Monique says the model shows 7/100. Do you agree? Explain.

Answer:

1st 6 is 1/10 of 2nd 6 and 2nd 6 is 10 times the 2nd 6.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are asked to find the relationship between the 6s in 660,472.

Upon looking at our given number, we can see that 1st see is in 10 thousands place and 2nd 6 is in hundred thousands place.

Place value of 1st 6: 60,000

Place value of 2nd 6: 600,000

Let us compare our both numbers as:

We can see that 600,000 is 10 times greater than 60,000, therefore, 1st 6 is 1/10 of 2nd 6 and 2nd 6 is 10 times the 2nd 6.

Answer:

[tex]\( f(x) + g(x) = -4x - 10 \).[/tex]

To find the domain of [tex]\( f(x) + g(x) \)[/tex], we need to consider the values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] for which the function is defined. Since [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]  and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are both linear functions, their domain is all real numbers.

So, the domain of [tex]\( f(x) + g(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \mathbb{R} \)[/tex] , which means that [tex]\( x \)[/tex] can be any real number.

Explanation:

To find [tex]\( f(x) + g(x) \)[/tex] , we simply add the functions [tex]\( f(x) \) and \( g(x) \)[/tex] together:

[tex]\[ f(x) + g(x) = (2x - 7) + (-6x - 3) \][/tex]

Now, let's simplify:

[tex]\[ f(x) + g(x) = 2x - 7 - 6x - 3 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ f(x) + g(x) = (2x - 6x) + (-7 - 3) \][/tex]

[tex]\[ f(x) + g(x) = -4x - 10 \][/tex]

In this composition, we first apply the function h, which is simply the identity function, to the input 4, resulting in 4. Then, we apply the function g to this result. As g(x) = 5x - 3, g(4) equals 17. Hence, (g◦h)(4) = 17.

To find (g◦h)(4), which represents the composition of functions g and h evaluated at x = 4, we first need to find h(4), then substitute the result into g(x).

Given h(x) = x, h(4) = 4.

Now, we substitute h(4) into g(x).

So, g(h(4)) becomes g(4).

Given g(x) = 5x - 3, substituting x = 4 into g(x), we get g(4) = 5(4) - 3 = 20 - 3 = 17.

Therefore, (g◦h)(4) = 17.

divide the two

40.8 / 8 = 5.1 gallons per container

A sequence can be both arithmetic and geometric, and this is illustrated where terms follow both an arithmetic and geometric progression.

Yes, a sequence can be both arithmetic and geometric. An example of such a sequence is when the terms of the sequence follow both an arithmetic progression, where the difference between consecutive terms is constant, and a geometric progression, where each term after the first is found by multiplying the previous term by a fixed, non-zero number.

Answer:

109

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that there is a sequence of numbers as

4,11,25,53,...

We have to find the next number.

To find the next number, let us see the pattern from the given four numbers

We have

I number = 4

II number = 4+7

III number = II number + 2(7)

Iv number = III number +4(7)

So if we guess this pattern continues the next number namely v number would be

V number = IV number +8(7)

=53+56

109

i.e. I number is added by 7, II number by 2(7), III number by 2^2(7)

hence next number 2^3(7)

Answer is 109

The next number in the sequence is:

As can be seen, the first number is a selected number, which in this case is four, to which seven are added to obtain:

Then double 7 is added to that number, that is 14, with which you get:

And to get the next number, double 28 must be added, which is 56, therefore:

By this reason, the next number in the sequence is 109.

If you want to learn more about Sequences, you can visit the following link: https://brainly.com/question/16130064

Final answer:

The scale factors for the points given are 1.5 for A to A', indicating an enlargement, and 0.5 for B to B', indicating a reduction. G to G' also indicates a reduction with a factor of 0.5.

Explanation:

To determine the scale factor given the point and its image, you can find the ratio between the coordinates of the image and the original coordinates. Let's analyze the pairs of points you've provided:

A (3, 6) and A' (4.5, 9)

G (1.5, 3) and G' (3, 6)

B (2, 5) and B' (1, 2.5)

We can find the scale factor by dividing the x-coordinates of the image by the original x-coordinate and doing the same for the y-coordinates. For point A:

Scale factor for x: 4.5 / 3 = 1.5

Scale factor for y: 9 / 6 = 1.5

For point G, we see that it's actually the reverse (original to image), but you can still calculate:

Scale factor for x: 3 / 1.5 = 2

Scale factor for y: 6 / 3 = 2

Lastly, for point B:

Scale factor for x: 1 / 2 = 0.5

Scale factor for y: 2.5 / 5 = 0.5

So, the scale factors for A to A' and for B to B' are 1.5 and 0.5, respectively, showing that A to A' is an enlargement while B to B' is a reduction. For G to G', the reverse is a reduction with a factor of 0.5.

Answer: The manager sold the couch at $163.85.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we have given that

Wholesale price of the couch = $113.00

If Jessica's Furniture Store marks up all furniture by 45%.

So, Increment in whole sale price is given by

[tex]\frac{45}{100}\times 113\\\\=\frac{5085}{100}\\\\=\$50.85[/tex]

So, the manager sold the couch at the price is given by

[tex]\$113.00+\$50.85\\\\=\$163.85[/tex]

Hence, the manager sold the couch at $163.85.

An example of one possible outcome in the sample space:

[tex]\[ \text{bgbbggbggbgbgbggbbgbgbgbbggbgbgb} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \text{bgbbggbggbgbgbggbbgbgbgbbggbgbgb} \][/tex]