The author tries to persuade the reader to agree with his claim about the importance of ecosystems by providing facts.
We can see a lot of facts examples through the reading, nature realities that science has proved many times for several years, so the author is trying to convince the reader by the use of undeniable truths.
The other techniques are incorrect because statistics are based in numbers coming out from research, and the author is not using that approach, he isn't either restating his claim since he never presents it in a different way to be more compelling, and he is not trying to make people get to a logical conclusion or result which is the objective of deductive reasoning.
A waist to hip ratio shows the extra weight on your hips true or false
the answer is false I hope I helped
Answer: False.
Explanation: The waist-to-hip ratio is used as an indicator of health. It takes differences in body structure into consideration, and measures circumference of the waist compared to the hips for fat distribution. When measured, we can detect if someone carries more weight around the waist or around the hips. Individuals who have more fat in their midsection are at a higher health risks, such as cardiovascular diseases.
How is the narrator in Stolen Day different from the narrator in the night the Bell fell
Identify the constituents of the subject and predicate In the sentence below
1.The hallow metal sound of the town Crier's drum aroused everyone from sleep.
What is it ironic that oedipus curses Laius murderer
Oedipus curses the murderer of Laius, not knowing he himself is the murderer, creating dramatic irony as the audience is aware of his true identity before he is.
Explanation:The irony in Oedipus cursing the murderer of Laius is one of the central themes of Sophocles' tragedy. When the Oracle of Delphi demands that the killer of the previous King Laius be brought to justice to lift the plague afflicting Thebes, Oedipus, the current king, vows to find and punish the murderer, unaware that he himself is the culprit. This situation is dramatically ironic because while Oedipus aims to rid his city of the curse, he unknowingly invokes a curse upon himself, as he is the very murderer he seeks. As Oedipus delves deeper into the investigation, he inadvertently uncovers his own past misdeeds, leading to a catastrophic realization that amplifies the tragedy's impact. The audience knows Oedipus’s true identity long before the protagonist does, creating a tension between the audience's knowledge and Oedipus's ignorance.
Learn more about Dramatic Irony here:https://brainly.com/question/31678266
#SPJ12
Both petroleum and coal are made up of complex carbon-based molecules, and both originated with living creatures of some kind. Both are vital sources of energy for the modern world and both were formed by geologic processes over millions of years. However, petroleum was mainly formed from the remains of ocean-dwelling microorganisms. Coal, on the other hand, originated from decayed vegetation in ancient swamps and bogs. In any case, it took millions of years for both coal and oil to be produced. This is the case because it took that much time for overlying sediments to produce the unimaginable heat and pressure that would one day allow us to harvest these energy resources. What is one clue word or phrase in the passage that indicates a contrast? A. In any case B. However C. Both D. Because
write down one adjective to describe the behaviour of swear words
what are central ideas of smith's text and what is the purpose of his aacount
A phone caller becomes irate and demands to speak to your boss, saying, "I know she wants to be interrupted to speak to me!" You should say,
A. "Oh, I'm sorry, I'll put you right through."
B. "I told you she was in conference!"
C. "I don't know quite what to do; I'll go into the conference and ask."
D. "Mrs. Wilson can't be contacted now, but I will give her your name and number as soon as possible."
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Even if the caller is very irritated and demanding to speak to your boss, you should not interrump him if he is in a meeting.
Therefore, the best response to this demand is to take down the name and phone number of the caller and pass it on as soon as your boss is available. This way, you are complying with the caller's request and respecting your boss' schedule at the same time.
because contrary to the wisdom of the bumper sticker it is not enough these days to Simply question authority
A bumper sticker is an adhesive label or sticker with a message that is meant to be attached to the bumper of a car and read by the people inside other cars, though they are frequently stuck onto other objects.
Why not put bumper stickers on cars?Bumper stickers can expose sensitive personal data about driver and their family, making them more susceptible to criminal activity. Stickers can also convey messages, whether political or otherwise, that can annoy and occasionally infuriate particular populations.
During the 1952 contest between Dwight Eisenhower and Adlai Stevenson for the presidency, the acceptance of bumper stickers advanced significantly. The use of bumper stickers for election-related advertising was a first. Since then, they have been employed in each presidential contest in the United States.
Learn more about bumper stickers here:
https://brainly.com/question/12622605
#SPJ2
What is Chesterton’s central idea in this essay, and how does he introduce it?
The essay initially pretends to be a critique of a type of self-improvement book popular at the time, which claimed to tell how to achieve success. These books defined success strictly in financial terms and assumed that if anyone follows certain steps, they will be able to duplicate the accomplishments of wealthy business owners. However, Chesterton’s review of these books includes a broader social criticism. The focus on the definition of success strictly in terms of money is central to his essay. But wrapped around that issue is the idea that each person can or should perceive success on the same terms as a business leader. He illustrates the point by saying a donkey is successful at being a donkey as much as a millionaire is successful at being a millionaire, so there is no point in calling a donkey a failed millionaire or vice versa.
To counter the common assumptions about success, Chesterton describes people in various walks of life and how each might more realistically succeed. In this description, he suggests that these books falsely pretend to help people succeed in their own social circles and encourage people to try to become something they are not and cannot ever be.
Chesterton says these writers tell the ordinary man how he may succeed in his career—if he is a builder, he may succeed as a builder; or if he is a stockbroker, he may succeed as a stockbroker. Chesterton increases his satire at this point, commenting that the authors say a grocer may become a sporting yachtsman; a tenth-rate journalist may become a peer, which is a British nobleman; and a German Jew may become an Anglo-Saxon. Obviously, these transitions are unlikely or even impossible. Chesterton then criticizes the main assumption of these books and the society that produces it. By claiming that average people can follow in the steps of business tycoons such as Rothschild or Vanderbilt, the book's author is taking part in "the horrible mysticism of money," in which people worship the unlikely possibility of achieving great riches.
Final answer:
G.K. Chesterton discusses the paradox of Indian nationalists desiring to establish an independent national identity through the adoption of English governmental models, hinting at a possible identity crisis for India.
Explanation:
G.K. Chesterton's central idea in his essay on Indian nationalism revolves around his perception of nationalists seeking to replicate English governmental models as a sign of a desire to adopt English identity rather than fostering a unique Indian ethos. Chesterton introduces this assertion by stating that the nationalists, who want all trappings of the English government such as the parliament, judiciary, and press, may appear less Indian and not really national in their aspirations.
According to Chesterton, the adoption of English systems and values in establishing a national identity fails to reflect a true sense of national identity. He argues this point by drawing a distinction between native cultures and the influence of colonial powers like England. Chesterton's essay, written for the Illustrated London News, provides insights into his views on imperialism and cultural identity, and it can be surmised that Chesterton fears the loss of unique cultural identities when colonial systems are adopted without question.
In summary, Chesterton's thesis points to the irony and potential issues of a colonized nation seeking independence by adopting the colonizer's governmental systems, suggesting that this might lead to a form of cultural and national identity crisis.
Which line from the poem best illustrates alliteration? “Silver” by Walter de la Mare
What does hadero mean when she uses the term, "sonic lineages". what does she describe as her own sonic lineages?
Answer:
eeee
Explanation:
What does the essay’s author Malcolm gladwell think schools should do to remedy the achievement gap
What is the meaning of drumming went wild?
How is the Declaration of Independence structured ?
we have to find 2 syllable word in following sentence " We will rake the leaves and then we will trim the bushes"
Briefly discuss the symbolism of the mask in Dunbar’s poem “We Wear the Mask.” What does it likely represent? Why does Dunbar use the image of a mask?
In “We Wear the Mask,” the mask symbolizes the social inequality present in America at the turn of the twentieth century. Dunbar uses the image of a mask to portray inequality and racism still prevalent in the United States at the time:
We wear the mask that grins and lies,
It hides our cheeks and shades our eyes
African Americans were forced to put on a smile in public and pretend as though they were treated justly:
Why should the world be over-wise,
In counting all our tears and sighs?
Inequality was something that they were forced to live with:
We smile, but, O great Christ, our cries
To thee from tortured souls arise.
Dunbar also uses the mask as a symbol of American hypocrisy in the following lines. Slavery had been abolished in the nation. If Americans were really adamant about changing society, they could do so. Instead, racism and racial inequality were still evident.
But let the world dream otherwise,
We wear the mask!
The mask in Dunbar's poem symbolizes the facade put on by African Americans to hide true feelings from society. It represents concealment and is used as a survival mechanism against oppression.
The symbolism of the mask in Paul Laurence Dunbar's poem We Wear the Mask likely represents the facade that individuals, especially African Americans during Dunbar's time, put on to conceal their true feelings and emotions. The poem suggests that this mask is worn to present a content and untroubled exterior to society, even though underneath lies pain and suffering. Dunbar uses the image of a mask to convey the theme that people often hide their genuine selves due to societal pressures or for self-preservation.
The use of the mask in literature often symbolizes a concealment of one's identity or emotions. It is a barrier between the person and the world, used to project a chosen image. Dunbar's usage is particularly powerful because it speaks to the African American experience, where the mask represents a survival mechanism in the face of systemic oppression and racism.
What does this excerpt from act 1 of Romeo and Juliet reveal about the Montague-Capulet feud? ABRAHAM: Do you bite your thumb at us, sir? SAMPSON: I do bite my thumb, sir. ABRAHAM: Do you bite your thumb at us, sir? SAMPSON: (aside to GREGORY) Is the law of our side, if I say ay? GREGORY: No. SAMPSON: No, sir, I do not bite my thumb at you, sir, but I bite my thumb, sir. GREGORY: Do you quarrel, sir? ABRAHAM: Quarrel sir! no, sir. SAMPSON: If you do, sir, I am for you: I serve as good a man as you. ABRAHAM: No better. SAMPSON: Well, sir. GREGORY: Say 'better:' here comes one of my master's kinsmen. SAMPSON: Yes, better, sir. ABRAHAM: You lie. SAMPSON: Draw, if you be men. Gregory, remember thy swashing blow. The servants are more serious about the feud than their masters. The servants of both households use the feud as an excuse to pick fights with each other. The Capulet-Montague feud is petty, foolish, and easily blown out of proportion. The servants don’t take the feud seriously and are disinterested in its outcome. The young noblemen of both houses use the feud as an excuse to pick fights.
Answer:
E
Explanation:
No matter when or where they meet, noblemen and servants of both houses use the feud as an excuse to fight.Probably being young and belonging to one of the feuds were the perfect excuses for wanting to defend a chosen or inherited side with passion.Violence is an easy consequence of any encounter as the rivalry and enemity between the houses proves perfect to initiate a fight.
Read the quotation from The Crisis, Number IV.
“It is not a field of a few acres of ground, but a cause, that we are defending, and whether we defeat the enemy in one battle, or by degrees, the consequences will be the same.”
Which phrase best describes the “cause” that Paine refers to?
Answer:
D. Freedom from an oppressive government
Explanation:
What happens at the end of chrysanthemums that makes Elisa sad?
Answer:
She sees that the stranger has thrown her chrysanthemum sprouts onto the road.
Explanation:
The traveler passing by didn’t care about her chrysanthemum.
A P E X. L E A R N I N G
patrick works a 40 hour week at $10.70 an hour with time and a half for overtime. Last week he worked 45 hours. what were his total earning for the week
Answer: $508.25
Explanation: $10.70 x 45 = $481.50, $10.70 * 2 = $5.35 x 5 = $26.75 + $481.50 = $508.25
According to the transcendentalists, how could man come to understand god
A) attending church and worshipping
B) by praying alone
C) by observing nature
D) by writing about true spirituality
The answer is C by observing nature
What does Edwards mean when he says that sinners “hang by a slender thread”?
The options of the questions are, A) Sinners have to climb that thread if they hope to reach heaven. B) There is Little that protects sinners from God’s fury. C) Prayer is the thread that connects the devout to God. D) God’s fury is like a sharp pointed needle.
The correct answer is B) There is Little that protects sinners from God’s fury.
What Edwards means when says that sinners “hang by a slender thread” is that there is Little that protects sinners from God’s fury.
Jonathan Edwards wrote “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” in 1741. He was a British preacher in the colonial times and he delivered that speech in Connecticut and Massachusetts. His ideas of the fury of God reflect the religious teachings during the Great Awakening. Specifically, in his speech he referred as the Hell, like a place for the sinners and the suffering and pain for the offenders of God’s precepts.
Which literary device is employed in the following sentence from Herman Melville’s short story "Bartleby, the Scrivener"?
And here Bartleby makes his home, sole spectator of a solitude which he has seen all populous—a sort of innocent and transformed Marius brooding among the ruins of Carthage
Answer:
Allusion
Explanation:
This is an example of allusion. Allusion is the name given to an indirect reference to something from an unrelated context. The author usually includes allusions in order to describe an item in an indirect way. In this case, the allusion is to the ruins of Carthage, an ancient civilization of merchants that was in conflict with Rome for most of its history.
What is one way and author can use the setting of a story to build tension
Answer: The characters don't fit in with their surroundings.
Explanation:
just solved it
What do you think is a memoir writer's responsibility to write his or her history accurately
what is typically the purpose of the beginning of the body of the letter?
The body of the letter is always the most important and longest part of a letter in which the main idea or purpose of the letter is conveyed.
Now, the purpose of the beginning of the body of the letter is to relay succinctly and clearly the reason why the letter is being written.
The body of the letter follows the heading, date, address, salutation or greetings, and the subject line or subject matter.
Why does wilson believe that gatsby killed myrtle?
Wilson believes that Gatsby killed Myrtle because Tom gave him intentionally misleading information.
What is an information?An information refers to something that has the power to inform. At the most fundamental level information pertains to the interpretation of that which may be sensed.
The digital signals and other data use discrete signs or alogrithms to convey information, other phenomena and artifacts such as analog signals, poems, pictures, music or other sounds, and the electrical currents convey information in a more continuous form.
Information is not knowledge itself, but its interpretation is important. An Information can be in a raw form or in an structured form as data.The information available through a collection of data may be derived by analysis by expert analysts in their domain.
Learn more about information here:
https://brainly.com/question/27798920
#SPJ5
The provided excerpts do not directly address why Wilson believes that Gatsby killed Myrtle, as they do not pertain to 'The Great Gatsby'.
Explanation:The question as to why Wilson believes that Gatsby killed Myrtle is not directly addressed in the passages provided. The snippets from various texts presented above do not include a specific reference to The Great Gatsby, Wilson, or the event in question. To accurately explain why Wilson believes Gatsby killed Myrtle would require an analysis of the plot points from F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel The Great Gatsby, where mistaken identities and the tragic collision result in Wilson's false belief. Since there's no direct answer to the question within the excerpts provided, and out of adherence to factual accuracy, I must refrain from answering based on these unrelated texts.
What point of view is used in "Was It a Dream?" How would a different point of view change the story? In one to two paragraphs, explain your answer
Answer:
The passage is written from the first-person point of view. In a third person limited passage, we would only get to know a single character's thoughts, but in an omniscient passage we would see and hear the thoughts of another character, letting us know what that character knows before they do.
Explanation:
Identify a universal theme for success is sweetest and successful failure Then, compare and contrast the two poems for their content and their themes.