The modern idea of due process can be found in the Second part of the Justinian Code of Laws because there it talks about actions of judicial protection and rights of citizens.
What is the Justinian Code?The Justinian Code is a term to refer to a collection of imperial constitutions promulgated by Emperor Justinian around the year 529.
The due process is evidenced in the Justinian Code because the laws were classified into different categories to organize them and give a different solution to each case as appropriate.
Additionally, it has a section in which it reaffirms the rights of citizens and their duties to treat them all in the same way by the law (equality and justice).
Learn more about justice in: https://brainly.com/question/978006
The evidence of due process in the Code of Justinian can be found in its provisions for a fair and orderly judicial system, which included the right to a trial, the right to present evidence, and the right to be represented by a lawyer.
The Code of Justinian, also known as the Corpus Juris Civilis, was a comprehensive collection of Roman laws and legal interpretations, compiled and issued from 529 to 534 AD under the direction of the Emperor Justinian I. It aimed to consolidate the laws of Rome and provide a legal framework that would be clear and accessible to all.
One of the key aspects of due process is the idea that legal proceedings should be conducted according to established rules and principles, which are designed to ensure fairness. The Code of Justinian contributed to this concept in several ways:
1. Right to a Trial: The Code established that individuals had the right to have their legal matters adjudicated in a court of law, ensuring that they would not be subject to arbitrary decisions by government officials.
2. Presentation of Evidence: It provided for the orderly presentation of evidence, allowing parties to present their cases and challenge the evidence against them, which is a fundamental aspect of due process.
3. Legal Representation: The Code recognized the importance of legal representation, allowing individuals to be represented by advocates (lawyers) who could argue on their behalf.
4. Judicial Review: It also allowed for the review of lower court decisions by higher courts, which helped to ensure that legal decisions were made consistently and in accordance with the law.
5. Publication of Laws: The Code of Justinian was an attempt to systematize and make accessible the vast and often contradictory body of Roman law. By publishing the laws, it allowed citizens to be aware of the legal standards to which they would be held, another important aspect of due process.
6. Equality Before the Law: The Code sought to treat all citizens equally under the law, which is a cornerstone of due process.
In summary, the Code of Justinian laid the groundwork for many principles of due process that are recognized in modern legal systems, including the rights to a fair trial, legal representation, and the orderly presentation and review of legal matters.
Write a two paragraph Essay. Your prompt is : Is life meaningless why or why not and if not do you have the right to execute yourself. Take this from a biblical perspective.
From the Bible's point of view, life is meaningful and filled with purpose. It is referred to as a gift from God, supporting reasons to rejoice, strive for righteousness, and help others. The concept of taking one's life contradicts the biblical commandment 'Thou shalt not kill', which affirms life's sanctity.
Explanation:From a biblical perspective, life is not meaningless, but rather is filled with purpose. In the Bible, life is referred to as a gift from God (Ecclesiastes 3:13). Believers are encouraged to rejoice, strive for righteousness, and help others, indicating a meaningful existence.
As to the matter of one's right to 'execute' oneself, the Bible views this as a violation of the commandment 'Thou shalt not kill’ (Exodus 20:13). The sanctity of life in this view suggests that it’s God who gives life and God alone who can take it away.
Learn more about Biblical Perspective on Life here:https://brainly.com/question/32805311
#SPJ11
Which president of the u.s. signed the declaration of surrener of the vietnam war and when?
Answer:
Pres. Richard Nixon
Explanation:
In Paris, Pres. Richard Nixon signed a Peace Treaty in 27 January 1973 after rounds of Peace talks between the North Vietnam, South Vietnam and the White House. An agreement was made including ceasing fire, releasing of P.O.W.s, etc.
Then the American troops were withdrawn from South Vietnam. The war continued until 30 April 1975 with the Fall of Saigon, when the country was reunited under communism.
"Be it therefore enacted by the King’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords….and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, That from and after the First Day of May One thousand eight hundred and seven, the African Slave Trade, and all…manner of dealing and trading in the Purchase, Sale, Barter, or Transfer of Slaves or of Persons intended to be sold, transferred, used or dealt with as Slaves, practised and carried on, in, at to or from any Part of the Coast or Countries of Africa, shall be, and the same is hereby utterly abolished, prohibited, and declared to be unlawful...." - from "An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade." Based on this passage, what did this act abolish? A) slavery in Africa B) profiting from slave labor C) slavery in the British empire D) the taking of slaves from Africa
The correct answer is D: this act abolished the taking of slaves from Africa. Let's see why:
A, B and C are wrong because:
It's important to not mistake slavery by slave trade. To abolish slavery would mean to end it immediately as a form of work that was an important profit source in many parts of the British Empire. This would be a more radical act that would happen only with the Slave Abolition Act 1833.
D is correct because:
It was thought by then that by abolishing trade of people bought in Africa all slavery would naturally end, that's why this act forbids it. This proved wrong: slavery survived, not only because not all nations respected this act (Brazil, for example, would forbid slave trade only in 1830), but also because the slave trade became a domestic trade. Brazil had slaves until 1888 based on trades between its regions, selling and buying sons and daughters of African slaves.
Answer:D
Explanation:
What did Eleanor Roosevelt do of particular significance several years after the war ended?
a. She chaired the committee that drafted the United Nation’s "Universal Declaration of Human Rights."
b. She traveled to China in an attempt to broker an end to the bitter civil war.
c. She acted as the U.S. representative in attendance at the Nuremberg Trials.
d. She became an outspoken critic of communist independence movements around the world.
e. She was the first U.S. official to visit Japan after the end of WWII.
Answer:
Option A, She chaired the committee that drafted the United Nation’s "Universal Declaration of Human Rights", is the right answer.
Explanation:
Anna Eleanor Roosevelt was a diplomat, political figure, and activist from America. Following the end of the war, Eleanor Roosevelt was involved in so many notable activities. Nevertheless, her involvement in the creation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was her most significant activity. In the year 1948, she not only participated in the drafting committee that drafted the United Nation’s "Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also openly promoted its adoption.
Most new immigrants who arrived during the early years of the twentieth century: Select one:
a. learned English immediately.
b. planned to remain in the United States temporarily.
c. generally earned lower wages in America than in their former homelands.""
Answer:
The answer is: b. planned to remain in the United States temporarily.
Explanation:
Initially, United States businesses recruited laborers. The idea was that they would come and work temporarily, save money and return back to their families
The main push behind the discussions about building a trans continental railroad in the mid-1900s was the________.
Answer: The main push behind it was aimed at how to connect the pacific coast with the remaining part of the nation.
Explanation:
The transcontinental railroad is a railroad network that connects the continental landmass with the terminals at different continental borders.
The transcontinental rail road project aided in the opening of up of settlements that are in the under populated region and that wouldn't have been known or explored. The transcontinental railroad helped cross country passengers and also freight transportation.
How did Vespucci feel about the animals and plants of South America? a. disgusted c. admiring b. sickened d. puzzled Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D Mark this a
Answer:
Vespucci felt admiring about the animals and plants of South America.
Explanation:
After Amerigo Vespucci first reached the continent of South America, he realized that the species of plants and animals that he was getting to see there were much different than what he had ever seen in Italy and elsewhere in Europe. He notes the distinction of the plants and animal species existing in the newly found land to be one of the most remarkable factors of the new continent.Answer:
The answer is C, admiring.
Explanation:
Took the test on edge.
From 1965 on, the region’s standard of living has soared, but also unemployment and prices.
a) but also
b) and also
c) but so have
d) and so also
e) but so did
Answer:
The correct answer is C: but so have .
Explanation:
After but we need an auxiliary verb to keep both parts of the question parallel, so we won't use A, B, and D, as these options do not have both parts parallel.
As the action started in 1965 and it is still valid, we should use the Present Perfect, so we won't use E (as this is Past Simple).
Therefore, the correct answer is C.
According to this map depicting the results of the 2000 election, winning the South and midwest electoral college votes allowed Bush to win states with the three most electoral college votes enabled Bush to win states with the most electoral college votes enabled Gore to win East and West Coast electoral college votes enabled Gore to win
According to this map depicting the results of the 2000 election, winning the South and Midwest electoral college votes allowed Bush to win. Thus, option A is correct.
What is a map?The map is a 2-dimensional representation of boundaries, territories, lakes, and other places that aid in recognizing and comprehending the world's territorial organization.
This map depicts the outcomes of the presidential race and shows that Bush was able to win by garnering support in the South and Midwest among the electorate.
These are some of the closest presidential contests in US history. Bush's Democratic opponent, Al Gore, narrowly prevailed in the national vote, but Bush received a majority of the total votes that were casted.
Therefore, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about map, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1565784
#SPJ5
At the turn of the century, the French Academy was divided rather sharply between two doctrines. Which taught that color was the most important element?
Answer:
Rubens Doctrine
Explanation:
Rate me and thank me
Use of joint capabilities in _____ helps shape the operational environment and keeps the day-to-day tensions between nations and groups below the threshold of armed conflict, while maintaining U.S. global influence.
Answer
Milatry engagement, security cooperation and deterrence activities.
Explanation:
Joint capabilities in diplomacy help shape the operational environment, keep tensions between nations under control, and maintain U.S. global influence. They involve coordinated efforts from multiple entities and could range from diplomatic negotiations to cultural exchanges. The goal is to prevent escalation of conflicts and maintain a nation's strategic influence.
Explanation:The use of joint capabilities in diplomacy helps shape the operational environment. It aids in keeping the tensions between nations and groups below the threshold of armed conflict, while maintaining U.S. global influence. Joint capabilities involve the resources and efforts of more than one group or nation, coordinated towards achieving a common goal. In the domain of diplomacy, these joint capabilities might involve various strategies ranging from diplomatic negotiations, economic sanctions, military presence, cultural exchanges, and aid programs. The aim is to prevent escalation of conflicts, promote peace, and maintain a nation's strategic influence.
For instance, the U.S. employs joint capabilities with other nations in the United Nations. It does so by using diplomacy to respond to global crises, maintaining peace and security, and strengthening international cooperation. Together, these efforts shape the operational environment and keep tensions under control, thus averting armed conflicts. This represents a proactive approach to managing international relations, focusing on conflict prevention rather than response.
Learn more about diplomacy here:https://brainly.com/question/31361908
#SPJ6
The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 was hated in the North for all of the following reasons EXCEPT that
a. it denied slaves the right to testify on their own behalf.
b. northerners who helped slaves escape could receive heavy fines and jail terms.
c. southerners could require compensation from the federal government for runaway slaves that were not found.
d. northerners could be required to help recapture runaway slaves.
e. commissioners would receive lower compensation for declaring a runaway slave "free" than they would for declaring him or her a "fugitive."
Answer:
c. southerners could require compensation from the federal government for runaway slaves that were not found.
Explanation:
The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 was an extension of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 according to which severe punishment is given to those who aid a runaway slave and ensured to capture and return the slave to its original owner. It was one of the most controversial acts of the nineteenth century as it came as a part of the Compromise of 1850 and it polarized more people on the issue of slavery. Where federal laws imposed under the pressure of Southern States, North became more reluctant to it.
As chief justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall
a. promoted the growth of state sovereignty.
b. supported the attainment of political and social equality.
c. emphasized the primacy of property and property rights.
d. abandoned his Federalist sympathies.
which of the following factors best explains why mexicos policy of inviting american settleers into its territories was not succesdul
Mexico gained independence from Spain and it included many parts such as Guatemala, Texas and parts of Colorado and Arizona. It invited american settlers to defend the Texas frontier from annexation by Spain.
Explanation:
Due to the territorial expansion Mexico started to invite american settlers by relaxing the immigration policies and it asked america to populate the northern territories. Texas was sparsely populated at that time and Americans had the great talent to make it develop into a commercial hub. So mexico decided to offer major land grants to Americans and it wanted the Americans to be loyal to Mexico and convert to Catholicism.
Americans whop settled in Mexico had courage to fight the dictatorship of General Santa Anna but they were happy that they own a land. American settlers appreciated democracy which brought Texas revolution.
Answer:
Settlers continued to identify as Americans rather than as Mexicans
Explanation:
Apex says so
Which of the following actions did abolitionists take to end slavery? Check any of the boxes that apply. 1.They kidnapped enslaved people and brought them north. 2. They published newspapers to spread the antislavery message. 3. They wrote letters to Congress asking for antislavery laws. 4. They held public meetings with antislavery speakers. 5. They violently attacked people who supported slavery.
The following actions which abolitionists take to end slavery are:
They published newspapers to spread the antislavery message.They wrote letters to Congress asking for antislavery laws.They held public meetings with antislavery speakers.Thus, options '2', '3', and '4' are correct.
How do abolitionists take to end slavery?The abolitionists wanted to end the ownership of slaves because they believed that slavery was an abomination and a curse on the United States. They circulated a ton of anti-slavery material among Southerners and petitioned Congress, sought office and distributed it widely. These ardent campaigners fought the spread of slavery into American territory and recently established states like Kansas, in contrast to the beliefs of other organizations like the Free Soil Party.
The American Colonization Society, established in 1816, made the notion of releasing slaves and sending them back to Africa part of an early push to abolish slavery. This answer was considered to be a compromise between abolitionists and pro-slavery individuals.
Learn more about abolitionists, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9741757
#SPJ5
Abolitionists actions to end slavery included publishing antislavery newspapers, writing letters to Congress, holding public meetings with antislavery speakers, and supporting the Underground Railroad. They used moral persuasion and sometimes, though less commonly, engaged in violence.
Explanation:Abolitionists took various actions to end slavery. They published newspapers to spread the antislavery message, with William Lloyd Garrison being a notable figure in the journalism space with his paper The Liberator. They also wrote letters to Congress asking for antislavery laws, which were part of the Great Petition Campaign. Additionally, public meetings with antislavery speakers were held to persuade people towards the cause. Wendell Phillips and Angelina Grimké were prominent orators who influenced public opinion. To directly aid enslaved individuals, abolitionists supported and operated the Underground Railroad, a covert network aimed at helping slaves escape to freedom. This disobedience to laws like the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 particularly showcased their commitment to abolitionist values. Although violence did occasionally occur in their efforts to fight slavery, it wasn't a representative strategy of the abolitionist movement as a whole, with individuals like John Brown representing the extreme end of abolitionist tactics.
What political purpose did the splendid palace at Versailles serve?
Answer:
The Palace of Versailles is indeed splendid and impressive. It shows the power and the refined taste of his first master, king Louis XIV. By moving to Versailles, the Sun King, as he was known, was following a policy aimed at taking more control from the French nobility in government issues; the court was there and this helped the monarch control policy-making; it also meant taking distance from the populace of Paris.
Explanation:
The political purpose did the splendid palace at Versailles serve was: The construction and design of the palace aimed to centralize political power in the hands of the monarchy.
By creating a magnificent residence for the French king, Louis XIV, at Versailles, the palace symbolized the authority and absolute power of the monarchy. It allowed the king to exert control over the nobility and courtiers by requiring their presence at Versailles, keeping them under his watchful eye, and fostering a sense of dependence on the king. The opulence and grandeur of the palace at Versailles were intentionally designed to impress visitors and foreign dignitaries.
Learn more about palace at Versailles here:
https://brainly.com/question/29630667
#SPJ6
Because of the principle of "rule of law,"
A. states can choose whether to follow national laws
B. people can legally break laws they do not agree with
C. even the president can be arrested and placed on trial
D. trials are not often necessary because the law is the judge
Answer:
C. even the president can be arrested and placed on trial
Explanation:
This principle addresses the concept that no one is above the law, even the president. It was created and it's used to promote the idea of equality and avoid tyranny or corruption. One of the most preeminent scholars to talk about this principle was John Locke who attests that if the people are not happy with the government, people can take it out, and put another one.
The 'rule of law' means everyone, including leaders, are subject to the law, hence choice C is correct. No one has special privileges to disregard or break the law, and fair trials are necessary.
Explanation:The principle of the 'rule of law' imparts that everyone, including leaders, is subject to the law. Therefore, the correct choice is C. even the president can be arrested and placed on trial. In essence, no individual or group is above the law or has privileges that place them beyond its reach. This foundational concept prevents states from disregarding national laws (A), doesn't permit people to break laws they disagree with (B), and necessitates fair trials, as the law doesn't be the judge (D).
Learn more about 'rule of law' here:https://brainly.com/question/31822583
#SPJ6
César Chávez became the first Hispanic mayor of a major city when he was elected in Los Angeles.True / False.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
César Chávez was a famous farm labor union leader. He founded the United Farm Workers or UFW, and was one of the first important, nationwide Hispanic leaders and a civil rights activist. He was a Mexican American. But he never was elected as LA mayor.
The emergency operations plan is a key component of an emergency management program that:________
a. Provides standard operating procedures for responding to specific types of incidents.
b. Serves primarily as a budgeting document for acquiring emergency management resources.
c. Establishes the overall authority, roles, and functions performed during incidents
d. Is required in order for a jurisdiction to receive Federal assistance with mitigation initiatives
Taking into account the statement above:
"The emergency operations plan is a key component of an emergency management program that:________
a. Provides standard operating procedures for responding to specific types of incidents.
b. Serves primarily as a budgeting document for acquiring emergency management resources.
c. Establishes the overall authority, roles, and functions performed during incidents
d. Is required in order for a jurisdiction to receive Federal assistance with mitigation initiatives"
The answer about that the emergency operations plan is a key component of an emergency management program is option: C. Establishes the overall authority, roles, and functions performed during incidents," because this can be applied to a wide variety of scenarios.
Hope this helps.
When Diener and Seligman (2002) did research to determine what distinguishes the happiest 10 percent from the unhappiest 10 percent of undergraduate students, what did they find to be the key factor?
Answer:
They found that the 10 percent of students with the highest level of happiness and the lowest sign of depression had strong ties to friends and family which were committed to spending much quality time with them.
Explanation:
In keeping with his emphasis on the genetic basis of happiness, Diener has found that external conditions do little to change one’s level of happiness. After a certain threshold there seems to be no correlation between income and happiness, and in fact in a recent study it was found that teenagers from blue-collar families were happier than teenagers from rich families.
While income is not highly correlated with happiness, Diener has found that social relationships are. This is very good news, for many people who are low on the happiness scale (perhaps due to genetically acquired gloominess) can raise their level significantly by closely interacting with a good friend on a daily basis.
As a result of the 1983 national report on the state of education, A Nation at Risk, Texas adopted which reforms to address the serious issues that had been identified?
Final answer:
Texas implemented education reforms such as the No Child Left Behind Act, which established accountability systems and testing for schools, and promoted the creation of charter schools and the use of educational funding vouchers.
Explanation:
Following the publication of the A Nation at Risk report in 1983, Texas adopted several education reforms to address the identified issues. Significant amendments to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act were made in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002, under President George W. Bush's administration. This act mandated states to implement accountability systems for all public schools, test all students in grades 3–8 in reading and math, and take corrective actions against schools failing to make adequate yearly progress.
Moreover, the development of charter schools was encouraged, and educational funding vouchers were introduced, allowing parents to choose private education for their children using tax revenue that would have been allocated to public schools.
By 1700, English colonial landowners began to rely more heavily on African slavery in part because_____.
Answer:
gold, cotton
Explanation:
The public planning of many lynchings in the South showed that:
O
A. The violence was considered to be legal.
O
B. Police were not interested in stopping violence.
O
C. Participants feared punishment for the violence.
O
D. The violence was intended to be kept secret.
Answer:
The public planning of many lynchings in the South showed that police were not interested in stopping violence.
Option: (B)
Explanation:
The lynchings that happened in the south have always been believed to have happened due to the deliberate ignorance of the Police and the other responsible authorities. The prejudice beard by the majority white population of the south against the blacks of the south kept on out-springing in violent unrest in between the groups of these two. The sparks of violence were aired to become rages of fire due to the ignorance of the Police as the police too were predominantly against the blacks.Answer:
A
Explanation:
Police were not interested in stopping violence
The American Indians and the Spanish learned many things from each other. Pueblo people learned how to use new tools, grow new foods, and raise sheep for wool. Many converted to Catholicism through the work of missionaries. From the Indians, the Spanish learned new techniques for growing crops. Some Spanish settlers treated the American Indians harshly by enslaving them and whipping those who continued to practice their traditional rituals.
Explanation:
This passage refers to the colonies established in the region of New Mexico, that would later become the scenario of the Popé Rebellion in the XVII century .
Answer:
Colonization of New Mexico by the Spanish saw a great deal of intercultural relations, and transmission of knowledge, but it would be fundamentally affected by the religious factors. Specifically, the missionaries tried to banish the Kashina religion from the Pueblo, and this was the key cause in the Pope rebellion in 1680.
please help me asap this is due in 20 minutes there are 2 questions
Question 1
How did the British Raj treat the people of India after their loyal military support for Britain during World War I?
Select one:
a. The British finally gave India a much greater level of independence.
b. The British rewarded the Indians with a greater voice in Parliament.
c. The British imposed wartime laws during peacetime--just on the citizens of India.
Question 2
How did the British use India’s caste system in their efforts to make India an industrialized nation?
Select one:
a. Britain managed to destroy the caste system in India, replacing India's social order with its own class system.
b. British companies ignored the limits imposed by the caste system and hired laborers on the basis of merit instead.
c. Once Indians understood that the caste system would not be tolerated by the British, they stopped recognizing caste.
Answer:
Question 1: Answer is Option A: The British finally gave India a much greater level of independence.
Question 2: Answer is Option B: British companies ignored the limits imposed by the caste system and hired laborers on the basis of merit instead
Explanation:
Question 1:
Indian Army played a major role in world war 1. There were around 13 lakh Indian soldiers who served during World War I and fought for the Britishers. When the World War I ended in 1919, Indians were promoted to higher officer ranks. Many cadets were also sent to study in "Great Britain" at the "Royal Military College".
Question 2:
As far as caste system was concerned, British served their own interests as it was very difficult for them to manage large Indian population and that to with wide variety of castes. So, they created single society with common laws so that they can easily govern them. So, they use to hire labors on the basis of merit and industrialization occurred in India.
At the end of the Revolutionary War, the United States acquired the territory of___________.
After the Revolutionary War, the United States gained territory up to the Mississippi River, with the Treaty of Paris in 1783 confirming this territorial expansion.
At the end of the Revolutionary War, the United States acquired the territory stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the Mississippi River. The thirteen states claimed sovereignty over this vast land until they formed a more centralized federal government. Subsequent land cessions by the states to the federal government were essential for equalizing power among the states and enabling orderly western settlement. The Treaty of Paris in 1783 significantly expanded the nation's territory and facilitated the formation of new states such as Kentucky and Tennessee, further solidifying American territorial gains.
What would be the status of an international f1 student status who got married to an American citizen and filed for status change?
Answer:
Green card holder is the status of that student.
Explanation:
Visa status states about the work and information of any person when he goes outside of the country. America also makes some visa policy. The visa policy for F1 and green card visa holder is as follows--
F1 is the visa status that is given to that person who wants to study in the American country. It means that if a person wants to study in America and if that person does not belong from America then he needs an F1 visa.When a person marries from American girl then he can take the citizenship of America either he is from the outside of America and the visa status of the person has become a Green card.The above question asked about the visa status of F1 when he will be married to an American girl, then the visa status will be a green card which is described above.
An F1 student who gets married to an American citizen and files for a status change can become a lawful permanent resident or a green card holder in the U.S. They typically maintain their F1 status until the adjustment of status is approved. It is also suggested to apply for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) which allows them to work in the U.S.
Explanation:When an F1 student marries an American citizen and files for a status change, they can apply for an adjustment of status to become a lawful permanent resident, or a green card holder, in the United States.
During this process, the F1 status is generally maintained until the adjustment of status to a green card holder is approved. However, it's crucial to remember that every situation can be different and receiving precise legal advice from a professional on this matter is essential.
Remember, while filing for adjustment, the student must consider applying for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), which will allow them to work in the U.S while their application is being processed.
https://brainly.com/question/39105983
#SPJ12
which title best completes the partial outline below ideas from the american revolution spread
Answer:
The policy in times of change crosses and surrounds different areas, the square, the streets that the circumscribed, the central institutions like the Cabildo or the sessions of the National Constituent Assemblies, the spaces that open the periodic press, but also the family gatherings, the cafes and the surroundings of the theater, the different services provided in the military contingents. While all that history (although not all),
but in some of those power environments, it has a serious and decisive turning point in the hectic days of the English invasions, it becomes highly visible and audible after the May Revolution of 1810: agitating priests, men of the church holding positions in the National Assemblies, in the drafting of press organs, churches converted into the place of political meeting, of deliberative assemblies.
The overwhelming evidence does not admit implications.1 The question of whether the priests involved in the policy does not matter. And he doesn't have it because it is obvious that they did. A historians specialized in the religious world are not interested then find out
Whether or not they participate in the revolutionary phenomenon. What is really more appropriate is Try to understand that process. If we leave aside the apologetic perspectives that abound in these cases, where in the middle of the scene it can be clearly found a drama and several heroes or antiheroes, and, where, finally, there is no interpretation but Excessively positive or negative ratings, two looks deserve to stand out.
One of the most popular interpretations is the so-called politicization of the clergy.
From this assumption, the scene appears divided, to the extent that it is believed that by a On this subject you can consult with great utility Di Stefano Fabián Herrero
On the one hand there is a fact, the revolution, and on the other hand, a church that can opt for strategies that refer to accession and support, or to others that they prefer instead the questioning and the combat. We are in the presence of actors who arrive at the time revolutionary have to opt. The hypothesis is based, then, on that contingent of Church men who participate in one way or another in the new world that opens the
revolutionary phenomenon.
Beginning in the 1920s, a long series of Supreme Court decisions brought about the ______________ of almost all of the protections of the Bill of Rights by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Answer:
incorporation
Explanation:
Prior to the ratification of the 14th amendment the supreme court stated that the bill of rights applied only to the federal governments (both in 1833 and 1876). At the beginning of the 1920s various 14th amendment interpretations incorporated most of theprotections of the bill of rights by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Which person is automatically a U.S. citizen by birth?
A. A man from Norway who is engaged to an American citizen
B. A woman born in the United States who moved to China as a child
C. A child born in Japan whose family moves to America soon after
the child's birth
D. A woman born in South Africa who lived in Los Angeles for several
years
Answer: B. A woman born in the United States who moved to China as a child
Explanation: People born in the United States are U.S citizens by birth.
A woman born in the United States who moved to China as a child is automatically a U.S. citizen by birth. Thus, option D is correct.
What is a citizen?Someone who was granted specific rights by virtue of being born in a certain nation or of had resided there. Except if the kid is born to either a foreign government minister who is present in the country in the capacity of an authorized minister, every newborn baby on American territory is immediately granted U.S. citizenship.
If either one of the spouses had a residency in the United States or another of its outlying settlements prior to the preborn child, the Nationality Act of 1965 grants U.S. citizenship to a kid born in another country in matrimony to two U.S. Americans.
Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about citizen, here:
https://brainly.com/question/455363
#SPJ5