The secretive, fragmented journal entries used to allow the narrator to tell her story could symbolize

Select one:
a. the sister-in-law’s meddling behavior with regard to the narrator’s illness.
b. the husband’s oppressive behavior toward the narrator.
c. the way the narrator “creeps” around at the end of the story.
d. the increasing fragmentation of the narrator’s sense of self.

The conflict develops the plot by building suspense about whether Perseus would succeed in killing Medusa.

Perseus did not expect to be sent on such a dangerous task, but because the king wants Danae, he needs Perseus out of the way, ultimately sending Perseus on a suicide mission.

Although the options are not included with the question, we can still look at how this conflict develops the plot.

The king is in love with Perseus' mother, Danae, but Perseus does not think he is worthy of her. I order to get him out of the way, the king asks Perseus for the head of Medusa. He is only using this as a ploy to get his mother. The conflict enhances the excitement of the story and develops the plot, as it makes the reader wonder whether Perseus will be able to achieve this feat.

The answer is suspense.

Answer:

Suspension

Explanation:

Answer: I believe the answer is C- The journal includes Steve writing about himself in the first person the screenplay include Steve writing about himself in the third person. Please tell me if I’m wrong.

Explanation:

The journal includes Steve writing about himself in the first person. The screenplay includes Steve writing about himself in the third person is the statement correctly compares Steve's journal entry and the screenplay in Monster. Hence, option C is correct.

A collection of grammatical devices that refer to someone who is neither the author or speaker of the speech in which they appear nor the intended audience for that utterance. The pronoun "they" is used in the third person.

The first, second, and third person are all used to convey points of view. First person is used in the I/we perspective. You are assuming a second-person perspective. Third person, he/she/it/they perspective.

Examples of third-person pronouns are he, she, it, his, her, it; himself, herself, itself; they; them; their; and themselves. The third person is acceptable when referring to other persons by name. Smith has a different viewpoint, for instance. His analysis shows that previous claims about the topic are untrue.

Thus, option C is correct.

For more information about third person, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/4205453

#SPJ6

One log spanning 40 feet forms a natural bridge.

C. How long does it take to travel from the Earth to the moon?

This is the weakest research question because it can be easily answered. According to a 2 second Google search, it takes about 3 days for a spacecraft to reach the moon from Earth. This question does not allow for a lot of research for development into an essay. Options A, B and D all have a variety of possibilities that would allow for a multi-paragraph essay with significant topic development.

Answer: Why should the government continue to fund space travel?

Explanation: Apex

Well,

I would most likely choose this answer.

"What appeals to you most about this position?"

Answer:

The option that would be a good proving question to ask in this scenario is “What was your favorite part about it?”

Explanation:

The provided scenario introduces an interviewer who wants to know about the work experience of the interviewee in their former job, then after the affirmation of the interviewee of liking their last job, a good proving question would give the interviewer the necessary information to have a better understanding of the topic that is being discussed.

The answer is C - climbed a tall tree. All of the other answers end with the same tense that is used in the beginning portion of the sentence. The answer would be the "climbed a tall tree" because it does not match the tenses used in the beginning of the sentence. Finish the sentence with each of your answer options and choose the one that sounds incorrect.

He was running, jumping, and climbed a tall tree.

Parallel structure, or parallelism, means using the same pattern of words to show that two or more words or ideas are of equal importance. Words and phrases within a sentence should not only match in structure but also be intense.

My dog not only likes to play fetch but also chase cars. Parallel: My dog not only likes to play fetch, but he also likes to chase cars. My dog likes not only to play fetch but also to chase cars. When you connect two clauses or phrases with a word of comparison, such as than or as, use parallel structure.

Learn more about parallel structure here https://brainly.com/question/1397774

#SPJ2

Let’s do this by parts.  

And also let’s start with CONTEXT CLUES. You can use this methodology with this helpful structure that I found (attached). And it works this way:

• You use the WORD part to understand deeply the meaning of the word and you do it by breaking down the parts of the word and looking for the definition of each part.

• You use the DEFINITION part to find the meaning of the word within the sentence.

• You use the SYNONYM part to have different words that have the same meaning and you might know.

• You use the EXAMPLE part to give you some clues about the meaning of the word.

SENTENCE ANALYSIS.  It consist of breaking down the sentence and identify each word of it whether if it is a verb, a noun, a compound noun, subject, a conjunction, subordinating conjunction and others. You do to understand the reason why it is used in the sentence and what the sentence means.

SYNTAX. To analyze this you need to unit the words to form sentences and to express concepts.

When trying to understand complex content, the most important thing is to break it down into smaller pieces that can be comprehended separately:

Combining all these elements is a good strategy to break down a complex test, in order to research what is less understood and make sense of the whole content.

The answer is Positive, I hope this helps! ;)

The correctly edited sentence is "While reading a book about magicians, I learned that Harry Houdini, the great escape artist, died of an acute appendicitis attack on Halloween of 1926". Thus, option first is correct.

A sentence is a linguistic statement, such as "The quick brown fox leaps over the sleepy dog," in linguistics and grammar. It is frequently stated in conventional grammar as a collection of words that expresses a complete notion, or as a measurable quantity of a subject and predicate.

Editing is the stage of the writing process in which a writer or editor attempts to enhance a draft by fixing errors and making words and phrases as clear, precise, and effective as possible.

"While reading a book about magicians, I found that Harry Houdini, the legendary escape artist, perished of an acute appendicitis attack on Halloween of 1926," is the proper modified phrase. Therefore, it can be concluded that option first is correct.

Learn more about Sentence here:

brainly.com/question/18728726

#SPJ5

Answer:

we not ansr u test

Explanation:

1. B. The student as well as the teacher want to go to the museum.

2.D. Sixty days is not enough time to complete the project.

3. A. A child can increase his self-confidence greatly by participating in physical activity.

4.D. When someone has been drinking, he or she may drive poorly.

5.D. Teachers can create podcasts for each child, helping them learn how to work in groups as well as plan their own projects.

Subject-verb and pronoun agreement are important aspects of grammar that ensure clarity and grammatical correctness in sentences. In the first set, option B is correct because it maintains a subject-verb agreement with the plural noun "student" and the plural verb "want."

In the second set, option D is the correct choice as it uses the singular verb "is" to agree with the singular noun phrase "Sixty days." Moving on to pronoun agreement, in the third set, option A is correct as it uses the masculine pronoun "his" to agree with the masculine noun "child."

In the fourth set, option D is correct as it uses the gender-neutral pronouns "he or she" to maintain agreement with the singular noun "someone."

Lastly, in the fifth set, option D is correct as it uses the plural pronoun "them" to agree with the plural noun "teachers."

Therefore 1. Option B; 2.Option D 3.Option A; 4.Option D; and 5Option D.

Learn more about subject-verb agreement here

https://brainly.com/question/30491015

#SPJ4

Growing up i have witness alot of pranks and pulled a few on my own that is why i am very fund of pulling pranks. I feel like pranks are a way for people to show off there creativity. For example, my friend ( enter friends name here) pulled a prank on me were she pretended to lose my phone. I was upset at the time until i realized he/she had a weird bulge coming from the side of there arm. My friend decided to hide my phone in the upper part of there shirt sleeve. I was rolling around laughing once i realized my phone was in no way lost. pranks are always funny when there not extreme, try and pull a little prank for yourself. Just remember to make sure if something breaks or really is misplaced, you can re[place that item. Pranks are meant to be funny and harmless. never pull a prank that you would not want someone to pull on you. And if it does happen maybe you should reconsider pulling extravagent pranks, or ask that person in advance if this would upset them and pull the prank on a later date once they have forgotten you asked about it.

hope this helps

Answer:

Explanation:

I have never personally pulled a prank, but have read about some on the internet. Also, I have never been pranked, since I don't hang out around that sort of crowd. I think that are many times when pranks can be a problem, especially if they go to far. For this reason, I don't necessarily like pranks. Some pranks are just plain mean. For example, there was one prank on the internet where the prankster gave the other person a burger, then preceded to tell them it was made of horse meat. The person immediately dropped the burger and started a frenzy. This is an example of a prank going too far. Remember that when pulling a prank, both sides must agree. Also, remember that while you might like to use a prank to get revenge on someone you dislike, this is a big mistake. Pranks can be fun if done safely and ethically.

PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST

Jane Eyre's naivety is exposed through her simplistic understanding of religious doctrine and her straightforward interpretation of Mr. Brocklehurst's questions which stems from her innocent and honest character.

Jane Eyre's naivety is clearly revealed through her limited understanding of religious doctrine and her very literal interpretation of Mr. Brocklehurst's question. The exchange between Jane and Mr. Brocklehurst not only highlights Jane's innocence but also demonstrates her honest and blunt character. This, combined with her lack of comprehensive knowledge of religious teachings, results in her simple and direct response to the complex concept of sin and its repercussions. Her statement, 'I must keep in good health, and not die', to the question about avoiding hell, is a perfect example of her literal interpretation and it suggests her limited understanding of religious doctrine.

https://brainly.com/question/27988761

#SPJ3

The answer is A, in older times people greatly believed that ravens meant something bad was going to happen. In some places ravens were believed to be demons that have come to torment those that have done wrong.

Hope this helps!

A. Ravens are considered birds of ill-omen.

The comparision of dreams and things that perish is that if one has a project in life (dream) and postponesit for whatever reason (deferred) the opportunity and will to take up the challenge might die or dim.

The similes in the poem all have in common that they are related to decay and unpleasantness.

The first simile compares a deferred dream to a raisin in the sun, which suggests that it will shrivel up and become useless. The second simile compares a deferred dream to a sore that festers and runs, which suggests that it will become infected and painful.

The third simile compares a deferred dream to rotten meat, which suggests that it will become smelly and disgusting. The fourth simile compares a deferred dream to something that crusts and sugars over, which suggests that it will become hard and inedible.

Find out more on similes at https://brainly.com/question/24543232

#SPJ3

Adverb Clause: (when) after the artist unveiled it.

Words modified:(verb) was displayed.

The answer to your question would be that the adverb clause identified is the following one "after the artist had unveiled it" and the words it modifies are "was displayed".

An adverb clause is a group of words that function as an adverb in a sentence. Adverbs give more information about how an action was performed, that is, they answer questions like how, why, where, and when. In this case, the adverb clause gives information regarding when the artwork was displayed and it has been introduced by the subordinating conjunction "after".

I think the answer is C.

1- Rosencrantz explains that when a king dies he does not die alone.He compares the public figure with a wheel on a mountain .When the wheel falls it makes everything  go down with it.It is a foreshadowing because it shows that the death of King Hamlet is already " acting like a gulf.." as with his own son.Prince Hamlet is giving signs of distress which affect the new king, his mother and the whole kingdom.It is the outcome of an event in the past because everything that is happening around Claudius has been originated by himself and his killing of his brother.

2-The primal eldest cause he speaks of is the death of Abel in the hands of his brother Cain..."A brother´s murder.."He cannot ask for forgiveness as he feels too guilty to do so.

3- Hamlet does not kill Claudius because he is praying.If Hamlet kills him while praying, as Christian people beleive, he will die and go to Heaven and he does not deserve eternal peace.

4-The lines relate to how king Hamlet was killed because Claudius put poison in his ear as he was sleeping.The words Hamlet utters are full of poison for Caudius and for herself, his mother.The appearance of the Ghost this time has a double meaning. He has warned Hamlet that the mother is innocent so he might be here in order to remind his son of that, to ask him  to intercede with her   and also because he wants his son to carry out his revenge. Hamlet gets the message that he has to go on with the revenge but would have liked some confirmation from the mother that Clauduis has murdered his father.He seems to need the mother on his side.

5-Gertrude is told by Hamlet that he has been pretendng to be mad.He wants her to hide that from Caudius, that she knows now what is going onwith her son. She agrees.He demands that his mother avoids being alone with his uncle, too.

In 'Hamlet,' Rosencrantz's warning to Claudius foreshadows future consequences and reflects past events, while Claudius cannot seek forgiveness for his guilt due to the benefits he gains from his sin. Hamlet spares Claudius to avoid granting him heaven, and the Ghost appears to remind Hamlet of his duty, revealing internal conflicts. Gertrude agrees to keep Hamlet's feigned madness a secret.

In Hamlet, Act 3 Scene 3, Rosencrantz warns Claudius about the consequences of the king's actions, which is a form of foreshadowing and also reflects events from the past, particularly the murder of King Hamlet. Claudius acknowledges his guilt in a soliloquy, referring to the "primal eldest curse," involving the biblical story of Cain and Abel, indicating his inner turmoil and inability to seek forgiveness as he still benefits from his sin. Hamlet refrains from killing Claudius in this scene, as he believes Claudius is praying and does not want to send his soul to heaven.

The intense confrontation between Hamlet and Gertrude in Act 3 Scene 4 results in Gertrude exclaiming that Hamlet's words are like daggers, which parallels the poisoning of King Hamlet's ears. The Ghost's appearance during this scene differs from Act 1 because it now seems to serve the purpose of reminding Hamlet of his duty to avenge his father rather than to spur him to action against Gertrude. The difference suggests an internal conflict within Hamlet, as the Ghost does not interact with Gertrude, indicating that she might not see it, thus implying the potential question of Hamlet's sanity or the nature of the Ghost.

Gertrude's agreement with Hamlet is to keep his secret of feigned madness, as Hamlet has convinced her of Claudius's guilt in the murder of his father.

I go with A because feel like it's the best one

Answer: A. It establishes basic principles on which everyone in the audience can agree.

Explanation: The option that best explains the role that the theme of freedom plays in this excerpt of President Roosevelt's "Four Freedoms" speech is it establishes basic principles on which everyone in the audience can agree. These four freedoms are the basic freedoms that all human beings have to have access to. These are the basic human rights, so everybody in the audience can agree to this. To defend these rights is why America, neutral up to that moment, has to enter the war.

In lines 83-84 of  Act III, scene 3, Othello says "Prithee, no more. Let him come when he will,  I will deny thee nothing." He says this to Desdemona, who is urging that he speak with Cassio and reinstate him as lieutenant. Although he says that he will speak to him, he is evasive about when he will do it, and he just wants to be left alone.

Because , Dreaded is a stronger word.

the main role was manual labor

I would say D.

because the narrator is telling her story.

Answer: d. the increasing fragmentation of the narrator’s sense of self.

The fragmented journal entries most likely symbolize the increasing fragmentation of the narrator's sense of self. As the narrator has been locked for so long, with no other outlet than that of her journal, this is likely to be the best account of how the narrator feels about her situation. As the journal becomes more fragmented, we can assume that the author becomes more confused about herself. We know that she is deprived of interaction with the world or intellectual stimulation. This forces her to lose her sense of self, and in time, her sanity.

Rukmani is a woman in India that faces many difficulties to raise a family. The dream of Ghandi was to conquer the independence of his country and in doing so he always advocated for peaceful means . Rukmany has this idea of making a living in a peaceful way, too. She was not so willing to ask for help. His friend Kenny who was a doctor that helped to have children kept saying that poor people should shout out loud when they needed help.

Ghandi started his fight for independence and in his speech he said that he deliberately wanted to do what he did and he didn't regret anything of what he did. In this aspect Ghandi was a little bit different than Rukmani because he saw the reality of his country and he thought about drawing the attention of the media and powerful people that can help in achieving his cause. Rukmani was more into making her family survive. She had to face many terrible situations but she didn't give up like when her daughter Ira became a prostitute and became pregnant or when the monsoon destroyed the harvest. Ghandi also faced many terrible situations and in his speech he stated that they were worthwhile if he could help his cause. In this aspect both characters are similar.

Rukmani’s voice in Nectar in a Sieve is personal and emotional, focusing on daily survival and family struggles. Gandhi’s voice in “Gandhi Defends His Beliefs” is philosophical and motivational, advocating for non-violent collective action. Both highlight resilience but differ in their scope and style.

Comparing and contrasting Rukmani’s voice in Nectar in a Sieve with Gandhi’s voice in “Gandhi Defends His Beliefs” reveals significant differences and similarities in their perspectives on life and struggle.

Rukmani’s voice is primarily a personal, emotional, and reflective one, focusing on the trials and tribulations of a common woman in rural India. Her narrative is centered around daily survival, family, and the intimate impacts of socioeconomic changes. For example, she often speaks about the personal toll of droughts, financial instability, and the loss of close family members, offering a deeply humanistic view of poverty and resilience.

In contrast, Gandhi’s voice in “Gandhi Defends His Beliefs” is idealistic, philosophical, and motivational. Gandhi addresses broader social and political issues, advocating for non-violence (ahimsa) and civil disobedience as methods for achieving social change. His speeches and writings emphasize the power of collective action and moral integrity, proposing non-violent resistance as not only a strategy but a way of life. For instance, in his speech he might say, “The weapon of ahimsa will lead us to our freedom,” focusing on inspiring his audience towards higher moral and ethical conduct.

Both voices, while differing in scope and style, reflect a deep commitment to resilience and improvement. Rukmani’s voice gives insight into personal and immediate survival, while Gandhi’s focus on overarching principles and collective well-being. Their points of view align in their advocacy for perseverance and moral strength in the face of adversity but diverge in their methods and audience focus.

The correct answer is A. I am sure. Hope it helps:)

The correct answer is: prepositional phrase. The underlined phrase "outside the fields" begins with the proposition "outside" followed by the noun phrase "the fields", which is the object of the preposition. Since these two components modify a noun (tennis balls), "outside the fields" is an adjectival prepositional phrase that describes the location of the tennis balls.

I'd say it's most likely answer choice: D. fond remembrance.

i think it is d because he is remembering his grandfathers childhood. PLZ RATE BRAINIEST

1. Simile

2.Metaphor

3. connotation

4. allusion

5. figurative language

6.imagery

7.irony

8. symbolism

9.structure

10. parrellism

11. literary device

1. a comparasion of two things using "like" or "as" is a simile.

2. a metaphor, very simmilar to similes except they dont use "like" or "as"

3.connotation

4. allusion it alludes to some sort of reference

5.figurative language

6.imagery; helps you visualize things

7.irony; something totally unexpected occurs

8.symbolism; something that represents something other than itself ex. a bamboo tree can symbolize good fortune

9.structure

10.parellelism; uses the same type of word ex. the boy is frolicking in the sun, running through the water, and looking at the girl.

11.literary device; it can be a allusion, metaphor, similie, any type of thing to enhance ones writing!

i hope this helped, if you have any questions please lmk