Do you think Brown v. Board of Education (1954) served its purpose of societal desegregation well? Or, do you think that that lack of legal justification in the decision created a more litigious environment for civil rights law suits? Think about and justify your position. Do Americans change their positions just because the Supreme Court rules a certain way? What negative externalities does public policy, particularly judicial policy create?

Answer:

During the renaissance, art, religion, science, technology and philosophy all changed.

Answer:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 increased life expectancy for African Americans, decreased infant mortality for African Americans, removed barriers to voting for African Americans, and introduced new educational opportunities and the idea of affirmative action.

Explanation:

PLATO

Answer:

False

Explanation:

I toke the test on E d g e n u i t y

Answer:

SF

Explanation:

The correct answer is: A human geographer.

Human geography is a discipline that studies the "interrelationships between people, place, amd environment, and how these vary spatially and temporally accross and between locations." Basicaly how the human interacts with the surface of the planet, spatial organization and procceses that shape the lives of people are studied.

This discipline is divided in sub-disciplinary fields, the one that matters in this answer is: Health geography. It deals with the role of place, location and geography in health, well-being and disease. The research focuses on: the patterns, causes, and spread of disease, and the provision of health services.

Answer:

It's probably A

Explanation:

just listen to the guy above me

Answer:

United States train travel had changed dramatically by this time, since the transcontinental railroad had been completed, which stretched all the way from the Atlantic to the Pacific

Explanation: edgy 2021

Answer: Tensions between Native Americans and colonists over land.

Explanation:

The war’s immediate cause was Plymouth Colony’s execution of Philip’s soldiers (June 1675), which worsen the long-lasting tensions between Indians and colonists over land claims. In addition to this main cause for war, there were disputes over hunting and fishing areas, interracial discrimination, and English cultural invasion on Native American´s life.

The House of Burgesses was established in Jamestown in 1619 to provide colonial self-governance amid the tobacco boom, reflecting British parliamentary principles. It evolved with the colony's expansion and became the lower house of the Virginia General Assembly.

As plantations were established and colonists focused heavily on tobacco production, there was a need for governance that would represent their interests and contribute to the common good. The House of Burgesses, consisting of elected representatives, was the first of its kind in the New World and set a model for colonial self-governance, reflecting the principles of the British Parliament. Despite its session being cut short by a malaria outbreak, it signified a historic step towards democratic governance in America.

Subsequently, as the colony expanded, the structure of this legislative body evolved. In 1643, the House became the lower house of the Virginia General Assembly, working alongside the Governor's Council as the upper house. This assembly would remain at Jamestown until the capital relocated to Williamsburg in 1699.

The complete question is

Why was the house of burgesses established in jamestown?

In defending their liberty from Britain while importing and selling African slaves, the colonists were navigating the complex facets of freedom and subjugation. They justified this primarily through colonial mercantilist ideology and reinforced racial distinctions. The socio-economic rationale was further steeped in racism, leading to the creation of strict labor hierarchies to enforce these viewpoints.

In the colonial era, colonists were navigating the complex facets of freedom and subjugation. The colonists were defending their liberty against British policies while simultaneously importing and selling slaves from Africa. While this seems contradictory, a closer look at the socio-economic context of the era sheds light on how such practices could be justified in their minds.

Firstly, many colonists adhered to the European mercantilist theory, which drove colonization on the premise of economic supremacy. Colonies enriching their mother countries with raw material, which they were mandated to purchase from the same. This system of colonial mercantilism relied heavily on cheap labor, and in the quest for economic dominance, African slavery came into play.

From the mid-17th century, British colonies began relying on enslaving Africans, a practice that wasn't prevalent in their homeland. The colonists, faced with a growing underclass of poor White former servants, found it easier to coerce the labor of Africans rather than fellow Europeans, especially after resistance and revolts from the former servants.

Racism became a contrived justification for the hierarchical labor system. Legal distinctions were made based on race, releasing privileges to Whites denied to Blacks, thereby establishing African ancestry as inferior and fit only for manual labor. Further, unlike African slavery at home, which was temporary and not inheritable, New World slavery was a lifelong condition.

Therefore, British colonialists, while fighting for liberty from the British Empire, justified enslaving Africans steeped in Racism, and a deeply entrenched mercantilist ideology that associated wealth and economic growth with the subjugation of an 'inferior' race.

https://brainly.com/question/6596144

#SPJ12

Colonists justified importing and selling slaves economically, socially, and ideologically, seeing slavery as essential for profitability and societal hierarchy.

Colonists who were defending their liberty against British policies often justified importing and selling slaves through a combination of economic, social, and ideological factors. Economically, slavery was seen as essential to the profitability of agricultural industries such as tobacco, rice, and indigo, which formed the backbone of the colonial economy. Socially, racism and ingrained beliefs in white supremacy led many colonists to view Africans and African Americans as inferior and suitable for enslavement. Ideologically, some colonists rationalized slavery by interpreting it within the context of their own struggles for freedom, believing that their liberty was incompatible with the rights of enslaved individuals. Additionally, religious justifications, such as interpreting biblical passages to condone slavery, were sometimes used to justify the practice. Overall, these rationalizations allowed colonists to reconcile their defense of liberty with the institution of slavery, despite the inherent contradictions.

The answer is: b. he widened the part played by ordinary citizens in Athens' government

The Cleisthenes’s reforms gave the right to the Athenian citizens to overthrow their King and chose the leaders by their own. This massively increase the power of the common people over the nobles and become a foundation for the modern day democracy.

Answer:

B. He widened the part played by ordinary citizens in Athens’ government.

Explanation:

I did the test

Answer:

Why did you leave your last job

Explanation:

This is an open question because the person asking it isn't looking for a specific answer.

Answer:

The Correct answer is Option C) They are expected to vote according to public opinion in their home states but also to make policies beneficial to all Americans.

Explanation:

A congress member is a representative of the people of their area. The idea being that the congress member will be able to effectively represent their local populations.

While it seems like an easy task to do, members of Congress must also pass bills, take part in committees, pass resolutions, amendments etc in line with making sure that these are beneficial for the whole of the Country.

There are times when something might benefit the whole of the country, but might not benefit a particular State and this is where things become more tricky.

For example, the government might want to restrict the export of Soybean to Russia as part of a sanctions package. However, this would directly have an impact on farmers in South Carolina.

Answer:

The women

Explanation:

The Inuits or Eskimos, as they are known by those who do not belong to the people, are an indigenous people that are located in very cold regions, specifically in Canada, Alaska and Greenland. Although they are known as Eskimos, they do not accept this term, for in their language, the Inuktitut, "Eskimos" means "eaters of raw meat," and Inuit means "people."

Women played a very important role in the Inuit communities. They took care of and organized the village, besides being the storytellers.

The key Supreme Court case relevant to Jerry Jones' potential appeal would be Tinker v. Des Moines, which affirmed students' rights to free speech in a school setting. Other notable cases are Brown v. Board of Education and Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier.

The Supreme Court case that could potentially set precedent for an appeal in Jerry Jones' case, assuming it revolves around student rights and freedom of speech within a school setting, is likely Tinker v. Des Moines. In the Tinker v. Des Moines case (1969), the Supreme Court upheld the rights of students to demonstrate peaceably in school, stating that neither students nor teachers lose their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.The Brown v. Board of Education case in 1954, which declared racial segregation in schools as unconstitutional, is another landmark case, although it does not fit Jerry Jones' situation as closely. Yet it's an example of the Supreme Court asserting students' rights within a school environment.

A precedent could also be set by Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988). This case clarified that school-sponsored expressive activities could be regulated by schools, providing these actions are justified as reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns.

https://brainly.com/question/224703

#SPJ12

Answer:

d

Explanation:

The answer is B.) North Korea crossed the 38th parallel and invaded South Korea.

The concepts of natural rights, the social contract, and separation of powers came to America mainly from the Enlightenment period. Natural rights are inherent to all individuals, the social contract involves citizens surrendering some rights to the state for societal order, and separation of powers prevents absolute power concentration. These ideas greatly influenced the formation of American governance.

The idea of natural rights, the social contract, and the separation of powers came to America primarily from the Enlightenment - a period that marked significant intellectual growth in Europe. Natural rights, as discussed by philosophers such as John Locke and Rousseau, are inherent to every individual and involved the right to life, liberty, and property. The social contract is a philosophical idea that citizens give up some of their natural rights to the state for protection and societal order. Further championed by Rousseau, the social contract theory held that a government’s legitimacy rested on the consent of its citizens.  

The concept of separation of powers, an important aspect of modern democratic governance, was promoted by the Enlightenment philosopher Baron de Montesquieu, who emphasized the need to divide the governance into executive, legislative, and judicial branches to prevent absolute power concentration. These Enlightenment ideas proved influential in the formation of the United States of America, especially in drafting the US constitution.

https://brainly.com/question/32212999

#SPJ12

Final answer:

Enlightenment philosophies including natural rights, social contract, and separation of powers influenced America's foundation, with contributions from Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau. These principles guided the formation of the U.S. government but coexisted with racial and social injustices.

Explanation:

Enlightenment Ideas in American Government

The ideas of natural rights, the social contract, and the separation of powers were central Enlightenment concepts that influenced the founding of the United States. Philosophers like John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu articulated these ideas, which were then adopted by the Founding Fathers. Locke's arguments for liberty of conscience and property rights as inalienable rights that could not be surrendered to the government became a cornerstone of American ideology. Montesquieu introduced the idea of separation of powers into executive, legislative, and judicial branches to prevent the concentration of power and to establish a system of checks and balances.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau contributed to this discourse by proposing that legitimate state authority is derived from the general will of the people. The application of these philosophies in America was a revolutionary act, as it was one of the first instances of creating a government based on these Enlightenment principles.

However, it's important to note that while these ideas were foundational to the American Constitution and Declaration of Independence, they existed alongside and often justified systems of oppression like slavery and the exclusion of Indigenous peoples and non-property holding white men from the political process.

Answer:

cotton

Explanation:

i got it right on the test