Answer:
The right option is D. De Klerk was more willing to compromise.
Explanation:
Frederik Willem de Klerk (1936-) was the last white president of South Africa (1989-1994), the last state leader of the racist apartheid regime of racial segregation. He released Nelson Mandela and negotiatied with him and Mandela´s African National Congress a political transition to majority rule.
What are three reasons why Martin Luther king jr was a positive leader?
Answer:
He was able to. Lead african americans in a non violent way. He had empathy and he was a life long student
Explanation:
what proof does president reagan provide in his speech of the failure of communism and the success of democracy?
The story of this discourse was revealed in an article written by historian Paul Kengor in Crisis magazine. The author recalls that Tony Dolan, the main author of Reagan's speeches, was a devout Catholic who knew Fatima well. Dolan confirmed to Kengor that the President, although not Catholic, was aware of the phenomenon.
“He knew about Fatima. Fatima was an important part of the anti-communist movement. The Fatima movement was something he would have known, and besides, he had a very strong mystical strand. ”
So Dolan included the phrase in the speech: “I knew he would like it and would use it. I was sure. It was very cheeky. ”
Answer:
when he says this in his speech it shows us how broken the soviet union is and the defeat of communism. It shows how the U.S ended up on top.
Explanation:
" In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind—too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom is the victor. And now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom."
The state of the union address is important because it only addresses the strengths and successes of the previous years . Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Just finished the test and got it right.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
because the state of union address an important point
You will need to use information learned in this unit as well as conducting outside (50 (NEED HELP ASAP)research online or in a textbook. In a few paragraphs (about 200-300 words), describe the problems that caused the decline of the Roman Empire. Also, explain what the leadership could have done to prevent the fall of the empire.
Your essay needs to have an introduction answering the prompt above, a couple of body paragraphs which uses facts and information to back up your claim/answer, and a conclusion paragraph.
Answer:
The fall of the Western Roman Empire occurred in 476 AD
Explanation:
During the fifth century, the Roman Empire was completely exhausted. Already at the beginning of the century, barbarian tribes began to invade Italy as well. As early as 410 AD, the Visigoths invaded Rome and devastated it for days, which was the first symptom of the collapse of the then unbreakable empire. The weakening of the Roman continued in continuity so that the Romans came into conflict with the Hun tribes. In 451, one of the greatest and bloodiest battles of Roman history took place. True, the result of the battle in the Catalan fields belonged to Rome, but with dire consequences. Only four years after this battle (455.), the Vandals will plunder the "eternal city." All these events will weaken Rome economically, militarily and politically. The last Roman emperor was Romulus Augustus, who was overthrown by German military commander Odoakar and proclaimed king of Italy. Thus, in 476, the largest empire in history ceased to exist.
When we talk about the fall of the Western Roman Empire, we have to look back to the events before 476 AD. The fall of the Roman Empire is not an event that happened "overnight." The causes go back a long way, so for the decline of the Roman Empire, we can say that it is a continuous and long-term process that culminated in 476 AD. Therefore, at the time of the fall, the authorities could do nothing to prevent the Roman Empire from collapsing, an opportunity that led to this event much further into the past. The fact that the Roman rulers were helpless at the time of the fall is also indicated by the fact that Odoakar did not liquidate the last Roman emperor but sent him into retirement (with a very large pension), which means that he did not pose any threat to him. Finally, it is important to point out that the fall of the Roman Empire in world historiography was taken as the beginning of a new period in history, the early Middle Ages.
Answer:
In the fifth century or during, the roman empire was completely exhausted. Already at the beginning of the century, barbarian tribes began to invade Italy as well. As early as 410 AD, the Visigoths invaded Rome and devastated it for days, which was the first symptom of the collapse of the then-unbreakable empire. In 451, one of the greatest and bloodiest battles of Roman history took place. True, the result of the battle in the Catalan fields belonged to Rome, but with dire consequences. Only four years after this battle (455.), the Vandals will plunder the "eternal city." All these events will weaken Rome economically, militarily, and politically. The last Roman emperor was Romulus Augustus, who was overthrown by German military commander Odoakar and proclaimed king of Italy. Thus, in 476, the largest empire in history ceased to exist. When we talk about the fall of the Western Roman Empire, we have to look back to the events before 476 AD. The fall of the Roman Empire is not an event that happened "overnight." The causes go back a long way, so the decline of the Roman Empire, we can say is a continuous and long-term process that culminated in 476 AD. Therefore, at the time of the fall, the authorities could do nothing to prevent the Roman Empire from collapsing, an opportunity that led to this event much further into the past. The fact that the Roman rulers were helpless at the time of the fall is also indicated by the fact that Odoakar did not liquidate the last Roman emperor but sent him into retirement (with a substantial pension), which means that he did not pose any threat to him. Finally, it is essential to point out that the fall of the Roman Empire in world historiography was taken as the beginning of a new historical period, the early Middle Ages. (thank god for Grammarly)
1. Explain some of the ideologies of the Radical Republicans.
Answer:
The Radical Republicans were a political faction within the Republican Party of the time of the Civil War. Their ideas were:
- Absolute oppostion to slavery and strong commitment to emancipation of African Americans;
- equal treatment and enfrachisement of freed black slaves;
- during the war, they advocated enlisting black soldiers in the Union army;
- they held the South morally and financially responsible for the war.
Explanation:
When an article includes more outside sources that support the liberal viewpoint than the conservative viewpoint, what type of bias is present?
Bias by source selection
Bias by omission
Bias by story selection
Bias by spin
Answer:
Bias by source selection
Explanation:
The author of the article is choosing which facts to look up, therefore evaluating those with viewpoints that they agree with.
Answer:
Bias by source selection
Explanation:
Bias by source selection implies that an article outlet ignores sources that goes in favour of an opposing form of view.
It is the process of revealing news stories that is in agreement with a particular agenda. It mostly as a result of an article outlet continuously revealing the stories that is in alignment with majorly one political point of view.
Take for instance, an article might contain a story or study produced by a liberal group while choosing to pass on likely stories and studies produced by the conservative sets. Or, a television news outlet might speak on or report an allegation of corruption against a liberal political candidate and choose to wilfully not report a close allegation report against a conservative candidate
Which of the following principles is NOT part of the Constitution?
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Skip: 0
Find
Glossary
Tag O
A
confederalism
C
separation of powers
B checks and balances
O
federalism
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The given principle that is not part of the Constitution is confederalism. The other principles such as separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism are all present in the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:The principle not included as a part of the Constitution out of the options you provided is confederalism. The three others, namely separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism, are all key foundational principles found in the U.S. Constitution. Confederalism refers to a political system where power is concentrated in the subnational (state) governments and the central government is weaker, which is not the system enacted by the U.S. Constitution.
Learn more about Constitution here:https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ12
who was Abraham Lincoln born
When: February 12th, 1809
Where: Hodgenville, Kentucky.
To: Nancy Lincoln (Mother) Thomas Lincoln (Father)
Answer:
February 12, 1809 in Hodgenville, KY
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln became the United States' 16th President in 1861, issuing the Emancipation Proclamation that declared forever free those slaves within the Confederacy in 1863.
Select the name(s) that the people who opposed the purchase of Alaska gave the new territory.
A. Sewards treasure
B. Sewards folly
C. Sewards icebox
D. Russia’s gift
B. Sewards folly
Explanation:
Secretary of State William Seward began negotiations with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Eduard de Stoeckl, in March 1867. The handover was soon confirmed for a relatively modest $ 7.2 million (worth just over $ 100 million today). This must have seemed like a good outcome, because Russia generally failed to develop Alaska, but still made a lot of sales. However, the United States would reach a far better deal if we looked at the matter from a long-term perspective. Because Alaska was so isolated and sparsely populated, shopping was met with indignation among certain circles in America, and some newspapers called it "Seward's Folly." However, the majority praised the agreement, understanding that it would help diminish British power in the region and American strategic interests in the Pacific.Learn more on William Seward on
https://brainly.com/question/9790717
https://brainly.com/question/4118791
https://brainly.com/question/8193982
#learnwithBrainly
Does an avalanche moves smoothly slowly or rapidly
It moves rapidly, since it is going downhill it of course gains traction and speeds up. An avalanche (by definition) is "a mass of snow, ice, and rocks falling rapidly down a mountainside." Therefore an avalanche moves fast and rapid.
hope this helps :)
Improvements to transportation have
Improvements to transportation have enhanced connectivity, facilitated economic growth, and increased mobility for people and goods. They have also contributed to urbanization, globalization, and the development of various industries, while improving access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities.
What are the benefits of transportation?Transportation offers numerous benefits that contribute to societal and economic development:
Economic growth: Efficient transportation systems enable the movement of goods and services, fostering trade and commerce, creating job opportunities, and stimulating economic activity.Accessibility and mobility: Transportation provides individuals with the ability to access education, employment, healthcare, and other essential services. It enhances personal mobility, enabling people to travel easily and reach their desired destinations.Regional and global connectivity: Transportation networks connect regions and countries, promoting cultural exchange, tourism, and cooperation. They facilitate the movement of people, ideas, and resources, fostering social integration and understanding.Infrastructure development: Building transportation infrastructure, such as roads, railways, and ports, stimulates construction industries, enhances connectivity in rural areas, and supports urbanization and regional development.Emergency response and disaster relief: Efficient transportation systems are crucial in facilitating the rapid response and delivery of aid during emergencies and natural disasters.Learn more about transportation here:
https://brainly.com/question/25474654
#SPJ2
Which of these time periods had the most rapid growth in the knowledge of medicine?
Renaissance
Dark Ages
Middle Ages
Ancient Greece
Answer:
In the Middle Ages, surgical practices inherited from the ancient masters were improved and then systematized in Rogerius's The Practice of Surgery. Universities began systematic training of physicians around 1220 CE in Italy.
Explanation:
that's all i got i hope this helps :D
Which of the following was one reason that the Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights?
Answer:
To fight back against a tyrannical government
Explanation:
The purpose of the Second Amendment was so during the Revolutionary War, state militia could be empowered to fight against the government. So, the Second Amendment did establish the principle that the government did not have the authority to disarm citizens.
studying the life's of ordinary people was part of (Pavlov's) or (Voltaire's) influence on historians (PLZZZZ HELP MEEEE)
Answer:
Voltaire
Explanation:
Political division, based on colour, is entirely artificial and,
when it disappears, so will the domination of one colour
group by another. The ANC has spent half a century
fighting against racialism. When it triumphs it will not
change that policy
Which statement best describes how this excerpt relates to Mandela's
relationship with F. W. de Klerk in the 1990s?
O
A. It argues for the cooperation between politicians of all races that
Mandela would fulfill in his negotiations with de Klerk to end
apartheid.
O
B. It proposes the passage of control from white to black South
Africans that Mandela would fulfill by refusing to negotiate with de
Klerk to end apartheid.
O
C. It argues for the cooperation between politicians of all races that
Mandela would reject by refusing to negotiate with de Klerk to end
apartheid.
O
D. It proposes the passage of control from white to black South
Africans that Mandela would reject by negotiating with de Klerk to
end apartheid.
Answer:
A. It argues for the cooperation between politicians of all races that
Mandela would fulfill in his negotiations with de Klerk to end
apartheid.
Explanation:
Apartheid, (Afrikaans: “apartness”) policy that governed relations between South Africa's white minority and nonwhite majority and sanctioned racial segregation and political and economic discrimination against nonwhites.
Explain how the Industrial Revolution relates to the history of workers' rights. Cite evidence from the text in
your response.
Answer:
The Industrial Revolution (mid-18th to early 19th century) gives birth to the workers as a social group.
Explanation:
Before the Industrial Revolution, the world of work in manufactured production was organized in a way where everybody who worked had full knowledge of the production process which was mainly hand production methods by small amounts of people.
The Industrial Revolution radically changes this scenario. Cities start to be more populated without having structure for it, factories are built and spread, a large number of people now work together in the same job, and these people don't have full knowledge about the production process. These people have similar habits, conditions of life, and work.
Similarities bring these people together and they recognize themselves as members of the same specific social group: the workers. That means they have specific demands: decent life and work conditions.
Thus it is with the industrial revolution that workers become aware of collective demands and join forces to fight for their rights, which is something they learn from the 18th-century revolutions (American revolution, French revolution) that is important to fight for.
who is the first prime minister in a Sri Lanka??
Answer:
D. S. Senanayake
Explanation:
Answer:
D.S. Senanayake.
Explanation:
hope this helps you!
Which of these was the MOST direct cause of World War I?
Answer:
The correct answer is: the assassination of Archduke of Austria-Hungary - Franz Ferdinand .
Explanation:
Franz Ferdinand, the Archduke of Austria-Hungary and his wife Sophie were assassinated by Gavrilo Princip in 1914, in Sarajevo.
The political motives for his assassination were the desire to separate the Austro-Hungarian province of Bosnia and Herzegovina and its unification with Great Serbia. The assassination of Ferdinand led directly to World War I when Austria-Hungary gave an ultimatum to Serbia, which was partially denied. Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, which triggered a series of war declarations between other European countries.
The correct option is B. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and ethnic tensions in Europe was the most direct cause of World War I, sparking a chain reaction that drew in European powers through their alliances.
While factors like imperialism, nationalism, and alliances contributed to the overall atmosphere leading to war, the immediate trigger was the assassination. This event ignited a chain reaction of escalating tensions between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, eventually drawing in their respective allies and leading to a wider conflict.
The other options are not correct answer-
A) Spread of communism: While the rise of communism was a significant historical development, it wasn't directly linked to the outbreak of World War I in 1914.
C) Japanese military expansion: This primarily occurred in Asia and the Pacific, not directly impacting the European tensions that sparked the war.
D) Independence movements in colonies: While these movements existed and contributed to broader global tensions, they weren't the central factor in igniting the specific conflict between European powers in 1914.
The complete question is- Which of these was the MOST direct cause of World War I?
A) the spread of communism
B) ethnic tensions in Europe
C) Japanese military expansion
D) independence movements in colonies
If you were involved in an occupation that held Hippocrates in very high regard, you would most likely be a ___.
Answer:
senate?
Explanation:
Answer:doctor
Explanation:
Briefly describe the ties between the south and and American Indians in Indian territory that impacted which side American Indians choose to join during the Civil War.
Answer:
give me a minute to research
Explanation:
Answer:
I just looked it up and one thing that i saw was "Westward expansion beyond the American frontier was one of the most significant historical events in North American history. The United States quickly became one of the twentieth century’s most powerful nations after settling more than three million square miles of rich, diverse land." Hope this helps!
Explanation:
The free exercise clause relates to which part of the Constitution?
Answer & Explanation:
Free Exercise Clause refers to the section of the First Amendment italicized here: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof... Historically, the Supreme Court has been inconsistent in dealing with this problem.
Answer:
The Free Exercise Clause relates to the Bill of Rights, specifically the First Amendment.
Explanation:
It protects the rights of American citizens to engage in the religious beliefs and rituals of their choosing.
Jainism and Buddhism were the results of movements that intended to reform ___?
Explanation:
Here are the options to the questions:
a. Hinduism
b. Islam
c. Zoroastrianism
d. Christianity
The answer is letter A. Hinduism
Both Jainism and Buddhism were the results of the movements intended to reform Hinduism.
Jainism is a non-theistic religion that teaches a path to spiritual purity.
Buddhism is a path of practice and spiritual development leading to insight into reality.
Buddhism and Jainism are similar to some of their beliefs since they both promote and support the right behavior and right conduct.
How did the Progressives change the food industry?!
Answer:
They regulated food and drugs in commerce, sale, manufacture or transportation by the Food and Drug Act in 1906, signed by President Roosevelt.
Explanation:
One of the many laws introduced by the Progressive Era was the Food and Drug Act. This refers to an inspection law which determined that before meat or animals go on sale, they have to be inspected, as evidence that it is clean. If the meat was not clean, the company could be sued for selling dirty meat.
The Drug Act was introduced in order to prevent the sale and transportation of the poisonous medicines, by introducing a prescription form a doctor that confirms that medicine is not dangerous.
what are the ways of revocating citizenship in Kenya
Answer: They pay taxes through regular levies dictated by the state.
Explanation:
Taxes are a way of financing the budget to support public goods, state institutions, infrastructure and all other elements necessary for the functioning of the state apparatus.
The manner of taxation differs as does the rate of taxation itself. And if Kenya is one of the poorest countries in the world with an average wage of $ 150, many countries in the world, even Africa, have a lower tax rate than Kenya (for example, Namibia).
These are just some of the taxes levied on the Kenyan tax system. Income tax (salary), rent income tax, property tax, value-added tax.
While an oligarchy is a society ruled by a small class of politically, economically, or socially empowered people, by contrast a monarchy involves
The correct answer is a single ruler
Monarchy is a form of government, being the oldest in force today. In a monarchy, the king / queen or emperor / empress occupies the position of monarch and is usually head of state and may also be head of government. This variation will basically depend on the type of monarchy.
The correct answer is D) a single ruler.
The other options of the question were A) a tricameral legislature B) rule by all people C) tyranny of the majority over other views
While an oligarchy is a society ruled by a small class of politically, economically, or socially empowered people, by contrast, a monarchy involves a single ruler.
In a monarchy, the king is the absolute ruler of the kingdom. The best examples were the kings of Europe during the dark age of the Middle Ages. There were powerful kings that exerted total power and control over their reigns. During most of these years, people lived under the oppression of the king. Just noble people or landlords were welcomed in the king's court.
What argument did the colonists use to support their call for
independence?
Need help
American colonists argued that the British crown had burdened them with heavy taxes and did not provide the colonists any representation in the British Parliament.
Explanation:
The British Crown did not provide the colonists the same rights as the English subjects. Moreover, the colonists were tired paying too heavy taxes. British saved the colonists from not getting annexed by France and in order to pay off the huge war charges, British Government started to repress the colonists by inflicting too many taxes.
People wanted to express their grievances regarding their inability to pay many taxes, but the colonists were not given equal representation on the parliament. There were none lend ears to the grievances of the colonists and frustrated by this treatment, The colonists staged many protests and declared their intention to secede from the Crown.
Why do some historians criticize the United States' decision to send combat troops to Vietnam after the Gulf of Tonkin incident?
A.It is likely that the South Vietnamese could have won the war if the United States had remained in an advisory role.
B.Evidence suggests that the reported North Vietnamese attack on an American naval vessel may never have happened.
C.Americans of the era feared that Vietnam would turn to Communism if left alone, but today's historians do not think that would have happened.
D.The Communist Party of the United States of America gained dominance at home while the military focused its efforts overseas.
Final answer:
Some historians criticize the decision to send U.S. troops to Vietnam post-Gulf of Tonkin due to doubts about the incident's occurrence and the exaggerated perception of a Communist threat, which led to an extended conflict with high human and material costs.
Explanation:
Some historians criticize the United States' decision to send combat troops to Vietnam after the Gulf of Tonkin incident because there is evidence to suggest that the reported attack by North Vietnamese forces may never have actually happened. Furthermore, the conflict was internally portrayed as a part of the widespread threat of Communism, which was believed to be backed by a coordinated Soviet and Chinese plot. However, scholarship indicates that the perceived Communist threat was exaggerated, given that the Soviet Union and China were not working together, and the Soviet strategy was less aggressive than U.S. officials feared.
The rapid escalation following the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution also led to the U.S. engaging in warfare without a clear congressional declaration, which later caused debate about the extent of military action authorized by political leaders. Moreover, the increasing military involvement drew heavy criticism as it lasted longer with high costs and questionable effectiveness, leading to a credibility gap between government reports and the harsh realities of the war.
7. What did Martin Luther King, Jr. do?
A. fought for civil rights
B. became the first black U.S. Senator
C. established the Harvard Law School
D. ran for President of the United States
Answer:
I pretty sure it's A.
Explanation:
Why were the Articles of Confederation replaced by the United States Constitution?
A. The parliamentary system set up by the Articles of Confederation established a government too much like England’s, against which the country had just fought a war.
B. The tax laws enacted under the Articles of Confederation favored wealthy landowners, which angered members of the merchant class, so new laws had to be written.
C. The weak national government established by the Articles of Confederation made passing and enforcing laws, collecting tax money, and regulating trade either difficult or impossible, so major changes were necessary.
D. The court system created by the Articles of Confederation did not allow for state courts, and people soon realized that the federal government could not resolve legal disputes related to state laws.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
got it correct on a test
In 1905 Japan forced Russia to:
A. Replace its government,
B. Share Russian technology
c. Accept missionaries,
D. Share Russian power in China,