as a result of colonial rulers' decision to make very little investment in education.
Learn more about the colonial rulers, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/98115
#SPJ2
How can you identify the geography of the Mesoamerican Civilizations? There are THREE of them. Explain what you know about EACH one.
not
a
clue
soz
hun
the mesoamercian civilisation sounds really old
Which of these did not occur as a result of the civil war ?
third one is the answer for me
The Civil War did not immediately end racial discrimination or immediately reunify the nation. The full civil rights for African Americans were not achieved until the mid-20th century, and it took several years of Reconstruction before the Southern states were re-integrated into the Union.
Explanation:The question is asking which events did not occur as a consequence of the Civil War. However, since specific options were not provided, it's challenging to give a precise answer. Still, it's possible to address events that did not happen as a result of the war. For example, the Civil War did not lead to an immediate end of racial discrimination in the United States. Although the war resulted in the emancipation of slaves, full civil rights for African Americans were not achieved until the mid-20th century, during the Civil Rights movement. Also, the war did not lead to an immediate reunification of the nation. It took several years of the Reconstruction period before the Southern states were fully re-integrated into the Union.
Learn more about Civil War here:https://brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ2
The main idea of globalization is that A-the economy of the United States dominates the rest of the world. B-the economies of other countries dominate the United States. C-the economies of the nations of the world are independent. D- the economies of the nations of the world are closely linked
Hello there!
Your answer would be D). the economies of the nations of the world are closely linked
The idea of "globalization" is another world for global, meaning the whole world. Globalization has helped out the different nations in the world to be independent and peaceful. The whole world under globalization will be "linked" together, or connected. The idea of globalization was to get all of the nations around the world linked. This "linking" could be helpful among nations by trading. Since the nations are closely linked because of globalization, it far off easier to trade. In other words, globalization has helped nations financially. This idea of globalization would be known as a phenomenon now. This changed the way nations reacted and communicated with other nations, from economical, to industrial, and financially.
Answer:
the economies of the nations of the world are closely linked.
Explanation:
Place in order from oldest to most recent
Details please, what are they
Answer:
is it the Mesozoic era, Cenozioc era, palezoic era????
Explanation:
i forget the 4th one but i hope this helps :)
Which statement best describes the election of 2008?
Answer:
D. Voter turnout was high because Americans knew important decisions had to be made.
Explanation: did it on edge 2020
Voter turnout was high because Americans knew important decisions had to be made is statement best describes the election of 2008. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What is election?The systematic process of selecting a candidate to be their political leader or representative in government through voting is known as “election.” If a candidate is elected, his duty in office will be to the economy. The election is to decided who is to win the election. The totally dependent of the citizen choice as the to give the vote.
Obama became the third senator from the US to be elected president while also becoming the first African American to hold the office. It is the first time a significant political party has put an African American up for president.
As a result, the significance of the statement best describes the election of 2008 are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on election, here;
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ2
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
Which statement best describes the election of 2008?
A. Voter turnout was low because neither candidate excited the public
B. Voter turnout was low because the country was prosperous and secure.
C. Voter turnout was high because Americans wanted to show approval for the government
D. Voter turnout was high because Americans knew important decisions had to be made.
Which statements accuataly describe the American civil war
It was a war that was not needed and many lives and dallors were lost
Which two statements about the Cold War are true?
These two statements underscore the central dynamics of the Cold War, highlighting the ideological struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union and the intense militarization and nuclear brinkmanship that characterized their rivalry.
Two true statements about the Cold War are:
1. Ideological Conflict: The Cold War was characterized by a profound ideological conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. The two superpowers espoused contrasting political and economic ideologies, with the United States championing democracy, capitalism, and individual freedoms, while the Soviet Union promoted communism, centralized planning, and state control. This ideological divide fueled tensions between the two blocs and shaped their foreign policies, leading to a global struggle for influence and dominance.
2. Arms Race: One of the defining features of the Cold War was the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union. Both superpowers engaged in a relentless competition to develop and stockpile nuclear weapons, leading to a dangerous escalation of military capabilities and the proliferation of nuclear arsenals. The arms race heightened fears of a catastrophic nuclear conflict and fueled a climate of mutual suspicion and mistrust between the two adversaries. This arms race also had significant implications for global security and stability, as the threat of nuclear annihilation loomed large over international relations throughout the Cold War era.
What caused the Seminole Indians to resist the US in the Seminole wars?
What caused the Seminole Indians to resist the U.S. in the Seminole wars?
The Seminole Indians resisted the U.S. in the Seminole wars because they wanted to stay in their land and didn't want to lose all their shelter, supplies, basic needs for living etc. Not just that, but also they were kicked out of their land multiple times.
_____________________________________________________
In the first Seminole War, Andrew Jackson and his troops captured Natives. They then attacked Spanish Florida and defeated them. A treaty was signed, called the Adams-Onís Treaty. This gave the U.S. East Florida while the Seminoles got Texas.
_____________________________________________________
The Indian Removal Act was passed in 1830 by the Congress. Andrew Jackson wanted the Seminole Indians' land for farming so the act was passed to give farmers more space for farming. The act was passed to move Indians to present-day Oklahoma.
The Choctaw were the first to be sent to the Indian Territory. The Mississippi legislature destroyed the Choctaw government and then forced their leaders to sign the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek. This treaty gave more than 7.5 million acres of their land to the states. The Choctaw were forced to travel on a cold winter, where ,most of them died.
The Cherokee tried to avoid conflicts and removal by adopting American customs. They made schools for Cherokee children to read and write. They also developed their own government after the U.S. Constitution with an election system, court system, and a bicameral council. The adoption of American culture did not help. Georgia's leaders became prepared to remove them. In response, they sued the state. They even had their own case, known as Worcester vs. Georgia, which stated that only the federal government had the power over Natives. However, Georgia ignored this and removed them. Their awful journey was known as The Trail of Tears, where one fourth of them died.
Other Natives also resisted U.S. troops. Chief Black Hawk, leader of the Fox and Sauk Indians, led his people to protect their land in Illinois. In 1832, they were running out of food and shelter and were forced to leave.
In Florida, leaders were forced to sign a removal treaty but they ignored it. Leader Osceola told his people to resist, which led to the 2nd Seminole War. He was captured and died in prison. His people continued fighting and some died. U.S. officials decided to give up and stop fighting, so small groups of Seminoles stayed there.
Final answer:
The Seminole Indians resisted removal in the Seminole Wars due to forced agreements with the US, leading to key conflicts like the Dade Massacre. Under leaders like Osceola, they used guerilla tactics, with some Seminoles ultimately remaining in the Everglades. The resistance was influenced by Black Seminoles, showcasing their determination to protect their lands and way of life.
Explanation:
The Seminole Indians resisted the US in the Seminole Wars for several reasons, with the primary cause being the US government's efforts to remove them from their lands in Florida to Indian Territory, as part of a broader policy of Indian Removal. Leaders of the Seminoles renounced agreements with the US government, claiming they had been coerced into signing them.
A significant turning point was the Dade Massacre in December 1835, which ignited the Second Seminole War, followed by the Third Seminole War. The Seminoles, under leaders like Osceola, employed guerilla tactics against US forces. The resistance was partly successful; while about 4,000 Seminoles were forcibly removed, 100 to 400 remained in the Everglades.
This series of conflicts was costly for the United States, both financially and in terms of human lives, and illustrates the determination of the Seminole people to resist displacement and protect their way of life. Another dimension of the Seminole resistance was the role of Black Seminoles, who were escaped slaves or freemen that had intermarried with or were adopted by the Seminole tribe, significantly impacting the tribe's war efforts and diplomatic relations.
What was the very important and necessary task that lay ahead for the disciples?
telling the world the lord had come
Answer: telling the people of the world that God has come.
what did north africa possess that the rest of europe didnt?
I would personally say that the abundance of raw materials in Africa, like oil, ivory, rubber, palm oil, wood, cotton and gum is what Africa possessed and Europe didn't. While the European countries didn't necessarily not have the materials, North Africa had an abundance of them. What pushed the European countries to colonize North Africa was due to the countries' being in an economic depression and the emergence of the Industrial revolution. One final thing is that Britain and France were locked into a rivalry after the 100 years war, which opened up competition between not only these countries, but the rest of Europe as well.
Sorry if the answer is a little long and confusing, but I hope this helped either way! Feel free to message me if you need more help or have any questions! (:
Which best describes the voting rights act of 1965
I don't see any options or anything, but I can tell you that the act made it possible for everyone of all color to vote. Signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson.
hope this helps
Answer:
It protected voting rights for all Americans by taking away qualifications.
Explanation:
The “Voting Rights Act” enforced in the United States in 1965was a federal law representing several provisions to regulate affair elections in the realm.
HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IT COULD MAKE OR BREAK ME! First step: Select two different groups that have faced discrimination in our country’s history. If you are having trouble thinking of groups who have faced discrimination I would suggest going with African Americans, women, Native Americans, Asian Americans, or other immigrants
Second step: For each of group that you picked above, you need to describe how they have been discriminated against. This can be one big paragraph, or divide it into two smaller paragraphs with one for each group.
Third step: Describe how our government took actions that either protected or limited the rights of each group. Provide specific examples of government actions such as court cases, laws, or other actions (8 points). *
Last step (you are almost there!): Tell me how you feel about these governmental actions
In our country's past, African Americans and Asian Americans have been harshly discriminated against! African Americans were forced to use separated facilities and was justified by the Plessy v. Ferguson case. This case claimed that this would make things "separate but equal." However, things were far from equal. Black schools were worn down and usually a single room in a building. Most black children couldn't read or write well and even the adults weren't properly educated! This lead to whites creating literacy tests that had to be passed in order for people (men) to vote. They created these tests to be on such an educational level that no black man could vote because they weren't as educated as white. These cruel, restricting, and unfair laws and rules continued on for years. The blacks suffered long and hard for every right and freedom they have today. America made a grave mistake to do such to a people just because they're different.
During WW II, when American was fighting against Japan among other nations, America incarcerated thousands of Japanese Americans. These Asian Americans were welcomed into the country willingly as a cheaper source of labor, but soon they were discriminated against. They were seen as a threat, during war against their home country especially, and thrown in massive concentration camps. Laws were passed such as the Miners Tax in 1850 that forced foreign miners in California to pay $20 a month to the government. Another law forced every Chinese immigrant entering into Californian ports to pay a $50 tax. This meant if a family of four came into the ports, they were wrongly forced to pay $200 to the government within three days! This was extremely unfair because they just left their lives behind to enter into a country with greater opportunity than their home country and now have to pay $50 for everyone of them that enters.
Hope this helps! :)
What religion helped to unite the people of Europe during the Middle Ages?
It was mostly Christianity that helped to unite the people of Europe during the Middle Ages, but it should be noted that this was also a very divisive and oftentimes violent religion as well.
¨If the drug effort were failing there would be no violence.¨ What is your reaction to this statement by senior U.S official?
Correlation is not causation is my immediate reaction.
To be more in depth, this is a silly oversimplification that ignores increased use of drugs and the general problems that go along with the war on drugs.
The senior U.S official's statement about violence being an indicator of the drug effort's success is challenged by reports suggesting the contrary. The war on drugs is increasingly viewed as ineffective, costly, and harmful, with experts advocating for reform towards decriminalization and focusing on treatment rather than punishment.
The statement by the senior U.S official suggests a perspective that violence is an indicator of the failure of the drug effort. However, the claim that 'If the drug effort were failing there would be no violence' is not supported by the evidence provided. A report by the Global Commission on Drug Policy underscores that the war on drugs has indeed failed and advocates for a radical shift in policies including decriminalization and legalization of certain drugs.
The 'War on Drugs' has been costly both in monetary terms, with a trillion dollars spent, and in human terms, impacting lives through deaths and incarceration. It has also had unintended consequences on community safety by contributing to jail and prison overcrowding. Violence in the illegal drug trade persists due to various factors including prohibition itself, which can escalate violence by fostering a criminal market. Instead of criminalizing drug use, reorienting policy towards treatment and social services could be a beneficial alternative.
What is the name given to a group that shares political beliefs about government and supports its members in elections? Candidates Political party Media Special interests
Correct answer: Political party
Explanation: A political party is a coalition of people with similar political beliefs that work to elect its members to various political offices.
Answer:
A group that shares political beliefs about government and supports its members in elections is a political party.
Explanation:
A political party is an organization aimed at gaining influence on government policy in a specific geographical area through participation in elections.
A political party is formed by people who agree on a number of political principles, although there are few parties where all members agree on all principles.
How did European countries interact with there African colonies after world war 1
They relied more heavily on African colonies to provide resources to help Europe rebuild.
The correct answer is C) They relied more heavily on African colonies to provide resources to help Europe rebuild.
European countries interacted with their African colonies after world war 1 in that they relied more heavily on African colonies to provide resources to help Europe rebuild.
After World War 1, most of the European countries that participated in the armed conflict suffered so much damage. Many cities and countries were destroyed. After the signing of the Versailles Treaty, Germany was forced to pay for all the damage that they created. Meanwhile, the European countries that had colonies in Africa knew that the raw materials and natural resources of these regions were very important to supply and satisfy some necessities in Europe, so the relationship became more interactive due to the benefits for the reconstruction.
The other options of the question were A) They started conflicts between African colonies to test new weapons and equipment. B) They ignored African colonies and focused entirely on preventing another European war, and D) They offered independence to any African colony that agreed to provide Europe with free laborers.
how did the british interfere with u s trade
So basically the British didn't want us to trade with the French. Then the French didn't want us to trade with the French. The British being extra decided to imprison our sailor if they found French goods in our ships. Then Thomas Jefferson decided to start the Embargo Act which instead of helping the problem it started a disastrous war.
How much national debt did Texas acquire after the Texas Revolution?
The results of the Mexican War brought Texas into serious conflict with the national government over the state's claim to a large portion of New Mexico.By this time New Mexico and all other lands ceded to the United States by Mexico had become embroiled in the slavery controversy.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!! XD
The correct answer is d. Texas acquired approximately $1.25 million dollars in national debt after the Texas Revolution.
Following the Texas Revolution, the Republic of Texas inherited a debt of $1.25 million from the provisional and ad interim governments. This financial burden was not actively acquired but passed down to the newly formed nation. The debt stemmed from financing military efforts and establishing governmental functions during the revolutionary period. Consequently, the $1.25 million debt played a significant role in shaping Texas's economic policies and interactions with other nations as it sought stability and recognition in the aftermath of independence.
The incorrect options are a, b and c.
a. 8 million dollars: This option overstates the amount of debt acquired by Texas after the Texas Revolution. The actual inherited debt was $1.25 million, significantly lower than $8 million.
b. 2 million dollars: Similar to option (a), this choice exaggerates the debt acquired by Texas after the Texas Revolution. The actual inherited debt was $1.25 million, not $2 million.
c. 4.25 million dollars: This option still overestimates the debt acquired by Texas. The correct figure for the inherited debt was $1.25 million, not $4.25 million.
The complete question is
How much national debt did Texas acquire after the Texas Revolution?
a. 8 million dollars
b. 2 million dollars
c. 4.25 million dollars
d. 1.25 million dollars.
How did 80's music impact US History?
Answer:
The 80's music was a reflection of all the frustration built up the crisis Americans had to face for the past two decades. This changed their perception about everything revolving around life.
Explanation:
Americans had gone through multiple wars and extreme political measures had to be taken. United states was going through political, social, educational and individual reforms.
Everyone just looked out for themselves. They were just tired of the struggles they had to face. They were not making any money, even if they did make money, they were losing it faster. Struggles did not pay them.
1980s music, through innovations like MTV and the Walkman, significantly impacted US history by transforming how music was consumed and produced, elevating music videos to a critical form of expression, and giving rise to hip-hop as a voice for social commentary and change.
Explanation:1980s music had a profound impact on US history, reflecting and shaping societal changes. The decade witnessed technical innovations like the compact disc and the Walkman, revolutionizing how people experienced music. Music videos, especially through MTV, became a dominant way for artists to reach their audience, with stars like Madonna, Prince, and Michael Jackson leading the way.
MTV not only fragmented television viewership but also provided a platform for artists to push the boundaries of music and its visual representation. It faced criticism for supposedly corrupting youth with its content, yet it underscored the era's trend of music intertwined with visual media. The era also saw the rise of hip-hop, emerging from the streets to become a powerful voice for addressing social issues, including racism.
Music in the 80s went beyond entertainment, serving as a vehicle for political expression and social change. It reflected a broadening of American culture, fusing different genres and bringing issues like LGBT+ rights, racial equality, and freedom of expression to the forefront.
In 1922, Lenin and the Communist party formally created a state known as the ______, with ____ or by the initials_____.
France & Great Britain
The only major European democracies left by 1939 were _________ and ___________;
dictatorial
some states fell to _________ regimes, which wanted total control of their citizens.
fascism, states, individual
Benito Mussolini's political philosophy of ___________ glorifies the _______ above the _____________ and emphasizes the need for a strong central government.
police, the media
To control the Italian people, Mussolini gave the secret _______ unrestricted authority and used ______________ to spread propaganda
Politburo, Leon Trotsky
After Lenin died, a struggle began among the seven members of the _____________, with _______________ advocating for rapid industrialization and the end of the NEP.
Stalin, Bolsheviks, plans
Communist Party general secretary _______ removed the ____________ from power, ended the NEP, and launched the first of several ______ for industrialization.
Czechozlavakia, democracy
Among the many regimes that arose in Eastern Europe after World War I, only ____________________, which had a large middle class, a liberal tradition, and a strong industrial base, maintained its political _____________.
Fransisco Franco, dictatorship
In Spain, ______________ led revolt against the democratic government and created a military ______________ that favored large landowners, businesspeople, and the clergy.
dictatorship, a totalitarian regime
Franco's regime is an example of _____________ rule rather than ___________________, because it did not attempt to control the everyday lives of its people.
famine, New Economic Policy (NEP)
After the Communist program was undermined by shortages caused by food hoarding and a severe _________, Lenin abandoned war communism in favor of his _____________.
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, USSR
In 1922, Lenin and the Communist party formally created a states known as the _________ or by the initials _________.
In 1922, Lenin and the Communist party formally created a state known as the Union of Soviet , with Socialist Republics or by the initials USSR.
What did Lenin advocated?Vladimir Lenin, a Russian Marxist revolutionary, invented Leninism, a political ideology that calls for the proletariat dictatorship to be led by a revolutionary vanguard party as a political prelude to communism.
Vladimir Lenin, also known as Vladimir Ilich Lenin, was the founder of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks), the inspiration and leader of the Bolshevik Revolution (1917), and the architect, builder, and first head of the Soviet state (1917–24). His original name was Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov. He was the posthumous source of "Leninism," the doctrine codified and combined with Karl Marx's works by Lenin's successors to form Marxism-Leninism, which became the Communist worldview. He was also the founder of the organization known as Comintern.
Learn more about Leninism here:
https://brainly.com/question/32059933
#SPJ2