Answer:
The book showed that Sinclair believed reform was necessary. Also that it was intended to show the world the effects of labor on workers and their families. And it was intended to inspire and motivate people to act.
Explanation:
What do you think was Sinclair’s purpose in writing this novel about Jurgis’s life? Do you think he was trying to influence social reform? Describe your answer in at least three sentences.
*Did your answer include these ideas? *
The book shows that Sinclair believed reform was necessary.
The book is intended to show the world the effects of labor on workers and their families.
The book is intended to inspire and motivate people to act.
Near the fall of Rome, why were Roman coins being used less
What factors increased wealth in the Islamic Empire?
Which leader was undecided about the invading spaniards being Gods or men
Answer: Moctezuma II, ruler of the Aztecs, may have thought the invading Spaniards to be gods.
Moctezuma showed indecision in the ways that he reacted to the invasion of Mexica (what the Aztecs called their territory). It's quite possible he was simply unsure of the Spaniards' intent -- whether they were a threat or not. But in a letter that the Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés sent to the Spanish king Charles V, Cortés suggested that Moctezuma believed that he (Cortés) could be the exiled god of the wind and sky, Quetzalcoatl, coming back to reclaim his territory. The "Florentine Codex," a 16th-century writing by Bernardino de Sahagún (a Spanish monk of the Franciscan order) repeated the idea that Moctezuma thought the Spaniards perhaps were gods.
What is an advantage of a savings account?
The money is available for an emergency
The money can double or triple in a short period of time
The account is riskier that investing in stocks
All of the above
Answer:
The money is available for an emergency
Explanation:
The money won't double quickly in a savings account and it is not risky at all. A savings account is exactly as the name says, for savings. It is meant for you to separate a money that will be kept aside at low interest for you to use in the future when the money is needed.
Why did the British begin to win the war after 1758
Who pioneered the use of guerilla warfare to defeat the spanish in south America
A Eva Peron
B Simon Bolivar
C Jose de San Martin
D Atahualpa
The correct answer is option (b).Simon Bolivar pioneered the use of guerilla warfare to defeat the spanish in south America .
The use of guerrilla warfare to defeat the Spanish in South America was pioneered by Simon Bolivar and his fellow revolutionaries during the Latin American wars of independence.
A. Eva Peron:
This is incorrect. Eva Peron, also known as Evita, was the First Lady of Argentina and a political leader and social reformer in the mid-20th century. She was not involved in the wars of independence in South America.B.Simon Bolivar:
This is the correct answer. Simon Bolivar, also known as "El Libertador," played a key role in the independence movements in several South American countries, including Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia.C. Jose de San Martin:
While Jose de San Martin was also a prominent leader in the South American wars of independence and played a crucial role in liberating Argentina, Chile, and Peru, he is not specifically noted for pioneering guerrilla warfare.D.Atahualpa:
This is incorrect. Atahualpa was the last Incan emperor before the Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire in the 16th century. He was captured and executed by the Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro.The city of Savannah was founded by the British in 1733. Which number represents Savannah?
Answer:
answer is c
Explanation:
Answer:
c
Explanation:
What are the improvements in the production of food in the 1970s called?
The Green Revolution
The Agricultural Revolution
The Food Revolution
The Rice Revolution
wrong answers will be reported....
Answer:
The Correct Answer is "The Green Revolution"
Explanation:
The Green Revolution, or Third Agricultural Revolution, is a collection of investigation technology shift drives happening among the 50s and the new 60s, that boosted agrarian stock globally, especially in the developing society, starting most considerably in the late 60s.Green revolution applies to the initiation of High yielding variety (HYV) of seeds and expanded use of fertilizer and spraying methods.Explain the relationship between the three branches of government.
The three branches of government are the executive, the legislative, and the judicial branch.
What are the relationship between the three branches of government?To guarantee a detachment of abilities, the U.S. National Government is comprised of three branches: legislative, executive and judicial.
To guarantee the public authority is successful and residents' privileges are secured, each branch has its own abilities and obligations, incorporating working with different branches. The legislative branch is comprised of the House and Senate, referred to on the whole as the Congress. Among different powers, the legislative branch makes all regulations, pronounces war, directs highway and unfamiliar business and controls burdening and spending arrangements.
The executive branch comprises of the President, their consultants and different divisions and organizations. This branch is answerable for upholding the rules that everyone must follow. The judicial branch comprises of the U.S. High Court and the Federal Judicial Center. As per the Constitution judicial Power of the United States, will be vested in one high Court, and in such sub-par Courts as the Congress may now and again appoint and lay out.
Therefore executive, the legislative, and the judicial are three branches of government.
Learn more about Government here:
brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ2
Decisions made by societies of the past often cause modern problems.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
T
F
What arrangement did President Madison make with France to stop the seizing ships?
A. To be its ally in a war against Britain
B. To build ships for sale to France
C. To trade with France but not with Britain
D. To help it regain control of the West Indies
C. trading with France but not with Britain. Is Correct Option.
President Madison made an arrangement with France to stop the seizing ships by trading with France but not with Britain.
Explanation:President Madison made an arrangement with France to stop the seizing ships by C. trading with France but not with Britain.
This arrangement was known as the Non-Intercourse Act of 1809, which lifted the embargo on both Britain and France but banned American trade with either country if the other country agreed to cease their trade restrictions on American ships.
Learn more about Non-Intercourse Act of 1809 here:https://brainly.com/question/18282292
#SPJ2
Throughout European history, Jews were forced to lived in segregated communities called
What Muslim empire was known for its grand and well-planned capital
A. Mughal Empire
B. Safavid Empire
C. Ottoman Empire
The answer is B. Safavid Empire
Border states, such as Virginia, remained in the Union but were
divided over which side to support in the Civil War.
a. true
b. false
How did state standard oil find a way around laws against monopolies in 1882
Answer:
Standard and Oil, an American company and corporate trust, from 1870 to 1911 was an industrial empire of John Rockefeller and associates, controlling almost all oil production in the United States.
Many critics stated trhat the company concentrated too much economic power. In 1906 the US government brought suit against Standard Oil Company, under The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. The company was ordered to divest itself major holdings 33 companies in all.
Explanation:
Standard and Oil under tghe direction of John Rockefeller was the biggest industrial empere, but it grew up too big so the US government had to apply The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890.
Create an invitation to invite the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention. On your invitation, explain why they need to attend. Remember, many of the states where the delegates were from did not want to change the "Law of the Land" which at the time was The Articles of Confederation. Also, to attend meant travel! It's a long way from Georgia to Pennsylvania on horseback! They didn't have trains either. You'll have to be convincing!
An invitation to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 emphasizing the need to address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and the importance of the delegates' contributions to forming a more effective and unified government, ensuring individual liberties, and creating a stable nation.
Esteemed Delegates,
You are cordially invited to partake in a historic assembly that will shape the future of our young nation \'\'or the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation.\'\' Recognizing the arduous journey this will entail, we entreat you to consider the profound impact your participation will hold.
Your presence in Philadelphia is sought after to address the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation and to forge a new path that will ensure a more effective and unified government.
The Constitutional Convention, convening in May 1787, is expected to be a turning point for this nation, overcoming the confederation's inability to sustain a stable and prosperous union.
The need for collaboration is paramount, as our current governance structure lacks the necessary authority and unity to effectively manage national affairs.
We seek your counsel, wisdom, and foresight to form a government that balances the power among the states and the national authority, safeguards individual liberties, and establishes a law-governed society resistant to the perils of unrestrained democracy witnessed in Shays' Rebellion.
Together, let us build a framework that resonates with the needs of both smaller and larger states, addresses the pressing matter of representation, and inclusively sets the stage for this country's growth. Your role as a delegate is crucial, for it is through your voice and vote that a more perfect union can be realized.
With the assurance of the highest esteem and regard,
The Organizing Members of the Constitutional Convention.
what role did Benedict Arnold play in the battle of Fort Ticonderoga
Answer:
bhdnf
Explanation:
dfghjjj
Read the passage, and then answer the question. An archeologist discovers an official-looking seal during an archeological dig. The seal is cylindrical in shape and is much like what a king would use when signing letters. Not long after, the archeologist finds a clay tablet covered in cuneiform script. The archeologist translates the words on the tablet. He discovers that it states a set of laws and rules that the citizens of the civilization must have had to follow. Based on the passage, what conclusion can be drawn about the civilization?
Answer:
The civilization had a functioning government in place that decided the law of the land.
Explanation: This is the only logical conclusion that we can get from the information providen by the passage. Let's begin, the passage shows us that there was probably a king in that civilization as the official looking seal is similar to others. The archeologist can compare his knowledge from other ancient civilizations and supose that this one has that thing in common. The tablet with cuneiform script demonstrates that the civilization was organized enough to have laws and rules, there were some problems that were so common the government needed a way to treat them.
So the government was stable enough to apply rules over the citizens, making it functional.
The things we can't know from the information is who wrote in the tablet, it could be the king or someone designated for that job. The content of the tablet doesn't say if there was one king or various governors. Lastly, the things found out by the archeologist only give us information of that specific civilization.
Explanation:
The former Soviet Union broke into _______ separate states.
15 12 13 16
Which of the following statements is true regarding Mexico City
Why did Socrates criticize Athens’ democracy?
Socrates’ analysis of the hatred he has incurred is one part of a larger theme that he dwells on throughout his speech. Athens is a democracy, a city in which the many are the dominant power in politics, and it can therefore be expected to have all the vices of the many. Because most people hate to be tested in argument, they will always take action of some sort against those who provoke them with questions. But that is not the only accusation Socrates brings forward against his city and its politics. He tells his democratic audience that he was right to have withdrawn from political life, because a good person who fights forjustice in a democracy will be killed. In his cross-examination of Meletus, he insists that only a few people can acquire the knowledge necessary for improving the young of any species, and that the many will inevitably do a poor job. He criticizes the Assembly for its illegal actions and the Athenian courts for the ease with which matters of justice are distorted by emotional pleading. Socrates implies that the very nature of democracy makes it a corrupt political system. Bitter experience has taught him that most people rest content with a superficial understanding of the most urgent human questions. When they are given great power, their shallowness inevitably leads to injustice.
The Charge Of ImpietySocrates criticized Athens' democracy due to its inherent inequalities, lack of self-improvement, and susceptibility to demagoguery.
He questioned the assumption that all opinions were equally valid and the idea that majority rule was sufficient for just governance, leading ultimately to his execution.
Socrates criticized Athens' democracy for a variety of reasons. Primarily, he believed that it fell short of being an ideal system because it was prone to inequality and the rule of the mob. In ancient Athens, only wealthy, land-owning men could participate in government, leaving women, the poor, and non-landowners disenfranchised.
Moreover, Socrates was concerned about the absence of self-criticism and self-improvement in a democratic society where the majority could enforce its will without a standard for rightness beyond the mere fact of majority preference.
He pointed out the dangers of a system where decisions were made by voting without necessarily being informed by wisdom or moral insight, potentially giving rise to demagoguery.
Ultimately, Socrates's critical examination of Athens' democratic principles and practices was met with hostility, leading to charges of impiety and corrupting the youth.
This led to his death sentence, which he accepted, remaining true to his philosophical beliefs and commitment to intellectual inquiry until the end.
Do you think Hammurabi was a good ruler? Why or why not?
Answer:
He implemented a set of fair laws that set the basic structure for many governing bodies form thousands of years.
Explanation:
yes he was.
What is the difference between European and Native Americans attitudes toward land use and land ownership?
Answer: Native Americans viewed land as something that was to be used communally by all the members of a tribe. There was no idea among the Indians that land was something to be divided up, sold, and owned by individuals.Native Americans had a spiritual vision of Nature and could not conceive land ownership as something respectable. European forced the Natives to adapt gradually to their notion of private property and land ownership.
The Abbasid dynasty was known for what
Answer:
The Abbasid Dynasty was a feudal theocratic state that existed in Baghdad from 750 to 945 and from 1194 to 1258. It included the territories of modern Arab countries of Asia, part of Central Asia, Egypt, Iran, North Africa and India. After the capture of Baghdad by the Seljuks in 1055, the Abbasid caliphs owned only the region adjacent to the capital.
In the state of the Abbasids, there was a rise over two centuries, but as the feudal fragmentation of the caliphate intensified and the political influence of the guard, composed of Turkic slave ghouls, increased, the dynasty gradually fell into decay.
in what ways were federalists and Democratic Republicans similar
The Federalists and Democratic-Republicans shared similarities in their support for a strong central government, economic development, and the importance of the Constitution.
Explanation:Although the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans had different ideologies and policies, they did share some similarities. One similarity was their support for a strong central government. Both parties believed that a strong federal government was necessary for the stability and growth of the new nation. Additionally, both parties advocated for a system of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power.
Another similarity was their support for economic development. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong national bank and a strong manufacturing base to promote economic growth. The Democratic-Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, also supported agricultural and commercial interests to drive the economy.
Lastly, both parties recognized the importance of the Constitution. They agreed that the Constitution was the supreme law of the land and should be upheld and interpreted according to its original intent. However, they had different interpretations of the Constitution and its limits on government power.
Learn more about Similarities between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans here:
https://brainly.com/question/29549360
#SPJ2
Which of the following best describes the success of major reform movements of the early nineteenth century?
A. They were successful in every aspect, and American society radically changed for the better.
B. They experienced little success, mainly due to the failure of reformers to attract followers.
C. They were totally unsuccessful, because most Americans of that era were anti-religion and refused to help people less fortunate than themselves.
D. They experienced some success through the hard work of Americans who believed in the perfectibility of society.
The major reform movements of the early nineteenth century saw partial success due to the efforts of reformers aiming for a perfectible society. They had different levels of success, with some movements achieving their goals while others met resistance.
Explanation:The success of the major reform movements of the early nineteenth century can best be described as partial, due to the dedicated efforts of those who strived for a perfectible society. These reform movements, encompassing a wide range of issues including abolitionism, temperance, and women's suffrage, experienced various degrees of success. They were not universally successful, nor were they completely unsuccessful.
Instead, the movements saw success in areas where reformers were able to effect societal change, largely through public advocacy and legislative action. However, some efforts met with resistance and not all goals were achieved immediately. For example, the abolitionist movement exerted a significant impact and was ultimately successful, although it took decades and a civil war to achieve its goals. The most accurate answer, therefore, would be '(D) They experienced some success through the hard work of Americans who believed in the perfectibility of society.'
Learn more about 19th Century Reform Movements here:https://brainly.com/question/9504156
#SPJ2
3. Describe three ways in which the early river valley civilizations were alike, and three ways in which they were different from one another
Three ways they where alike is they had a division of labor, they all had a huge usage with water, and they believed in gods. Three ways they were different was that they all had their own writing, they had their own certain gods, and they had different systems of ruling.
i had this on one of my TGA's, so i hope this helpsThey are alike because they all had a major river, they had a very natural environment that provided them with food, and they all had a division of labor. They were different because they spoke totally different languages, they had different cultures, and while Egypt and Mesopotamia were very open to others, the Indus Valley Civilization and the Yellow River Civilization were quite private.
Please don't use exactly this or you will get plagiarism marks.
the Battle of Long Island is known as the first significant battle of the Revolutionary war.
how might the spread of Islam have contributed to muslim success in trade
which organism has ganglia
A.fish
B.sponge
C.hydra
D.flatworm
the real subject is science
The organism that has ganglia is: B. sponge
Ganglia refers to nerve cells that located in an organism's autonomic nervous system or their sensors. Ganglia exist in sponges as their controller of motoric functions and as a medium to sense things that exist in the environment around them.
Among the given organisms, it is the flatworm that possesses ganglia, a simple form of a brain that controls the nervous system.
Explanation:The organism that has ganglia is D. flatworm. Ganglia are simple forms of a brain, acting as a mass of nerve cells that control an organism's nervous system. Fish have a more complex brain structure, so they surpass ganglia. Sponges do not have nervous systems at all.
Hydras have a more decentralized nerve net without ganglia. In contrast, flatworms are primitive creatures that do possess ganglia, providing them with a rudimentary form of the nervous system. Ganglia are groups of nerve cells that act as a simple nervous system. The hydra is a freshwater invertebrate that belongs to the phylum Cnidaria. It has a simple nervous system with a network of ganglia that helps in coordinating its movements and responses to stimuli.
Learn more about the Biology of Ganglia here:https://brainly.com/question/28266179
#SPJ11