Answer:
Explanation:
A catalyst is a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself getting consumed in the reaction as it helps in decreasing the activation energy. Thus, rate of reaction also increases.
A positive catalyst helps in increasing the rate of a chemical reaction whereas a negative catalyst decreases the rate of a chemical reaction.
Whereas when we increase the temperature then collisions between the particles increases due to increase in kinetic energy. Hence, rate of reaction increases with increase in temperature.
Thus, we can conclude that out of the given options adding a positive catalyst will increase the rate of a chemical reaction.
Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/1572744#readmore
ANSWER QUICK Identify the sentence pattern.
The lovely children are my nephews.
S-V-O
S-LV-PN
S-V
S-LV-PN
I'm like 80% sure because there are no verbs in this sentence.
The sentence 'The lovely children are my nephews' follows the S-LV-PN sentence pattern, with 'The lovely children' as the subject, 'are' as the linking verb, and 'my nephews' as the predicate noun.
The sentence pattern for the sentence 'The lovely children are my nephews' is S-LV-PN. Here, S stands for Subject, LV stands for Linking Verb, and PN stands for Predicate Noun. The subject 'The lovely children' is doing the action, the linking verb 'are' connects the subject to the predicate noun, and 'my nephews' is the predicate noun that renames or identifies the subject.
the conclusion of an analytical essay should
When you're writing an analytical essay your aim is to back up the conclusion that comes at the end. The main body of the essay should lead logically to that conclusion, and it should be properly supported by your arguments and analysis. That's all down to your research and how you structure the essay, of course.
mark me brainliest please!
Answer:
Be properly supported by your arguments and analysis.
Explanation:
When you're writing an analytical essay your aim is to back up the conclusion that comes at the end. The main body of the essay should lead logically to that conclusion.
What is the correct ratio of task to maintenance roles? 1:1
1:2
2:1
3:1
The correct ratio of the task to maintenance is 2.1
Help me please please someone help me please please help me please help please please help me please please help please someone please please help me please please help help
She is my sister. Sue is twelve years old and I am sixteen.
We aren't adults. We are students. We are Canadians. We are Americans.
We are from Chicago. Chicago is in the United States.
Rule for knowing when to use is : Use when talking about a single thing
Rule for knowing when to use am: Use when talking about yourself
Rule for knowing when to use are: Use when talking about multiple things.
Hope my little explanation at the end made sense and helped a bit. Let me know if you need more help!
She is my sister. Sue is twelve years old and I am sixteen. We aren't adults. We are students. We are Canadians. We are Americans. We are from Chicago. Chicago is in the United States
Which word choice from this passage provides the BEST evidence of this letter being written in extremely formal language? A) worthy B) journey C) approve D) diminution
Answer:
it depends on what the letter is about but in general I would say diminution
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The answer is diminution.
Which sentence uses the underlined vocabulary word correctly?
*(this means underlined word)*
A) LeeAnne has been up to her (knavery) again: today, she made breakfast for all before anyone else was up!
B) In my math class, we each took a (perchance) by pretending to purchase shares of a stock.
C)The band's entrance was (clamourous), as the tuba player tripped and fell into the percussionist, who dropped his cymbals.
D) Bosco is an (exception) because like every other cat in the world, he loves catnip.
Answer:c
Explanation: Clamorous means funny or humorous.
Answer: C)The band's entrance was (clamourous), as the tuba player tripped and fell into the percussionist
Explanation:
I completed the unit test.
Identify the sentence with the correct end punctuation.
a.
Did you see the elephants;
b.
I saw a baby kangaroo,
c.
Who found the way to the penguins:
d.
I missed the monkeys!
Answer:
It would be answer D. because quotation marks are used for informing, and in this case it informs that i missed the monkeys!
Explanation:
D....................
What’s the difference between a drawer and an artist?
Answer:
"A drawer (not the thing you put your underwear in) is an artist, but an artist is not necessarily a drawer, though most probably are. Drawing is just that, using a writing utensil to draw, like pencil, chalk, crayon, etc. An artist might use any number of mediums to produce art that doesn't involve drawing…
"
Explanation:
i just serched that don copy lol!!
1.Drawer is a person who only draws the figure or picture but a artist is a person who can have any skills like designing, building, flimmaking, printmaking, etc.
2.Drawer always draws the pictures but artist may or may not draw the pictures.
3.Drawing has only one career whereas artist has has so many career.
4. If drawer is a branch, then artist is the tree.
HURRY QUICK 50 PTS HURRY AND I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLEYIST
1 Which form of the adverb is underlined in the sentence?
I awoke early this morning and cooked a surprise breakfast.
A comparative
B superlative
C positive
2 Which is the superlative form of the adverb far?
A most far
B farthest
C more far
D most farther
3 Which is the comparative form of the adverb fast?
A more faster
B faster
C fastest
D most fast
Answer:
this is right
1.c
2.b
3.b
i think
Explanation:
Answer: c b a
Explanation:
Which of these best identifies the shift of mood in this sentence?
We grew up without a male figure, and cannot you imagine what that is like?
A.
from interrogative to subjunctive
B.
from indicative to conditional
C.
from imperative to indicative
D.
from indicative to interrogative
Answer:
D. from indicative to interrogative
Explanation:
The first clause (We grew up without a male figure) is a declarative sentence in the past indicative. Declarative sentences in the past indicative describe something that occurred in the past.
The second part (cannot you imagine what that is like?) is an interrogative sentence, which is a sentence that asks a question and ends with a question mark.
Why did trench warfare come to characterize the western front by the fall of 1914? And for the rest of the war?
In trench warfare, the two sides fighting each other dig trenches in a battlefield to stop the enemy from advancing.
Which of the following statements most accurately expresses a common theme of postmodern drama?
A. the world is so badly broken that rational behavior is no longer possible
B. even the most moral person sometimes makes the wrong choices
C. humans should not be trusted with the godlike powers of science
D. one persons arrogance can cause the distruction of a whole society
!!!!!!the answer is b
Answer:b
Explanation:
Polydectes is able to trick Perseus into battling Medusa because of Perseus’s
Answer:
Excessive pride
Explanation:
The downfall of Perseus is his excessive pride. This is the reason why Polydectes is able to trick him into battling Medusa. Excessive pride is a common negative trait in Greek heroes, and it is often known as hubris. From this fact, we can conclude that modesty was a value that the Greeks appreciated highly.
type the noun used as an adjective from the sentence below in the space provided. Both houses of Congress are concerned with protecting citizen rights.
Answer:
citizen
Explanation:
The noun citizen is used as an adjective to modify the word rights in the noun phrase citizen rights. Normally, the modifiers in the noun phrases are adjectives, articles, and prepositional phrases. In this sentence, the noun citizen functions as an adjective answering the question "What rights are both Houses of Congress concerned with protecting?"
Answer:
citizen
Explanation:
The noun citizen means a 'legal member of a country or state'. However, in this sentence, it is used as an adjective to describe the noun rights.
For the last several months, Rebecca had been working with her team on raising money in her neighborhood to donate to the hurricane Katrina Relief Fund. They were having a competition with groups to see who could raise the most money in a year. She and her team thought of creative ways to earn money, other than the basic chores, car washes, and baby-sitting that other teams were doing. She and her team had become close, and they vowed that they would stick together.
A few months into the project, one of Rebecca’s team members stopped coming to the meetings and helping out. Soon, one of the other teams was using the same creative ideas for raising money as Rebecca’s team. Within days, Rebecca learned that this member had joined another team. She was disappointed and told her team that she now knew how Benedict Arnold’s troops felt.
What is the historical allusion?
A.
Benedict Arnold
B.
local homeless shelter
C.
Katrina Relief Fund
Answer:
a
Explanation:
What is the meaning of the phrase “the clouds that lour’d upon our house ?
A.) Bad weather
B.) Misfortunes
C.) A tragic loss
D.) A storm
E.) Shadows
B. misfortunes
The excerpt reveals a metaphor, stating that the 'mists' are 'covered' which implies they are no more. After that you can see the portrayal of cheerful occasions that rule of ruler Edward IV has brought.
Hope This Helped!
Have A Great Day!
Stay Safe,
TheBlueFox
in the book, “The Other Wes Moore,” what does the clothing represent in chapter 3?
In 'The Other Wes Moore', the clothing in Chapter 3 symbolizes the characters' identities and societal roles. The author's military school uniform represents commitment and discipline, while the other Wes Moore's clothing represents a life of crime and hardship.
Explanation:In the book 'The Other Wes Moore', clothing has significant symbolic meaning in Chapter 3. The way the characters dress represents their identities and the roles they play in society. For example, the author, Wes Moore, is in his military school uniform, symbolizing discipline, order, commitment, and a path to a better future. On the other hand, the other Wes Moore's clothing, usually casual or streetwear, communicates a life of hardship and crime, highlighting the contrasting paths the two Moores are on.
Learn more about Symbolism of Clothing here:https://brainly.com/question/34142227
#SPJ3
The clothing in chapter 3 of “The Other Wes Moore” represents the diverging paths the two main characters are taking. Military school uniforms worn by the author represent discipline and structure, whereas the urban streetwear worn by the other Wes Moore represents disregard for societal norms.
Explanation:In chapter 3 of “The Other Wes Moore,” clothing represents the divergent paths that the two Wes Moores take. Notably, one Wes Moore, the author, is seen wearing military school uniforms that symbolize discipline, structure, and a future outside the confines of Baltimore's inner city. On the other hand, the other Wes Moore, who becomes entangled in the city's drug trade, often wore urban streetwear, representing disregard for authority and societal norms.
This stark contrast in attire becomes a visual representation of the distinct futures they will face. The military school uniforms demonstrate the author's commitment to education and breaking away from the hardships of their shared environment, while the urban streetwear of the other Wes Moore represents his deeper immersion into the dangerous lifestyle of the streets of Baltimore.
Learn more about Symbolism of clothing here:https://brainly.com/question/1094666
#SPJ6
An effective argument (5 points) uses anger to prove one idea is better than another uses emotions to prove one idea is better than another uses evidence to prove one idea is better than another uses opinions to prove one idea is better than another
An effective argument uses evidence, because if you are being bias, it isn't helpful.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
what are the similarities and differences between nick carraway and tom buchanan
Answer:
A brutal, hulking man, Tom Buchanan is a former Yale football player who, like Daisy, comes from an immensely wealthy Midwestern family. His racism and sexism are symptomatic of his deep insecurity about his elevated social position. Tom is a vicious bully, physically menacing both his wife and his mistress. He is a thoroughgoing hypocrite as well: though he condemns his wife for and his mistress. He is a thoroughgoing hypocrite as well: though he condemns his wife for her infidelity, he has no qualms about carrying on an affair himself.
Explanation:
Final answer:
Nick Carraway and Tom Buchanan are both from wealthy backgrounds which provides them a perspective into the high society of the 1920s. They contrast in that Nick is reflective with moral integrity and Tom is arrogant and prejudiced, symbolizing the divide between values and corrosive affluence within the novel's exploration of the American Dream.
Explanation:
The similarities and differences between Nick Carraway and Tom Buchanan in The Great Gatsby are crucial for understanding the dynamics of the narrative and the social commentary of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Nick, the story's narrator, is depicted as thoughtful, reflective, and possessing a sense of moral integrity, while Tom is portrayed as brash, aggressively arrogant, and deeply prejudiced. One key similarity is that both characters hail from a background of wealth and privilege, which gives them insight into the elite social circles of the 1920s. However, their dispositions and actions contrast starkly: Nick is more reserved and sees the corrupting effects of wealth, whereas Tom embodies those effects through his entitlement and infidelity. Both characters serve to explore themes of decadence, class conflict, and the elusive nature of the American Dream.
Their differences are nuanced and represent broader themes in the novel. For instance, Nick's Midwestern roots contrast with Tom's ostentatious East Egg lifestyle, symbolizing the divide between honest values and the corruptive nature of affluence. Additionally, Nick's reflective nature and Tom's domineering persona highlight the diversity of voices and attitudes in the Jazz Age. This contrast underscores the major theme of societal dissension and the deep rifts between individuals' ethical frameworks shaped by their social environments.
pls help i will mark brainlest
Answer:
Q 1 . Setting .
Q 2 . Third - Person Omniscient .
An overt flirt is .
meloncholic
sanguine
choleric
phelgmatic
Synonyms that simplify each word to make it easier to understand:
melancholic - basically feeling sad or depressed
sanguine - There are different definitions of this word but I'm going to assume that you are talking about this one: optimistic/positive
choleric - grumpy
phlegmatic- self-confident
An overt flirt is phlegmatic
You have to be confident to be able to flirt properly or else it doesn't work very effectively
Hope this helped!
Read the following sentence: The cat thought the dog was scary, even though the dog loved the cat. What tells you that the narrator is omniscient? A.
Answer: the answer would be A
limited the narrator only knows the thoughts and feelings of one character
What does the statement holding grudges is easier than forgiving mean
Being mean to another person based on the fact that they angered you in some way is easier to do, but on the contrary understanding that what the person did to you is more difficult.
What this quote means? One thing’s sure and nothing’s surer/The rich get richer and the poor get-children./He had thrown himself into it with a creative passion.”
It's exactly as it says, the rich get richer and poor people are fircedbto have children. I don't know who "he" that's being mentioned is but maybe he is poor and he is okay with having children?
Answer:1
Explanation:
1
What are text features?
Text features include all the components of a story or article that are not the main body of text. These include the table of contents, index, glossary, headings, bold words, sidebars, pictures and captions, and labeled diagrams. ... A poorly organized text can impede the reader by being counterintuitive.
20 POINTS! Based on the passage and what you have learned in the lesson, write three to four sentences explaining whether dipping letters in vinegar to prevent the spread of yellow fever was a good conclusion.
From the passage, it can be deduced that because people did not know that yellow fever was a result of the bite of an infected mosquito, and it was believed that people could catch the disease through touch.
Yellow fever is a viral infection that was caused by mosquitoes. This leads to bleeding and jaundice.In this passage, it was stated that yellow fever was caused by the bite of an infected mosquito, they assumed that people could catch the disease through touch.Therefore, to control the disease, letters were cleaned with vinegar before being sent. This implies that there was a negative cause and effect relationship that was depicted in this case.
Learn more about passages on:
https://brainly.com/question/11600913
Answer:
it can be deduced that because people did not know that yellow fever was a result of the bite of an infected mosquito, and it was believed that people could catch the disease through touch.
Explanation:
How does repetition affect the narrator's tone?
Answer:
It makes the tone more serious
Explanation:
When a narrarator repeats something, its probably because what he or she is repeating is important information, usually casting the narrarators voice to be a bit serious.
Repetition can greatly affect the tone in narration. It is used to emphasize points, establish rhythm, intensify emotions, and build or relieve tension. However, overuse may lead to monotony, so it should be applied judiciously.
Explanation:Repetition in narration can significantly affect the tone, which is the author's attitude or feelings towards the subject matter or audience. Repetition can be used to emphasize particular points, establishing a rhythm that enhances the narrative. This technique can intensify the desired emotion or mood, therefore affecting the overall tone of the narration.
For instance, in suspenseful sequences, repetition of certain words or phrases can build tension and anxiety. This tends to make the tone apprehensive or unsettled. In contrast, repetitive mention of calming or tranquil images can foster a soothing or peaceful tone. Hence, it is evident that repetition has a substantial role in manipulating and defining the tone of a narrative.
However, there's a note of caution with its use. Overuse of repetition can lead to a monotonous, tedious tone, potentially losing the audience's interest. Therefore, it's crucial for the narrator to balance their use of repetition to maintain an engaging narrative and a compelling tone.
Learn more about Repetition and Tone here:
https://brainly.com/question/30145546
#SPJ3
(1) King Midas wanted to be the richest king in the world, and one day, he had the chance to make it happen. His servants had captured a satyr, a half-man and half-goat creature. The satyr happened to be good friends with a very powerful god named Dionysus.
(2) Midas thought that Dionysus just might give him a reward for finding the satyr, so he asked the satyr to stay at the palace where he would be treated as a guest. The satyr was given a nice room with fine linens and any food he desired. The satyr was quite happy about all this.
(3) Soon, Dionysus arrived at the palace, as he had been searching for the satyr. Midas took Dionysus to see the satyr, who told the god about all the rich foods and fine things the king had given him. Dionysus was grateful to Midas for treating his friend so well, and he offered to grant Midas one wish.
(4) "I wish that everything I touch would turn to gold!" Midas exclaimed without thinking. He couldn't believe his luck! Now he would definitely become the world's richest king. Dionysus asked if he was sure, and because Midas said he was sure, Dionysus granted the wish.
(5) For the next few hours, Midas was in heaven. He touched flowers, and they became gold. He touched his bed, and it became gold. He touched his castle, and it became gold. Then, because he was thirsty, Midas tried to drink some water, but it dried as it touched his lips and also became gold. He tried to eat an orange, but it too turned into the precious metal. Finally, his daughter ran to give him a hug, and she too became gold! Midas realized that his wish had become a curse.
(6) Midas begged Dionysus to take back his wish. Dionysus saw how sorry Midas was and took pity on him. He sent Midas to bathe in the River Pactolus. The waters cleansed him and released him from the golden touch. Midas realized then that riches are not the most important things in the world.
1
What is the main idea of the entire story?
A. King Midas learns that riches are not the most important things in the world.
B. King Midas gets his wish and becomes the richest king in the world.
C. Dionysus will grant you a wish if you are kind to his friend.
D. King Midas enjoys turning many different things into gold.
Answer:
A. King Midas learns that riches are not the most important things in the world.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. King Midas learns that riches are not the most important things in the world.
Explanation:
According to the text, the author actually states that "Midas realized then that riches are not the most important things in the world." In addition, Midas regrets turning everything he touches into gold, since, apart from all his possessions, his own daughter and his food and drink were turned into gold too. As a result, he asked Dionysus to take back his wish.
Which of the following uses the bolded vocabulary word correctly?
A.No amount of *Recompense* can make up for the suffering I’ve endured
B.Everything on the menu is great, but the chicken sandwich is especially *exception.*
C.The children’s choir was beautifully *clamorous*
D.She *beseeched* her boss with a thank-you note and flowers
Answer: Pretty sure it's A.
Explanation: I know that beseeched is like, begging or pleading and clamorous is not the right descriptive word if beautiful is used. Exception means it meets the demand but isn't as good as it could be, so, A is the best answer I have for you.
How can you tell the difference between a limited narrator and an omniscient narrator?
A limited narrator enters the thoughts of one main character
B. A limited narrator is cautious, whereas an omniscient narrator is unrestrained.
C. A limited narrator is abstract, whereas an omniscient narrator is descriptive
D. A limited narrator enters the thoughts of many different characters.
A limited narrator provides the perspective of one character, offering insight into their thoughts and feelings only. An omniscient narrator, however, presents the thoughts and feelings of many or all characters, giving a broader view of the story.
Explanation:The difference between a limited narrator and an omniscient narrator lies mostly in the scope of knowledge and perception they present in a story. A limited narrator enters the thoughts and feelings of one main character, offering only their perspective. This means that the reader gains insight into the world through the eyes and mind of one character. For example, a limited narrator might let us know what a main character is thinking or feeling, but other characters’ thoughts and feelings are inferred through dialogue and action.
On the other hand, an omniscient narrator has a broader perspective. They provide insight into the thoughts and feelings of many, if not all characters. An example of an omniscient narrator would be a narrative voice that jumps between characters, providing insight into everyone's thoughts and motivations. They are not bound by any character's perspective and therefore, has a more extensive view of the story
Learn more about Narrative Voice here:https://brainly.com/question/28012334
#SPJ2