By the end of the ninth century bce, the __________ culture controlled most of mesopotamia

Answer:

b) They created trapping and trading trails that eventually became important travel routes

Explanation:

Traders, trappers and mountain men had routes that they had to transit to move from east to west, this later helped to create routes that were used by regular people to move west to populate the western lands, since they already had routes and places where it was safe and secure to transit.

Answer:

Yeah... what big brained man said

Explanation:

Answer: a highly educated population with no job market

Explanation:

This past weekend marked the 234th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  And while much has changed since the signers met in secret to dissolve the bands that tied them to England, their words are as true today as they have ever been. 

The preamble to the Declaration states:

The arrangement of this statement reveals the founders’ belief that individual rights pre-exist the establishment of a government-- a radical notion at the time.  The Declaration begins, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”  By referring to the aspects of the subsequent statement as "self-evident truths," the founders insist that they do not merely apply to colonists but rather that they are universal.  Included in these universal truths is the idea, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  This bold assertion insists that no one life is more valuable than the next, and that—by virtue of sharing the same rights—no individual has the authority to rule over or oppress another.

Moreover, the equal rights shared by all humans are “unalienable.”  They cannot be taken away.  This is because they are granted not by any man or institution but rather they are “endowed” upon individuals by their Creator.  Only the One who grants rights has the authority to take them away.

Although the founders believed in the unalienable rights of every person, they also understood that there will always be forces in this world that seek to oppress.  Thus, “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.”  Put simply, the government possesses no rights.  Its sole purpose is to protect the rights of its citizenry from outside forces.  If it fails in this duty, it is the responsibility of individuals to abolish it.

The writers of the Declaration—and subsequently the writers of the Constitution—believed that government’s power comes out of its ability to protect the rights of its people.  Individuals do not receive natural rights from government and thus government does not have the authority to take rights away.  To the extent that it protects individual rights, government operates legitimately.  However, when it fails to protect such rights or when it imposes upon them, it becomes an illegitimate ruler over what would otherwise be free people.

When the founding fathers gathered in 1776, they did not merely declare the independence of the colonies from their British oppressors.  They declared the independence of all individuals from the unlawful intrusion of overreaching government.  And that declaration forever altered the course of human history.

Final answer:

Unalienable rights and natural rights are concepts that stem from Enlightenment thinking, emphasizing inherent human freedoms that cannot be surrendered to any government. These rights, such as 'Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness,' are rooted in the belief that they are fundamental and not subject to legal or government control. While some philosophers have dismissed the existence of natural rights, their significance in forming modern democracies and human rights law is undeniable.

Explanation:

The concepts of unalienable rights and natural rights are deeply intertwined with the philosophical underpinnings of individual freedoms established during the Enlightenment. Unalienable rights, as reflected in the United States Declaration of Independence with the phrase "...law of nature and nature's god", are rights that cannot be taken away or denied. They were famously encapsulated by Thomas Jefferson as "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness," mirroring John Locke's enumeration of "Life, Liberty, and Property" as the crucial natural rights. Locke and other Enlightenment thinkers, such as Francis Hutcheson and John Lilburne, argued that these rights are inherent to all human beings and infractions upon them are beyond the legitimate scope of governmental control.

While natural rights are similarly foundational and not subject to governmental grant or restriction, the notion has been debated throughout history. Philosophers like Jeremy Bentham have dismissed natural rights as 'nonsense upon stilts,' arguing against the existence of any rights prior to the establishment of a government or a legal framework. On the contrary, Enlightenment philosophers like Locke believed that natural rights are pre-societal and provide a justification for the formation of governments through a social contract aimed at protecting these rights. The discussion about whether property is an aspect of natural rights continues to be a topic of debate.

In essence, unalienable rights and natural rights form the ethical foundation which argues that some rights are so fundamental to human beings that no authority can take them away. These concepts have played a critical role in shaping modern democratic governance and the legal understanding of human rights. The distinction between these terms and their association with features traditionally linked to them can sometimes vary, but their core principle of inherent and intransgressible rights remains a cornerstone of liberal democracy.

Final answer:

Stuart meets the criteria for an APA diagnosis due to symptoms such as persistent and severe sadness, functional impairments, and other clinical features consistent with major depression. Bill's experience of sadness doesn't appear to meet these criteria, possibly due to less severity and impact on his daily life.

Explanation:

Both Stuart, who has been diagnosed with major depression, and Bill, who has not been diagnosed, may be experiencing symptoms like persistent sadness and emotional turmoil. Stuart likely exhibits symptoms that are more severe and prolonged, leading to significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning, which are criteria for an APA diagnosis of mental illness. Bill, on the other hand, might be experiencing situational sadness without the intensity, duration, or functional impairment necessary to meet the diagnostic criteria for a mood disorder.

Stuart's condition could include symptoms such as a depressed mood most of the day, nearly every day, a marked loss of interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities, significant weight loss or gain, insomnia or hypersomnia, fatigue or loss of energy, feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt, diminished ability to think or concentrate, and recurrent thoughts of death. These symptoms, which must last for at least two weeks, would align with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for major depression. Bill's sadness may result from identifiable life events, have less impact on his daily functioning, and not persist over an extended period, thus not meeting the criteria for diagnosis.

The differentiation in diagnosis is vital because it influences treatment approaches and the understanding of each individual's experience. While disorders like depression and anxiety can be caused by or exacerbated by stress and lead to serious psycho-social issues, not all sadness or emotional challenges amount to a mental disorder.

Denmark ending its absolute monarchy and adopting a liberal constitution was a direct result of the revolutions of 1848.

The revolutions of 1848 took place towards the end of the first half of 19th century. It was a series of revolts held by republicans against the monarchies in Europe.

The impact of the revolutions of 1848 on Denmark was so much that it had to end the rule of absolute monarchy in its region and adopted a liberal constitution in the years that followed.

Hence, option C holds true regarding the revolutions of 1848.

Learn more about the revolutions of 1848 here:

https://brainly.com/question/14263481

#SPJ2

Answer:

Through many Compromises

Explanation:

The American political system tried to resolve sectionalism and slavery by passing a series of compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that proposed Missouri to become a slave state at the same time that Maine was admitted as a free state and created this imaginary line that was the “slavery boundary”.

The Compromise of 1850 also tried to solve the problem if slavery should be accepted into the western territories and new states, at the end popular sovereignty solved the problem.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 also tried to solve the demands of the Southern States by demanding that slave owners had the right to reclaim their property even in the Northern States.

The Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854 also tried to solve the slavery issue by proposing that Nebraska Territory would be divided into Kansas and Nebraska and the settlers would decide if slavery would be acceptable there.

Eventually, we know that all those compromises did not solve the problem which eventually led to the Civil War.

While the English Crown did grant Connecticut and Rhode Island certain freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. It attributed the avoidance of the American Revolution solely to these freedoms oversimplifies the complex factors that led to the revolution.

While these freedoms may have helped maintain a degree of colonial loyalty, various other issues, such as taxation without representation, economic disparities, and growing desire for self-governance, were instrumental in fueling the revolutionary sentiment.

It's unlikely that equal freedoms for all colonies would have entirely prevented the revolution, as broader ideological, political, and economic tensions were deeply rooted in the colonial experience and played a significant role in the movement toward independence.

Learn more about Connecticut, from:

brainly.com/question/11980534

SPJ12

The English crown granted Connecticut and Rhode Island many freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. Historians believe that if all colonies had the same freedoms, the American Revolution might not have occurred.

According to historians, the English crown gave Connecticut and Rhode Island many freedoms enjoyed by other colonies. If all colonies had enjoyed the same freedoms, some historians believe that the American Revolution may not have happened. The provision of these freedoms allowed Connecticut and Rhode Island to develop systems of self-government, expanded suffrage, and religious toleration, which moved them towards democracy.

https://brainly.com/question/28750226

#SPJ3

The Great Plains refer to the large flat area of land situated between the Rocky Mountains and the Mississippi River, which spans parts of the U.S, Canada, and Mexico.

The huge expanse of flatlands between the Rocky Mountains and the Mississippi River is known as the Great Plains. The Great Plains stretch over 500,000 square miles and include parts of 10 states of the U.S, as well as portions of Canada and Mexico. It is a wide plateau, which descends eastwards from the Rockies towards the Interior Lowlands. These plains display a gentle slope which is primarily used for agriculture, particularly wheat and corn.

https://brainly.com/question/33147887

Final answer:

The Olmec civilization, which arose in Mesoamerica around the third century BCE, is considered the earliest complex civilization in the Americas. Prior non-complex societies, such as those associated with the Clovis culture, existed over 13,000 years ago. In South America, the Caral culture stands as one of the earliest urban centers.

Explanation:

The earliest civilization in the Americas is widely regarded as the Olmec civilization. Emerging in Mesoamerica around the start of the third century BCE, the Olmec culture is often referred to as the mother culture to later Mesoamerican civilizations. Its influence is evident in the domains of religion, art, architecture, and writing, among others. The Olmecs are notable for their extensive trading networks, their complex agricultural society, and their religious practices that involved blood sacrifices. Mesoamerica, a region that stretched from north of Panama to central Mexico, was a fertile cradle for the rise of civilizations due to its diverse terrain and climate that supported the domestication of important crops like corn (maize).

In North America, prior to the Olmec, there were indigenous peoples such as those associated with the Clovis culture, and other non-complex hunter-gatherer societies dating back over 13,000 years. However, these were not considered fully developed civilizations like the Olmec. Another early complex society emerged in the Ohio River valley around 1000 BCE with mound-building cultures such as those in the Eastern Woodlands. Part of this development came from the agricultural revolution, with early plant domestication greatly influencing the rise of permanent settlements and complex societies.

In South America, one of the earliest urban centers, the Caral culture in Peru, dates back five thousand years. Subsequent civilizations, such as the Moche, Nazca, Wari, and Chimor, contributed to the legacy of civilization in the Americas long before European contact.

Thus, the history of the Americas is rich with multiple centers of advanced civilization development, characterized by their unique agricultural, sociopolitical, and cultural advancements. These civilizations laid the groundwork for later societies, such as the famous Inca Empire, which would eventually come into contact with European explorers and settlers.

Final answer:

The major achievements of the Middle Stone Age include the development of sophisticated stone tools, the transition to agriculture, and the emergence of early symbolic thought.

Explanation:

The major achievements of the Middle Stone Age include the development and use of more sophisticated stone tools, the transition from a hunter-gatherer culture to agriculture, and the emergence of early symbolic thought.

During the Middle Stone Age, humans began to create stone tools with more precision and complexity, such as grinding tools, chopping tools, and cutting tools. This allowed them to perform more specialized tasks and improve their daily lives.

Another significant achievement was the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to agriculture, where people started growing crops and domesticating animals for food. This shift led to the establishment of settled communities and the development of early farming practices.

Lastly, the Middle Stone Age saw the emergence of early symbolic thought in modern humans. The Apollo 11 cave stones in southern Africa, for example, demonstrate that humans possessed the capacity for modern symbolic thought as early as 25,000 years ago.

The Gossamer Condor's final generation design addressed issues with airfoil pitching moments, incorporated ergonomic cockpit designs, and used advanced lightweight materials, resulting in improved aerodynamics, comfort, and overall performance.

The Gossamer Condor is renowned for its innovative design in human-powered flight. The first generation design had basic structural features and aerodynamic properties, but several key issues needed to be addressed.

The evolution from the first to the final generation design of the Gossamer Condor highlights significant advancements in aerodynamics, human factors, and materials, culminating in a far more efficient and effective aircraft.

The correct answers would be:

"To convince the public to support an idea" - Obviously, the president would like to have the support of the public on his plans.

"To encourage the public to unite" - It's ideal for a country to be united, focused on the goal of doing good for the country, as well as understanding the plans of the government, and being patient while they progress and start showing results.

"To motivate the public to take action" - This one is related to the previous one. Again he's motivating the public to get on board with his plan.

Answer:

To convince the public to support an idea

To encourage the public to unite

To motivate the public to take action

Explanation:

United States President Roosevelt delivered his state of the Union address in 1945, during World War II to convince, encourage and support the American people about the United States success and to ensure the country was on the right track regarding the war and that the possibilities to win were favorable. Roosevelt's speech successfully appealed to a sense of nationalism in all Americans, which was a key point on winning because every American wanted to contribute in anyway the could.