The correct options are:
A crowd of about 20,000 people demonstrated in 1905 in St. Petersburg to appeal for workers' reforms. This demonstration led to the Bloody Sunday.
This demonstration along with the Mutiny on the battleship Potemkin (1905) are understood as the first phase of the Socialist Revolution in Russia in early the 20th century.
This series of rebellion against the czar led to the organization of the first soviets, which would be fundamental for the October Revolution 1917. Soviets were councils of organized workers to defend their rights.
A crowd of about 20,000 people demonstrated in 1905 in St. Petersburg to appeal for [tex]\boxed{\text{workers reforms}}[/tex]. This demonstration led to [tex]\boxed{\text{Bloody Sunday}}[/tex].
The event described in the passage refers to the 1905 Russian Revolution, which was a wave of mass political and social unrest that spread through vast areas of the Russian Empire. The demonstration mentioned is known as the Bloody Sunday massacre, which occurred on January 22, 1905 (January 9 in the Julian calendar, which was used in Russia at the time).
The first blank pertains to the reason for the demonstration. The options given are the freedom of serfs, workers reforms, and the appointment of a new czar. Serfdom in Russia had been abolished in 1861 by Czar Alexander II, more than four decades prior to the 1905 events. Therefore, appealing for the freedom of serfs would not have been relevant in 1905. The appointment of a new czar was not a demand of the demonstrators; they were seeking reforms from the current czar, Nicholas II. Hence, the most appropriate option for the first blank is workers reforms, as the demonstrators were appealing for better working conditions, fair wages, and political reforms.
The second blank refers to the consequence of the demonstration. The options are Bloody Sunday, the Decembrist revolt, and the Crimean war. The Decembrist revolt occurred in 1825, and the Crimean war took place from 1853 to 1856, both of which are unrelated to the 1905 event. Bloody Sunday, on the other hand, is the name given to the event when the Imperial Guard fired upon a peaceful crowd of workers led by Father Georgy Gapon, resulting in the death and injury of hundreds of people. This tragic event significantly escalated tensions and contributed to the revolutionary atmosphere of 1905. Therefore, the correct option for the second blank is Bloody Sunday.
describe some ancient Egypt achievements in mathematics, Science,
and Technology
Ancient Egypt has significantly contributed to the development of modern math. They had their own number system. in the field of science, they invented calendars and clocks. They also possessed the precious knowledge of how to construct huge ships for trade and commercial purposes.
Explanation:
Ancient Egyptians used body parts for the measurement purposes. Decimal numeric system developed and gained fame in Egypt. They used ten fingers in order to understand the decimal system. written numbers used strokes, heel bone, lotus plant as a means to measure. Practical problems of trade helped Egyptians understand the concept of fractions. Pyramids and their construction is the best example that echoes the greatness of Egyptian mathematicians. In science they invented working with metals like gold and copper and they invented calendar and they were also well versed and pioneers in astronomy and medicine. they were the first to write records and preserve for future references. Ramp and lever were simple machines which were used to construct huge marvels called pyramids. They also possessed great knowledge in aerodynamics.
Answer:
Describe some of ancient Egypt's achievements in mathematics, science and technology. In mathematics the Egyptians built the great pyramids and made the calendar. In science and technology the Egyptians built canals, discovered medical advances, and studied the anatomy.
What was the name of the first economically successful English colony?
A) Boston
B) Florida
C) Jamestown
D) Plymouth
Please this is urgent!??
Please I need this!?!
Answer:
The correct answer is Jamestown
A Supreme Court appointed by the executive branch was a feature of which plan for the federal government presented at the constitutional convention
Answer:
The Supreme Court of the United States was established by the Judiciary Act of 1789 in order to separate the government powers by creating a third branch.
Explanation:
Under this model of governance, public power is divided between three independent branches to prevent the concentration of unchecked power. The First United States Congress officially began operations under the frame of government established by the 1787 Constitution.
Answer:
Both the Virginia and New Jersey plans
Explanation:
Summarize two legacies of the counterculture movement.
Music:
The idea of not complying with the forms of music inherited from the ancestors and instead wanting to create new forms that would stand to counter the cultural music was the basic proposition behind music being one of the two major legacies of the counterculture movement.Art:
The cultural forms and themes of arts descending down for ages and left with no more room for modification were denied to be practiced by some.This gave emergence to the counterculture movement in the discipline of art.Humanism teaches that our human rights come from :A God B government B education C ourselves
If you answer correct you get Brainly
Answer:
B government
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
PHOENIX, Sept. 20, 2012—Arizona's new immigration law takes effect this week. According to the law, police officers must check the status of anyone who may be an undocumented immigrant. Officers have the right to decide who is checked under this law.
Which argument would a supporter use to show that this law is necessary?
All citizens are entitled to due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.
Birthright citizenship was granted in the United States only with the Fourteenth Amendment.
The First Amendment permits freedom of assembly by all people, including immigrants.
The U.S. Constitution gives states the right to make and enforce their own laws.
The U.S. Constitution gives states the right to make and enforce their own laws.
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
The immigration law of Arizona came into effect in the year 2012. This law was basically formed for keeping a check on the immigrants which came to the country without their proper documentation.
The people who are in the support of this law said that the states should have the right given to them by the constitution to form their own rights. This was the case because every state has separate cases of the immigrants.
Answer:
d i just took the test
Explanation:
Match each idea to the correct principle of government. federalism separation of powers checks and balances divides the powers of government into different branches arrowRight divides the powers of government between central and state governments arrowRight each branch of government has certain powers that prevents the abuse of power on the people arrowRight
Answer: Federalism : division of power between central and state government. Separation of power : division of powers between different branches of the government. Checks and balances : each branch of government has certain powers that prevents the abuse of the power on the people.
Explanation:
Federalism : division of power between central and state government
Federalism is that principle under which the country is divided into national and other level of government. Each level has certain authority and has lists in which the power is divided among the different level of the government.
Separation of power : division of powers between different branches of the government
The government is divided in the three branches of the government : the executive which executes laws, the legislative which makes laws and the judiciary which maintains peace and order in the country.
Checks and balances : each branch of government has certain powers that prevents the abuse of the power on the people
Each branch has powers which acts as control over the power f the other branch to avoid the abuse of power.
Federalism -> divides the powers of government between
central and state governments.
Seperation of powers -> divides the powers of government into
different branches.
Checks and balances -> each branch of government has certain
powers that prevents the abuse of
power on the people.
Hope this helped!
Why did Dowager Empress Cixi support
* CIXI support the Boxers in their rebellion?
Answer:
The Dowager Empress Cixi supported the Boxers in their rebellion because the Boxers were willing to fight the foreigners and were successful to some extent.
Explanation:
Initially, the Chinese government did not approve of the Boxers and tried to suppress them. But as soon as the Dowager Empress Cixi realized that the Boxers were patriotic fighters, she declared her support to the Boxers.Later in time, the Chinese army started joining the Boxers in their missions and the rebillion of boxers turned into a mission directly supported by the government.How did Captain Preston involve the king in his testimony?
Answer:
Captain Thomas Preston involved the king in his testimony by saying that the king had given him the authority to open fire against anyone whenever and wherever required.
Explanation:
During the trial that was separately run for Thomas Preston, he presented his testimony which attempted to indirectly blame the king for the massacre that happened.It is believed that President John Adams had instructed Captain Thomas Preston to involve the king himself in the Boston Massacre trial by including the king’s name in his final testimony.How did muhammed start spreading his message about islam
Muhammad start spreading his message about Islam by preaching at Mecca, he could spread the message about Islam in an influential way.
Explanation:
One of the major ways with which Muhammad could spread his message about Islam to the people was by preaching at Mecca. In the present world, Mecca is the holiest place in the world for the Islam religion and is located in a desert valley in western Saudi Arabia. Quran, the holy book of Muslims, was written later by his contemporaries which was based on his own stories.
Answer:The answer is C
Explanation:
Lincoln's "Emancipation Proclamation" had all of the following effects EXCEPT
A) it transformed the Union's goal of the war.
B) it caused the Union to change its Confiscation Acts.
C) it led to mass movements of slaves out of "border states".
Eliminate
D) it led to the British and French refusal to support the Confederate States
B)
This is because as a result of the Emancipation Proclamation, the Union’s goal was now to free slaves along with preserving the Union. The slaves in the Southern states began to flee North toward freedom too. Lastly, the public in Europe supported the Union, so the leaders of those countries turned against the Confederate States.
Answer: The correct answer is C) it led to mass movements of slaves out of "border states".
What did Olympe de Gouges and Mary Wollstonecraft have in common?
O
A. Both were executed after opposing the leaders of the French
Revolution.
O
B. Both rewrote famous documents to reveal how those documents
neglected women's rights.
O
c. Both led organizations that fought for women's right to vote.
O
D. Both wrote about women's rights before a true women's rights
movement emerged.
D. Both wrote about women's rights before a true women's rights
movement emerged.
Explanation:
The first wave of feminism begins in parallel with the French Revolution.A significant role in the beginnings of feminism was played by the "women who belong to the main movers of feminism.This two women wanted to point out that she women were "as humanly human as a man".For this reason, they sought equality with men before the fundamental laws of life that were then intended for man.De Gouges wrote Declaration of the Rights of Woman, while Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.Learn more on Feminism on
https://brainly.com/question/6469517
https://brainly.com/question/531347
https://brainly.com/question/6370205
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:D
Explanation:
AP3X
How might a Supreme Court ruling to uphold the state law barring minors from using
social media affect young Americans? How might such a ruling affect social media
companies? What might be some of the unintended consequences of such a ruling?
Considering what you have learned about the Constitution, why is it very unlikely that
the Supreme Court would ever uphold a law barring young people from using social media? Can Somebody please help me
Answer:
1-It will affect the protection of their individual rights.
2- Some particular, social media providers may argue that government regulations impermissibly infringe on the providers’ own constitutional free speech rights.
3- it could have considerable implications for the regulation of free speech on such platforms.Like constitutional injuries.
4- Courts have held that the First Amendment, which provides protection against state action, is not implicated by the actions of these private companies.
Explanation: Some have expressed concern that these sites are not doing enough to counter violent or false speech.
1-The reason most social media services use an age limit of 13 or over is in part because of a law in the USA. The COPPA law Children's Online Privacy Protecction Act. An entire generation of young Americans has come of age accustomed to looking to the Supreme Court to protect individual
rights,"
2-Some have argued that Congress should step in to regulate social media sites. Government action regulating internet content
3-Would constitute state action that may implicate the First Amendment. Under existing law, social media platforms may be more likely to receive First Amendment protection when they exercise more editorial discretion in presenting user-generated content, rather than if they neutrally transmit all such content.
4- Courts have concluded that many non-constitutional claims are barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
When information from a conservative perspective is placed sooner in an article than information from a liberal perspective, what type of bias is present?
Bias by source selection
Bias by omission
Bias by labeling
Bias by placement
Answer: ^Bias by omission^
– leaving one side out of an article, or a series of articles over a period of time; ignoring facts that tend to disprove liberal or conservative claims, or that support liberal or conservative beliefs; bias by omission can occur either within a story, or over the long term as a particular news outlet reports one set of events, but not another. To find instances of bias by omission, be aware of the conservative and liberal perspectives on current issues. See if both the conservative and liberal perspectives are included in stories on a particular event or policy.
Explanation:
Bias by selection of sources – including more sources that support one view over another. This bias can also be seen when a reporter uses such phrases as “experts believe,” “observers say,” or “most people believe.” Experts in news stories are like expert witnesses in trials. If you know whether the defense or the prosecution called a particular expert witness to the stand, you know which way the witness will testify. And when a news story only presents one side, it is obviously the side the reporter supports. (Journalists often go looking for quotes to fit their favorite argument into a news story.) To find bias by use of experts or sources, stay alert to the affiliations and political perspective of those quoted as experts or authorities in news stories. Not all stories will include experts, but in those that do, make sure about an equal number of conservatives and liberals are quoted. If a story quotes non-experts, such as those portrayed as average citizens, check to be sure that about an equal number come from both sides of the issue in question.
6. What issue led to both the Magna Carta and the establishment of Parliament?
A. how to cope with the bubonic plague
B. how to regain control of Jerusalem
C. how to resolve the Great Schism
D. how to end taxation without representation
Answer:
D. how to end taxations without representation
what are some examples of the soviet attempts to desperately hold the city
Final answer:
The Soviet Union robustly defended key cities during WWII such as Leningrad and Stalingrad through tactics like 'hugging the enemy' and encirclement, which were pivotal in turning the tide against the German advance.
Explanation:
The Soviet Union faced numerous challenges during World War II, particularly when trying to hold crucial cities against the advancing German forces. Some examples of Soviet attempts to hold critical areas can be seen in the defense of Moscow in 1941, the two-and-a-half-year siege of Leningrad, and notably, at the city of Stalingrad.
The Siege of Leningrad presented unbelievable hardships for the Soviets, lasting from September 1941 for over two years. Throughout 1942, despite being cornered into a small area of the city, the Soviets denied the Germans any easy victory. The 'hugging the enemy' strategy forced the Germans into an attrition war in urban terrain.
At Stalingrad, the Soviet defense was desperate yet strategic. By the end of 1942, the Soviets managed to encircle the German forces with a counterattack, leading to a massive surrender, which became a turning point on the Eastern Front. Both cases exemplified the Soviet resolve and strategic prowess in turning the tide of the war.
Examples of Soviet Resilience:
Defense of Moscow - fortified the city and used the bitter winter to their advantage.
Siege of Leningrad - endured hardships and adopted an urban defensive strategy.
Battle of Stalingrad - encircled and cut off German supply, leading to a crucial surrender.
how old was Einstein when he died?
Answer:
76 years
Explanation:
Einstein was 76 years when he died
Albert Einstein died when he was 76 years old. He was born in 1879 and died in 1955.
I hope this helped! If so, please mark brainliest.
How did the 14th amendment impact African Americans and other minorities?
Answer:
they didn't want slavery and racism
Explanation:
Answer:
The Fourteenth Amendment was intended to undo the attempts of the southern states to enforce limits on African Americans in both political and social spheres through the Black Codes. However, the ratification of the amendment achieved little real change in the life of the everyday African American.
Explanation: Hope this helps
On 18 February 2013, Mississippi became the last state to officially ratify the Thirteenth Amendment, formally overturning slavery. Their refusal to ratify the amendment represents one example of the disconnection between the way the law says society should behave and actual social practices. In the early twentieth century, the centrality of the Emancipation Proclamation and the Thirteenth Amendment to national memory spurred the march toward civil rights for African Americans. While these laws were certainly momentous, they were not decisive, nor were they effective in bringing about racial equality. The Thirteenth Amendment failed to better the lives of ex-slaves because it did not specify how to treat former slaves, but merely abolished the existence of the institution. The Fourteenth Amendment addressed this omission, but the enforcement of this document was limited, especially on the part of the Supreme Court and the President.
Much has been written about the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and the subsequent challenges in interpreting the document. In his 1957 article “There Is No ‘Fourteenth Amendment,’” David Lawrence, founder and longtime columnist for U.S. News and World Report, argues that the Fourteenth Amendment was never a valid document.Three-fourths of the states that comprised the union at the time needed to ratify the amendment. This did not happen, according to Lawrence, and since then, the courts have been acting under false pretenses. His interpretation of history illustrates the southern states’ reluctance to ratify the amendment and the courts’ unwillingness to interpret it as part of the ongoing struggle society against the idea of incorporation of the Fourteenth Amendment.1 Historian Irving Brant considers the Fourteenth Amendment’s incorporation in his book The Bill of Rights: Its Origin and Meaning. He argues that the amendment was intended to overturn those decisions of the Supreme Court that upheld the states’ right to violate the Bill of Rights, such as the case Dred Scott v. Sandford, which denied that African Americans were citizens of the United States. This 1857 decision allowed states to create laws like the Fugitive Slave Act and other legislation that treated slaves as property. Brant goes on to argue that the framers’ intent in writing the Fourteenth Amendment was not carried out until the mid-20th century, over eighty years after it was ratified.2
Connecting these two concepts, it is clear that white society’s reluctance to accept freedmen as equals led to white society’s denial of freedmen’s civil rights. The unwillingness of many whites to accept the change in the social status of freedmen was mirrored in the court’s limited interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment in cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Additionally, the Presidents of the late nineteenth century could have used their power and influence to push for greater equality among the races. Whether the reluctance to fully enact and enforce the Fourteenth Amendment was caused by the fact that the justices and the President were themselves part of a society that would not accept African Americans as equals or their fear of societal backlash against any efforts to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment is unclear. What is clear is that white society’s prejudices affected the courts in a way that prevented the legal system from upholding the amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment was intended to undo the attempts of the southern states to enforce limits on African Americans in both political and social spheres through the Black Codes. However, the ratification of the amendment achieved little real change in the life of the everyday African American. The unwillingness of the Supreme Court and the President to enforce the de jure equality of African Americans outlined in the Fourteenth Amendment rendered the changes to the US Constitution impotent.
Which of the following was not one of Huayna Capac's accomplishments?
Answer:
Huayna Capac :Inca Emperor
He made some great development to Inca Empire during his reign. He constructed tow important Inca roads one from Tumbez to Pachacamac and the other from Pachacamac to Cusco. ...
He ordered that after his death his heart should remain in Quito, but body be back in Cusco. ...
Huayna was a great warrior and Emperor.
Answer: establish the Inca empire’s rigid social classes
how do totalitarian and fascist values differ from democratic principle and goals
Totalitarianism and fascism favor total control by the state, with an emphasis on nationalism and social hierarchy in the latter. They aim to suppress individual thought to achieve collective conformity. Conversely, democracy upholds individual rights, emphasizes freedom of expression, and derives authority from the people via elections.
Explanation:The primary difference between totalitarian, fascist values and democratic principles lies in the level of control exerted by the government and the value placed on individual rights. Totalitarianism refers to a political system where the state has total control over all aspects of public and private life. This includes the elimination of free press, imposition of censorship and mass surveillance, prohibition of state opposition, and severe repercussions for disobedience, with the goal of eradicating individuality in favor of having citizens conform to governmental ideals.
Fascism is an ideology characterized by strong nationalism, disregard for democratic principles, and a belief in social hierarchy. It often involves authoritarian rulers, tends to be associated with military and economic control, and eschews individual freedom in favor of collective nationalism and racial purity.
In contrast, democratic principles strive for the rights of individuals to express their views freely, to participate in the governing process, and to have basic human rights protected. Democracies tend to promote coexistence of diverse groups, advocate for freedom of speech, and afford political power to the people through elections. Democratic leaders must act in the interests of the citizens they represent, ensuring their well-being and protecting their rights.
Learn more about Political systems here:https://brainly.com/question/19298230
#SPJ12
Totalitarian and fascist values differ significantly from democratic principles and goals in several key aspects: Government Structure and Power, Individual Rights and Liberties, Economic Control etc.
1. Government Structure and Power:
- Totalitarianism: This system is characterized by a single party or leader controlling all aspects of life, including the economy, education, art, science, private life, and morals of the citizens. The state has total power, and there is no legal or institutional limit to that power.
- Fascism: Similar to totalitarianism, fascism is also an authoritarian system, but it is often associated with a specific type of nationalism. Fascist regimes typically exalt the nation, state, or race above individual rights and suppress opposition through violence and propaganda.
- Democracy: In contrast, democracies are founded on the principle of the separation of powers among different branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial). This serves as a check on the concentration of power and prevents any single entity from gaining complete control.
2. Individual Rights and Liberties:
- Totalitarianism and Fascism: Both systems limit individual freedoms. They suppress civil liberties such as freedom of speech, assembly, press, and religion. The rights of individuals are considered secondary to the interests of the state or the ruling party.
- Democracy: Democratic systems prioritize individual rights and freedoms. The rule of law protects these rights, and governments are accountable to the people through free and fair elections.
3. Economic Control:
- Totalitarianism: The state typically controls the economy, often employing central planning to manage economic production and distribution.
- Fascism: While fascist states may allow for private property and private enterprise, they exert significant control over the economy, directing it to serve the interests of the state, often in preparation for war or in pursuit of national expansion.
- Democracy: Most modern democracies practice a mixed economy that combines elements of a free market with government regulations to protect consumers, workers, and the environment. Some democracies may lean more towards socialism or capitalism, but they generally support economic freedoms within a framework of laws.
4. Political Pluralism and Participation:
- Totalitarianism and Fascism: These systems are characterized by the suppression of political opposition and the absence of genuine political pluralism. The ruling party or leader maintains power through force, propaganda, and control of the media.
- Democracy: Political pluralism is a cornerstone of democratic societies. Multiple political parties compete for power, and citizens have the right to form and join political parties and organizations. Free and fair elections are held regularly to ensure that the government reflects the will of the people.
5. Ideological Foundations:
- Totalitarianism: The ideological foundation can vary, including communism, as in the Soviet Union under Stalin, or a cult of personality, as in North Korea.
- Fascism: Fascism is often associated with extreme nationalism and the belief in a natural social hierarchy and the need for a strong leader to enforce it.
- Democracy: Democratic principles are rooted in the Enlightenment and the belief in the inherent equality and rights of individuals. Democracies are based on the idea that legitimate power comes from the consent of the governed and that all citizens have an equal say in the political process.
In summary, while totalitarian and fascist regimes centralize power, suppress dissent, and prioritize the state or ruling party over individual rights, democratic systems emphasize the rule of law, protection of individual liberties, political pluralism, and the active participation of citizens in the governance process.
what was the first New Deal?
Answer:
The First New Deal refers to the primary actions taken by president FDR to deal with the financial and social crisis impacting the US during the Great Depression. It comprises the years 1933-1934. After taking office, he swiftly moved to stabilize the economy, provide jobs and relief to suffering people. FDR first tackled the banking crisis with the Emergency Banking Act, passed just a few days after the start of his presidency in March 1933. Emergency relief, worker relief and agricultural relief programs were passed. The acts and policies passed and enforced during the first years of his first presidency is what we call the First New Deal.
Explanation:
Explain and analyze how two of the following were examples of the constitution as a living document that can effectively operate as working government.
•The Louisiana purchase • •Marbury VS Madison
•The whiskey Rebellion
•The election of 1800
Marbury VS Madison
John Marshall, in his decision, is in charge of pacifying the issue. Marshall argues, in short, that, in the hierarchy of laws, the US Constitution rules and the courts, as well as the other departments, are bound by it. Thus any law contrary to the Constitution should be declared void.
Thus, Marshall incidentally (incidentally) decides the unconstitutionality of Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, to the extent that it contravenes the precepts of the American Constitution. The unconstitutionality of a law was declared without the analysis of the merit itself. Note that Marshall, in making such a decision not on the merits, does not, in theory, give a favorable understanding to either of the poles, so as not to generate for him political conflicts with both parties.
The Whiskey Rebellion
It was a "tax protest" in the United States, beginning in 1791 and culminating in an insurrection in 1794. The rebellion took place primarily in Washington, Pennsylvania, in the Monongahela Valley during the presidency of George Washington under the command of the American revolutionary war veteran Major James McFarlane.
"The Louisiana Purchase and the case of Marbury v. Madison are both prime examples of the Constitution as a living document, demonstrating its ability to adapt and guide the functioning of government effectively.
The Louisiana Purchase (1803):
The Louisiana Purchase was a land deal between the United States and France, in which the U.S. acquired approximately 828,000 square miles of land west of the Mississippi River for $15 million.
This transaction was not explicitly provided for in the Constitution, and some argued that the President did not have the authority to make such a purchase.
However, President Thomas Jefferson, despite his strict interpretation of the Constitution, justified the purchase as an exercise of the necessary and proper clause, which allows Congress to pass laws necessary to execute its powers.
Marbury v. Madison (1803):
Marbury v. Madison was a landmark case in American law that established the judicial review power of the courts. The case arose from a petition by William Marbury, who had been appointed a justice of the peace in the final days of John Adams' presidency but whose commission was not delivered before Adams left office.
Marbury asked the Supreme Court to compel the new Secretary of State, James Madison, to deliver the documents. Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion held that the part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that allowed Marbury to bring his claim directly to the Supreme Court was unconstitutional because it extended the Court's original jurisdiction beyond what was outlined in Article III of the Constitution.
How do the responsibilities of the executive branch lead to supporting these principles, which are reflected in American democratic ideals and founding documents?
The executive branch upholds American democratic principles by executing laws, maintaining a balance of power, promoting democratic representation, and ensuring accountability.
Explanation:The responsibilities of the executive branch play a vital role in upholding the principles reflected in American democratic ideals and founding documents. These responsibilities involve executing the law, appointing government officials, negotiating treaties, and commanding the military. These functions ensure a balance of power, promote democratic governance by the people's elected representatives, and uphold individual rights and freedoms.
For instance, through its enforcement of laws, the executive branch safeguards the principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution allocates legislative, judicial, and executive authority in a manner that assures each branch some level of autonomy from each other, ensuring a healthy balance of power, a cornerstone of American democratic ideals.
Framers of the Constitution designed the executive branch within a network of checks and balances controlled by the other branches of the federal government. This promotes consultation, cooperation, and compromise in policymaking, reflecting the democratic ideals of consensus and collaboration.
The visibility of the executive branch also contributes to democratic principles by ensuring accountability.
Learn more about Executive Branch here:https://brainly.com/question/24295264
#SPJ12
HELP ASAP! How did the takeover of the Suez Canal in 1882 shape the future of northern Africa?
A. Britain and France joined forces to extend their spheres of influence in Africa
B. Egypt took control of one of the most important waterways in the world
C. Britain was unable to access its colonies in India, Malaya, and Burma
D. Britain conquered Egypt and turned it into a British protectorate
D. Britain conquered Egypt and turned it into a British protectorate
Explanation:
Egypt had been under British control since 1882, although it formally belonged to the Ottoman Empire, which recognized its internal independence, led by the Kedah. Since then, most of the government has been governed by the British, while the khedives have had mostly formal duties. This situation was further strengthened by the British-French Agreement of 1904, which recognized British interests in Egypt and the French in Morocco.Learn more on Egypt on
https://brainly.com/question/1332773
https://brainly.com/question/7965026
https://brainly.com/question/9948936
#learnwithBrainly
which amendments from the bill of rights could we probably get rid of
Answer:
Right to keep and bear arms in order to maintain a well regulated militia is the amendment which could probably get rid of.
Explanation:
The first 10 amendments of the United State's constitution are known as Bill of Rights. Yes, Right to keep and bear arms in order to maintain a well regulated militia is an amendment which could be get rid of because this right can make a chaos in the state.
Having arms means more cases of crime scenes and killing in the country which can spread the unrest and due to this people will not feel safe. This can create the dangerous environment for the women and children.
which planent is the biggest
Answer:
Jupiter is the biggest planet.
Explanation:
Answer: jupiter
Explanation:
according to the federalists, why was it important for the national government to be moral?
Answer:The main purpose of The Federalist Papers was to explain the newly proposed constitution (we had a first constitution called The Articles of Confederation) to the people of New York in the hopes of encouraging them to ratify the new constitution in the upcoming ratifying convention
What was a major technology development in the 1990’s
Answer:
It's Internet
Explanation:
Answer:
If your options are:
A. Newspapers
B. Cellular phone
C. Television
D. Printing press
The correct answer would be B. Cellular phone.
Explanation:
In 1990, the first cell phone call was made using the new digital technology which was faster and more reliable than ever. Motorola StarTAC was the company that made the phone. They made the first clamshell cellular phone and also one of the first display screens featured on a cell phone.The new technology also made cell phones capable of being smaller rather than the large and less portable cell phones from the 1980s.
Hope this helps!!!
Please give me brainliest!!
Have a GREAT day and remember to take care of yourself!
Which accomplishment was congress recognizing
Answer:
Commanding a victory at sea against the British Navy was the accomplishment which congress recognizing.
Explanation:
The War of the American Independence saw a series of military maneuvers and consisted of naval forces from the British Imperial Navy and Continental Navy from 1775 and the French Navy from 1778.
While the British enjoyed more numerical victories, these battles culminated in the surrender of Lieutenant-General Earl Charles Cornwallis to the British Army Forces, an event that led directly to the beginning of serious peace negotiations and the war.
how did various empires after the middle ages increase their power and influence
The various empires after the middle ages increase their power and influence by controlling large quantities of territories.
Explanation:
An empire comprised of a centralized state which controls large quantities of territory and many diverse populations.
Empires are increasing and growing because power and influence are expanding and then they can collapse if they lose sight from too much territory or whether they are killed.
The kingdom of Gupta had ceased to exist in 550 CE. But for another century a small Gupta Empire existed. Gupta is a paradigm of a colonial decline in which the central state still remains, but is incapable of expanding its power and influence beyond a small area.
By comparison to that of the Western Roman Empire, whose last emperor was forced out of power, the hierarchical Roman regime was abolished.