In a Toulmin argument, support is composed of the following:

A. Evidence that a writer uses to prove the claim.


B. Assumptions and inferences that the writer takes for granted.


C. Help the author set limits on his/her assertions.


D. Additional evidence to defend the warrant.

Final answer:

The suffering of Makhaya in 'When Rain Clouds Gather' encompasses themes of societal and environmental challenges within South Africa, as exemplified by the living conditions in Khayelitsha, the decline of Mapungubwe, and the changes in Mhondoro.

Explanation:

While the provided excerpts do not specifically mention Makhaya or his sufferings in South Africa, they do paint a vivid picture of the broader context of suffering within the country. The excerpt from Khayelitsha illustrates the post-apartheid struggles, depicting the harsh living conditions of Panyaza and her family in a sprawling township, highlighting issues such as overcrowding, poor hygiene, and the threat of illnesses. This mirrors the broader societal issues that characters like Makhaya would face. The historical context of Mapungubwe's decline provides an insight into the environmental and social challenges faced in South Africa, which are themes relevant to Makhaya's story. Lastly, the personal account from Mhondoro, though not directly linked to Makhaya, encapsulates the transformation of African landscapes and societies under external pressures, akin to Makhaya's personal transformations and challenges.

In English, 'keen on' means to be interested in or like something, while 'keen to' means to be eager to do something. The two are used in different contexts, with 'keen on' describing interest and preference, and 'keen to' indicating eagerness and ambition.

In English grammar, 'keen' is a commonly used adjective that can be followed by different prepositions to form different meanings. If you say someone is 'keen on' something, it means they like it or are interested in it. For example, 'He is keen on football' implies that he really enjoys football. In contrast, if you say someone is 'keen to' do something, it signifies their enthusiasm or eagerness to undertake that action. For instance, 'She is keen to learn Spanish' indicates that she is very eager to learn Spanish.

https://brainly.com/question/19822707

#SPJ12

There are five patients in a hospital occupying 5 separate rooms, each one of them have a different disease.

Miss Anderson have mononucleosis and is staying in room number 104 of the hospital.

It is a contagious infection which is caused by herpes virus, the symptoms of this disease are fatigue, fever and extreme body aches. This infection is common in young adults.

#SPJ2

Learn more about diseases at https://brainly.com/question/2286343

The type of context clue that uses logic and reasoning skills is called deductive reasoning, which involves using general principles to predict specific conclusions.

The type of context clue that uses logic and reasoning skills is referred to as deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning involves using general principles to make specific predictions or conclusions. By applying this form of logical thinking, one can forecast specific outcomes based on broader laws or premises, which is essential in hypothesis-based science and argumentative writing. For example, from the understanding that all mammals have a backbone, one can deduce that if dolphins are mammals, then they must have a backbone as well.

Another form of logical thinking used in science is inductive reasoning, which contrasts with deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning uses observations to arrive at general conclusions. It is commonly used in descriptive sciences, where scientists observe patterns and draw generalizations from them. However, the question specifically asked about reasoning that employs logic and reasoning skills to arrive at a conclusion, thus, the answer would be deductive reasoning.

Answer:

B: Fortunato is dressed in motley as he is lured into the catacombs

Explanation:

i had this assingment graded like two hours ago, i hope this helps!

Answer: The narrator makes it clear from the beginning that on his first day as a reporter, he was panicking because he didn´t have any experience nor previous interest in journalism. The only reason he had to even go to an interview for that kind of job was the lack of opportunities in the job market at the time he started to search for his first full-time employment.

Explanation:

He had gone to the interview for a reporter position thinking it would be wise to gain interview experience as well as networking. He was surprised to get the job, but, as an English major, he accepted it as a possibility to write every day.

Final answer:

Doublespeak refers to a deceptive language technique that disguises or distorts reality, transforming negatives into positives and facilitating ambiguity. Commonly found in politics, advertising, and public relations, it is used to mislead and manipulate public perception.

Explanation:

What is Doublespeak?

Doublespeak is a language power technique that purposefully uses words to obscure, mislead, or distort meaning by making the negative appear positive or less severe. It often involves the deceptive use of euphemisms, allowing for ambiguity and enabling speakers to avoid or shift responsibility. Doublespeak can be observed in various domains, such as politics, advertising, and public relations, where it is used to mask intentions and support certain narratives.

For example, a political statement might use doublespeak to downplay the severity of a conflict, referring to it as a "prolonged engagement" rather than a war. In advertising, a product's negative side effects might be referred to with a less alarming phrase, such as "temporary discomfort," to mitigate the product's perceived drawbacks. Consumer literacy requires awareness of such uses of language to avoid being misled.

Inspired by George Orwell's ideas, the term was coined by William Lutz, highlighting that doublespeak goes beyond conventional euphemisms and can be more intentionally deceptive. It manipulates language to exaggerate or downplay a subject's qualities, often contributing to confusion among the audience.

The characteristics that would indicate the passage is a sonnet include option A:  The pattern of lines.

A sonnet can be defined as a poem which is been structured in the form of 14 lines.

Moreover, it is usually iambic pentameter which provides the expression of a thought along with an idea, and with this a rhyme scheme is established.

Therefore, correct option is A.

Learn more about sonnet, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/13942462

#SPJ2

students skip school; it is the behavior that the children have not enjoyed to learn then they avoid or escape from the school .in my opinion ,i totally agree this problem is occurred from several reasons which their family and teachers should coordinate to solve this problem .first reason which may affect student to abstain from school;the child cannot understand the lesson ,then they lack of interest in learning and focus on learning .so ,it may make them to have an experiencing failure in school and lower academic achievement.in additional ,they may not have the close friends and their friends may threaten them.

second reason,their family is unhappy ,poor or rich but lack of love and care from their parents.And the last reason is school and teacher ,they do not understand children .There are strict rules and teacher is an authoritarian and inflexible or teacher may punish severely student.Also some teacher has the teaching method as not interesting .These reasons should influence students to keep away from school.for the ways to solve the problem ,thus i thought that it should begin at home first .

whenever the parents have been known the disappointment because of their child ,then they should calm their anger first to find the cause of the children leaving school.the parents should not refer to the question "why..." to their children leaving school.The parents should begin with love and understanding ,and ready to forgive them .Then ,the parents begin to solve the problems and engage with the children and the school in order to provide opportunities and activities to reduce the value feeling of children and attitude of children since someone thought that they devalue .

Answer:

written by an author who is respected in their field.

Explanation:

Final answer:

Phrases like 'the consoling proximity of millionaires' and 'white palaces of fashionable East Egg glittered' convey a sense of opulence and wealth in 'The Great Gatsby.' These phrases highlight the luxurious lifestyle of the characters, emphasizing the contrast between the wealthy and the protagonist, Jay Gatsby.

Explanation:

In F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel 'The Great Gatsby,' phrases such as 'the consoling proximity of millionaires' and 'white palaces of fashionable East Egg glittered' convey a sense of opulence and wealth. These phrases highlight the luxurious lifestyle of the characters in the novel, particularly those in the affluent East Egg community. The mention of millionaires and glittering white palaces emphasizes the contrast between the extravagance of the wealthy and the reality of the protagonist, Jay Gatsby, who longs to be part of this elite world.

Learn more about Message conveyed by phrases in 'The Great Gatsby' here:

https://brainly.com/question/29614712

#SPJ11

Fran should prioritize regarding the time she has to get that task done, and the importance said task has. Relying on the schedule provided (it is a Monday) , she should start with  her homework due for the next day, followed by her French test (on that Thursday), then her algebra test (that Friday), then her science project and essay and finally her friend's birthday party.

Unlike Arthur Brooke’s narrative poem The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet, which starts with a moralizing preface, Shakespeare’s version of the story does not dwell on moral behavior. The play does not make it sound like the act of falling in love against the families’ wishes is a sin. Shakespeare makes it clear in the prologue to act I that Romeo and Juliet are not to be blamed for their tragedy, which is caused partly by fate:

From forth the fatal loins of these two foes

A pair of star-cross'd lovers take their life;

The only moralizing in this play comes from Friar Laurence, who is portrayed as a flawed and imperfect man who cannot follow his own advice despite being a trusted man of faith. He tells Romeo that a hasty love will end in tragedy, but then he goes on to perform Romeo’s secret and hasty marriage to Juliet:

These violent delights have violent ends

And in their triumph die, like fire and powder,

Friar Laurence makes other hasty decisions such as giving Juliet the sleeping potion, which ultimately causes the tragedy at the end. By not condemning Romeo and Juliet and revealing Friar Laurence’s shortcomings, Shakespeare shows that real humans are flawed and make mistakes. The only overt moralizing that the audience can take away from this play is that the feud between the Capulets and Montagues is unnecessary and is responsible for the tragedy. The Prince notes that the ongoing feud has resulted in tragedy:

See, what a scourge is laid upon your hate,

That heaven finds means to kill your joys with love.

The reason why it is important to choose a counterclaim that it is strong and reasonable when writing an argumentative research essay is because there will always be two sides to an argument; when we write an argumentative essay we must also know what the counterclaim may be, that is, any objection to our argument; this will allow us to have better supporting points to disprove the counterclaim. The stronger the counterclaim, which we will disprove with our reasons and evidence, the greater chances our claim, will have to be accepted.

Answer:

A.he was excited to have new clothes, rich food, and a strange girl to play with.

Explanation:

He wasn't even 14 when his parents decided to marry him to Kasturbai, a girl from Porbandar. When he was a kid, he was very happy. He had someone new to play with, new clothes, and got to eat nice food, but when he grew up, he spoke against the evil practice of child marriage.

Answer:

The option that best describes the sentence is D. The sentence is built around the simple subject “dad” and simple predicate “gave.” It also contains both a direct object “lunches” and indirect object “us.”

Explanation:

The subject of a sentence is the person, thing, place or idea that is doing something. In this sentence, dad is the subject.

The simple predicate is the verb that tells the action the subject is performing. Gave is he simple predicate of this sentence.

The direct object is the receiver of the action described by the verb, like lunches, and the indirect object refers to the person or thing for whom the action of the verb is performed, like us.

Therefore, sentence D is the correct option.