The effect of gravity on matter is the measure of __?

Answer:

The correct answer will be- repetition of the experiment ensures the validity and truthfulness of the results.

Explanation:

In the scientific community, the repetition of the experiment using the same procedure by the same researcher or another researcher plays an important role.  

The repetition of the experiment is done to test and verify the results which could be doubtful or fraud. The experimental results of another experimenter act as evidence which if similar supports the experiment and help ensure the validity of the experiment.

Thus, the repetition of the experiment ensures the validity and truthfulness of the results is the correct answer.

Final answer:

The wind blowing a sand dune exemplifies sediment deposition by wind, commonly observed in deserts and coastal areas, and involves processes that create well-sorted, often red colored sands. This phenomenon is also significant in planetary science, evidenced by features on Mars reshaped by wind, such as large dune fields and yardangs aligned with the wind direction.

Explanation:

The wind blowing a sand dune is an example of sediment deposited by wind, which is a process often observed in deserts and coastal regions. Sand dunes formed by wind deposition are typically composed of well-sorted sand, which can be red in color due to the oxidation of iron-bearing minerals. This type of sediment transport is due to the variable energy of the wind, which can range from gentle breezes capable of slowly shifting grains of sand to powerful gusts that rapidly reconfigure the dune landscape.

Studying the effects of wind on sand dunes is not only relevant to Earth but also to planetary science, as seen with the exploration of surface features on Mars. Here, wind plays a pivotal role in reshaping the landscape, creating features such as large dune fields, intricate patterns caused by dust devils, and exposing underlying darker materials that give rise to contrast in coloration on the Martian surface. The dynamic nature of wind erosion and deposition is evident in the existence of yardangs, ridges that are aligned with the dominant wind direction and carved by persistent, strong winds.

In summary, the movement of a sand dune by wind is a clear illustration of the power of natural forces to shape and alter landscapes on Earth and other celestial bodies like Mars, particularly in areas characterized by a scarcity of water and vegetation that might otherwise anchor the surface material.

Answer:

There are several benefits farmers and owners of agribusinesses.

Cheers!

Final answer:

There are approximately 1.31 moles of NaHCO3 in 110 grams of the compound. This is calculated by determining the molar mass of NaHCO3 and then dividing the mass by the molar mass.

Explanation:

To calculate the number of moles in 110 grams of NaHCO₃ (sodium bicarbonate), we need to follow these steps:

Therefore, there are approximately 1.31 moles of NaHCO₃ in 110 grams of the compound.

A pure substance contains its own contents only. The pure substance among the given options is pumpkin pie because it contains no other contents.

What is a pure substance?

A pure substance contains only its own contains and not any other things are added to it. Water Itself is pure despite the quality of water. But when we add salt or sugar to it it cannot be classified as a pure substance.

Salt is a naturally made chemical compound but it might contains some impurities and the traces other minerals in it since it is collected from the sea.

Iced tea is not classified as pure because, it contains ice, tea powder, sugar and water. Thus, it is a mixture of different substances. Pumpkin pie is naturally made fruit  contains its pulp and seed only not any added things are there.

Hence, pumpkin pie can be classified as a pure substance and option C is correct.

To find more about pure substances, refer the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/24415838

#SPJ5

Answer: Option (a) is the correct answer.

Explanation:

A substance that cannot be broken down into simpler substances is known as an element.

For example, a piece of sodium metal contains only atoms of sodium.

Whereas a compound is defined as a substance that contains two different elements which are chemically combined together in a fixed ratio by mass.

For example, LiCl is a compound in which atoms are present in 1:1 ratio.

A compound is able to dissociate into its constituent particles but an element cannot.

Both an element and a compound are pure substances.

A mixture is defined as a substance in which two or more number of different substances are mixed together. Particles of a mixture never combine chemically to each other.

So, when black powder on coming in contact with water dissociates as red particles that float to the top, black particles that sink to the bottom, and a green liquid. Then it means a chemical reaction has taken place.

Hence, we can conclude that the black powder is a compound.

Construct a hypothesis  part of the scientific method is he missing from this scientific investigation. Thus option B is correct.

Scientific investigation is a continuous process involving different steps to find out the answer to a real question by using method and experimental data.

The basic steps include to make observation from different sources, to develop, experiment and improve a hypothesis and formulate the explanation based on an observed phenomenon.

The different steps of Scientific Investigation are making Observation in scientific investigation is the first step to observe the process involve in the step of inspection, conducting the investigations.

Asking Questions another step used based on observation to make sure that every detail is known and a query can be solved quickly, Formulation of a Hypothesis involves explanation of  the query which is most significant part of the scientific investigation.

conclusion leads to  drawn out of the information which should be proper scientific or a mathematical statement followed by Communication of the information from the investigation

For more details regarding scientific investigation , here

brainly.com/question/12877466

#SPJ2

Answer:

to increase surface area or A

Explanation:

1) Answer is: False.

A period in the periodic table is a horizontal row. For example, sodium and chlorine are in third period and they have very different properties. Sodium is solid metal and chlorine is gaseous nonmetal. Elements in the same row have the same number of electron shells, but different proporties.

2) Answer is: True.

Group is a column of elements in the periodic table. For example, lithium and sodium are in 1 group of the periodic table and they both have one valence electron.

3) Answer is: valence electrons.

For example, electron configuration of oxygen atom: ₈O 1s² 2s² 2p⁴.

Oxygen atom has six valence electrons, so it is in 16 group of Periodic table of elements.

Answer: The correct answer is Option 2.

Explanation:

To calculate the percentage error, we use the equation:

[tex]\%\text{ error}=\frac{|\text{Experimental value - Actual value}|}{\text{Actual value}}\times 100[/tex]

We are given:

Experimental value of circumference = 60.0 cm

Actual value of circumference = 63 cm

Putting values in above equation, we get:

[tex]\%\text{ error}=\frac{|60.0-63|}{63}\times 100\\\\\%\text{ error}=4.8\%[/tex]

Hence, the correct answer is Option 2.

If you mix together 50 mL of a strong acid and 50 mL of a strong base what would yo predict the pH of the new solution would be 7. Because it neutralized the solution.

The pH scale, which previously stood for "potential of hydrogen," is used to describe how acidic or basic an aqueous solution is. The pH values of acidic solutions are lower than those of basic or alkaline solutions.

At 25 °C, the pH of pure water (H20) is 7, but when this equilibrium is subjected to atmospheric carbon dioxide, the pH of the water decreases to about 5.2 because the airborne CO2 dissolves in the water and produces carbonic acid.

Thus, If you mix together 50 mL of a strong acid and 50 mL of a strong base what would yo predict the pH of the new solution would be 7. Because it neutralized the solution.

To learn more about pH follow the link below;

https://brainly.com/question/491373

#SPJ2

Answer:

I think it is da C

Explanation:

Later ✌️

Final answer:

The distance vs. age plot is expected to show a positive correlation if the Pacific Plate is moving over a stationary hotspot, with older volcanoes/mountains being farther from Kilauea. A lack of pattern, like in the Line Islands, suggests a complex tectonic history. Correlation analysis and topographic and tectonic interpretations are pivotal in examining volcanic activity and age-distance relationships.

Explanation:

The relationship between the age of volcanoes/mountains and their distance from Kilauea can be determined by analyzing a distance vs. age plot. As the distance from Kilauea increases, we generally expect the age of the volcanoes/mountains to increase as well, if the hypothesis that the Pacific Plate is moving over a stationary hotspot is correct. A positive correlation between distance and age would support this, suggesting that the older features are farther away from the current hotspot location because they were formed first and have been carried away by the plate motion over time.

Conversely, if there is no clear pattern or relationship between age and distance, it could indicate a more complex tectonic history, as suggested by the Line Islands, which do not show a clear age-distance relationship. This lack of pattern could be due to different tectonic movements or the presence of multiple hotspots, as opposed to a single, stationary hotspot. The concept of correlation, which can be positive or negative, is crucial in interpreting such geologic data. As demonstrated in the example with Old Faithful's eruptions, where there's a positive correlation between eruption duration and the time between eruptions, we can use similar methods to determine the age-distance relationship.

Critical thinking about the topography and tectonic history can provide insights into why one area might have larger volcanic eruptions compared to another. Factors such as rift zones, plate boundaries, and hotspots might influence the eruption style and magnitude.

Answer: [tex]C_5H_{12}+8O_2\rightarrow 5CO_2+6H_2O]/tex]

Explanation:

According to the law of conservation of mass, mass can neither be created nor be destroyed. Thus the mass of products has to be equal to the mass of reactants. The number of atoms of each element has to be same on reactant and product side. Thus chemical equations are balanced.

Combustion is a type of chemical reaction in which fuel is reacted with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water.

[tex]C_5H_{12}+O_2\rightarrow CO_2+H_2O]/tex]

The balanced equation will be :

[tex]C_5H_{12}+8O_2\rightarrow 5CO_2+6H_2O]/tex]

What is the group number of the most nonmetallic group that contains metalloids?

16

What is the group number of the most metallic group that contains metalloids?

13

Explanation:

Metalloids are the substances which show properties of both metals and non-metals.

The left side of periodic table contains metals and on moving towards the right there are non-metals. Between the metals and non-metals there are metalloids.

Group 16 is the most non-metallic group that contains metalloids. In group 16, O, S, and Se are non-metals whereas Te and Po are metalloids.

Group 13 is the most metallic group that contains metalloids. In group 13, Al, Ga, In and Tl are all metals whereas boron is a metalloid.

Answer:

Suppose you were to make a ring from a single strand of gold atoms. Then you have to take the following steps;

Let us assume that the ring is a size 7 ring, which has a circumference of 54.3 millimeters. Converting this to centimeters, the circumference of the ring is:

54.3 mm = 5.43 cm

Now, we determine the number of gold atoms that will be present in this:

5.43 / 1 x 10⁻⁹

There will be 5.43 x 10⁹ atoms

We now determine the number of moles this is by:

one mole = 6.02 x 10²³ atoms

Moles = 5.43 x 10⁹ / 6.02 x 10²³ 

Moles = 9.01 x 10⁻¹⁵ moles

The molar mass of gold is 197 g/mol

The mass is 9.01 x 10⁻¹⁵  * 197

The mass of the strand is 1.76 x 10⁻¹² grams

The AWNSER i think is c and do you use time4learning

The electrons in the outermost shell, or energy level, of an atom are Valence electrons. Electron dot model is a model that shows only the valence electrons of an atom, i.e., option C.

Because valence electrons are so crucial, atoms are frequently represented by simple diagrams that only show their valence electrons.

These are known as electron dot diagrams. Also referred to as Lewis structures.

Electron dot model is a model that shows only the valence electrons of an atom.

Thusm the correct option is C.

For more details regarding Lewis structure, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4144781

#SPJ2

Answer:  114.29 mL

Explanation:

We are given that density of ether = 0.70 g/ml

Mass of ether= 80.0 g

Formula to calculate the density is given by :-

[tex]\text{Density}=\dfrac{\text{Mass}}{\text{Volume}}[/tex]

Substitute the value of density and mass , we get

[tex]0.70=\dfrac{80.0}{\text{Volume}}\\\\\Rightarrow\text{Volume}=\dfrac{80}{0.70}=114.285714286\approx114.29\ mL[/tex]  [Rounded to the nearest two decimal places.]

Hence, the volume of ether = 114.29 mL

Challenging a scientific theory is an essential part of the scientific process, not an indication of a theory's weakness. Theories are meant to be falsifiable and robust, able to withstand scrutiny and adapt to new evidence. Criticism and challenge signify the self-correcting nature of science.

The statement "Any time a scientific theory is challenged, it means it's not a good theory" is a misconception about the nature of scientific inquiry. In science, challenging theories is fundamental to scientific progress.

When a theory is challenged, it does not necessarily mean the theory is weak or incorrect; rather, it's an opportunity to test the robustness of the theory. Scientific theories are built to be falsifiable, meaning that they can be tested against observations and experiments. If a theory cannot be falsified, it's not considered a strong scientific theory.

When we encounter data that contradicts a theory, it's critical to examine this data critically. Sometimes, after scrutiny, the data may not be credible, but other times it can lead to a theory being revised or replaced. A revolutionary scientific theory is often not accepted until it has undergone rigorous testing and scrutiny, potentially replacing an older theory. Valid criticism and challenges to a theory, rather than indicating poor quality, demonstrate the self-correcting nature of the scientific method.

Moreover, the progress of science involves improving upon or discarding theories when new evidence arises. In this sense, science has no sacred ideas that cannot be challenged.

The strength of a scientific model lies in its ability to withstand challenges and adapt to new data. If a theory does not fit within the observed data or if new information arises that contradicts the theory, it is the standard scientific practice to either modify the theory or develop a new one that better explains the phenomena.