According to Israelite belief, what was God's covenant with Abraham?
Answer:
God's covenant with Israel was that he was going to make a big nation. And it would be more than stars that Abraham could count.
Explanation:
In Israelite belief, the covenant with Abraham promised his descendants a prosperous land and a great nation in exchange for worship and moral righteousness. This agreement involved the rite of circumcision and established their special relationship with God, serving as a precursor to the Sinai Covenant and the universal application of divine law.
God's Covenant with Abraham
According to Israelite belief, God's covenant with Abraham is a foundational aspect of Jewish faith. This covenant was a promise from God that in return for their devotion and the circumcision of all Hebrew males, God would bestow upon Abraham's descendants a prosperous land, known as a 'land of milk and honey'. This promise also indicated that Abraham would be the father of a great nation, and his name would be honored. This agreement further extended to a moral obligation where the Hebrews would foster justice and righteousness, setting an initial foundation for the Israelites and later widening to all humanity.
The renewal of this covenant 14 years later affirmed that Abraham's descendants would possess the land of Canaan perpetually, changing his name from Abram to Abraham, signifying 'father of a multitude'. It instituted the practice of circumcision as a sign of the covenant among non-kin members of the household, highlighting that national identity in Israel was not based solely on ethnicity. This everlasting agreement was marked by faith in one supreme deity, Yahweh, and set the stage for further covenants, notably the Sinai Covenant made with the Israelites through Moses at Mt. Sinai.
The broader scope of this covenant is seen as not only a relationship between God and the Israelites but as a cornerstone for the development of monotheistic traditions and a universal application of God's laws, eventually intended to encompass all nations.
Where are the majority of the wettest climates located?
some people might consider the American revolution patriots "terrorists." Do you agree with this claim?
How did divisions over foreign policy, especially the French Revolution, poison American politics and threaten the fledgling nation’s unity in the 1790s?
What did the son of liberty do to protest the stamp act
Answer:
They started the stamp act riot and forming a mob in front of Governor Thomas Hutchinson’s house. Demanding that he wrote the letter to England to repeal the act.
Explanation:
The Stamp Act of 1765 was an act of the Parliament of Great Britain that imposed a direct tax on the colonies in North America and required that the printed materials in there should be produced in London.
The Sons of Liberty were a secret organization created by the thirteen American colonies to fight taxation by the British Government. They did the job so effectively that the tax was never collected. After achieving that the group disbanded.
I hope this answer helps you.
Until approximately four thousand years ago, the basic survival strategies of woodland indians consisted of
Until approximately four thousand years ago, the basic survival strategies of woodland indians were through hunting deer and gathering nuts and seeds. Since the people of the Eastern Woodlands lived in forested areas and were usually close to water they became very skilled hunters and fishermen. When the lakes were frozen over during the winter season, they spent hunting larger game and trapping smaller animals. For the people of the Eastern Woodlands, the most important animal to them was the white-tailed deer. That kind of deer was hunted for their meat, and not only that. The skins of the hunted game were also dried and used in making their houses and clothing. The said society dictated that it was solely the man's responsibility to hunt and fish. The women on the other hand, were in charge of farming, and gathering various wild berries, nuts, tubers and other plants to eat from the woodlands that surrounded their community.
which of these people probably benefited most from the construction of the panama canal
The ancient Indians can boast of few significant achievements. true or false
Based on the list of imports and exports, how would you describe axum’s role in the international commerce of the first century ce?
Axum generated and exchanged low cost materials like clothing and elephant tusks in large quantities to the richer states and in return got more valuable things like gold and silver.
Axum was the focus point of the marine exchanging power known as the Aksumite Kingdom, which originated before the earliest mentions in Roman period records.
The Union’s capture of New Orleans severely hurt the Confederacy by
Final answer:
The Union's capture of New Orleans significantly weakened the Confederacy by disrupting its economy and cotton exports, and allowing the Union to control a critical part of the Mississippi River, contributing to the Confederacy's isolation.
Explanation:
The Union's capture of New Orleans in the spring and summer of 1862 severely hurt the Confederacy by cutting off a major economic resource and disrupting the southern export of cotton. It was a significant blow due to New Orleans being the most important port in the Confederacy. The access to the Mississippi River was critical for the transport and export of goods, particularly cotton, which was a staple of the Southern economy.
The capture of New Orleans had far-reaching effects, particularly as it was followed by further Union successes such as the capture of Vicksburg and the Union's control over the Mississippi River. These victories were not only tactical but also struck a blow to the morale and economic stability of the Confederacy, which was already struggling with infrastructure and resource limitations compared to the North.
The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 provided for the?
The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 outlined the process for territories to become states, banned slavery in new territories, and established a Bill of Rights. It set population guidelines for territorial governance and statehood, and its grid system for land division remains visible today.
The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was a significant law passed under the Articles of Confederation that established a process for territories in the Old Northwest to become states within the Union. Notably, the ordinance had a profound impact on American expansion, providing for the orderly admission to the Union of what is today Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. One of its key features was that it prohibited slavery in the new territories and set a standard for the creation of future states. Moreover, it guaranteed a Bill of Rights for settlers, including religious freedom, and representation in government, while also respecting the tribal land rights of Indian peoples.
As per the ordinance's guidelines, a territory with fewer than 5,000 white adult males would be governed by a governor and a three-judge panel appointed by Congress. Once the population reached between 5,000 and 60,000 white male inhabitants, a legislature could be elected, though the governor remained a congressional appointee. When a territory's population exceeded 60,000, it could then draft a constitution that forbade slavery, protected religious freedom, and apply for statehood, to be confirmed by Congress.
This legislation also had geographical implications, creating a township grid that organized land sales and set aside land for schools and public use. Its influence on American land development is still visible today, reflected in the geometric grid pattern observable across much of the western United States.
What was the primary purpose of spain's colony of new mexico?
Explain Montesquieu's proposed design for a government
Why did Missouri’s request to join the Union increase sectionalism?
Sectionalism was shown very much in the debate that led to the Missouri Compromise, with two main sections of the country -- North vs. South -- divided over the issue of slavery.
The Missouri Compromise (1820) admitted Missouri into the Union as a slave state with Maine being added at the same time as a free state, to keep the balance of slave and free states equal. The Missouri Compromise also prohibited any future slave states north of the latitude line 36 1/2 degrees north of the equator in territories of the Louisiana Purchase, with the exception of Missouri (north of that line) being admitted as a slave state.
A couple decades later, that sectional debate was sparked still further by the acquisition of lands from Mexico after the Mexican-American War. The Mexican Cession was the large region of land that Mexico ceded to the United States in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. It included territory that would later become the states of California, Nevada, Utah, and parts of what would become Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming. The Mexican Cession reignited tension on the issue of slave-holding states vs. free states. Since the Missouri Compromise had specified only the Louisiana Purchase lands with its 36 1/2 degrees latitude dividing line, new debate arose over whether territories in the Mexican Cession territory would be slave or free states.
Which led to revisionist history of the Cold War?
20. Who wrote the book Uncle Tom's Cabin, which highlighted the horrors of slave life
In 1700 most of north america was inhabited by
Which factor most greatly limits the power of the US government
Answer:
constitutional system
Explanation:
What was the espionage act
Which of the following is an exclusive power of the national government?
A. borrowing money to balance a budget
B. holding elections
C. regulating interstate commerce
D. establishing courts
Answer:
C. Regulating interstate commerce.
this is correct on gradpoint fyi! Good luck
There is an Army marching towards your city. You need to raise a defending army, build walls around the city, and this has to be done fast. The problem is that you don't have enough money to do it, so you'd neee to get the upper classes to contribute. Which goverment would be the best to have in this situation. Also describe why you would choose the goverment
Democracy, autocracy , dictatorship, theocracy ,oligarchy, anarchy. (Those are the type of governments)
Answer:
oligarchy
Explanation:
In an oligarchy it is often the wealthy that govern the society, in this case it´d be better to have an oligarchy since they can actually fund and give money to help the country in this case the city that´s under attack and they would do it with no problems since they are directly part of the government.
Germans blamed the newly formed_____ government for their troubles. Desperate for a new leader, they turned toward the ____ to restore Germany’s lost glory. NextReset
Germans blamed the newly formed Weimar's Republic government for their troubles. Desperate for a new leader, they turned toward the Nazi Party (and its leader Hitler) to restore Germany’s lost glory.
The weakeness of the German Weimar Republic, that lasted from 1918 to 1933, gave rise to popular support towards the arrival of the Nazi party and Hitler to power.
The Weimar Republic faced numerous problems, mainly economic, related to the accomplishment of the requeriments established by the Treaty of Versailles and the payment of the excessive war reparations imposed on Germany after WWI. Such impositions prevented economic recovery and stagnation led to hyperinflation. Moreover, political extremism and paramilitary forces started to arise, that were fed by the tense relationships maintained with the victorious powers of WWI (UK and specially, France).
This whole situation triggered the social sucess of Hitler and the country preferred to support his ruling rather than any democratic goverments, like the previous ones.
why did Martin Luther King used work,speeches,songs and the bible in his speech
Martin Luther King Jr. masterfully used work, speeches, songs, and the Bible in his speeches to deeply resonate with diverse audiences, drawing on shared cultural and spiritual resources to promote the civil rights movement. His skillful use of prophetic rhetoric and emotional appeal helped galvanize support and advance the cause of racial equality, leaving a lasting legacy as one of history's greatest public speakers.
Explanation:Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. strategically used work, speeches, songs, and the Bible in his speeches to connect deeply with his audience, drawing on shared cultural, spiritual, and intellectual resources to advocate for civil rights. By referencing the Bible, King invoked the moral authority and prophetic tradition central to his audience's values, emphasizing the struggle for justice as a divine mandate. His speeches often highlighted the systemic inequalities and injustices faced by African Americans, drawing parallels with historical and biblical narratives of oppression and liberation. King's use of freedom songs and poetry, deeply rooted in African American spiritual and oral traditions, further united and mobilized the civil rights movement, grounding their collective action in a shared quest for dignity, respect, and equality.
The power of King's oratory lay in his ability to weave together logical argumentation with emotional appeal, encouraging empathy and identification with the civil rights cause. Through his speeches, King not only presented a compelling case for racial equality but also inspired hope and courage among supporters, utilizing the transformative power of words to challenge and change societal norms. His reference to contemporaneous issues, such as the unfair treatment of African Americans in various spheres of life, served as a call to action, highlighting the urgent need for legislative and societal changes.
In summary, King's rhetorical choices were deeply intentional, leveraging the cultural, spiritual, and emotional resonance of his references to galvanize support and effect change. His legacy as a speaker is marked by his skillful integration of diverse elements into a coherent and persuasive vision for a more just and equitable society.
Which statement best describes the colonial attitude before this 1760s?
A) Most colonists wanted complete independence from Great Britain
B) The colonists thought they should be granted more freedoms than the grit the British citizens living in England received.
C) Most colonists wanted to transfer their loyalties to the French government
D) Most colonists wanted the same rights and privilages enjoyed by British citizens living in England
Before the 1760s, most American colonists desired the same rights and privileges enjoyed by British citizens living in England, not seeking independence or planning to transfer their loyalties to the French government.
Explanation:The statement that best describes the colonial attitude before the 1760s is, 'Most colonists wanted the same rights and privileges enjoyed by British citizens living in England'. This is because, before the 1760s the American colonists still considered themselves loyal subjects of the British crown. They were not yet seeking independence, nor were they hoping to transfer their loyalties to the French government. Rather, they wanted to be granted the same rights and protections that were guaranteed to residents of England.
Learn more about colonial attitude here:https://brainly.com/question/31725755
#SPJ6
In what region of North America did Pueblo build their cliff dwellings
Explain the outcomes and decisions made during the meetings of 1st and 2nd Continental Congress.
The legislative branch is responsible for which of the following? Select all that apply.
The legislative branch is responsible for creating statutory laws at both the federal and state levels. In the United States, Congress is the federal legislative branch made up of the Senate and the House of Representatives, ensuring equal state and citizen representation in lawmaking.
The early state of __________ gave rise to the modern state of ethiopia.
Compare and contrast british ideas of kingship before and after the glorious revolution. what was the most important change brought about by the event of 1688 and 1698
The theory of environmental determinism was first explained by Alfred Kroeber true or false
I believe so it's true:)
Answer:
The statement is false. The theory of environmental determinism was not first explained by Alfred Kroeber.
Explanation:
The theory of environmental determinism is the conception in which the environment strongly defines or influences human physiology and psychology, so that it would be possible to explain the history of peoples in terms of the cause and effect relationships that would be established in nature / man interaction. It was first used as a theoretical-methodological perspective by some followers of Friedrich Ratzel, which eventually earned him fame as the father of this theory.