Create a literal question that can be answered by this excerpt from Little Brother:

He slammed his hand down on the desk and then pointed his finger at me. "The *problem*, Mr. Yallow, is that you've been engaged in criminal conspiracy (a secret plan) to subvert (ruin, break) this school's security system, and you have supplied security countermeasures (ways around the system) to your fellow students. You know that we expelled Graciella Uriarte last week for using one of your devices." Uriarte had gotten a bad rap. She'd bought a radio-jammer from a head-shop near the 16th Street BART station and it had set off the countermeasures in the school hallway. Not my doing, but I felt for her.

Answer: The correct answer is C.

Explanation:

   In the 14th century, poets such as Petrarch used to write love sonnets about idealized women. They were compared to elements of nature, portraying them as perfect and as having an extraordinary beauty. For instance, her eyes were bright like the sun, her lips were red as coral, her cheeks were like roses or her voice was like music. Mistresses were white, slender with blonde hair and had a silky smooth skin.

   In Shakespeare's poem 130, he writes a parody of those traditional love poems and  ridicules the descriptions of the perfect mistress. His description is based on the same conventions found in love poems but quite the opposite. The woman in the poem is far from being the goddess with the perfect beauty. Her eyes are not like the sun, her lips are not red, her hair stands out like wires, her breath doesn't smell like perfume, her voice is not a pleasant sound, she seems to walk like an ordinary person would.

By mentioning her flaws or her not-so-perfect beauty, he is not making fun of women, he is being honest. He seems to accept her mistress the way she is.  In fact, in the couplet ( the last two lines of a sonnet), there's an affirmation of the speaker's love for her.

Final answer:

Indirect evidence, or circumstantial evidence, relies on inferences to connect it to a fact, contrasting with direct evidence which provides straightforward proof. A fingerprint at a crime scene is an example of indirect evidence, suggesting presence and potential guilt, while a confession is direct evidence, plainly indicating involvement.

Explanation:

Indirect evidence, also known as circumstantial evidence, involves using evidence to make inferences about the causes that led to a certain set of circumstances. This contrasts with direct evidence, which directly proves a fact without needing to infer. For example, a fingerprint at the scene of a crime is indirect evidence; it suggests that because the defendant's fingerprint is there, they were present and potentially committed the crime. Conversely, a defendant's confession is direct evidence as it directly proves their involvement in the crime.

The difference between direct and indirect evidence primarily lies in the way each type proves a fact. Direct evidence provides a straightforward proof of a fact, such as eyewitness testimony or a video recording of the event. Indirect evidence, on the other hand, requires the drawing of inferences to connect it to the fact being proved, like deducing someone's presence at a crime scene from fingerprints or DNA evidence. While criminal cases relying on direct evidence may appear easier to prove due to less potential for reasonable doubt, circumstantial evidence can be equally compelling, especially when it is highly reliable like DNA evidence.

Answer: C. Compare and contrast.

Explanation: In the given excerpt we can see that it is used the organizational pattern of compare and contrast. The speaker is comparing Fleming's All-Purpose Flour with the other flours on the market, he compares their ingredients: "While other brands use artificial ingredients such as soy lecithin and high fructose corn syrup, Fleming's uses only natural ingredients with no sugar added" and their flavors: "Choose Fleming's All-Purpose Flour . . . the taste is miles above the rest" all this with the goal of convincing the audience to buy Fleming's flour.

Answer:  C. At the end of the play, they feel that Macbeth is a murderous tyrant, but at the beginning they thought he was a brave and good man.

The character of Macbeth changes a lot throughout the play, and this is reflected in the feelings of his soldiers. Initially, Macbeth is admired and appreciated by the soldiers, who believe him to be a good, brave and fair man. However, Macbeth becomes obsessed with power, and slowly loses some of his best qualities. By the end of the play, the soldiers believe him to be an abusive and murderous tyrant.

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Interrogative pronoun .

Answer:

Humanity and need for government.

Explanation:

The answer is

Dr. Jekyll wrote the letter that he claims was written by Mr. Hyde.

How do i know?

Because i just did the assignment :D

A. snap shot is your answer

A snapshot gives a picture or a scenery of a certain passage, and allows the reader to have information to imagine what is going on.

hope this helps

In Act 4 of The Crucible, Elizabeth reassures John Proctor that he has his goodness intact.

English Literature: The Crucible

In Act 4 of The Crucible, Elizabeth means that her husband, John Proctor, has regained his integrity and inner moral compass by choosing to confess to witchcraft and save his own life.

By admitting his guilt falsely, he believes he has lost his goodness, but Elizabeth, recognizing the true worth of her husband's self-sacrifice, reassures him that he has his virtue intact. She understands that his decision to preserve his life is a sign of his goodness and love for his family.

Learn more about Elizabeth's reassurance to John Proctor here:

https://brainly.com/question/32448210

#SPJ6

Answer:

D. All of the above

Explanation:

Lysander loves Hermia who also loves him, but hermia is promised to marry Demetrius. That's enough reason for Lysander not to like Demetrius. In addition, Demetrius had already courted Helena (who loves Demetrius deeply), but to marry Hermia, Demetrius left Helena without any fear and that made Lysander claim that Demetrius is cruel and without feelings.

Answer: D) Gone with the Wind.

Explanation: In MLA format the rules of capitalization of titles are strict, according to those rules, we have to capitalize the first and last word of the title and also all the important words (nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, pronouns and subordinating conjunctions) also we don't capitalize the prepositions (with, between, of, on, by, etc), articles (the, a, an), coordinating conjunctions (but, and, or, yet, etc) and the word "to" when is an infinitive of a verb. So in the given title the correct capitalization is Gone with the Wind, because "with" is a preposition and "the" is an article.

Answer:

Gone with the Wind

Answer:

"why did the police officer get angry and expell him?"

Explanation:

a evaluative question is asking for your opionon and which side do you choose

Kabbalah is a set of mystical teachings based on Hebrew scripture, emphasizing on Jewish spirituality. The Talmud is a collection of ancient commentaries on the Hebrew scriptures, often referred to as the Oral Torah.

Kabbalah is a set of mystical teachings based on Hebrew scripture. It focuses on Jewish spirituality and seeks to uncover secret meanings in the Jewish text. It is not a place, like a city in Transylvania, but rather a spiritual and religious practice.

The Talmud, on the other hand, is a collection of ancient commentaries on the Hebrew scriptures. Also crucial to Jewish tradition, it is not a ghetto or a Jewish prayer but is referred to as the Oral Torah, consisting of discussions and interpretations of the Written Torah (first five books of the Bible).

https://brainly.com/question/515365

#SPJ12

Answer:

A literary device similar to a symbol that can also represent a theme or idea is called a motif.

Explanation:

The sentence that correctly uses commas to separate items in a list is as follows:

Thus, the correct option is C.

The significance of commas is determined by the fact that they generally function like a tool in order to indicate to readers a certain separation of words, phrases, or ideas in order to shut out misimpression of the intended meaning of the writer or author.

According to the context of this question, options first and second, and fourth are incorrect because a comma is generally placed after collection and before and. So, both sentences represent incorrect use of commas. So, the most valid option with respect to the utilization of punctuation marks. i.e. comma is the third option.

Therefore, the sentence that correctly uses commas to separate items in a list is well mentioned above.

To learn more about Punctuation marks, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/92653

#SPJ2

The pronoun himself in the sentence "John himslef should have known better even if Joe did not." is an intensive pronoun.

An intensive pronoun is almost identical to a reflexive pronoun, but they have different functions. Intensive pronouns are used to add emphasis. Like a reflexive prounoun, it ends in self or selves. The pronoun is intensive rather than reflexive because it is there simply for emphasis. The sentence would have the same meaning (with less intensity) without the use of the pronoun.

"John should have known bettter even if Joe did not."

Answer:

Explanation:

Marigold is a short story by Eugenia Collier written in 1969. Eugenia Collier was born in 1928, an award-winning teacher and writer. Eugenia wrote this story during the "Great Depression" of the 1930s when millions of Americans suffered unemployment.

The mood evoked by the ending of Marigolds is "resentful". In the story Marigold, there's a girl named 'Elizabeth' who is childish and cared for one but herself. One day she sees that Ms. Lottie has no one with her but her "Marigolds" which she grew herself and her actions have an ill-effect on her. But when her father told that he is leaving the town to work because of the poverty that has hit the nation she gets angry and in her anger, she destroys Ms. Lottie's Marigold garden. When Elizabeth turns and sees Ms. Lottie crying she becomes resentful for her actions and wishes if she could repay her.

Final answer:

Conventional symbols are widely recognized, while literary symbols in literature convey abstract ideas in a nuanced manner, adding depth to the text.

Explanation:

Conventional symbols are widely recognized symbols that carry a common meaning, such as the association of birds with freedom. On the other hand, literary symbols in literature go beyond literal meaning and represent abstract concepts or ideas. These symbols are open to interpretation and allow for deeper layers of meaning in a text.

Using symbols in literature adds depth and complexity to a text, enabling authors to convey nuanced ideas in a condensed form. Symbols create a rich tapestry of meaning, inviting readers to explore different interpretations and engage with the text on a deeper level.

Main Reason: The interpretation highlights societal pressure for men to suppress vulnerability, using tough demeanor as a coping mechanism.

Interpretation of "Terrible Softness":

Men employ tough language or demeanor to suppress internal vulnerability or emotional depth.

"Terrible" implies negative perception of internal softness, compelling concealment.

Societal Expectations for Men:

Expectation of stoicism and emotional resilience.

Emotional openness may be stigmatized as weakness, leading to adoption of a harder exterior.

Challenges of Maintaining Facade:

Emotional suppression leads to psychological distress and prevents authentic expression.

Dissonance between internal feelings and external behavior can cause identity crisis.

Hinders development of deep relationships, impacting intimacy.

Contributes to mental health issues like anxiety and depression.

Critique of Gender Norms:

Reflection on harmful societal norms enforcing rigid gender roles.

Suggests expectations are outdated and detrimental.

Summary:

"Terrible softness" refers to socially unacceptable vulnerability men conceal.

"Hard vocabulary" serves as coping mechanism in a world where showing emotion is seen as frailty.

The answer is C. His mother would have to return to her father's house.

Hope this helps <3

The main idea of the paragraph is implied, indicating that Alaska's purchase was initially criticized but ultimately proved to be a significant benefit due to its abundant resources.

The main idea of the paragraph about Alaska's purchase is implied rather than explicitly stated. The paragraph details how, in 1867, the United States purchased Alaska from Russia for about $7 million, amid criticism from many Americans who saw it as a foolish buy and referred to it as "Seward's Folly." However, it later became apparent that Alaska was rich in resources like oil, fish, lumber, and it also acted as a strategic boon for the United States. The implied main idea is that the purchase of Alaska turned out to be a significant benefit to the United States despite the initial criticism.

The Spanish-American War was a conflict between Spain and the United States in 1898. The main issue in this conflict was the question of Cuban independence. The war was a significant change in American policy, as the United States had generally favoured an isolationist approach when it came to international relations before this date. The war eventually led to the American acquisition of Spain's Pacific possessions.

Answer:

A) Seeking to understand the female is the protagonist's unattainable goal.

Question:

In "Araby," James Joyce uses many archetypal images: the innocent youth, the mysterious female, and the distracted adult.

How does the mysterious female affect the meaning of the story?

A) Buying the female a gift despite interference results in a satisfying ending.

B) Accepting the female's lack of interest is the protagonist's main obstacle.

C) Dealing with the youth's emotions toward the female slows the pace of the story.

D) Seeking to understand the female is the protagonist's unattainable goal.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

youre giving them the main topic of the whole text you will be providing, note this is nescessary because they might be clueless about the topic of your text

Final answer:

The appositive phrase 'is known as tofu' is non-essential and should be punctuated with commas: 'Bean curd, is known as tofu, is a healthy protein.'

Explanation:

To determine if an appositive phrase is essential or non-essential, we must decide if the sentence would still make sense if the phrase were removed. An essential appositive provides information that is necessary to the meaning of the sentence and should not be surrounded by commas. On the other hand, a nonessential appositive is additional information that can be omitted without changing the sentence's meaning; this should be punctuated with commas.

Considering the sentence options provided:

The correct sentence is the first one, because the phrase 'is known as tofu' is non-essential information. It can be removed without affecting the core meaning of the sentence, which is that bean curd is a healthy protein. Therefore, this appositive phrase is non-essential and should be surrounded by commas:

Bean curd, is known as tofu, is a healthy protein.

the answer is d.strangely