Answer:
From the Greek Aristotelian modes of persuation, when the elements of an argument appeal to the ethical responsabilities of a culture based on its fundamental character, credibility or beliefs as a society, we talk about "ethos".
Antigone is an ancient Greek tragedy writen by Sophocles influenced by the political and socio cultural life of Athens after a civil war, in the story, after both sons of Oedipus kill each other, Creon, one of those characters that rely on the appeal of ethos to develop an argument, survives and retain rulership of Thebes.
Creon’s argument that he is older and wiser than his son is an example of "Ethos".
Explanation:
Enkidu acts as a foil to gilgamesh what do you learn about gilgamesh's strengths and weaknesses by contrasting him and enkidu
A foil in works is a character that is cast-off to light up the strengths and weakness of another over the two character’s resemblances and dissimilarities. This is factual of Enkidu and Gilgamesh.
In the first place, they act as foils in each other in relation to their backgrounds and genetic arrangements. Gilgamesh is two thirds celestial and was raised in a cultured setting, which highpoints the frequently coarse behavior of Enkidu, who was raised in the barren and is human. In this manner, the character’s dissimilar background expresses us about the feebleness in Enkidu’s social conduct.
In characteristics, the two are also diverse. Enkidu could be apparent as gutless by difference to Gilgamesh, who is famished for battle, but actually we see that Enkidu’s understanding is a very essential temper to Gilgamesh’s spontaneity. Enkidu has the foresight to distinguish that fighting Humbaba will end gravely, while Gilgamesh is motivated by his wish for full immortality to act irresponsibly.
Final answer:
Contrasting Enkidu with Gilgamesh in The Epic of Gilgamesh highlights Gilgamesh's transformation from arrogance to wisdom through the themes of power, friendship, and the human condition. Enkidu's character emphasizes Gilgamesh's initial weaknesses and ultimate growth, teaching that true strength involves self-reflection and meaningful connections.
Explanation:
By contrasting Gilgamesh and Enkidu in The Epic of Gilgamesh, we learn a great deal about Gilgamesh's strengths and weaknesses. Enkidu, emerging from the wilderness and representing a counterbalance to Gilgamesh's might and hubris, acts as a foil that highlights Gilgamesh's character development from a tyrannical leader to a wise and compassionate ruler. Initially, Gilgamesh is portrayed as nearly invincible but arrogant, lacking empathy and consideration for his people's well-being. Enkidu's introduction brings out Gilgamesh's capacity for friendship, catalyzing his transformation.
Through their relationship, we see Gilgamesh's strengths, such as his bravery and leadership. However, Enkidu's humility, closeness to nature, and eventual fate also underscore Gilgamesh's weaknesses, including his fear of mortality and quest for immortality, which ultimately leads to his realization of the importance of cherishing life and ruling justly. This contrast between Gilgamesh and Enkidu teaches that true strength lies in the ability to grow, learn, and forge meaningful relationships.
The epic uses the power of friendship to illustrate important themes like the absurdity of death and the journey from ignorance to enlightenment, making it not just a story of adventures but a profound exploration of the human condition.
when in high school my guidance counselor talked to me about career options . What kind of error does this sentence have?
Answer:
I'd say that this sentence has a dangling or misplaced modifier.
The modifier when in high school cannot be used that way, because we don't know for sure whether that refers to the guidance counselor or you. The correct way to write this sentence would be:
When I was in high school.
In "A Cub Pilot," Mr. Bixby advises the narrator to never let anybody else shake his confidence in himself. This is an example of which plot element?
A. exposition
B. falling action
C. rising action
D. climax
Which of these is a theme found in The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton? Gentle souls are often disguised by rough exteriors. Rich kids and poor kids will never get along. Walking home alone will only lead to trouble. Watching a movie with someone can be uncomfortable.
Answer:
Option a. A theme found in The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton is the one that gentle souls are often disguised by rough exteriors.
Explanation:
"The Outsiders" is a novel written by American writer S.E Hinton that was first published on April 2nd, 1967. The novel tells the story of an on-going conflict between two gangs separated from each other by their socioeconomic status.
One of the main themes of "The outsiders" is how life-altering experiences often make people hide their gentle souls and emotions and disguise them with rough exteriors and violence. The reader can see how Ponyboy and the rest of the boys of the gang have such rough upbringings shaped by isolation, abandonment and sadness, that they have the necessity to protect themselves by acting in violent and aggressive manners, in order to survive on their own.
What must you never lose sight of when writing a report
which phrase from the excerpt best supports the idea that the narrator has held the same job for several years
Psalm 71:3 (King James Version) Be thou my strong habitation, whereunto I may continually resort: thou hast given commandment to save me; for thou art my rock and my fortress. Name and explain the figure of speech verse 3.
The answer is Metaphor.
The figure of speech used in the verse 3 of the Psalm 71 is Metaphor, which is the comparison of two things that are not related, in an implicit or hidden way. The psalmist is comparing God to a solid rock, which is not easily moved ("my rock") and is a refuge for him; he also compares God to a well-protected castle ("my strong habitation and my fortress"), he feels secure and protected.
The figure of speech in Psalm 71:3 is a metaphor, with God being likened to a 'rock' and a 'fortress' to imply strength, protection, and reliability.
Explanation:The figure of speech in Psalm 71:3 from the King James Version is metaphor. This is a figure of speech where a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable. In this verse, a metaphor is used when God is referred to as a 'rock' and a 'fortress'. This implies that God is a symbol of strength, safety, and security, in the same way that a rock is solid and unchanging, and a fortress offers protection. The use of metaphor here is intended to convey the steadfastness and reliability of God as a refuge to the believer, offering a place of safety and shelter from life's troubles.
Read the sentence.
Sitting in his highchair, the baby poked curiously at his food.
What is the participial phrase, and which word does it modify?
at his food; modifies poked
in his highchair; modifies Sitting
Sitting in his highchair; modifies baby
poked curiously; modifies baby
The trustworthiness of a speaker adds to the speaker's A. emotional appeal. B. ethical appeal. C. verbal appeal. D. appeal to reasoning.
The correct answer is; B. ethical appeal
Please Help.
Which expression best captures the irony of The inchcape Rock
A. Dont judge a book by its cover.
B. Love conquers all.
C. What goes around comes around.
D. Do as I say, not as I do
the answer is C. what gose around comes around i did the quiz!!
Which of the following four items is LEAST like the other three?
A
H
I
E
Which of the following questions should you ask yourself when analyzing structure? What kind of text is it—a list, a paragraph, a report, a memo? What is the theme or main idea of the piece of writing? What details and data appear in the text? Are the words loaded with meaning to show the author’s viewpoint?
Answer:
What kind of text is it—a list, a paragraph, a report, a memo?
Explanation:
Took a test
what is the answer ?
Writers don’t explain everything outright in a story. Some details are left for the reader to infer through the clues and information included in the text. Based on the inferences you made while reading the short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” how would this story have been different if Whitney, not Rainsford, were on the island and being hunted by Zaroff? Consider the idea of the survival of the fittest as you write your response. Also, provide textual evidence and examples from the story to support your response.
Whitney, Rainsford’s friend, is traveling with him on a hunting expedition to the Amazon. Whitney is also a big-game hunter, but unlike Rainsford, he believes that animals feel “the fear of pain and the fear of death” when hunted. Whitney seems more perceptive and observant than Rainsford. He notices that “the crew's nerves seemed a bit jumpy” as they are passing the mysterious island. He seems to be a good conversationalist and is able to extract information even from the reluctant captain of the ship. Whitney also has good instincts. He feels “a mental chill; a sort of sudden dread” as they near the island. He does not dismiss the fears of the sailors as mere superstitions but instead respects their “extra sense” that indicates danger. He believes evil is tangible, and he prefers to stay away from evil.
If it had been Whitney on the island instead of Rainsford, Whitney’s perceptiveness and ability to understand human nature may have helped him to recognize Zaroff’s evil nature at the very beginning. He may not have even gone inside the chateau; he likely would have figured out from the signs of struggle in the bush that a murder happened in the forest and connected it to Zaroff. If Whitney even reached the chateau, he would be more alert than Rainsford to signs of evil and trouble, as he was on the ship. Based on his behavior early in the story, you can guess that he would be perceptive enough to realize that Zaroff is not as nice and hospitable as he pretends to be. Whitney is a big-game hunter too, but possibly not as famed as Rainsford, so Zaroff may not have known him. But on recognizing that Whitney is Rainsford’s companion, Zaroff might have considered him a worthy opponent for the hunt. As a constant companion of Rainsford and a perceptive person, Whitney may have defeated Zaroff, just like Rainsford was able to. However, unlike Rainsford, he likely would not have gone back to get revenge, since he’d prefer to stay away from the evil general.
Why does the boss find george and lennie’s relationship unusual?
in aishas culture women are expected to help provide for a family's financial well being while in Leila culture that role is expected only of men this is example shows that deviance is
B is the correct answer
In Aishas culture women are expected to help provide for a family's financial well being while in Leila's culture that role is expected only of men this example shows that deviance is Relative. The correct option is B.
Why is it important that women take an active role in society?In every country around the world, women are the primary caregivers for children and the elderly. International studies show that when a society's economy and political structure change, women take the lead in assisting the family in adjusting to new realities and challenges.
Financially literate people can plan strategically for the long term rather than living day to day and incurring higher costs. As a result, a lack of financial knowledge prevents women from amassing wealth and, as a result, from securing their future.
Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about Women here:
https://brainly.com/question/928992
#SPJ5
Match the excerpts from Frankenstein to the themes they reflect.
1.isolation
2.dangerous knowledge
3.deceptive appearances
4.revenge
A."From that moment I declared everlasting war against the species, and, more than all,
against him who had formed me and sent me forth to this insupportable misery."
B."If I am assailed by disappointment, no one will endeavor to sustain me in dejection.
I shall commit my thoughts to paper, it is true; but that is a poor medium for the
communication of feeling."
C."They have acquired new and almost unlimited powers; they can command the thunders
of heaven, mimic the earthquake, and even mock the invisible world with its own shadows."
D."I found a fire which had been left by some wandering beggars, and was overcome with
delight at the warmth I experienced from it. In my joy I thrust my hand into the live
embers, but quickly drew it out again with a cry of pain."
1~B
2~C
3~D
4~A
This is what I put for Plato, I am not 100% sure but i did a lot of reading and am confident in it.
Write three to five sentences explaining how two or more elements of the advertisement convey the viewpoint effectively.
How many minutes does students have to complete the aspire writing test
Answer: The ACT Aspire Writing Assessments Writing part consist of 30-minute writing.
Explanation:
Such test is required for the students in the school grades 3rd to 8th and for the first years of high school. Each student, according to the level of grade they are in, must write in the form of an essay to a single prompt. The answers from the students are later on evaluated following different rubrics that assess the generation, development, communication and organization of ideas in standard written English language. It is usefull to provide an indicator of whether or not the students have the language and writing skills required to start working on the next school grade, as it describes writing abilities, skill and complexity grade by grade.
How is an allegory different from a myth? A. An allegory includes characters that represent moral and ethical qualities, while a myth provides an explanation of elements in a culture. B. An allegory refers to a historical or literary figure, while a myth expresses sorrow or mourning for someone who has died. C. An allegory uses facts and evidence to explain supernatural events, while a myth emphasizes the magical elements of a story. D. An allegory is an interpretation of the traits of characters from many stories, while a myth focuses only on characters that are specific to one story.
B. An allegory includes characters that represent moral and ethical qualities, while a myth provides an explanation of elements in a culture.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: How is an allegory different from a myth, would be: A: An allegory includes characters that represent moral and ethical qualities, while a myth provides explanation of elements in a culture.
Explanation:
An allegory is technically a literary device, most like a metaphor, whose intention is to present, through symbolism, deeper meanings and concepts that cannot be understood better unless these symbols are used. Maybe one area in which allegory is in religion, where texts are written in such a way that they come out full of symbolisms that represent concepts and ideas that are too deep and too broad to understand using any other means. Usually, allegories will have as a characteristic, characters that become the very representation of the moral and ethical values of a society. Myths, on the other hand, though they may use allegorical techniques, they are, essentially, narratives or stories that represent not only the underlying beliefs of a society regarding their oirigins, but also the justification for their cultural traditions and customs. This is why the best answer from all the ones here, is A.
In which sentence is the predicate nominative correct?
A.
The band members are Bill, Cathy, and me.
B.
The bakers of the cookies are them.
C.
Brandon's older brother is he.
D.
The funniest comedian is him.
Answer:
D). The funniest comedian is him.
Explanation:
Predicate nominative or subject complement is demonstrated as the words(predicative expression) that follow the verb phrase(linking verb) that functions to define or rename the subject in the sentence. It categorizes the subject by replacing the noun or pronoun. As per the options are given, the sentence that employs predicate nominative among the given options is option D as 'him' follows the verb phrase. It renames the subject 'The funniest comedian' by replacing it with 'him'. Thus, option D is the correct answer.
Explain the difference between what Kant calls a categorical imperative and a counsel of prudence
The categorical imperative is a universal moral command that must be followed, while a counsel of prudence involves personal judgment and practical wisdom in decision-making.
Explanation:The categorical imperative and a counsel of prudence are two moral concepts introduced by Immanuel Kant. The categorical imperative refers to moral commands that are universally valid and must be followed regardless of personal desires or goals. On the other hand, a counsel of prudence involves individual judgment and practical wisdom in making decisions based on personal desires and goals.
Learn more about difference between categorical imperative and counsel of prudence here:https://brainly.com/question/5723246
#SPJ3
what’s the purpose of a literary analysis
Answer:
The purpose of a literary analysis essay is to carefully examine and sometimes evaluate a work of literature or an aspect of a work of literature
Explanation:
What type of noun is the word “shore” in the following sentence? Go down the highway until you reach the shore. A. proper noun B. compound noun C. simple noun
When I looked into the mirror, I saw that they were not fine. Now they stuck out from my head like two satellite dishes, and I was receiving more signals than ever.
Which of the underlined verbs is a linking verb?
were
stuck
saw
looked
The answer is were :)
You've been assigned a research paper on the Holy Wars. Which of the following would provide a factual base for additionalresearch?
in the setting of a bus ride Isabella meet a woman select two reasons why the woman is important in the story
In the setting of a bus ride, the woman is important to illustrate the theme and convey the plot in the story.
What is settings?It should be noted that settings means the place and time that a story takes place in a literary work.
In this case, in the setting of a bus ride, the woman is important to illustrate the theme and convey the plot in the story.
Learn more about settings on:
https://brainly.com/question/5660357
#SPJ2
Final answer:
The woman Isabella meets on a bus ride is important for two potential reasons: she could catalyze Isabella's character development or signify thematic elements within the story, such as empathy, connection, or social awareness.
Explanation:
In the setting of a bus ride, Isabella meeting a woman can be significant for several reasons. First, the woman might serve as a catalyst for Isabella's character development or journey within the story. This encounter could reveal important backstory or instigate a change in Isabella. For example, similar to Dorothy's interaction in the excerpt, where the revelation of a shared past and the woman's current plight lead to a deeper sense of empathy and a philanthropic act, Isabella's meeting with the woman could push her towards growth or a new understanding.
Second, the woman may be important for thematic development. Characters that are introduced into a narrative often represent broader ideas or themes. In the case of Dorothy and the woman with the shoes, the encounter highlighted themes of poverty, charity, and shared humanity. The importance of the woman in Isabella's story could likewise enrich the thematic tapestry of the narrative by symbolizing concepts such as connection, social issues, or personal accountability.
A(n) ______ is a series of related jobs built on a foundation of interest, knowledge, training, and experience. a. occupation b. trade c. career d. skill set
the correct answer is C
A career is a seties of related jobs built on a foundation of interest, knowledge, training, and experience.
A career is related to person's life, learning and work. It can be also be defined as a job that involves special training, skills and education. In this light, a career can be described as a sequence of related jobs inside a sector, or industry, such as "career in education". The only way to develop a career is through learning, work and other aspects of life.
Read these sentences from the story, spoken by Oona: In that place there be many Russian folk, and their rule is harsh. And from Sitka, Old Kinoos, who was Young Kinoos in those days, fled away with me, a babe in his arms, along the islands in the midst of the sea. My mother dead tells the tale of his wrong; a Russian, dead with a spear through breast and back, tells the tale of the vengeance of Kinoos. What can be inferred about Oona based on the information in this sentence
What is a honey badgers greatest asset or quality
The honey badger’s greatest asset as its aggressive disposition. According to the author, “The honey badgeries fearless and a tireless fighter.”Even though these mammals are smaller than a beagle, they have been known to “chase away lions and take their kills.” The honey badger has rightfully earned its “tough guy” reputation. The animal world has learned to respect the fierce honey badger, and human