Describe what Alfonso de Albuquerque did on the Spice Islands in 1511. Please answer quickly this is due in fifteen minutes.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

In the case of United States v. Fields, we are confronted with a complex issue that rests on the delicate balance between individual privacy rights and the government's duty to protect its citizens.

The case centers on the government's use of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), commonly known as a drone, to conduct surveillance on a suspect, Mr. Fields, without obtaining a warrant. The drone's surveillance led to the discovery of evidence that formed the basis for Mr. Fields' arrest and subsequent criminal charges.

After careful consideration of this matter, I concur with the majority opinion, which holds that the warrantless use of drones for surveillance in this case violated Mr. Fields' Fourth Amendment rights.

In line with precedent established in cases such as Katz v. United States and United States v. Jones, we must recognize that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy even in areas where they may be observed from a public vantage point.

In conclusion, the Fourth Amendment's protections are not static and must evolve to address emerging technologies. In this case, the use of drones for surveillance without a warrant violates an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy and, therefore, constitutes an unconstitutional search.

Find out more on Supreme Court opinion at https://brainly.com/question/31098988

#SPJ3

It forced him to go through the motions of making treaties with the tribes.

Answer:

C. It forced him to go through the motions of making treaties with the tribes.

Explanation:

In 1854, the Missouri Compromise was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Three years later the Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision, which ruled that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories.

A ( Ottoman Empire, Safavid Empire, Mughal Empire).

your answer is A

hope it helpez

The correct answer is - They wanted to desegregate local restaurants.

The Greensboro Sit-In movement rose as a response to a segregation in a restaurant in Greensboro. The movement was making peaceful protests in order to get things out in the public and pressure the politicians to act adequately.

Even though this was taking place in 1960, there were still places where the segregation existed, and white and black people were not able to be in the same places, even restaurants. The peaceful protests, created mostly by students, spread around the country, and they had a big effect on desegregation of the restaurants, as well as other public places in the United States where this was still existing.

Answer:

They wanted to desegregate local restaurants.

In a unitary system, the central government has all the power. In a federal system, some powers are given to the central government and other powers are given to the lower levels of government (provinces or states). ... In a federal system, they have a right to their powers.

A unitary system of government has a single, central government that provides small amounts of power to legislates and administrative bodies within an entire nation.

A federal system of government has a central, overarching government with smaller regional governments.

The Mayans were a very powerful region, and made important discoveries that influenced us now. However, they had some struggles against the natural environment, and their background history has failures and successes. The Maya was not a unified civilization, and it was made up of city-states ruled by an independent leader, the king. There were many kings in the Mayan time, but each king preferably ruled a different city-state. All the city-states followed the same culture, systems, etc., but they did not get along. Many city-states went to war with others, and destroyed each other. However, there was peace between all city-states at sometime, and the leaders often met each other to discuss important discussions. 

Each city-state was advanced and well educated. The king was highly respected, and thought to be actually half god, half human, or, it was thought that the king was working for the gods. The people also had a strong belief that the king was chosen by the gods to rule, and was given permission. Not just the king ruled, also high officials were chosen among the nobles, (Lords, military leaders, priests, etc.) and also helped the king rule. Religion was very, very important in Mayan life, so priests were powerful figures in the government too, sometimes as powerful as the king. (The king was sometimes thought of as a priest.) Kings of Maya often came to priests for advice for what to do in a conflict, or for predictions of the future. Priests had a lot of influence on how the king ruled, and what the king did. 

Mayan life was very strict and hard to follow. Many religious rituals were hosted everyday by the king, and it could last for more than 6 hours. Mayan laws were very strict, and had harsh punishments if the people committed crimes. Murder, arson, acts against the gods, (Acting against the gods had a very severe punishment, often death.) The punishment was reduced if the crime was found to be an accident, but still there was a punishment. If someone broke a law, they appeared in court and local leaders or nobles accompanied the judge in deciding the punishment. Sometimes, but rarely, the king was the judge. Usually, the king just sat and announced the person guilty or not. At the trial, the judge would get the evidence together, and also, witnesses would be there, and the judge would listen and talk to them. If the person was found guilty, then the punishment was announced and given right away. 

There was no prisons in the Mayan times, so mostly the punishments were, death sentences, becoming a slave, and fines. Sometimes they would shave the person’s head when the crime was very small and was an accident, the shaved head represented the sign of shame. If the victim wanted to apologize and beg forgiveness, the punishment was reduced. The Mayan government was guessed to be an oligarchy, but it is not absolutely sure. There were 52 Mayan kings, and every single one of them has been powerful and treated like a god. 

Bold ~ Main Part

I hope this helps! :D

june 1941 during operation Barbarossa

The greatest impact could be when Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was killed. this could of led to people rioting around the place because they ha lost all their hope because Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was the only person who actualy got india to have at least the bare minimum of peace and without him they can't do annything or some thing like that. i hope this is good enough for you. I hope you are happy

Mahatma Gandhi played a pivotal role in the freedom struggle of India. His non violent ways and peaceful methods were the foundation for gaining independence from the British. ... One of the first series of non violent protests nationwide was the non cooperation movement started by Mahatma Gandhi.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!

Can I have crown? please

A.The plan took away power belonging to the Cabinet.

C.The plan increased the powers of the presidency

D.The plan created less accountability to the Senate.

Answer:

A,C,D

The plan took away power belonging to the Cabinet.

The plan increased the powers of the presidency

The plan created less accountability to the Senate

Explanation:

on edgy

well he built the interstate highway system as a defense measure. he was also interested in getting involved around the world, stop the spread of communism and stuff

Answer:

A company that makes bombs pressures a senator to support US involvement in a proxy war.

Explanation:

Land-Grant College Act of 1862, or Morrill Act, Act of the U.S. Congress (1862) that provided grants of land to states to finance the establishment of colleges specializing in “agriculture and the mechanic arts.”

HOPE THIS HELPED!!! XD

The Land Grant College Act made it so public colleges were PUBLIC to all citizens. This was passed in 1862,  all west colleges could be public after this passed. Therefore, citizens would go to college as the Easterns could go as-well. So as it made fair rights.

Answer:

Explanation:

The counterculture of the 1960s was an anti-establishment cultural phenomenon  that grew first in the United Kingdom  and after that the United States  before spreading all through a significant part of the Western world between the mid-1960s and the mid-1970s, with London, New York City, and San Francisco being hotbeds of early countercultural action.  

The idea of the 1950s enlivened the counterculture movement is created in 1960s was the enthusiasm for travel and hunger for new experiences.

Because they both called for civic liberties such as freedom of speech and of press.

The Upper South sold and transported enslaved people to the Deep South where they needed workers. Both the Upper and Deep South grew different crops so they depended on each other for these crops.

Hope this helps !!! ^_^ !!!

The Freedmen’s Bureau, formally known as the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen and Abandoned Lands, was established in 1865 by Congress to help millions of former black slaves and poor whites in the South in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Freedmen’s Bureau provided food, housing and medical aid, established schools and offered legal assistance. It also attempted to settle former slaves on land confiscated or abandoned during the war. However, the bureau was prevented from fully carrying out its programs due to a shortage of funds and personnel, along with the politics of race and Reconstruction.

Enslaved African Americans demonstrated agency through various slave revolts, including the Stono Rebellion, Gabriel's Conspiracy, and the Nat Turner Rebellion, which were active resistances against slavery and an assertion for freedom and equality.

An event that demonstrates the agency of enslaved African Americans is the occurrence of slave revolts. These uprisings were direct forms of resistance where enslaved individuals asserted their desire for liberty and equality. Notable examples include the Stono Rebellion (1739), the New York City Conspiracy of 1741, Gabriel's Conspiracy (1800), the German Coast Uprising (1811), and the Nat Turner Rebellion (1831). These rebellions showed that rather than being passive, enslaved people actively resisted their oppression. The rebellion not only displayed a fight against physical captivity but also reflected a quest for education, understanding, and ultimately, freedom.

Additionally, enslaved African Americans exhibited agency through covert acts such as espionage on plantations, negotiating statuses, and pursuing education in secret. The formation of communities and the ongoing struggle for civil rights after emancipation further underscores the resilience and agency of African Americans throughout history.

C - Many white Southerners support segregation laws.

Many white Southerners wanted to keep segregation, especially in the schools. They did NOT want to repeal the Jim Crow laws and were will to fight for segregation (not desegragation)

Answer:

Many white Southerners support segregation laws.

Despite the abolishing of the slavery, and the free movement of the African Americans in the USA, as well as gaining officially most of the rights, they still faced a lot of difficulties.

Thinking that the North would be a much better place for them to live and prosper, lot of African Americans moved in this states. Unfortunately for them, things were not as they imagined. There was worked for them indeed, the problem was that they were given the jobs that were payed less, and were also harder. Also, they were settled in neighborhoods that were not properly urbanized on the edges of the cities, and where the living conditions and the infrastructure were not on adequate level. In general, it turned out that they ended up as unofficial ''slaves'' in the factories, and continued to live in poverty and without any big chance of progress as that was still very limited on racial basis in that period.

national law& philosophy

Answer:

National Law

Explanation:

China hoped to ensure itself against overpopulation.

Answer:

so the population wouldn't skyrocket

Explanation:

James Madison said that in Federalist No. ... Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. ... If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on ... through books, or through law review articles), and you'll see plenty of references ...

Answer

False

Explanation:

After the Revolution, many Americans were worried that the new American government would start acting like the old English government.

So, they put in the Bill of Rights to protect from government overreach.

Final answer:

Nationalism contributed to the decline of the Habsburg Empire through its emphasis on separate nations, demands for individual and collective rights, and conflicts in the Balkans.

Explanation:

Nationalism contributed to the decline of the Habsburg Empire in several ways:

d. the amount of common land available for grazing.

The process of enclosure in the 1700s increased farming efficiency by allowing farmers to have better control over their plots and implement new farming techniques.

The process of enclosure in the 1700s tended to increase farming efficiency. Enclosure refers to the practice of enclosing common fields and land, which were previously used for communal grazing and cultivation, with fences or hedges. By enclosing land, farmers could have better control over their plots and implement new farming techniques, such as crop rotations and improved irrigation methods. These changes ultimately led to higher agricultural productivity and efficiency.

Answer:

The correct answer is B) The colonists boycotted British goods.

Just took the test

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The correct answer is - idealistic but violent.

The Black Panther Party initially started off as an organization that was patrolling the black neighborhoods in order to protect the black people, especially from the police brutality. Very quickly though, the rhetoric changed, and the Black Panthers took an idealistic turn towards Marxism. They also started to call the African Americans to arm themselves and to make a revolution, as well as asking for releasing all African Americans from the jails, and the exemption of all drafts and sanctions.

Answer:

idealistic but violent

| Search bar_ |

|was Stalin politically a fascist?_|

{System: Please wait while loading your question}

[Loading...]

[Loading...]

[Loading...]

[Access!]

——————————————————-

X - [_]

[Website:Wikipedia.com]

Answer:Stalinism is the means of governing and related policies implemented from around 1927 to 1953 by Joseph Stalin (1878–1953). Stalinist policies and ideas as developed in the Soviet Union included rapid industrialization, the theory of socialism in one country, a totalitarian state, collectivization of agriculture, a cult of personality[1][2] and subordination of the interests of foreign communist parties to those of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, deemed by Stalinism to be the leading vanguard party of communist revolution at the time.[3]

Stalinism promoted the escalation of class conflict, utilizing state violence to forcibly purge society of the bourgeoisie, whom Stalinist doctrine regarded as threats to the pursuit of the communist revolution. This policy resulted in substantial political violence and persecution of such people.[4] "Enemies" included not only bourgeois people, but also working-class people with counter-revolutionary sympathies.[5]

Stalinist industrialization was officially designed to accelerate the development towards communism, stressing the need for such rapid industrialization on the grounds that the Soviet Union was previously economically backward in comparison with other countries and asserting that socialist society needed industry in order to face the challenges posed by internal and external enemies of communism.[6] Rapid industrialization was accompanied by mass collectivization of agriculture and by rapid urbanization.[7] Rapid urbanization converted many small villages into industrial cities.[7] To accelerate the development of industrialization, Stalin imported materials, ideas, expertise and workers from Western Europe and from the United States[8] and pragmatically set up joint-venture contracts with major American private enterprises, such as the Ford Motor Company, which under state supervision assisted in developing the basis of the industry of the Soviet economy from the late 1920s to the 1930s.[9] After the American private enterprises had completed their tasks, Soviet state enterprises took over.

———————————————————

{System:I hope this helps! Comment below if you need any more help! ^^}

Final answer:

No, Stalin was not politically a fascist. He was a communist and embraced Marxist-Leninist principles.

Explanation:

No, Joseph Stalin was not politically a fascist. While fascism and communism share some characteristics, they are distinct ideologies. Fascism is a far-right ideology characterized by dictatorial power, extreme nationalism, and suppression of dissent. On the other hand, communism, which Stalin adhered to, is a far-left ideology that advocates for the abolition of private property and the establishment of a classless society.

Stalin's political ideology aligned with communism, not fascism. He embraced Marxist-Leninist principles and implemented policies that aimed to eliminate class distinctions and achieve collective prosperity. Despite the totalitarian nature of his regime and the mass purges, his political ideology did not align with fascism's core principles.

It is important to understand the differences between political ideologies to accurately assess historical figures and their beliefs.

June 6, 1968, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, CA

June 6, 1968, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, CA

the great depression

Stock prices began to decline in 1929 due to the Stock Market Crash. The market couldn't sustain its high value, causing panic selling and the start of the Great Depression.

The stock prices began to decline in late 1929 due to what is known as the Stock Market Crash. After a period of speculative excess, where many investors bought stocks on margin (borrowed money), there was increasing fear that the market could not sustain the high levels of value. As a result, panic selling began, which led to falling prices as investors tried to exit the market. This marked the beginning of the Great Depression, a severe worldwide economic crisis that lasted through much of the 1930s.

https://brainly.com/question/22632414

#SPJ6