Senator McCarthy’s influence might have died quickly following his 1950 accusations had it not been for

The reason why Alexander Hamilton opposed to the bill of rights was mainly because he has a belief that the bill of rights was not needed or unnecessary for the government to continue or to have because this only posses specific powers of the delegate.

(C) - The court did not recognize the Cherokee tribe as a sovereign nation.

The Great Plains refer to the large flat area of land situated between the Rocky Mountains and the Mississippi River, which spans parts of the U.S, Canada, and Mexico.

The huge expanse of flatlands between the Rocky Mountains and the Mississippi River is known as the Great Plains. The Great Plains stretch over 500,000 square miles and include parts of 10 states of the U.S, as well as portions of Canada and Mexico. It is a wide plateau, which descends eastwards from the Rockies towards the Interior Lowlands. These plains display a gentle slope which is primarily used for agriculture, particularly wheat and corn.

https://brainly.com/question/33147887

Option B, "Nativist groups began to encourage immigration," is not a reason why Europeans immigrated to the United States during the latter half of the nineteenth century. Instead, nativist groups were often opposed to immigration and sought to restrict or limit the influx of immigrants into the country. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

During the late 19th century, particularly in the decades following the Civil War, the United States experienced a significant wave of immigration from Europe. Several factors contributed to this mass migration:

A. Terrible religious persecution was happening: Many Europeans, particularly from countries with state-sponsored religions or religious persecution, sought refuge in the United States where religious freedom was guaranteed by the Constitution. Jews, Catholics, and other religious minorities faced discrimination and persecution in various parts of Europe, prompting them to seek a new life in America.

C. People wanted freedom from rules and regulation: Economic opportunities and the promise of greater personal freedom and autonomy attracted many Europeans to the United States. Economic hardships, restrictive social structures, and limited opportunities for social mobility in their home countries prompted individuals and families to seek a fresh start in America, where they hoped to build a better life for themselves and their descendants.

D. Gold was discovered in the state of California: The California Gold Rush of 1848-1855 spurred significant immigration to the United States, particularly from Europe and Asia. The discovery of gold in California attracted fortune seekers from around the world, including Europe, who hoped to strike it rich in the goldfields of the American West.

In summary, while religious persecution, economic opportunities, and the allure of personal freedom were significant factors driving European immigration to the United States in the latter half of the 19th century, the encouragement of nativist groups did not play a role in promoting immigration; rather, nativist sentiments often sought to restrict immigration during this period.

The complete question is:

Which of the following is not a reason why Europeans immigrated to the United States during the latter half of the nineteenth century?

A. Terrible religious persecution was happening.

B. Nativist groups began to encourage immigration.

C. People wanted freedom from rules and regulation.

D. Gold was discovered in the state of California.

Answer:

Its not the tenth amendment it was wrong

ill take the test and find out the answer

Explanation:

aabc is the answer to the whole quick chck

Final answer:

Stuart meets the criteria for an APA diagnosis due to symptoms such as persistent and severe sadness, functional impairments, and other clinical features consistent with major depression. Bill's experience of sadness doesn't appear to meet these criteria, possibly due to less severity and impact on his daily life.

Explanation:

Both Stuart, who has been diagnosed with major depression, and Bill, who has not been diagnosed, may be experiencing symptoms like persistent sadness and emotional turmoil. Stuart likely exhibits symptoms that are more severe and prolonged, leading to significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning, which are criteria for an APA diagnosis of mental illness. Bill, on the other hand, might be experiencing situational sadness without the intensity, duration, or functional impairment necessary to meet the diagnostic criteria for a mood disorder.

Stuart's condition could include symptoms such as a depressed mood most of the day, nearly every day, a marked loss of interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities, significant weight loss or gain, insomnia or hypersomnia, fatigue or loss of energy, feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt, diminished ability to think or concentrate, and recurrent thoughts of death. These symptoms, which must last for at least two weeks, would align with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for major depression. Bill's sadness may result from identifiable life events, have less impact on his daily functioning, and not persist over an extended period, thus not meeting the criteria for diagnosis.

The differentiation in diagnosis is vital because it influences treatment approaches and the understanding of each individual's experience. While disorders like depression and anxiety can be caused by or exacerbated by stress and lead to serious psycho-social issues, not all sadness or emotional challenges amount to a mental disorder.

The laws under the 13th Amendment were limited to an  extent where most former slaves had no employment, and these laws made it possible to keep African Americans in a cycle of slavery by imprisoning them for being jobless. Therefore, the option D holds true.

The Thirteenth Amendment under the National American Constitution protected the individuals from being put into slavery practices, and abolished the practices completely by making them illegal.

However, after its enforcement, the former slaves did not have any employment. As a result, they were being imprisoned and made to practice slavery as they were anyway jobless, and had to do something to continue their living. This in turn itself made the laws under thirteenth amendment stay limited to an extent of abolishing slavery practices.

Therefore, the option D holds true and states regarding the significance of the Thirteenth Amendment.

Learn more about the Thirteenth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/12879864

#SPJ5

Answer:

Through many Compromises

Explanation:

The American political system tried to resolve sectionalism and slavery by passing a series of compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that proposed Missouri to become a slave state at the same time that Maine was admitted as a free state and created this imaginary line that was the “slavery boundary”.

The Compromise of 1850 also tried to solve the problem if slavery should be accepted into the western territories and new states, at the end popular sovereignty solved the problem.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 also tried to solve the demands of the Southern States by demanding that slave owners had the right to reclaim their property even in the Northern States.

The Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854 also tried to solve the slavery issue by proposing that Nebraska Territory would be divided into Kansas and Nebraska and the settlers would decide if slavery would be acceptable there.

Eventually, we know that all those compromises did not solve the problem which eventually led to the Civil War.

This past weekend marked the 234th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  And while much has changed since the signers met in secret to dissolve the bands that tied them to England, their words are as true today as they have ever been. 

The preamble to the Declaration states:

The arrangement of this statement reveals the founders’ belief that individual rights pre-exist the establishment of a government-- a radical notion at the time.  The Declaration begins, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”  By referring to the aspects of the subsequent statement as "self-evident truths," the founders insist that they do not merely apply to colonists but rather that they are universal.  Included in these universal truths is the idea, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  This bold assertion insists that no one life is more valuable than the next, and that—by virtue of sharing the same rights—no individual has the authority to rule over or oppress another.

Moreover, the equal rights shared by all humans are “unalienable.”  They cannot be taken away.  This is because they are granted not by any man or institution but rather they are “endowed” upon individuals by their Creator.  Only the One who grants rights has the authority to take them away.

Although the founders believed in the unalienable rights of every person, they also understood that there will always be forces in this world that seek to oppress.  Thus, “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.”  Put simply, the government possesses no rights.  Its sole purpose is to protect the rights of its citizenry from outside forces.  If it fails in this duty, it is the responsibility of individuals to abolish it.

The writers of the Declaration—and subsequently the writers of the Constitution—believed that government’s power comes out of its ability to protect the rights of its people.  Individuals do not receive natural rights from government and thus government does not have the authority to take rights away.  To the extent that it protects individual rights, government operates legitimately.  However, when it fails to protect such rights or when it imposes upon them, it becomes an illegitimate ruler over what would otherwise be free people.

When the founding fathers gathered in 1776, they did not merely declare the independence of the colonies from their British oppressors.  They declared the independence of all individuals from the unlawful intrusion of overreaching government.  And that declaration forever altered the course of human history.

Denmark ending its absolute monarchy and adopting a liberal constitution was a direct result of the revolutions of 1848.

The revolutions of 1848 took place towards the end of the first half of 19th century. It was a series of revolts held by republicans against the monarchies in Europe.

The impact of the revolutions of 1848 on Denmark was so much that it had to end the rule of absolute monarchy in its region and adopted a liberal constitution in the years that followed.

Hence, option C holds true regarding the revolutions of 1848.

Learn more about the revolutions of 1848 here:

https://brainly.com/question/14263481

#SPJ2

Answer:

Yeah... what big brained man said

Explanation: