Answer:
Hope this helps :)Explanation:While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. ... Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor
In which areas have Mexican Americans had a great impact?
Give two specific examples.
Answer:
construction indusrty and factorys not to be rasict but it a sad truth
Explanation:
Which statement best describes a result of the Missouri Compromise?
A. Slavery was allowed to spread into all U.S. territories,
B. Maine and Missouri joined the United States as free states.
C. Texas was added to the United States as a slave state.
D. Limits were set about where slavery could spread in U.S.
territories
Answer:
D. Limits were set about where slavery could spread in U.S. territories
Explanation:
In return to the limits of where slavery can spread, the US upheld that they will remain strict in catching and returning slaves, much to the displeasure of abolitionists in the North.
~
Answer:
i think it is d.
Explanation:
What are the four main goals of foreign policy?
Answer:
Preserving the national security of the United States.
Promoting world peace and a secure global environment.
Maintaining a balance of power among nations.
Working with allies to solve international problems.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
U.S. foreign policy focuses on four main goals: protection of the United States, citizens, and allies; assurance of access to international resources and markets; preservation of a global balance of power; and protection of human rights and democracy.
Explanation:The four main goals of U.S. foreign policy are as follows:
Protection of the United States and its citizens and allies: This entails safety both domestically and abroad, spanning both military and economic threats from other nations, terrorist groups, or high tariffs on trade.Assurance of continuing access to international resources and markets: This means maintaining access to essential resources like oil and economic resources. It also includes access to international marketplaces for goods that American consumers might want and advancing the interests of U.S. businesses both domestically and globally.Preservation of a balance of power in the world: There is no true world-level authority dictating the relations among nations. U.S. foreign policy seeks to help maintain a balance of power among countries and their governments.Protection of human rights and democracy: The United States attempts to support international peace, human rights, and democracy through its foreign policy, including aspects such as foreign aid and involvement in international organizations like the United Nations, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), etc.Learn more about U.S. Foreign Policy here:https://brainly.com/question/29444315
#SPJ2
Was the U.S. justified in invading Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power?
Answer:
This is a matter of opinion.
Explanation:
Saddam Hussein was a megalomaniac dictator and would stop at nothing to ensure he stayed in power, including betraying allies. I believe the U.S. was justified, but some say that the U.S. should never intervene in foreign affairs.
A. Identify the architectural style and time period of the building(s) above.
B. Explain innovations that facilitated this design
C. Analyze how this design symbolized perceptions of God and the Church
Answer:
Answer: Try to answer the question, if that doesn't work redo the problem, if that doesn't work try again, if even that does not work than good luck, you'll need it
Explanation:
Explanation: Try and try again. Never give up.
Match each influence of the global economy to the correct description. outsourcing regulatory bodies nongovernmental organizations free trade agreement removing barriers to exchange of goods and services focusing on solutions to specific problems, like poverty relocating jobs in other countries setting rules for international trade and resolving disputes
Answer:
Outsourcing - relocating jobs in other countries.
The goal of outsourcing is to make use of a country's comparative advantage. For example, an American company that outsources production to a country with lower wages, its using that country's comparative advantage in the wage department.
Trade agreement - removing barriers to exchange of goods and services.
The goal of a trade agreement is to allow for a freer exchage of goods and services, mainly by removing tariffs and other barriers to trade.
Regulatory bodies - setting rules for international trade and resolving disputes
Regulatory bodies are in charge of setting the rules, and applying those rules. The most important regulatory body in international trade is the World Trade Organization (WTO), founded in 1995. It has 164 member countries.
Nongovernmental organizations - focusing on solutions to specific problems, like poverty
Nongovermental organizations (NGOs) focused on specific issues outside of government intervention. For example, Amnesty international focuses on human rights, Greenpeace on enviromental issues, and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), on the protection of endangered species.
Nongovernmental organizations focused on specific issues outside of government intervention that include Amnesty international focuses on human rights and Greenpeace on environmental issues etc.
What is the term outsourcing term?
The goal of outsourcing is to make use of a country's comparative advantage.
Outsourcing= relocating jobs in other countries.
Trade agreement= removing barriers to exchange of goods and services.
Regulatory bodies= setting rules for international trade and resolving disputes
Non-governmental organizations= focusing on solutions to specific problems, like poverty.
Learn more about outsourcing, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14202035
WILL GIVE BRANLIEST
Which of the following would be another way to describe the Seneca Falls Convention?
The site of the first women's rights convention in history
A convention about eliminating all forms of discrimination
A credentials committee convention that did not include women
A historical convention where women were segregated from men
Answer:
The site of the first women's rights convention in history.
Explanation:
Write two paragraphs describing the different points of view in the following scenarios:
In the first paragraph, you are a Republican senator who has just returned to Congress to find that O.M. Roberts, former president of the Texas Secession Convention is now a U.S. senator from that state. As a dedicated member of the United States Senate, explain why you believe it is wrong for Roberts to be there.
In the second paragraph you will take the part of O.M. Roberts. Explain why you believe you should represent Texas in the Senate despite your leadership in the Texas Secession Convention.
Republican senator:
O.M. Roberts:
Answer:No secession ball will mark the day. Nor, it appears, are any other commemorative events planned by Texas, which would rather boast of its time as an independent country. But 150 years ago today, shortly after 11 a.m. on Feb. 1, 1861, a state convention voted overwhelmingly to secede from the Union.
In Austin, on the second floor of the old Texas statehouse just south of the current Capitol building (near the present-day Alamo and Texas Rangers monuments), cheering delegates to the special convention approved a short document declaring that the federal government was becoming "a weapon with which to strike down the interests and prosperity of the people of Texas and her Sister slaveholding States." Texas, they stated, was henceforth a "separate Sovereign state ... absolved from all allegiance to the United States." (An even more explicit "declaration of causes" followed a day later; it's well worth a read.)
For one aging veteran in the hall, this was the blackest of days. Sam Houston, the 67-year-old governor of Texas (who had twice served as president of the Republic of Texas), had for years almost single-handedly kept secessionist sentiment in the state at bay, despite being a slaveholder himself. Nearly three decades earlier, Houston had fought for Texan independence from Mexico and guided the fledgling Republic into the Union. He did not want to lose his life's work. "Mark me, the day that produces a dissolution of this [Union] will be written in the blood of humanity," Houston, then a U.S. senator, told Congress in 1854 as he defied Southern predilections to vote against the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Of himself, he had said: "I wish no prouder epitaph to mark the board or slab that may lie on my tomb than this: 'He loved his country, he was a patriot; he was devoted to the Union.'"
As secessionist fever swept Texas, Houston was denounced as a "traitor-knave" for his Unionist views. Always, though, when the grand old man — who still hobbled from a wound sustained at San Jacinto in 1836 — took the stage, he had been able to quell his rivals. But as the year 1860 drew to a close, with Abraham Lincoln's election causing South Carolina to secede and other states to teeter on the brink, Houston, despite being governor, could no longer hold back the tide.
He tried. When secessionists began clamoring for a special legislative session in anticipation of secession, Houston stalled. Soon, however, a secession convention at the end of January 1861 appeared inevitable. Houston convened a special session of the Legislature just before the convention, hoping that he could somehow persuade lawmakers to rein in the proceedings.
It was not to be. The delegates — chosen in a hastily organized election in early January — convened in Austin on Jan. 28, 1861, and quickly penned a document that would sever Texas' ties to the federal government. Houston was invited to the roll call on Feb. 1. He sat "grim and motionless," writes his biographer M.K. Wisehart. One man called him a traitor to his face, though Houston's allies swiftly demanded (and received) an apology. The delegates approved the secession ordinance, 166-8.
The governor won a few concessions, however. He had said he would swallow secession if the people ratified it — so it was put to a vote on Feb. 23, 1861, and the people affirmed it, 44,317 to 13,020. Houston tried to argue that Texas voters had merely approved secession, rather than latching onto the Confederacy. This was technically true, but the governor, who preferred that Texas should return to its old status as an independent country, had lost his sway. In March, Texas became the last state to join the Confederacy in the "first wave," before hostilities broke out at Fort Sumter.
A defiant Houston would swear no oath to the Confederacy, and he was finished as governor. "Fellow citizens, in the name of your rights and liberties, which I believe have been trampled upon, I refuse to take this oath," he declared on March 16, 1861. "In the name of the nationality of Texas, I refuse to take this oath. …" Nor would he live to see the end of the war he tried so hard to avert; he died in 1863, a year after the Battle of Shiloh, in which his son, Sam Jr., a Confederate soldier, was wounded and held prisoner for months. Texas, in fact, would become the site of the last battle of the Civil War, in May 1865. It was also the last rebel state readmitted to the Union, on March 30, 1870, subject to several conditions.
There is another peculiar post-script to the secessionist drama of 1861.
Oddly enough, one Robert E. Lee was living in Texas at that time. Lee had been stationed in Texas on and off for several years, commanding the Second United States Cavalry in frontier skirmishes against Comanches and Mexicans. He didn't seem too fond of the frontier life; he wrote to his wife of living of a "desert of dullness."
Answer:
A man who has openly opposed the U.S (Constitution) should not be allowed to make laws affecting the country. Now that the Confederacy has lost the war, former leaders may seek to bring down the U.S. by other means. If Texas is sincere about wanting to re-join the Union, it must select leaders who favor a Union. Roberts’ defense of himself as senator may include: He was fairly elected by the citizens of Texas. It is up to the voters of Texas to say who will represent them, not another senator who simply does not agree with Roberts’ former politics. For the country to reunite and move forward, it is necessary to bury the past.
Explanation:
Enlightenment thinkers most contributed to the development of which political idea? A. Written constitutions place unnecessary restrictions on governments’ powers. B. Democratic governments have the responsibility to protect human rights. C. Criminals must be punished harshly if a society is to maintain order. D. Religious leaders should play the largest role in establishing a society’s laws.
Answer:
B. Democratic governments have the responsibility to protect human rights
Explanation:
Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, and Rousseau contributed to the political idea that democratic governments must protect human rights, leading to the creation of written constitutions upholding individual rights and limiting government power.
Explanation:Enlightenment thinkers most significantly contributed to the development of the political idea that democratic governments have the responsibility to protect human rights. Philosophers such as John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau formed the core of Enlightenment philosophy which greatly influenced political thought during the 17th and 18th centuries. Their ideas emphasized the concepts of natural rights, the importance of consent of the governed, and the notion of a social contract between the rulers and the ruled. These principles played a crucial role in shaping the creation of written constitutions in various democratic revolutions, most notably the American and French Revolutions, where the protection of individual rights and the establishment of limits to government power became foundational.
John Locke's assertion that the people have a right to change a government that fails to protect life, liberty, and property, and Rousseau's ideas on the general will and popular sovereignty, are clear examples of Enlightenment thought contributing to political liberalism. Additionally, figures like Baron de Montesquieu promoted the idea of separation of powers to ensure a balance and prevent any one branch of government from becoming tyrannical, another influence on modern democratic systems. The commitment to ensuring the sovereignty of the people and equality before the law are legacies of the Enlightenment that continue to underpin the values of many democratic nations today.
Learn more about Enlightenment Thinkers and Democratic Governance here:https://brainly.com/question/30188216
#SPJ2
Which of the following recent presidential candidates is considered to be a
progressive?
A. Mitt Romney
B. Barack Obama
C. John McCain
D. George W. Bush
Answer:
Im not really sure, but from what I know i believe its B or C im not really sure tho. But i hope this helped a little
Explanation:
Barack Obama is a recent presidential candidate is considered to be a
progressive. Hence, option B is correct.
What is the candidate in election?Candidate is the eligible person who is willing to go further in the election. Candidate has some criteria for filling the form with the election if the person have passed all the condition in the form then they are eligible for to stand in the election.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about candidate in election, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18013620
#SPJ2
Which of the following scenarios is an example of how a state may constitutionally limit free speech at a protest demonstration?
States can constitutionally limit free speech at protests by imposing content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions that aim to serve a significant government interest, such as public safety, and are the least restrictive means available.
For instance, states can require protests on roads or highways to have a permit, ensuring public safety and order are maintained. This is done not to restrict the content of the speech but rather to prevent disruptions or safety hazards. Additionally, to be constitutional, such regulations must be the least restrictive means available and must not be done as a pretext to suppress a particular viewpoint.
22)
How did the Weimar Republic eventually lead to the rise of fascist dictator Adolph Hitler?
The weakened Germany government was taken over by Italian fascists, led
by Benito Mussolini, who placed Hitter in power in Germany
Germany attied itself with Austria-Hungary because of the Treaty of
Versailles, and this alliance gave Hitler the power to take over Germany
Germans anger over perceived weakness in the German republic and its
acceptance of the Treaty of Versailles led to strong feelings of nationalism,
which Hitler used to win power
German officials elected Adolph Hitler as the High Chancellor of the
Weimar Republic when the government was first established, and Hitter
eventually changed the government to fit his plans.
Answer: The Weimar Republic was Germany’s government from 1919 to 1933, the period after World War I until the rise of Nazi Germany. It was named after the town of Weimar where Germany’s new government was formed by a national assembly after Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated. From its uncertain beginnings to a brief season of success and then a devastating depression, the Weimar Republic experienced enough chaos to position Germany for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.
Explanation:
One of the most important principles of the Texas Constitution is _________.
a.
limited government
b.
unique powers
c.
property rights
d.
advanced education
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
Texas actually goes by a principle of limited government or it basically has a limited government
Answer:
A
Explanation:
What defensive shape did the Union army use for the final 2 days at Gettysburg?
Answer:
Fish hook defensive formation.Explanation:
The Union battle line of Gettysburg was in the shape of a fishhook. During the Civil War's Battle of Gettysburg, the Union set out in a defensive formation matching a fish hook (General Slocum's line of defense). The Union Army strengthened its position on Culp's Hill and Cemetery Ridge. Positioned on high ground, the Union could easily send support where they were required. The Confederates more spread out formation where communication and support over the vast distance were more difficult.
How did the court case Elmore v. Rice affect the movement for civil rights in South Carolina?
A: African American service members confronting military segregation in South Carolina based their case on the 14th Amendment.
B: More people in South Carolina supported civil rights for African Americans because of their service during World War II.
C: The federal government was determined to maintain the social status of African Americans that existed prior to World War II.
D: After World War II, African Americans were in a position to start challenging long-standing restrictions of their rights in South Carolina.
Answer:
Hi, I am here to help. The correct answer for you is D: After world war 2, African Americans were in a position to start challenging long-standing restrictions of their rights in south Carolina.
I hope this helps :)
The civil rights movement in South Carolina is affected by the court case Elmore v. Rice. After WWII, African Americans in South Carolina were in a position to begin fighting long-standing limitations on their rights.
What is the rights movement?The Civil Rights Movement was a movement in the United States that aimed to provide African Americans equal rights.
Nonviolent protests and civil disobedience are hallmarks of the movement, peacefully refusing to follow unfair laws. Boycotts, sit-ins, and protest marches were among the tactics utilized by activists.
The court case Elmore v. Rice has an impact on the civil rights movement in South Carolina.
Following WWII, African Americans in South Carolina were able to begin challenging long-standing restrictions on their rights.
Therefore, option D is correct.
To learn more about the case of Elmore v. Rice, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10083826
#SPJ2
What is an example of "trust-busting' that Theodore Roosevelt enforced?
A.
He supported the Northern Securities Company.
B.
He created a trust for all the sugar companies to join together.
OC. He created an act that supported child labor.
OD. He broke up the Northern Securities Company.
E. He abolished child labor.
Answer: A
Explanation: An example of "trust-busting" that Theodore Roosevelt enforced was his administration's suit against the Northern Securities Company in 1902. The company was a railroad trust that controlled major midwestern railroads, and it was accused of creating a monopoly over Northwestern Railroads.
Which statements correctly explain how Kublai Khan tried to restore China from the ravages of war
Answer:
A. commanded Chinese workers to build and repair roads
B. allowed traders, pilgrims, teachers, and artists to travel to China on the Silk Road
D. lengthened the Grand Canal, extending it to Beijing
Explanation:
Kalahira says: B. Allowed traders, pilgrims, teacher, and artists to travel to China on the Silk Road, and E. continued the tradition of giving civil service exams to people who wanted to work in the government, so I submitted, only B. was correct one she got, Correct answers in answer section.
Answer:
allowed traders, pilgrims, teachers, and artists to travel to China on the Silk Road
commanded Chinese workers to build and repair roads
lengthened the Grand Canal, extending it to Beijing
Explanation:
__________ is given in order to alleviate the suffering of others.
Military Aid
Foreign Policy
Humanitarian Aid
Medical Assisance
Answer: humanitarian aid
Explanation:
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Who founded the American Federation of Labor (AFL) in 1886?
Answer:
Samuel Gompers founded the AFL
Explanation:
Why do you think farmers were the first to protest the unfair shipping practices of the railroads in the late 19th century?
Answer:
Farmers were facing many problems in the late 1800s. These problems included overproduction, low crop prices, high interest rates, high transportation costs, and growing debt
Explanation:
Answer:
BECAUSE THEY MAKE .FRUITS AND VEGETABLES FOR THE ENVIORMENT
Explanation:
What is one way in which an individual citizen can influence the government
A. Save money from extra earnings
B. Help a neighbor solve a problem
C. Sign a petition to state legislators
D. Watch television to become better informed
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Signing a petition to state legislators is the most influential thing an individual citizen could do on this list. Sure, the other things may influence things, but signing a petition is what influences the government. I really hope this helps you!
One way in which an individual citizen can influence the government is to sign a petition to state legislators. The correct option is c.
What is a government?A government is a system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a state. In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary.
Government is a means by which organizational policies are enforced, as well as a mechanism for determining policy. In many countries, the government has a kind of constitution, a statement of its governing principles and philosophy. While all types of organizations have governance, the term government is often used more specifically to refer to the approximately 200 independent national governments and subsidiary organizations. The major types of political systems in the modern era are democracies, monarchies, and authoritarian and totalitarian regimes.
Historically prevalent forms of government include monarchy, aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, theocracy, and tyranny.
Learn more about government, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8561829
#SPJ6
What was the American System?
The American System, conceived by Henry Clay, was a strategic economic policy involving a national bank, protective tariffs, and internal improvements such as roads and canals to strengthen the American economy.
The American System was an economic plan that played a significant role in American policy during the first half of the 19th century. Conceptualized by Henry Clay, it aimed to strengthen and unify the nation with a focus on three fundamental pillars: a national bank, a protective tariff, and investments in internal improvements.
The bank was intended to foster a stable currency and credit supply. The tariff sought to protect emerging American industries from foreign competition while also raising government revenue.
The internal improvements, such as roads and canals, were designed to facilitate the movement of goods throughout the country, hence improving the efficiency of domestic trade and commerce.
In 1816, under the presidency of James Madison and spearheaded by influential lawmakers such as Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun, Congress set about implementing this system to support national growth.
The American System reflected aspects of Alexander Hamilton's earlier economic proposals and was advanced further during the presidency of John Quincy Adams.
The system was a response to the country's need for economic independence and infrastructural development, reducing reliance on foreign trade and uniting the diverse American economies of the North and South.
Can someone help me with this 2 questions please???
Answer:1-c
2-a
Explanation:
Islam teaches that Christians and Jews
A. believe in false gods.
B. need to be conquered.
C. are people who follow sacred writings.
D. are also Muslims.
Final answer:
The accurate answer is 'C. are people who follow sacred writings,' as Islam recognizes Jews and Christians as ahl al-kitab or 'People of the Book,' monotheists with sacred scriptures. Jews and Christians have historically been able to live under Muslim rule and are part of the shared Abrahamic tradition.
Explanation:
Islam sees Jews and Christians as ahl al-kitab, or "People of the Book," because both faiths are considered monotheistic and have sacred scriptures believed to be revealed by God. Muslims, Jews, and Christians are united by their recognition of a shared spiritual lineage tracing back to Abraham, a prophet in all three faiths.
With respect to the question, the most accurate statement is 'C. are people who follow sacred writings.' This is because Islam acknowledges the religious texts of Jews (the Torah) and Christians (the Bible), although Islam holds that these texts have been corrupted over time. The correct teachings, according to Islam, are found unaltered in the Qur'an, which Muslims believe to be the final revelation from God, delivered through the Prophet Muhammad.
Describe the political history of Turkey during the 20th century.
Answer:
Although the Turks favored neutrality in the conflict germinating between the Central Powers of Germany and Austria and the allied countries of England, France, and Russia, Enver Pasa, who declared himself war minister in 1914, favored cooperation with the Germans.
In the summer of 1914, Enver Pasa signed a secret peace treaty with the Germans promising naval assistance in the face of Russian aggression in the Black Sea. Two months later, the Ottoman Empire was dragged into a war. With the Arab revolts in the east and the Russians on the northern border, the Turks were surrounded by hostile forces. Atatürk's legendary defense of Gallipoli in 1915 succeeded in saving the Straits, and therefore Istanbul, from invasion. But Turkish forces were no match for Allied tanks, automatic weapons, and airplanes. On October 30, 1918, the Turks, represented by the CUP government, agreed to an armistice with England and France.
The Treaty of Sèvres was signed on August 20, 1920 by the government of Mehmet VI. Under the treaty, the Ottomans relinquished all European territories except for a small area around Istanbul. Armenia and Kurdistan gained autonomy, Greece was assigned the administration of the region around Izmir, and French and Italian troops were left to occupy portions of the rest of Anatolia. Control of Turkish finances was taken over by the Allies. But the treaty was to be short-lived.
Turkish Statehood
Spurred on by defeat and foreign occupation, nationalists established pockets of resistance called "Defense of Rights" groups. Atatürk -- who was already an active nationalist, having taken part in the CUP overthrow of 1909 -- began organizing various nationalist factions, with the twin goals of recognition of a national movement and the liberation of Anatolia from foreign occupation.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
Turkey's 20th century political history involves the transition from the Ottoman Empire to a modern secular nation-state, the founding of a republic by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and challenges such as establishing secular democracy and regional disputes over resources.
Explanation:The 20th Century Political History of Turkey
The political history of Turkey during the 20th century is marked by significant transformation and turmoil. The fall of the Ottoman Empire, which was once a substantial power controlling parts of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, set the stage for modern Turkey's founding. In the early 20th century, the empire, labelled the "sick man of Europe", saw a rise in Turkish nationalism, particularly with the Young Turks movement that sought to reform and preserve the empire.
The onset of World War I saw the Ottoman Empire side with Germany, hoping for gains but ultimately contributing to its downfall. The empire's end came with the Treaty of Sèvres in 1920, but nationalist forces led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk opposed the treaty's harsh terms. The successful military campaigns led to the formation of a new, secular republic, which was formalized in the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923, that set the borders of the modern state of Turkey.
Under Atatürk's leadership, Turkey underwent significant Westernization and secularization. The adoption of a new constitution and regular elections signaled a move towards democracy. Reforms included the giving of voting rights to women, the change from Arabic to Latin alphabet, and the modernization of legal systems inspired by European civil codes, abandoning Islamic law. Yet, the early republic remained under single-party rule until multi-party democracy took hold after World War II.
Turkey's internal politics in the latter half of the century were often turbulent, including military coups and conflicts over the role of Islam in government. The country also faced challenges with its ethnic minorities and issues such as the Armenian Genocide remain sensitive topics. In its foreign policy, especially concerning water rights over the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, Turkey has been involved in regional disputes with neighbors like Syria and Iraq.
Overall, the 20th century saw Turkey transition from an empire to a modern nation-state, pursuing secular democracy amidst various internal and external challenges.
How many estimated deaths were caused by World War I (combining military and civilian deaths
Answer:
The Answer is C., 16 million.
Answer:
16 million
Explanation:
Choice C
Explain the difference between domestic and foreign policy.
Answer:
The difference between foreign and domestic policy is that one concerns states and international institutions, while the other concerns all of the factors in a specific place. The term “foreign policy” encompasses all actions made by a country in the international context with regard to other States or to international institutions. Conversely, the term “domestic policy” refers to all actions and decisions related to issues concerning the domestic sphere of a country, including business, the environment, health care, education, taxes, energy, social welfare, collective and individual rights, law enforcement, housing, immigration, military, religion, and the economy.
Why was appeasement a foreign policy failure for Great Britain and France?
O
A. The United States was committed to drawing Germany into a
military conflict.
O
B. The formation of the Tripartite Pact forced Germany to rapidly
secure new lands.
O
C. German leaders could not be trusted to honor agreements with
other countries.
O
D. The Soviet Union began to expand into territories Germany agreed
to leave.
SUBMIT
Answer:ITS C!!I just took the quiz and A was wrong
Explanation:
AP
Appeasement a foreign policy was a failure for Great Britain and France because
German leaders could not be trusted to honor agreements with
What was appeasement policy of Great Britain and France?Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain's policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. Most closely associated with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, it is now widely discredited as a policy of weakness.
Why did the appeasement policy fail?Appeasement failed because Hitler was unappeasable. He sought not to adjust the European balance of power in Germany's favor, but rather to overthrow it. He wanted a German-ruled Europe that would have eliminated France and Britain as European powers.
What did the policy of appeasement result in?What was the result of appeasement? Appeasement reached its climax in September 1938 with the Munich Agreement. Chamberlain hoped to avoid a war over Czechoslovakia by conceding to Adolf Hitler's demands. The Agreement allowed Nazi Germany to annex the Sudetenland, the German-speaking parts of Czechoslovakia.
How did the policy of appeasement affect France and Great Britain?The policy of appeasement affected France and Great Britain because France was not prepared for war with Germany, while Great Britain was left to fight Germany alone after France was conquered.
Was appeasement a good policy?Appeasement was said to have been beneficial because it provided the Allies with more time to prepare for war. However, the idea that the Munich Agreement had restored peace fooled the Allies into a stagnant state since none of them were fully prepared for the war when it arrived.
What was Munich agreement?British and French prime ministers Neville Chamberlain and Edouard Daladier sign the Munich Pact with Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. The agreement averted the outbreak of war but gave Czechoslovakia away to German conquest.
To learn more about appeasement policy click here
https://brainly.com/question/10629070?
#SPJ2
What are the three inspirations that led to writing the Declaration of Independence
Which term describes medical practices as they existed in the 14th century?
O primitive
modern
effective
sophisticated
Answer:
primitive
Explanation: