Many african american women left fieldwork immediately after the civil war because

3rd answer is really c

they imported more American goods

The correct answer is C) read a description of the powers in the Constitution.

The best way to understand the expressed powers of Congress is to read a description of the powers in the Constitution.

The expressed powers of the Constitution are listed in Article I, section 8. Among the expressed power, are: to borrow money, to declare war, to tax and spend for defense, authorization to construct roads, to establish post offices, and the regulation of commerce between the states and authorize trade agreements with other nations, such as was the case of NAFTA, the North America Free Trade Agreement, now called USMCA.

The best way to understand the expressed powers of Congress is to read a description of the powers in the U.S. Constitution. This primary source provides the most direct and accurate understanding of Congress's official powers.

The expressed powers of Congress are specifically listed in the United States Constitution. The Constitution details the roles, responsibilities, and powers of the Congress. Therefore, the best way to understand the expressed powers of Congress is to directly read a description of the powers in the Constitution itself (Option C).

While examining how Congress has exercised its powers over time (Option A) or studying the statements made by the executive branch (Option B) could provide supplementary understanding, these methods are more indirect and potentially subject to interpretation and change. Conversely, the expressed powers listed in the Constitution represent the intended and official functions of Congress.

https://brainly.com/question/34142302

#SPJ6

Tecumseh, the Shawnee chief, resorted to an alliance with the British because he needed Britain's help to restricting American settlement from encroaching on Indian lands.

It should be noted that an alliance simply means an agreement that's done in order to achieve a goal.

In this case, Tecumseh, the Shawnee chief, resorted to an alliance with the British because he needed Britain's help to restricting American settlement from encroaching on Indian lands.

Learn more about alliance on:

brainly.com/question/1872673

#SPJ1

Final answer:

Tecumseh formed an alliance with the British during the War of 1812 to protect Native American sovereignty and land against American expansion, embracing a philosophy that no single tribe could cede land without the consent of all tribes.

Explanation:

Tecumseh, the Shawnee chief, saw an alliance with the British as the best means to protect Native American sovereignty and territories against the United States. Especially after the US declared war on Britain in 1812, Tecumseh and his confederation found the British to be more aligned with their interests in curbing American expansion. Tecumseh's perspective was greatly influenced by his ideal that all Native American land was communal property, a belief antithetical to American land cession treaties which were dividing and selling Native lands without the unanimous consent of all tribes.

Over time, Tecumseh's movement to resist American encroachment and the resulting loss of culture garnered support from various Native American tribes, bolstering the confederation. The War of 1812 provided a larger conflict in which Tecumseh and his followers could take part alongside the British to further their aims. This alliance was a strategic move to unite against their common enemy, the American forces pushing westward.

the answer is C for apex

A strong central authority in African kingdoms greatly benefited trade, military organization, and political stability, allowing these kingdoms to prosper, expand, and maintain internal order. However, after the decline of central powers, African societies struggled to resist external influences such as European colonization and the slave trade.

A strong central authority provided multiple benefits to African kingdoms, particularly in terms of trade, military organization, and political stability. The medieval African kingdoms, such as Ghana, Mali, and Songhai, were known for their prospering trade, due in part to their control of the trans-Saharan trade routes. These routes enabled the trade of gold, salt, and slaves, which were critical to these kingdoms' economies.

Moreover, a centralized state, like the West African chiefdom of Asante, could muster a powerful military force. Under strong leadership, the Asantehene united chiefs in a military confederation, enabling them to collect tribute and expand through conquest. A strong central authority also had the power to enact laws and to maintain social order within its territories, creating a stable environment for economic and cultural development.

In contrast, the lack of a central power often led to fragmentation and made it more difficult to resist external pressures, such as the increasing European involvement in the slave trade. Centralized states, like Benin, attempted to regulate this trade, but with varied success. Overall, a strong central authority bolstered African kingdoms by providing stability, promoting prosperity through trade, and effectively coordinating defensive and offensive military strategies.

The correct answer is B) to make less money than their male counterparts and C) to be forced to stay at home if they became pregnant.

Women working outside the home during the roaring 1920s could expect to make less money than their male counterparts and to be forced to stay at home if they became pregnant.

The roaring 1920s were a time of changes and prosperity for American citizens. In the particular case of women, there were many changes for them in this decade that included working habits, cultural changes, and more independence in some aspects.

Many women had to get a job outside the home to help the family. Unfortunately for them, women made less money than their male counterparts. They also were forced to stay at home if they became pregnant because the owners thought that a pregnant woman in the workplace was detrimental to job productivity and women were fired.

The process of ratification of the Articles of Confederation was slowed by disagreements over consent requirements, economic burdens from the Revolutionary War, disputes over the structure of the government and American representation, and disputes between states over territory claims.

The ratification process of the Articles of Confederation was slowed by several factors. First, the requirement for any law to have the consent of nine states and amendments to require the consent of all states made it difficult to pass any changes. This was further complicated by the fact that any acts put forth by the Congress were non-binding, meaning individual states could choose whether or not to comply.

Furthermore, the economic burdens of the Revolutionary War resulted in many states being buried in debt, weakening their capability to support the ratification. The struggle between delegates over the structure of a centralized government and American representation also contributed to the delay of the ratification process. Issues over rights and the omission of a bill of rights from the Constitution nearly stalled the process completely.

Finally, the requirement for all thirteen states to approve the articles meant that disputes between states, such as Maryland's disagreement with the Appalachian territory claims, resulted in a delay in ratification until all territorial claims were relinquished.

https://brainly.com/question/10504905

#SPJ12

What was the most important document published in 1776? The Declaration of Independence is the easy answer for Americans, but many would argue that Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" had a bigger and more global impact.

On March 9, 1776, "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations" (commonly referred to as simply "The Wealth of Nations") was first published. Smith, a Scottish philosopher by trade, wrote the book to upend the mercantilist system. Mercantilism held that wealth was fixed and finite and that the only way to prosper was to hoard gold and tariff products from abroad. According to this theory, this meant nations should sell their goods to other countries while buying nothing in return. Predictably, countries fell into rounds of retaliatory tariffs that choked off international trade. (For related reading, see: The Basics Of Tariffs And Trade Barriers.)

The core of Smith's thesis was that humans' natural tendency toward self-interest (or in modern terms, looking out for yourself) results in prosperity. Smith argued that by giving everyone freedom to produce and exchange goods as they pleased (free trade) and opening the markets up to domestic and foreign competition, people's natural self-interest would promote greater prosperity than with stringent government regulations. Smith believed humans ultimately promote public interest through their everyday economic choices. “He (or she) generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention,” states Smith in “An Inquiry Into The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations” (1776). This free-market force became known as the invisible hand, but it needed support to bring about its magic.

The automatic pricing and distribution mechanisms in the economy—which Adam Smith called an "invisible hand"—interacts directly and indirectly with centralized, top-down planning authorities. However, there are some meaningful conceptual fallacies in an argument that is framed as the invisible hand versus the government.

The invisible hand is not actually a distinguishable entity. Instead, it is the sum of many phenomena that occur when consumers and producers engage in commerce. Smith's insight into the idea of the invisible hand was one of the most important in the history of economics and remains one of the chief justifications for free market ideologies. The invisible hand theorem (at least in its modern interpretations) suggests that the means of production and distribution should be privately owned, and that if trade occurs unfettered by regulation, in turn, society will flourish organically. These arguments are naturally competitive with the concept and function of government.

The government is not serendipitous; it is prescriptive and intentional. Politicians, regulators and those who exercise legal force (such as the courts, police, and military) pursue defined goals through coercion. However, in contrast, macroeconomic forces—supply and demand, buying and selling, profit and loss occur voluntarily until government policy inhibits or overrides them. In this sense, it is more accurate to suggest that government affects the invisible hand, not the other way around.

Answer:

A - America should be an independent nation

Explanation:

correct on edge

Final answer:

The rise of China's first civilization was influenced by agriculture, political marriages, written scripts, technological innovations, and regional warfare.

Explanation:

The rise of China's first civilization was influenced by several factors, including:

The Louisiana Purchase was a significant event in American history, doubling the size of the country and paving the way for its westward expansion. The event occurred due to intriguing circumstances including the success of the Haitian Revolution. While it had some controversial aspects, it is often termed as the greatest real estate deal in history.

The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 was a significant event in American history that essentially doubled the size of the United States. This purchase, from France, covered a vast territory that spans from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from the Gulf of Mexico to Canada.

President Thomas Jefferson's main aim was to expand the United States to create his 'empire of liberty', and to bolster trade in the West. The dream of a Northwest Passage and opening the Pacific to American commerce was also part of this ambition. Interesting events led to the successful purchase of the Louisiana territory, including the success of the Haitian Revolution against the French, leading Napoleon to abandon his quest of re-establishing an extensive French Empire in America.

The Louisiana Purchase represented not only significant territorial gain but also an economic opportunity, in terms of exploiting the area's commercial potential. However, it also caused controversy, particularly in respect of slavery and constitutional matters. The expansion envisioned by Jefferson, however, significantly shaped the future of the United States, paving the way for its westward expansion, and is often called the greatest real estate deal in American history.

https://brainly.com/question/29760168

#SPJ12