Slater assisted in the transfer of industrialization from Britain to the United States. As a result, Option (C) is the appropriate response.
What is industrialization?In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Britain experienced rapid industrial development that quickly spread to Western Europe and North America. This period of time is known as the Industrial Revolution. Industrialization began with the introduction of new and improved large-scale production techniques and equipment.
The Industrial Revolution was sparked by Britain's high-wage, low-energy economy, which was the result of successful worldwide trade. There was a need for technologies that replaced labor with capital and energy due to high wages and inexpensive energy. Numerous industries used these incentives.
Various excellent outcomes came from the Industrial Revolution. A rise in wealth, the output of commodities, and the standard of living were a few among them.
Therefore, Option (C) is the correct choice.
Learn more about Industrialization, from:
brainly.com/question/7721379
#SPJ5
Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question is:
Samuel Slater worked in a textile factory in Britain. Britain was the first country to invent the machine that spins a thread. This spinning machine sped up the production of cloth. The British wanted to maintain their manufacturing advantage, so it was illegal to take the plans for those machines out of the country. It was also illegal for trained textile workers to leave. However, Samuel Slater wanted to go to the United States, so he left Britain in disguise. Once he reached the United States, he built a spinning machine from memory. By doing so, he brought industrialization to America.
Which of the following would be the best topic sentence to discuss Samuel Slater’s influence on industrialization?
(A) Slater learned how to operate a spinning machine in Britain.
(B) Slater ran a machine that speeded up cloth production.
(C) Slater helped industrialization spread from Britain to the United States.
(D) Slater broke the law that forbade taking plans out of the country.
What issues divided the eastern and western Christian churches?
Final answer:
The Great Schism was primarily caused by differences in language, culture, and authority recognition between the Eastern and Western Churches. The Eastern Church permitted married clergy and held a more collegial view of church governance, while the Western Church practiced clerical celibacy and vested supreme authority in the pope. This division still influences the two distinct branches of Christianity.
Explanation:
The division between the eastern and western Christian churches, known as the Great Schism of 1054, was largely due to differences in language, culture, and ecclesiastical authority. The Western Church, centered in Rome, conducted its services in Latin, enforced celibacy among its clergy, and recognized the pope as the ultimate authority on church matters.
In contrast, the Eastern Church, based in Constantinople, used Greek, allowed its priests to marry, and saw the patriarch as having authority equal to that of the pope. These differences were emphasized and made more pronounced by the reform movements of the time.
Over time, differing interpretations of religious texts and controversies over church leadership further deepened the divide. The Eastern Orthodox Church now comprises various national churches, including Greek and Russian Orthodox, while Western Christianity was entirely Roman Catholic until the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century, which led to the development of numerous Protestant denominations.
The initial split had ripple effects through the centuries, impacting religious practices, church governance, and ultimately leading to separate paths in the evolution of Eastern and Western Christian traditions.
One pivotal moment in this division was when the pope's representative excommunicated the Patriarch of Constantinople, who then excommunicated the pope's envoy in response. This official separation resulted in what are now known as the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches. Despite the schism, the western Church retained its organizational hierarchy and continued to exert considerable influence across Europe.
Which answer best describes part of James Otis' role in the Revolutionary Period?
A)Otis said taxes paid to support Britain's Parliament were a patriotic act.
B)Otis said that taxes paid to support America's Congress were a patriotic act.
C)Otis supported Britain's Parliament but wanted Americans to be able to vote for its members.
D)Otis did not support Britain's Parliament because Americans could not vote for its members.
Answer: I think the answer is D
What was a Roman allowed to take from his neighbor's land?
Final answer:
Romans were not generally allowed to take resources from their neighbor's land. However, laws enacted during the Roman Republic did allow soldiers to receive equitable portions of conquered lands. Wealthy Romans also bought or leased land for plantations, often resulting in small farmers losing their properties.
Explanation:
The question pertains to the rights Romans had with regard to property and resources from their neighbor's land. During the expansion of the Roman Republic, an important law was enacted around 350 BCE that limited the amount of land that could be awarded to a single citizen after a military victory, thus ensuring that land distribution was more equitable among plebeian soldiers. This provided a strong incentive to serve in the Roman army, as any soldier could potentially become very rich from participating in a successful campaign.
Furthermore, as Rome conquered new territories, large landowners would buy land from poor farmers or lease public land from the Roman state, turning them into large plantations worked by slaves, which were highly profitable due to the low cost of slave labor. This process, however, often led to small farmers losing their lands to such wealthy landowners. Therefore, outside of the law regarding land awarded after military victories, there is no clear evidence that Romans were allowed to legally take anything from their neighbor's land, given Roman law typically protected private property rights somewhat similarly to modern legal systems.
I will make the first person who answers this brainliest!!!
Scenario 2
State law recognizes that the owner of a vehicle is the person or company whose name appears on the title, or legal and official ownership document. The state also recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means.
A young woman says her neighbor agreed to purchase her old car. She agreed to accept payments from him on a monthly basis until he paid off the car and trusted that he would honor this plan. She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car.
The neighbor says he understood the car to be a gift and has no obligation to make payments. He did not sign an official agreement to make payments. He says that she gave him the car in exchange for his electric scooter, which is new and gets great gas mileage. The neighbor maintains she just wants the car back now that he fixed it and it looks better.
Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________
Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________
Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. ____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
The legal dispute over a car between a young woman and her neighbor falls under civil law, which aims to protect individuals' property rights. The woman's claim is complicated by the lack of a written payment agreement, and the title's presence in the neighbor's name usually indicates ownership in the eyes of the law.
Civil law deals with the rights and duties of individuals among themselves. In this case, the source of law is likely a statute, as the state recognizes the owner of a vehicle through the title, an official document. Without the law in place, individuals would risk losing their property without legal recourse, and it might lead to an increase in fraudulent activities. Here, the purpose of law is to protect people's property rights and provide a mechanism for resolving disputes like the one between the young woman and her neighbor.
The young woman could argue that despite the title being in her neighbor's name, there was a verbal contract relating to the payment plan. However, verbal agreements can be difficult to enforce, especially if not witnessed or recorded. The absence of an official, written and signed payment agreement makes this case more challenging. Thus, government intervention by making an exception to the law based on verbal agreement claims could set a complicated precedent. Therefore, usually the person whose name appears on the title is recognized as the owner, as possession and ownership rights are well-established to avoid ambiguity and conflict.
how does a constitution benefit society
How is a low price an incentive to a consumer?
A) Low prices serve as incentive to buy more.
B) Low prices are incentive to consumers to buy less.
C) Low prices are incentive to producers to sell more.
D) Low prices are incentive for producers to stop selling.
PLEASE ANSWER! WHOEVER ANSWERS WILL GET A 5 STAR RATING! PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
The diagram below shows that the Roman Republic contributed to the development of democratic principles.
The Senate and Assemblies--->_____________
Which phrase completes the diagram?
The Congress
The Consul
The Twelve Tables
Presidential Veto
what did the Babylonians develop through their study of astronomy A. the first 12-month calendar B. a calendar that predicted lunar eclipses C. a theory that the earth revolved around the sun D. a telescope to observe the planets
Compare and contrast
compare and contrast the exploration made by Lewis and Clark with Pike’s, and tell why the Lewis and Clark journey was considered more valuable. Include the material each exploration team brought back, the territory covered, the people they met, and the amount of information each contributed.
please be specific
thank you!
Why do u think revere went so far North before getting on the same path as Dawes
Paul Revere went north to warn the militias along the way about the British plans to seize munitions in Concord, Massachusetts.
Explanation:Paul Revere went so far north before getting on the same path as Dawes in order to warn the militias along the way about the British plans to seize munitions in Concord, Massachusetts. He and other riders from Boston were responsible for spreading the message and alerting the militias, ensuring that they were prepared to meet the British troops. Revere was captured by the British, but his efforts were still crucial in mobilizing the militias and ultimately leading to the skirmishes at Lexington and Concord.
Learn more about Paul Revere here:https://brainly.com/question/11526400
#SPJ2
Based on census results, a state can gain or lose ___________.
A.
the right to have a governor
B.
land for a national park
C.
approval for growing certain crops
D.
representatives in Congress
Answer:
yep, the answer is D
Explanation:
took the test on edge 2021.
Why did kings of France, England, and Spain urge exploration and settlement of the New World?
Answer:
The kings of France, England, and Spain urged exploration and settlement of the New World because they wanted to expand their empires by acquiring land.
Explanation:
In the 1400s, trade routes to China and the other eastern countries were cut for Europeans. It happened that the Muslim peoples, after several religious clashes in the Middle East, decided that no Christian kingdom could trade using its routes. This led to many European countries, mainly Spain, Portugal, France and England, deciding to explore various routes with the aim of reaching the east to trade with China and India, and obtain the precious spices that were highly valued in the European market.
This was how the Spanish kings financed the trip of Christopher Columbus, who in 1492 discovered the American continent. Once the Europeans became aware of the existence of this territory, and found that it did not belong to any of the known European kingdoms, they began to invade these lands and conquer them, seeking to obtain the maximum benefit from the natural resources available in the American lands.
State constitutions today share which of the following features?
no system of checks and balances
separation of powers
vague descriptions of state institutions
complicated procedures for amendment
Answer:
B for my plato peoples
Explanation:
Witch three countries does the rocky Mountains extend through?
Which of the following best explains the Three-Fifths Compromise?
-Delegates agreed that three-fifths of the voting members had to be in favor of a law before it was written into the Constitution.
-Delegates agreed that three out of five members of the House or Senate from each state must be men who had served in a branch of the military.
-Delegates agreed that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person when determining the population and representation in Congress.
-Delegates agreed that each state must have at least three out of five delegates present at the Constitutional Convention for that state to get a vote.