Determine the x, y, and z components of the moment of the force of f = 570 n about point
a. g

D. The game will be called if the storm continues, the weather is dangerous.

Further Explanation:

Option D is an example of a run on sentence, as it consists of two grammatically incorrect clauses within the sentence. A sentence might consist of multiple clauses, however, it is required to arrange them sequentially, or separate the clauses with a semicolon, or connects them using a proper modifier. This sentence is a proper example of a run-on sentence, as there are more than one independent clauses within the statement, and they are improperly connected, which means there are two separate sentences within one statement. The above sentence is a proper representation of a comma splice, which means two independent clauses that are joined with a comma, thereby disturbing the sequential structure of the statement.  

A Run on sentence is one of the most common errors while attempting to use a transitional expression in the middle of the sentence. To avoid these kinds of errors, a run on sentence can be easily converted into a complex or a compound sentence. The simplest way to correct a run-on sentence is to remove the comma splice and use a semicolon instead, in this way, the sentence shall become a complex sentence, comprising of the main clause and the subordinate clause. The parts of the run on sentence may be connected or separated as per the need. The parts of a sentence may be separated using a period however care has to be taken that it does not result in short unmeaningful sentences. A subordinating or a co-ordinating conjunction can also be used.  

Learn more:

1. According to Roger Williams, how did the English usually justify their attacks on the Indians?

https://brainly.com/question/4891530

2. Which similar challenge did china and japan face following the Sino-Japanese war?

https://brainly.com/question/639997

Answer Details:

Grade: Secondary school

Chapter: Formation of a sentence.  

Subject: English.  

Keywords:

Subject, Predicate, parts of a sentence, sequence in a sentence, gerund, verb, infinitive, complex and compound sentence, central idea and theme.  

The correct answer is C. Sitting in his highchair; modifies baby.

Participles are relatively easy to spot - present participles always end in -ing. A participle phrase includes the participle and all the words connected to it. In the sentence above, the participle phrase is sitting in highchair.

The participial phrase here modifies (or describes) the noun baby. You can easily determine this by asking the question How is the baby poking curiously at his food? And the answer is Sitting in his highchair.

Answer: C anger

Explanation: O-o

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

I just did it

The passive language can create vague ideas if is not use properly, for example in the sentence “It seems that this has a positive connotation of intimacy and love.” A positive connotation for who, the passive language here does not include the actor. To improve this paragraph should be reviewed the elimination of passive language. The answer is B.

Federigo's falcon of prey expands on a topic. The topic of the story alludes to the focal point of a content. Its tone and state of mind are additionally felt everywhere throughout the story. Tone alludes to the mentality of the creator toward a subject while mind-set is the environment of the story.  

Further Explanation:

The tone of the story Federigos Falcon:  

Federigo's Falcon starts with incongruity, anyway the tone goes to grieving after the slaughtering of the bird of prey and the demise of the little fellow. The story has a cheerful completion on the in addition to side. The tone goes to satisfaction after the two grown-ups are hitched finally.  

The fundamental subject of Federigo's falcon:  

Topic of Federigo's Falcon by Giovanni Bocaccio are love, the nature of giving and penance. Toward the starting the principle character has a powerful urge that is by all accounts difficult to figure it out.  

character of Federigo's falcon of prey:  

The principle characters are Federigo and Monna Giovanna. The fundamental characters of the story are Federigo himself, his bird of prey, and Monna Giovanna. Different characters incorporate Giovanna's family (her child, her better half, and her kin). The story fixates on disaster, misfortune, and love.  

Moral exercise of Federigo's falcon of prey:  

The ethical exercise can get in the tale of Federigo's bird of falcon is love is about the inclination you got from the substance or quaities of somebody and not by the physical appearance and qualities of somebody. It is significant additionally to be cautious in basic leadership.

Subject: English

Level: college

Keywords: The tone of the story Federigos Falcon, The fundamental subject of Federigo's falcon, character of Federigo's falcon of prey,  Moral exercise of Federigo's falcon of prey,  

Learn more about evolution on:

https://brainly.com/question/1305193

https://brainly.com/question/3018544

Tone: Sad Tone

Mood: Sympathetic, happiness, sorrow

Theme: love

Sub-theme: Sacrificing for our loved ones

Further Explanation:

The story "Federido's Falcon" is about the love and sacrifices made in the love. Federido's love for Monna was beyond the materiality of the world. He loved her so extensively that he didn't hesitate to sacrifice the most valuable thing for her. His love was beyond the limits of expectation. He spent everything, his wealth and even his Falcon for Monna. At the beginning of the story, the love of Federido is denied by Monna when he spends his entire wealth in impressing her. It is only in the end when he sacrifices his Falcon, Monna understands the intensity of his love and marries him. Each part of the story moves with suspense and a sense of mystery can be easily felt in it. The tone of the story is sympathetic as each time Federido wants to express his love, he is rejected of the approval. The most disheartening scene arrives in the story when he kills his most lovable Falcon to serve the dinner to his lady love. When he comes to know that she wanted the same Falcon which he had served her, tears dropped from his eyes. He felt very devastated as he was not able to serve the thing which his lady love had asked from him.

Learn more:

1. When should a comma be used between adjectives? https://brainly.com/question/1482506

2. Which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten anthony’s words? https://brainly.com/question/2883270

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: English

Chapter: “Federido's Falcon”

Keywords:

Federido's Falcon, Monna, sacrifice, falcon, love, suspense, intensity, disheartening, happiness, sorrow, sad.

Answer:

B) We have nothing to share.

Explanation:

In option A the word "barely" change the entire significate of the sentence, because its meaning is only just. So in option A there would be something to share but it would be minimum.

On the other hand options, C and D are double negatives.

I hope this answer helps you.

Answer:

Subjective information is not the same as STATEMENTS OR CLAIMS THAT CAN BE VERIFIED WITHOUT RELYING ON FEELINGS.

Explanation:

Answer:

A - It indicates that Hamlet feels trapped.

Explanation: Hamlet, Part 3: Figurative Language and Allusions

Answer:

Option A: It indicates that Hamlet feels trapped.

Explanation:

Edge 2023

An useful rhetorical technique for organising and succinctly expressing a lot of information is asyndetic listing. When two or more items are enumerated without the use of a conjunction or other linking words, it is referred to be a sort of parallelism.

The main benefit of asyndetic listing is that it can aid in highlighting the listed items. The linking words are left out, which forces the reader to concentrate on each thing alone.

Asyndetic listing also has the benefit of making a piece of writing more succinct. The writer can efficiently convey a lot of information in a little amount of space by leaving out the linking words. For authors who must convey a lot of information in a little space, this might be helpful.

Learn more about  anticipation  at:

https://brainly.com/question/31556627

#SPJ2

Answer: A.

Broken pencil, balls of crumpled paper / Deadline tomorrow, homework failure.

Explanation:

Here, the pair of lines, that demonstrates a slant rhyme is option A. That is 'Broken pencil, balls of crumpled paper'.

Assonance is the repetition of a vowel sound in two imperfectly rhyming words. Assonance between the final syllables of some slant rhymes, such as "hat" and "bad" or "crate" and "braid," is present. Keep in mind that assonance and consonance are different from slant rhymes.

Assonance and consonance are two literary elements that can appear anywhere in a word, although slant rhymes may employ them at the end of a syllable. Slant rhymes enable more imaginative word selection.

Poets are constrained in the phrases they can use while writing in perfect rhymes; the rules are more rigid, and the words must match exactly available when writing in slant rhymes, allowing for greater creative expression and more.

Here, option A contains the slanted rhymes.

Find more on slanted rhymes:

https://brainly.com/question/26661797

#SPJ7

“The Open Boat” was inspired by Crane’s real-life experiences and his struggles of being stranded in the Atlantic Ocean. The most notable difference between “The Open Boat” and “The Human Drift” is the structure. While the former is a short story and is based on the writer’s experiences, the latter is an essay comprising an argument and factual details. 

“The Open Boat” makes use of elements such as diction, imagery, and pacing that help the reader to experience the same passage of time that the characters do. On the other hand, “The Human Drift” is a persuasive expository text, which makes use of a series of conclusions. These conclusions become premises for further conclusions about social theory and human development from prehistoric times to modern times.

These works also share some similarities. Like London’s “The Human Drift,” Crane’s story is interspersed with naturalist elements. In both of these works, the most important theme is nature. 

Crane personifies nature, giving the sea divine and animalistic qualities. The story establishes the harsh fact that man is only mortal and at the mercy of nature’s whims. In ”The Open Boat,” the narrator portrays the changing moods of nature by describing the sea in different ways. Early in the story, the sea “snarls” and “bucks like a bronco.” Later, the sea merely “paces to and fro.”

Similarly, in London’s “The Human Drift,” the focus is on nature. Man and all his wanderings are fueled by the basic need to satiate hunger. Thus men and entire civilizations drift and eventually settle where nature lets them survive, as shown in these lines:

Man, like any other animal, has roved over the earth seeking what he might devour; and not romance and adventure, but the hunger-need, has urged him on his vast adventures.

Both Jack London's 'The Human Drift' and Stephen Crane's 'The Open Boat' are naturalist literary works that emphasize the indifference of nature to human survival. While London's work focuses on humanity's progress and struggle for control over the environment, Crane's work features characters struggling for survival against a violent sea. Both works underscore the helplessness of humans in the face of nature's might.

Jack London's essay 'The Human Drift' is a comprehensive exploration of humanity's evolution and its continuous urge to dominate the environment. Much like Stephen Crane's short story 'The Open Boat', it falls under the naturalist literary tradition where nature is depicted as an indifferent or hostile force that human beings must confront. In both works, the authors emphasize the helplessness of humans in the face of nature's overwhelming strength and indifference.

In 'The Human Drift', London focuses on the idea of the human quest for progress and its innate urge for mastery over nature. The characters struggle with life in a harsh and indifferent universe, which is synonymous with Crane's 'The Open Boat', where the characters are left to the mercy of a violent sea, epitomizing nature's indifference to human survival.

While Crane's work often contemplates on human's struggle for survival against external elements, London's works typically ponder over the idea of adaptation and survival within a society driven by progress. Despite differences, the underlying theme in both works showcases the essence of naturalistic literature.

https://brainly.com/question/5794419

#SPJ11

Considering the time at which homer wrote this excerpt, people didn't even know that they had to have good hygiene or etiquette when hosting a guest and I don't think he wrote it with that many details about the materials the pitcher and basin were made of without a specific point in mind.

The correct answer is option B.  Homer wants to show how wealthy the kings were, and that is why he elaborates so much on the details that otherwise wouldn't matter.

Answer:

C) central metaphor

Explanation:

Mr. Brown is a character in Chinua Achebe's 1958 novel Things Fall Apart. The epic recounts to the tale of an Igbo man got in the throes of British dominion in his town in Nigeria.

Mr. Brown speaks to one part of religion and colonialism on the African mainland. In any case, he's unique in relation to other 'white men' displayed in this novel, in that he is quiet, astute, and comprehension of local traditions. Despite the fact that Mr. Brown is a minister, he reliably endeavors to comprehend the way of life of the townspeople in Umuofia and neighboring Mbanta, and he takes part in conscious, serene talks with numerous men of the towns in regards to religion. As it were, Mr. Dark colored is the definite sort of fellow you should need to do preacher work with.

the answer is   B. world war I

The above question is from "The Wife of Bath's Tale" from Chaucer's Canterbury Tales. The theme of the story is that women desire to be treated equal to men and have the same sovereignty over men as the men have over them.

The interaction between the wife of bath and the friar in the prologue is part of Chaucer’s frame story. The following connections can be made between this section of the prologue and the tale itself:

• "The Wife of Bath's Prologue" is also a part of The Canterbury Tales. In the prologue, the wife tells us about marriage, and she considers herself as an expert on the topic as she married five times.

• The Friar criticized the wife of bath throughout the prologue.

• Being a widow was considerably different from the ideal woman in the medieval times. But, the wife was totally aware of it and she tried to validate her actions in the prologue.

• It serves as a sort of autobiography.

• The speech given is really long. The prologue is actually twice as long as the tale itself.

• The prologue and the tale actually complement each other, as the prologue serves as a background for the tale and helps in questioning important issues such as marriage, sexuality and gender inequality that are mentioned in the story.

It could be said that the connection between the above two parts might be associated to women’s roles in the middle ages. In both the parts, the main idea being told is what women most desire in life.

Learn more about the Canterbury Tales here:

https://brainly.com/question/13702996?referrer=searchResults

Final answer:

The analysis of Wislawa Szymborska's "A Word on Statistics" involves exploring poetic devices such as rhythm, enjambment, word choice, and structure. This analysis enriches the readers' understanding, allowing them to connect more deeply with the poem's themes and emotions. The poet's choices in form and word selection are especially critical in poetry to convey precise meanings and evoke specific responses from the reader.

Explanation:

The subject's question revolves around the analysis of the poem "A Word on Statistics" by Wislawa Szymborska. Poetry analysis is a crucial aspect of understanding and appreciating the finer nuances of a poem's theme, structure, and the emotional undertones it conveys. It is important to note that while analyzing poetry, we delve into various poetic devices such as rhythm, enjambment, word choice, and structure, all of which play significant roles in shaping the reader's perception and interpretation of the poem.

Understanding why a poet opts for one particular form over another can provide insight into their intent and the era within which they wrote. Analyzing drafts and revisions may reveal the painstaking effort a poet invests in choosing the precise words to convey the intended emotional response or thematic resonance. Settings too contribute to the overall mood, while flexible use of the poem's structure allows the speaker to communicate their narrative authentically and powerfully without constraints.

Ultimately, analyzing poetry enhances our comprehension and augments our enjoyment, enabling a deeper connection between the poem and its audience. This exercise in literary analysis helps to uncover the layers of meaning that a poem holds and affirms that every structural decision, from punctuation to the form, is pivotal to the poem's impact.

Answer is A, because the subject of the sentence, "Eleanor and Emma" is plural and should be matched with a plural pronoun--"their" instead of "her." The sentence should read, "Eleanor and Emma showed us their new dresses."

Answer: A) Eleanor and Emma showed us her new dresses.

Pronoun-antecedent agreement refers to the rule that a pronoun must match its antecedent (the word it is referring to) in gender and number. In the case of sentence A, this is not being respected. The subject of the sentence is plural "Eleanor and Emma." However, the pronoun is written in a singular form ("her").

The coordinating conjunction that correctly joins the sentences 'Most dinosaurs were herbivores.' and 'They ate plants rather than animals.' is 'in other words'. This choice allows for a rephrase or clarification of the first sentence, explaining the diet of herbivorous dinosaurs.

The question asks about coordinating conjunctions, a part of the English language used to join sentences together. The correct option to join these two sentences is 'D. Most dinosaurs were herbivores; in other words, they ate plants rather than animals.'

Using the phrase 'in other words,' introduces a rephrasing or clarification of the preceding sentence, which explains the nature of herbivorous dinosaurs, namely, that they ate plants rather than animals.

This coordination option provides a clear connection between the two sentences, which maintains the logical flow of ideas.

Remember:

Using the proper coordinating conjunctions can greatly improve your sentence structure and the overall quality of your writing.

https://brainly.com/question/31636701

#SPJ2

In paragraph 2 of the essay the narrator uses anecdotal evidence to support her opinions about her schools courses. The narrator claims of wanting to take a journalism class to support her major in communications, although she is not able to because of the schools required classes she must met. Because of this incident the narrator claims schools goals are to help each student gain personal fulfillment and (2) to help create good citizens, but she questions them with her opinions of why, then, are they forcing students to take classes they don’t want to take? Why am I not able to take journalism even though it is fulfilling my personal goals? Anecdotal evidence is based off of own personal experience and observations, and the narrator uses this situation as an example of why they are questioning, (why, then, are they forcing students to take classes they don’t want to take? Why am I not able to take journalism even though it is fulfilling my personal goals?).

An excerpt indicating other explorers like Cook and Darwin made significant discoveries in uncharted territories before Scott suggests his South Pole mission was not the first, entailing his efforts were in vain.

The excerpt that provides evidence that supports the inference that Captain Scott's efforts to be the first to reach the South Pole were in vain is the mention of other explorers such as James Cook and Charles Darwin who embarked on scientific voyages before Scott. These explorers made significant contributions to the mapping and understanding of uncharted territories, including Antarctic regions. The absence of an excerpt directly related to the Terra Nova Expedition or a description of Scott's team reaching the South Pole after another explorer suggests that they were not the first. Furthermore, the mention of earlier successful expeditions and a focus on the heroism in adversity of past explorers implies that Scott's endeavor, although heroic, did not achieve its primary objective of being the first at the South Pole. This can be inferred from the historical context provided, which emphasizes previous accomplishments rather than Scott's specific journey.

A.letter to the editor of a newspaper  

B.explanation of how to change a tire

C.autobiography  

D.advertisement about Hawaii

(these are the choices)

Answer:

it

Explanation: