In what way was colonial reaction to the Stamp Act, the Townshend Acts, and the Tea Act similar?
The colonists no longer bought any British goods.
The colonists boycotted British goods.
The colonists dumped goods into Boston Harbor.
The colonists refused to house British soldiers.

Answer:

James believed that the United states should have a CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

Explanation:

James Monroe who was the Fifth president of the United states of America from 1817 to 1825 was a lawyer and a Diplomat. he was also the last president of the Virginia Dynasty, a member of the Democratic-Republican party. James Monroe was well known for his establishment of the Foreign policy doctrine.

James Monroe died July 4 1831 of Tuberculosis.

A central Government is a Government that controls a Unitary state it is also called a Federal Government when found in a federation. a central government makes laws and passes policies that governs or its abided to by the whole country.

The statement Internet blogs do not influence public opinion because there is not any guarantee that anyone will read them is FALSE.

Internet blog can be defined as an individual or bloggers that write and share news on their website or online for people to read.

Internet blog tend to influence people opinion or public opinion by expressing their views or opinion on issues because it is certain that internet users will often read it.

Therefore the statement is False.

Learn more about internet blog here:https://brainly.com/question/10893702

#SPJ2

Sample response: Both the newspaper account and Washington's account explain that the British were defeated when they panicked on the battlefield. But the newspaper account explains the loss differently. It says, for example, that there was an unknown number of enemy fighters, while Washington says there were no more than 300.

A primary source is a firsthand account of an event by someone who witnessed it. A diary entry from someone who lived during the period being studied qualifies as a primary source because it is an original document offering firsthand testimony valuable for historical analysis.

An example of a primary source is an account by a person who witnessed an event, providing a direct connection to the historical period in question. Among the options provided, a diary entry by a person who lived in the period under discussion is a representative example of a primary source. This is because it constitutes an original document that offers firsthand testimony, commonly valued by historians for building a clear and accurate picture of the past.

Primary sources may include personal narratives, eyewitness accounts, and original documents such as treaties, speeches, and newspaper coverage of events as they occurred. These primary data sources are invaluable as they are created contemporaneously with the events they describe, providing the most immediate connection to the subject of study.

In contrast, secondary sources are created after the event and provide interpretation or analysis of the primary sources. Understanding the difference between primary and secondary sources is essential for conducting rigorous historical research and analysis.

The correct answer is the following.

The correct chronological order is:

1) Christopher Columbus sets out on his first voyage

2) the Muscovy company is established.

3) the Spanish established their first settlement in North America

4) the French established a fur trade in Canada.

We are talking about colonial times in the Americas. With the sponsorship of King Ferdinand of Aragón and Queen Isabelle de Castille, Christopher Columbus set his voyage and discovered America on October 12, 1492. From there, most European superpowers decided to send explorations, conquerors, and colonizers to the new territories. The English established the 13 colonies in North America, the French were more interested in the Fur trade with the Native Americans, and the Spaniards conquered the Aztec Empire and the Inca Empire.

The Civil War was precipitated by a series of events, including the election of Abraham Lincoln, the stance of the Republican Party on slavery in the territories, and the socioeconomic strains of war. Secession, economic challenges, and social unrest all contributed to the outbreak and continuation of the conflict.

Key Developments Leading to the Civil War

The period leading up to the Civil War was marked by numerous events and developments that heightened tensions between the North and the South. The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 signaled the immediate secession of seven Deep South states, who formed the Confederate States of America (CSA), committed to preserving slavery and white supremacy. Despite last-minute compromise attempts like the Crittenden proposal and the Corwin amendment, no agreement could be reached, and the Civil War was sparked by the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter.

Forces Leading to Divisions

The Republican Party's stance on excluding slavery from new territories

Fears in the South of Republican abolitionists using tactics like those of John Brown

The formation of the Confederate States of America dedicated to maintaining and expanding slavery

Economic and Social Strains

Ongoing inflation and conscription raised tensions, leading to events like the Richmond bread riots and draft riots in New York City.

The South faced shortages of goods and dramatic price increases due to the Union blockade and the difficulties in transforming an export crop economy into one focused on domestic food production.

Morale in the South suffered under food shortages, inflation, and the impact of war on their agricultural and transportation systems.

The Union, on the other hand, mobilized resources on a massive scale, including constructing new railroads and transitioning to a wartime economy, which ultimately contributed to the North's ability to sustain and win the war.

The election of Abraham Lincoln, fears of Republican policies, the formation of the CSA, and the attack on Fort Sumter were key events that led the Union toward the Civil War. Social issues and economic differences further exacerbated tensions, making the conflict inevitable.

The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was a major factor that led the Union toward the Civil War. His victory alarmed the southern states, who feared Republican policies aimed at restricting the expansion of slavery. This led to the secession of seven states from the Union to form the Confederate States of America (CSA), intent on preserving slavery and white supremacy. Attempts at compromise failed, and the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter marked the beginning of the Civil War.

Additional developments such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act and differing economic systems between the North and the South exacerbated tensions. These events, coupled with social pressures like riots and conscription, highlighted deep-seated political, economic, and social fissures that eventually made the war inevitable. The Civil War significantly changed American life, leading to the dominance of the federal government, transformation of the economy, and most importantly, the emancipation of enslaved individuals.

Answer:

All the statements are descriptions of George Washington.

Explanation:

George Washington was the first president of the United States of America from 1789 to 1797.

As Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army from 1775 to 1783, he was one of the founding fathers of the United States and chaired the constituent Philadelphia Convention in 1787. During his presidency, Washington made groundbreaking decisions that continue to shape the development of the United States of America as a republican democracy. Above all, he worked towards a central power that could act against the individual states and the congress and deliberately trained the newly created office by setting precedents.

Washington was awarded the highest rank of General of the Armies of the United States posthumously on October 11, 1976, "for the past and present" on the occasion of the bicentenary of the United States.

In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court established a foundational principle regarding the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.

The case involved a dispute over the right to operate steamboats in New York waters. The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Marshall, held that the federal government, through the Commerce Clause, had the authority to regulate interstate commerce, and this authority was paramount over conflicting state laws.

However, the Court also recognized that states could regulate matters of purely local concern. The ruling did not categorically state that federal law always supersedes state law or vice versa. Instead, it established that the applicability of federal or state law depends on the nature of the commerce in question.

If the business activity is interstate (operating in several states), federal law would generally govern. If the activity is intrastate (operating within a single state), state law could regulate it, provided that it does not unduly burden interstate commerce.

Therefore, the Supreme Court's decision in Gibbons v. Ogden supports the idea that the application of federal or state law depends on whether the commerce is interstate or intrastate, which corresponds to option b."

Answer:

The idea that people should govern themselves led to the formation of the Continental Congress. However there should be a few laws that the people have to follow, with someone to enforce these laws. They didn’t want to have a king; they wanted a democracy so they could hold elections and the people were able to choose their leader.

Explanation:

Study the graph and then complete the analysis of the data by filling in the missing information.

The U.S. experienced a record number of measles cases in 2014, with 644 cases reported from 27 states.

Measles cases in 2019

From January 1 to December 31, 2019, 1,282* individual cases of measles were confirmed in 31 states. This is the greatest number of cases reported in the U.S. since 1992.

Although measles was declared eliminated in the United States in 2000, almost 1,300 cases of measles were reported in 31 states in the U.S. in 2019— the greatest number since 1992.

Please check the attached file for missing parts of the question and guidelines.

Learn more about measles cases at

https://brainly.com/question/15308813

#SPJ2

Answer:

its air trust me <3

Explanation:

Answer:

C) The English Bill of Rights

Explanation:

Final answer:

The arrival of Columbus in the Americas led to conflict between Spain and Portugal. The Treaty of Tordesillas was signed to resolve disputes by dividing the territories between the two nations, but it was later challenged by other European powers.

Explanation:

The conflict created by Columbus's travels to the Americas mainly involved Spain and Portugal, two nations that were the maritime powerhouses of the 15th and 16th centuries. Their competition intensified when Columbus, sailing for Spain, reached the New World in 1492. This event set the stage for the negotiation of the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494, which was an agreement between Spain and Portugal aimed at settling conflicts over newly discovered lands by drawing a line approximately halfway between the Portuguese-held Cape Verde islands and the islands found by Columbus. Lands and trade routes to the east of the line were designated to Portugal, and lands to the west to Spain. This division was intended to prevent conflict over the spice trade and the claim to territories in the Americas. However, their claims often ignored the rights and existence of the indigenous peoples.

The Treaty of Tordesillas eventually led to conflicts with other European powers such as England, France, and the Netherlands as they joined the colonial race and challenged the claims made by the treaty, which began to unravel the Spanish-Portuguese duopoly. The Treaty of Zaragosa, which attempted to extend the dividing line between Spain and Portugal's spheres of influence, also came into effect later. With time, as Spanish and Portuguese dominance waned, other nations increased their presence in the region.

Answer:

He used force for some of them that isnt following the law

Explanation:

Answer:

Religious

Explanation:

Answer:

European states hoped to economically dominate different parts of China

Explanation:

China was also a victim of Imperialism and it was attacked by different countries, dominated, forced to change in many ways and its territory was put under the influence of different nations.