Answer:
The camel driver is trying to help Santiago to discover his internal richness and purpose in life. Santiago needs to learn how to get rid of vanities and find purification.
Explanation:
According to the description of what could happen in the oasis as a complete lifestyle, Santiago describes the situation as something that good knows should not be a comfort zone. Staying in the oasis to enjoy an easy and calm life is not the best option for him, since he will always be thinking about how his life would have been if he had simply continued on his way to discover his buried treasure.
Evidence that Santiago has internalized the bit of wisdom offered by the camel driver is the camel driver teaches Santiago to learn from every encounter, including negative ones, emphasizing resilience and the search for wisdom through experiences. Santiago internalizes this wisdom, seeing the oasis as not just a destination but as a symbol of life's journey and opportunities for growth.
The conversation between Santiago and the camel driver on pages 84-85 of The Alchemist is rich with life lessons about the nature of experiences and learning from every encounter. The camel driver imparts wisdom based on his own observations and experiences, emphasizing the crucial lesson of learning from all encounters, including the negative ones. He tells Santiago that even the thief who stole his money in Tangier had a lesson for Santiago: that every detail of life, including hardships and setbacks, can teach him something valuable if he is observant and open to learning. This life lesson is about resilience, adaptability, and the search for wisdom through personal experiences and challenges. As Santiago approaches the oasis, his reaction reveals that he has indeed internalized the camel driver's wisdom. Santiago's newfound ability to see beyond the immediate appearance of the oasis and to appreciate the deeper lessons and opportunities it presents is a clear indication that he has embraced the camel driver's advice. He views the oasis not just as a physical destination but as a symbol of life’s journey, filled with lessons and chances for personal growth.
9.
Which sentence best shows correct comma usage?
A.
It was a hot, humid, afternoon when we decided to head for the beach.
B.
It was a hot, humid afternoon when we decided to head for the beach.
C.
It was a hot humid afternoon, when we decided to head for the beach.
D.
It was a hot humid afternoon, when we decided, to head for the beach.
Answer:
B). It was a hot, humid afternoon when we decided to head for the beach.
Explanation:
In the given question, option B reflects the sentence with a correct comma usage as it joins the two coordinating adjectives together that modifies/qualifies the same noun 'afternoon'. The other options are incorrect as they place the comma inappropriately.
In option A, the comma precedes the noun 'afternoon' that is grammatically incorrect while in options C and D, the coma precede the conjunction 'when' which is also grammatically incorrect as according to the rules a comma precedes a conjunction only when two independent clauses are joined together which is not the case here(an independent clause is being followed by a dependent clause here). Thus, option B is the correct answer.
If you fully support a topic, your evaluation does not need to address the opposition or include counter arguments.a. Trueb. False
Answer:
b. False
Explanation:
If you want to be objective that means looking at all sides and addressing their presence with what they oppose.
Final answer:
The statement is b. false. When supporting a topic, it is important to present a clear viewpoint and also address counterclaims to provide a thorough and empathetic argument, avoiding false dichotomies.
Explanation:
The statement that if you fully support a topic, your evaluation does not need to address the opposition or include counter arguments, is false. It is important in argumentative writing to present a clear, definite viewpoint, which means readers should understand which side you support.
However, it is also critical to support your viewpoint with reasoning and evidence, which includes acknowledging and addressing any relevant counterclaims or dissenting opinions. By doing so, you demonstrate empathy and provide a more well-rounded argument. Not addressing the opposition might suggest a false dichotomy, which is a form of poor reasoning that limits the available options without justification.
Reginald's camera always makes a clicking noise just before the flash goes off. After taking many pictures of his little brother Devin, he presses the button, the camera clicks, but the flash does not go off. Despite this, Devin blinks just as he did when the flash was working. This is an example of ______ conditioning, and the flash is the ______.
Answer:
- Classical;unconditional stimulus
Explanation:
According to the description, the given situation exemplifies 'classical conditioning' as Devin blink(just as he did) exhibits 'learning through affiliation' that occurs due to connection of two stimuli(neutral and biologically dominant) to produce a learned(conditioned) response. The concept was coined by famous psychologist Ivan Pavlov due to which it also known as 'Pavlovian conditioning'.
In this situation, the flash would be categorized as the 'unconditioned stimulus' as the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus together contribute to evoke a 'conditioned or learned response' from Devin.
Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you agree with? Explain why.
Answer:
I disagree everyone should have a fair chance of a higher education
Explanation: