What percentage of the american population makes up the power elite?

Spanish colonies had a Colonial Caste System that was designed mainly to maintain power, the caste system was based on race and was very complex. It was imposed by the Spanish government. The three main races were the Peninsulares, the Native Indians and the African Negros, there were also other castes of mixed races.

The Gauchapines were the Peninsulares that were born in Europe, they were considered socially superior, the others were socially and legally inferior to them. The castes were based in a race which meant that no one could move from one caste to another.

This strict structure contributed to the social unrest and the calls for independence since people wanted the same rights and were tired of people naming themselves better than others.

Class divisions are often a reason for social unrest. This is because dividing society in classes, castes or other type of groups can create resentment among those in the lower classes, as they might believe that the upper classes unfairly benefit from some unearned privilege.

This was the case in the Spanish colonies. The colonies were interested in independence partly due to the differences that the Spanish created within society. While the Spanish Peninsulares had all political control and most of the wealth of the colonies, other groups such as the criollos, mestizos, mulatos, negros and indigenas were left out of politics with very few rights and liberties.

Final answer:

Absolute monarchy is a form of government in which a single monarch has complete authority over state affairs. Louis XIV of France is an example of a historical absolute monarch, while Oman represents a modern example. Absolute monarchs have the power to create laws, formulate foreign policy, and impose taxes without needing to share power or seek consent.

Explanation:

Absolute monarchy is a form of government where the monarch has absolute or unmitigated power over their state. This form of rule has existed since ancient times and continues in various forms to the present day. Historically, one of the most renowned absolute monarchs was Louis XIV of France. His reign, beginning in 1643, is often cited as the epitome of absolute monarchical power, as he centralized authority and reduced the power of the nobility.

In contrast to historical European absolute monarchies, some modern examples can be found in the Middle East and Africa. For instance, Oman can be considered an absolute monarchy, where Sultan Qaboos bin Said Al Said ruled since the 1970s until his death in January 2020.

While some absolute monarchs throughout history have successfully centralized power and governance, others have imposed oppressive or unfair policies based on their unchecked power. Absolute monarchs often weaken the power of nobles and other political figures to maintain their authority, exercising complete control over laws, foreign policies, justice, and taxation without the need to share power or seek consent.

Question:

How did the Egyptians view the rising and setting of the sun? Good question here is my answer.

Answer:    

    They have believed that the god of Re controlled the sun. They believed that Re had made this world that they lived on. Also they would believe that he had made all life. For the rising and setting of the sun they believed that the Re would rise in the morning and die when the sunset came. I hope that you have enjoyed my reasoning for How did the Egyptians view the rising and setting of the sun?

The answer is True!

Answer:

it is true

Explanation:

Final answer:

The relative autonomy of slaves in the South Carolina Low Country was due to the agricultural expertise they brought from West Africa for rice cultivation, and the economic dependence of plantation owners on their skilled labor. Planters' enforcement of slave codes was also sometimes relaxed due to their reliance on goods provided by slaves, though the overall system severely limited slaves' freedoms.

Explanation:

The relative autonomy of slaves in the South Carolina Low Country can be largely attributed to the region’s strong reliance on African labor for the cultivation and processing of rice and indigo. Slaves in the area, many of whom came from regions in West Africa with preexisting knowledge of rice culture, were essential for the success of these plantations. Due to their expertise, they experienced instances of autonomy as they engaged in work that required specialized agricultural and technological skills.

Moreover, the growing number of enslaved Africans led to a Black majority by 1715, and the enforcement of restrictive laws was not always straightforward, largely due to the planters' dependence on the goods and services provided by the enslaved population. The plantation economy of the Low Country produced great wealth for white owners, which in turn created a complex dynamic where economic interests sometimes moderated the harsh application of the slave codes derived from earlier Barbados precedents.

However, it is important to note that 'autonomy' within this context is relative and with strict limitations, as slaves were still living under a system that reduced them to property and curtailed their freedoms significantly.

it was the iconic duo lewis and clark

Meriwether Lewis and William Clark

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                                   hope this helps!

Christian mission aims to form a viable indigenous church-planting movement in many countries around the world. One of the Christian missionaries is the European Missionaries who sought to encourage native dance and song, but only in Christian festivals while amazed at the achievements and complexities of the Inca and Aztec empires.

the correct answer is A

Answer:    D. To combat internalized racism

Explanation:  This statement that color diversity makes the world more beautiful certainly does not contribute to halting or ending diversity. On the contrary, it contributes to the diversity of color and race, and contributes to the fight against growing internalized racism. It also does not contribute to the supremacy of one race, which is the same as racism.

If color diversity is something that makes the world more beautiful, then applying that attitude and acting is in favor of stopping racism, not in favor of ending diversity.

Explanation:

White supremacy or white supremacism is racism action and ideology which states that white people (from Europe and America) are more superior than other people. This ideology has been around since the 17th century, white people start to do colonialism and oppression of other people especially negro people (from Africa) and Asia people. This issue has many contentions in the 20th century, so that happen resistances from Asians which was colonized by white people up to decades, they fought in physic war and diplomacy. In Africa, there's also contention from African or known as Anti Apartheid. Apartheid is a political system and racism introduced by White people in America to separate the position of white people and Africans, anti-apartheid was introduced by Nelson Mandela as a President of South Africa in the middle of the 20th century. He really against the Apartheid and fighting for the rights and position of his people, so that Apartheid is officially abolished in South Africa in 1993. But in the 21st century, racism is happening again under the government of  Donald Trump as a President of the United States of America. Donald Trump restricts immigrants from entering his country and provides specific treatment for these immigrants not just from African but also from Asia, with this happening so that happen again the new racism in the United States.

Learn More:

What is white supremacy? A hole paragraph. brainly.in/question/6633856

What is meant by white supremacy in very short? brainly.in/question/10911954

what is the white supremacy group called urgent please!!! brainly.com/question/12115329

Answer Details

Subject: History

Chapter: History of America

Grade: College

Keyword: what is white supremacy?, how white supremacy went mainstream in the US?, what is white supremacy in America?

The white supremacy movement promoted inflammatory articles published by newspapers, increased violence attacks against African american and thousand of people, mostly black people were killed as a result of violence.

The white supremacy movement are of the believe that white identity should be the principles of countries that have its major population as whites.

The white supremacist are clamoring for policies that would check the declines of the white majority.

some of the priority of the white supremacy is to end the migration of blacks people without regard to their status (whether legal or illegal).

The supremacist want an end to multiculturalism and miscegenation. They want the white idea preserved.

The white supremacy movement want an America without any law that backs the black or other non white citizens. They are against the civil right acts and the immigration and national act. Both pieces of legislation protect the right of the citizens, including the African american and others.

The white supremacist actually see this legislation as policy that is against the white people. They cited it as harbingers of white dispossession. They also considered the law as a genocide against the white majority.

The white supremacist movement proposed an ethnostates, a sovereign state whereby its citizens would be limited only to white people.

LEARN MORE:

KEYWORDS:

Cape Bojador --- Prince Henry of Portugal

-The first known European navigator who managed to overtake Cape Bojador was the Portuguese sailor Gil Eanes in 1434, on his fifteenth expedition, under the auspices of Prince Henry of Portugal. The disappearance of many European ships that sailed in the area had led to myths such as the existence of marine monsters and the impossibility of passing Cape Bojador to the south.

Newfoundland and Labrador in Canada --- Henry VIII of England

-King Henry VII financed the expedition of John Cabot, looking for opportunities to trade with the islands of spices. Cabot's idea was to reach Asia by sailing west across the North Atlantic. He estimated that this route should be shorter and faster than the one newly discovered by Columbus. Finally, Cabot's expedition discovered Newfoundland and Labrador.

Hispaniola and the Caribbean --- Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain

-Funded by the Catholic Kings of Spain, Christopher Columbus explored the area, during his first trip to America in 1492. On his arrival in Hispaniola, he founded the fort La Navidad on the north coast of present-day Haiti. Upon his return, the following year, following the destruction of the fort, Columbus quickly founded a second settlement further east, in the current Dominican Republic, La Isabela, which was the first permanent European settlement in America.

St. Lawrence River in Canada --- King Francis I of France

-In 1534, the Malouin Jacques Cartier officially took possession of the lands of the St. Lawrence River in the name of King Francis I of France. Cartier is generally considered to be the discoverer of the St. Lawrence Valley.

Cape Bojador --- Prince Henry of Portugal

Newfoundland and Labrador in Canada --- Henry VIII of England

Hispaniola and the Caribbean --- Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain

St. Lawrence River in Canada --- King Francis I of France

The correct answer is D) France, and other countries went to war against Britain.

After the battle of Saratoga, France recognized the United States as a nation. This helped the war effort in that France, and other countries went to war against Britain.

The Battle of Saratoga was held on September 19, 1777, and October 7, 1777, in Saratoga, New York. The Americans defeated the British Army in these important battles during the American Revolutionary War. English General Burgoyne surrendered its troops on October 17. After the American victory, King Louis XVI of France established negotiation with the American side to form the Franco-American Alliance and France went into war against England.

The passage tells about the poor economic condition of Rocco when he lived in orphanage where all the boys dressed alike and were taken care by some nuns. All the boys would beg every morning and Grandpa took all their money. Rocco got frightened when he heard him the old man talking to someone else and asking the price to make Rocco a cripple. Eventually he found a job as fishermen and a priest taught him how read and write as well duties to church. After that he made some money and traveled to USA.

An increase in immigration would result in economic growth and assimilation into the existing labor force, potentially affecting wages depending on the skill level and number of immigrants. Over time, this would be akin to a slight population increase, with immigrants contributing to both job creation and consumption.

If a great wave of immigration increased employment in the United States, it would have significant effects on the labor markets. Immigrants would not only bring diversity in skills and talent, but would also contribute to the economic growth through increased production and consumption. This scenario resembles a situation where the population has simply increased marginally, with effects over time being an expansion in the range of jobs performed, income earned, taxes paid, and public services demanded.

Moreover, if the immigrants match the U.S. population in terms of age range, education, skill levels, family size, and occupations, the overall impact would be relatively smooth assimilation into the economy. However, immigration does lead to an increase in the labor force, potentially impacting wage levels if the immigrants are largely of the same labor type and in significant numbers. Specifically, if the United States allows a larger number of highly skilled workers, it could potentially affect the average wages of existing highly skilled employees, depending on the balance of supply and demand.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

What you can learn from Lodge's speech about the various responses of senators to the treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations is that the hearings in the US Senate that lasted almost six months and were presided by Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, did not favor the Treaty of Paris, neither the US integration into the League of Nations. Many Senators opposed both, and they convinced other senators to disapprove of both measures. Wilson tried to convince the American people but he suffered a stroke. Finally, the vote in Congress was a "no" for the US integration into the League of Nations.

A. Be aware of negative wording