A construction worker has been away from home doing commercial blasting. When he finishes a job, he realizes that he has a case of dynamite left over that isn't accounted for. He could really use that to blow some stumps on his farm when he gets home, but he obviously can't take it with him on the airline. He considers shipping it via air freight, declaring it as household goods. What are the possible adverse consequences of such an ac

Answer:

POWERS GIVEN TO THEM TO INITIATE BILLS AND REMOVE OFFICIALS

Explanation:

The U.S state House of Representatives, who form the national legislature of the country with the senate, are made up of 425 members duly elected across the fifty states of the nation.

These members of the lower house of the congress of U.S have certain powers exclusively given to them to initiate revenue bills, remove federal officials via impeachment and to elect the president when there seems to be a tie at the electoral college.  

Answer:

The house of representatives has exclusive powers to: initiate revenue bills , dismiss federal officials  and elect the President in case of a tie in the elections.

Explanation:

The House of Representatives is part of the legislative power of the federal government. These representatives serve for a period of two years. The number of representatives for each state is based on the population of that state. The bills originate in the House of Representatives but need to be approved with a majority of votes, that is, 2/3 (two thirds) of the Senate to become law.

In addition, it has exclusive powers, such as initiating revenue bills, dismissing federal officials and electing the President in case of a tie in the elections.

Answer: drive on low gear

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Using cruise control

Explanation:

I answered it incorrectly on my Driver's Ed quiz, so as you can see below, it gave me the correct answer after.

Answer:

In the video, the image of Kennedy looks much more favorable since it gives the impression of security when speaking directly to the camera without hesitation and with the conviction that he is speaking with the truth.

Explanation:

In the video, the image of Kennedy looks much more favorable since it gives the impression of security when speaking directly to the camera without hesitation and with the conviction that he is speaking with the truth. He moves his hands in a natural way and in general his body language seems secure. On the other hand, his opponent Nixon, seems nervous and expresses himself with a little of insecurity, it is possible to see when he speaks that his lips are dry and he tries to moisten them at all times, in addition, his hands seem tied to the lectern which sends an unconscious message to the spectators of their fear before the camera.

In the video, Nixon appeared to be nervous and uncomfortable. Those who listened to the debate on the radio would not have seen this as clearly. On the other hand, Kennedy appeared to be confident and comfortable, and he spoke clearly while focusing on the camera.

Answer: state court system

Explanation:

The state courts can be defined as the courts of general jurisdiction. These courts can hear all the cases not specifically selected for the federal courts. The trials for both civil and criminal cases can be conducted in the state courts. The state court follow and interpret the state laws. This helps the state to retain it's power in jurisdiction. Cases involving multiple states, foreign ambassador and non-citizen immigrants do not come under the jurisdiction of the state court.

Answer:

state court system unless the charges involved multiple states, non citizen immigrants or a foreign ambassador

Explanation:

A

Answer:

Within the legislative branch, each house of Congress serves as a check on possible abuses of power by the other. ... Once Congress has passed a bill, the president has the power to veto that bill. In turn, Congress can override a regular presidential veto by a two-thirds vote of both houses

Hope this helps :) -Mark Brainiest Please :)

Answer:

Because establishes five principles regarding the rights of the accused in a criminal trial.

Explanation:

The sixth amendment of the United States Constitution establishes five principles regarding the rights of the accused in a criminal trial: the right to a rapid and public trial, the right to be tried by an impartial jury, the right to be informed about the charges, the right to summon witnesses and face them, and the right to a lawyer.

Answer: the Department of Justice.

Explanation:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is the independent intelligence security service in the United States it works under the jurisdiction of Department of Justice, US. It is a principle law enforcement agency. FBI is assigned with duties like protection against terrorist activity, protection against cyber attacks, protection of civil rights, detection of white-collar crime, detection of organized crimes and also helps in criminal detection proceedings.

Answer:The Federal Bureau of Investigation is the domestic intelligence and security service of the United States and its principal federal law enforcement agency.

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes all are liable.

In many states, LLCs can have a limited life. When a member joins or leaves an LLC, some states may require the LLC to be dissolved and re-formed with new membership — unless they have already an agreement in place within the LLC for buying, selling, and transferring ownership.

Explanation:

An LLC has advantage of both the corporation and partnership business structures.

LLCs protect business owners from personal liability in most instances, their personal assets — like vehicles, house, and savings accounts — won't be at risk in case LLC faces bankruptcy or lawsuits.

Profits and losses can get passed through to your personal income without facing corporate taxes. But, the LLC members are considered self-employed and must pay self-employment tax contributions towards Medicare and Social Security.

in many states, LLCs can have a limited life. Some states may require the LLC to be dissolved and re-formed with new membership when a member joins or leaves an LLC. This will not be required however if there is already an agreement in place within the LLC for buying, selling, and transferring ownership.

LLCs are a good choice for medium- or higher-risk businesses, owners with significant personal assets that they want to be protect, and owners who want to pay a lower tax rate than they would with a corporation.

Answer: 12th Amendment (Amendment XII)

Explanation:

12th amendment(Amendment XII) of Unit States of America Constitution determines the way the president and vice president will be elected, it gives room for the each elector to vote for president and vice president separately, as against the previous voting procedures which requires the elector to vote twice for the president only in the presidential election.

Before the twelfth amendment, each elector is entitled to cast two electoral votes during presidential election without separating the president vote from that of the vice president, after which the presidential candidate with the highest votes elected as president, and the candidate with the second highest votes elected as vice president.

The 12th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution describes the process of how the President and Vice President are elected. This amendment was enacted after complications in the 1800 election under the original system.

The 12th Amendment to the United States Constitution precisely details the process for electing both the President and the Vice President.

This was ratified in 1804 and replaced the original process detailed in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3. Prior to this amendment, the candidate with the most electoral votes would become President and the candidate with the second most would be the Vice President.

This caused significant issues in the election of 1800, leading to the creation of the 12th Amendment. Under this amendment, electors cast separate votes for President and Vice President.

https://brainly.com/question/32172006

#SPJ12

Answer:

C. Evidence of the crime exists.

Explanation:

To obtain a search warrant, law enforcement must prove a crime has occurred, evidence of the crime exists, and that the evidence is in the place to be searched. The existence of contraband is not a necessary component to secure a warrant.

In order to obtain a search warrant, a law enforcement officer must reasonably establish three issues, which are often referred to as the 'triad of necessity'. The three components of this triad are:

Therefore, option B, 'the item to be seized is contraband', is NOT one of the requirements for obtaining a search warrant. It's important to note though, that while contraband might be sought, its existence doesn't specifically need to be proven for a warrant to be issued.

https://brainly.com/question/36902912

#SPJ3

Although both murder and euthanasia result in the death of a person, these are very different concepts.

Euthanasia is a practice in which a person's life is purposely ended with the intention of relieving pain and suffering. Euthanasia, therefore, is usually administered to people in terrible conditions, insufferable pain or who suffer terminal diseases. This is a difference with murder, which can take place regardless of the conditions of the person.

Another important difference is that for a death to be considered euthanasia, the person has to consent for his life to be ended. This can also be called assistive sui.cide.

In terms of the law, courts treat these two situations very differently. Virtually all nations that have a code of law condemn murder and punish those who engage in such a practice. Most countries also consider euthanasia to be illegal. However, a number of countries have passed laws to make euthanasia legal under certain circumstances.

Answer:

A. Anti Gridlock law

Explanation:

If You are in middle of an intersection and blocking traffic and meanwhile the green light turns red then it is a gridlock. If the traffic is blocked then it disrupts traffic in one direction at least. and blocking traffic is violation of law in some states. If you are in California and caught by police then you can be fined for this as per the Anti-Gridlock Act of 1987. This act forbids the divers from entering an intersection.

The term for entering an intersection or railroad and getting stuck due to cars in front of you in California is called violating the Anti Gridlock Law. This is law prevents blockage of intersections and railroad crossings when there's insufficient space to clear it.

If you enter an intersection or railroad and get stuck because of the cars in front of you, you have violated California's Anti Gridlock law.

California's Anti Gridlock Law, also known as Section 22526 of the California Vehicle Code, prohibits drivers from entering an intersection, marked crosswalk, or railroad grade crossing unless there is sufficient space on the other side of the intersection or crossing to accommodate their vehicle without obstructing the through passage of vehicles, pedestrians, or trains, regardless of the signal indication. Violating this law is considered a moving violation and is subject to fines.

https://brainly.com/question/33727407

#SPJ6

Answer:

D. Department of State.

Explanation:

Non combatant evacuation operations are carried out to evacuated nonessential military personnel and civilians from and overseas country to a safe haven. These operations are carried out in case of military uprising, civil unrest, natural disaster and environmental issues. These operations are managed by the Department of the State and directed by the president of the US. Initially it was conducted exclusively for US citizens but now NEO's can include citizens from the host country or any other country.

Non-combatant Evacuation Operations (NEOs) are directed by the President of the United States of America and managed by Department of State.

NEO is an acronym for Non-combatant Evacuation Operations and it can be defined as an operation that involves the planning, coordinating, and executing of the evacuation of civilians from a particular country, especially due to war, crisis or a deteriorating security situation.

Non-combatant Evacuation Operations (NEOs) are directed by the President of the United States of America and managed by Department of State.

Read more on NEOs here: https://brainly.com/question/13639340

One of the main clues that it gives are what caused the fire, and could give if the fire was started on purpose or was accidental. This, in turn, can provide them with what caused the fire, and then they can figure out who had the product which the fire was started by.

I hope this helped. If so, please mark brainliest!

Flames and smoke are probably two of the main things that investigators use to judge an investigation. The color of the flames can indicate many different things like temperature and use of particular accelerants. The direction of the burn patterns left by the flames can also tell a great deal.

The "willful or malicious" part of the definition for arson is what truly determines whether the crime of arson has occurred.

They also look for things like the direction of the smoke, the flames, and the distance.

Learn more about arson investigation here-https://brainly.com/question/14317242

#SPJ2

Answer: It means the United States has determined towards improving how to take over all states or countries

Explanation:

When the united states' use of military force is successful in maintaining national security, the United States : It means the United States has determined towards improving how to take over all states or countries by Occupying them.

The military force did this purposely to prevent any occurrence of threat, war or destruction in the nearest future. After the national security has been duly maintained, fixing of the problems shall follow suit in a peaceful way.

Answer:

The answer would be b. false.

I hope this helped!

Answer:

b. False

Explanation:

Final answer:

Recent trends in American juvenile justice indicate a complex system with growing incarceration rates, a history of racial bias, and debates on whether to be harsher or more rehabilitative. Despite this, the crime rate is decreasing, and efforts to improve the justice system continue.

Explanation:

Recent trends in American juvenile justice have sparked significant debate. Some argue that a harsher justice system deters crime, yet others contend that it fails to rehabilitate and unfairly targets certain demographics. Notably, juvenile justice has seen shifts with the Supreme Court influencing the legal use of the death penalty and sentencing of minors.

The American criminal justice system is notorious for its approach to mass incarceration, leading to the highest number of imprisoned individuals globally. Since the 1980s, 'get tough on crime' campaigns have substantially increased the incarcerated population, peaking in 2017 with over two million people. This system faces criticism for being overly punitive, having racial biases, and ignoring holistic methods of crime prevention like addiction treatment.

Despite high incarceration rates and the persistence of social challenges, recent trends show a declining crime rate and proactive attempts to remedy the system's deficiencies. The inequitable enforcement of laws remains a problematic issue, with ongoing efforts to improve these outcomes.

Non-repudiation refers to ensuring that the signer cannot later deny what was signed.

Option D

Explanation:

During the collecting of the evidence from the witness’s proper procedure will be carried out according to the law. And while collecting the evidence the witnesses will briefed about the how the information are to be collected digitally and also the value of the digital signature its authenticity.

Non-repudiation is a legal setting which means the author of the statement cannot deny the validity of the contract associated.  

According to the available clauses in the law, witness is examined and collected evidence is being authenticated by the digital signature of the witnesses which are submitted for prosecution before the court.  Later the authenticated documents or evidence cannot be denied by the witness.

Answer:

(D) Non-repudiation

Explanation:

This is an example of the legal concept of non-repudiation. When investigators take a statement from witnesses, they require them to provide a digital signature. The main reason for this is to ensure that the validity of this document is not later questioned. Paper signatures can be forged relatively easily. However, digital signatures are much harder to break. This is why such certificates provide non-repudiation.

Answer:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Explanation:

The Universal Declaration of Human Right was first published in 1948 by the United Nations.

It consists of 30 articles expressing individuals rights, and has been used as a model for human rights around the world since them.

So the correct answer is:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Answer:

I think your answer is A, but as I'm not sure of the answer I will leave some other actions that can be done.

Fundamental will also be to adopt unemployment mitigating measures, with actions that:

a) retain young people in schools for some time with some kind of income (scholarship);

b) mobilize temporary occupation - employment of public and / or community interest - for services (health, education, etc.) and works of collective interest (construction, paving, sanitation, etc.), which generate a good or service and income;

c) offer credit and support to micro and small enterprises;

d) encourage and support popular and solidary initiatives of economic activities in the production of goods and services;

e) mobilize resources and rules for debt renegotiation of companies and families, under appropriate conditions;

f) extend the protection of unemployment insurance.

Measures like these need to be put in place to help workers and businesses in this difficult transition

Hope this helps :) -Mark Brainiest Please :)

Answer:

Dawes Acts was enacted into law in 1887, purposely to make native Americans, true Americans, by redistributing tribal lands to individual owners. Assimilation policy of Dawes failed because of the following reasons:

(1) The government didn't support the assimilation policy.

(2) The Natives of American are not interested in property own by individual.

The assimilation policy of the Dawes Act failed because it disrupted Native American culture, resulted in the loss of their land, and had negative consequences for Native American families.

The assimilation policy of the Dawes Act can be considered a failure for several reasons.

From the Native American perspective, the Dawes Act was seen as an assault on their way of life. It ended their communal lifestyle, which was central to their social, economic, and religious practices. Dividing the land into small individual plots prevented them from hunting and disrupted their traditional practices.

Moreover, the Dawes Act led to the loss of millions of acres of Native American land. The government controlled 12 million acres within just two years of implementing the act. The land that was not allocated to Native Americans became property of the federal government, who redistributed it to Anglo settlers.

Additionally, the Dawes Act had a detrimental impact on Native American families. About 60 percent of those who accepted land allotments lost control of their land within two generations.

The correct statement is that the Kellogg-Briand pact promoted international peace, as it was a step in curbing war as a form of foreign national policies of the nations.

This pact between Briand and Kellogg was signed between the US and France before the countries worldwide were on the verge of breaking the World War II. during the mid-Twentieth Century.

Hence, the Kellogg-Briand pact of 1927 between France and the US promoted international peace by signing an agreement that the two nations will not indulge in war activities.

Learn more about Kellogg-Briand pact here:

https://brainly.com/question/3178345

Final answer:

The Kellogg-Briand Pact sought to promote peace by outlawing war as a tool of foreign policy, but it lacked enforcement mechanisms and did not prevent future conflicts.

Explanation:

The Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1927 was an international agreement that aimed to promote peace by renouncing war as an instrument of national policy. The pact was signed initially by fifteen nations in 1928, led by U.S. secretary of state Frank Kellogg and French foreign minister Aristide Briand, and was eventually endorsed by a total of more than sixty countries. However, the pact lacked enforcement mechanisms and failed to prevent future conflicts, including the outbreak of the Second World War. Despite these shortcomings, the Kellogg-Briand Pact represented an early attempt at collective security and played a role in the development of later international laws designed to prevent war, such as those embodied in the United Nations Charter.

Answer:

B. Low-level employees engaging in stock fraud

Explanation:

A: The reason A is an incorrect option is because the question specifically refers to employees of the company. Meaning that interference by outsiders does not count as embezzlement.

C: This option is incorrect because this option involves company owners, which does not refer to low-level employees, and therefore is incorrect.

D: Also does not refer to low-level employees due to the referencing to upper-level management.

There are three main types of powers in U.S. government: Delegated powers, reserved powers , and concurrent powers. Delegated powers are specific authorities given to the federal government, reserved powers are rights not explicitly granted to the federal government and therefore reserved for the states, and concurrent powers are responsibilities shared between both federal and state governments.

Delegated, reserved, and concurrent powers are key aspects of federal systems of government, such as that of the United States, which distribute authority between the central (federal) government and individual state governments.

Delegated Powers (Enumerated Powers) are explicitly granted to the federal government by the constitution. They encompass matters of national concern, like defense, foreign policy, and currency regulation. These powers are clearly defined in the constitution, ensuring a strong central authority.

Reserved Powers are reserved for the individual states or the people, as per the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. They include areas like education, family law, and intrastate commerce. States have the authority to regulate these aspects of daily life unless they conflict with federal law.

Concurrent Powers are shared by both levels of government. This includes the power to tax, regulate commerce within the state, and establish courts. While states can operate in these areas, federal law prevails in case of a conflict. Concurrent powers promote cooperation while allowing for localized governance.

These divisions aim to maintain a balance of power, prevent centralization, and ensure efficient governance across diverse issues in a federal system.

Learn more about Delegated, Reserved, and Concurrent Powers:

https://brainly.com/question/37207562

#SPJ6

Answer: Citizens spend less money repairing punctured and torn tires.

Explanation:

A positive externality is the economic benefit that is enjoyed by the third party that may or may not had contributed for the resource. The individuals who obtain benefits without paying are considered as free-riders.

According to the given situation, the citizens will get benefit from road repair. As the road will become smooth for riding thus the citizens will spend less money for repairing the torn tires and puncture. This is an example of positive externality. The citizens are the third party obtaining benefit from road repair.

Answer: b. False

Explanation:

Larceny is a crime by law that involves the theft. In larceny the thief conduct a criminal trespass to a owner residence and carry away personal property with an intent to deprive the owner with the possession of the stolen property permanently. It is a crime of misdemeanor charge or penalty. It is not considered under heinous offense.

The increasing inability of federal law enforcement agencies to effectively collect evidence derived from electronic communications via the Web is referred to as Going dark.

Option A.

The federal agencies are unable to collect information available on the Web/secured data, that may be relevant to national security. It has been reported as an increasing issue and is referred to as 'going dark'. It happens when defaulters are able to cover up their tracks and information using advanced encryption. It creates innumerable obstructions for the federal law enforcement agencies while they try to collect stored data by lawful means. The obstruction may also be caused by the usage of new and advanced technologies.

Going dark is a major concern for federal bodies as well as Intelligence Communities as the data which is being held back is mostly relevant to criminal activities. These activities may include drug dealings, trafficking or planning and organisation of certain crimes and so on.

Answer:

Going Dark

Explanation:

Going dark means that people who are given responsibility to protect our us are unable to access the evidence they need to prosecute crime and prevent terrorism despite having lawful authority.

The government agencies have the legal authority to intercept , access communications but lack the technical ability to do so, because all the types of data available to law enforcement agencies are encrypted.

The data is divided into two categories, e-mail, live chat sessions and phone calls are called data in motion while data stored in devices is known as data at rest. Earlier it was easier to conduct surveillance as the authorities just had to tap the phone call but it is not easy to do so now.

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

TRUE  

Bill can come from anyone and members of the congress can as well initiate a bill in the congress, at any time they are in session.  

When the idea of the bill is fully developed, a member of the congress then brings it up before the congress, officially, while he or she becomes the sponsor of the bill.

When the bill passes the first reading before the house, it then gets sent to a special committee and they debate on the bill being proposed. They may decide to make changes to it. Before the changes happen, members of the committee can vote to either accept or reject it.

Answer:

There is an inverse relationship between IQ and delinquency.

Explanation:

Recent studies in criminology have shown that the relationship between IQ and delinquency is an inverse one. People who have a lower IQ are generally more likely to engage in criminal behaviour. However, it is important to remember that this is a general trend, and not an absolute necessity. Moreover, many other factors can play a role in delinquency, including peer pressure and family problems.

The relationship between IQ scores and socioeconomic status is complex, with children in poverty potentially scoring lower due to environmental stressors. Research also indicates that social environment significantly affects juvenile delinquency rates, not ethnicity. Additionally, attributes like grit and perseverance can be more important than intelligence alone for academic success.

The relationship between IQ scores and socioeconomic status (SES) is complex and multifaceted. Studies have shown that children living in poverty are subject to daily stressors that can affect their brain development and function, which may result in lower IQ scores. Research by Kishiyama and colleagues highlights that children in poverty may show brain function similar to those with prefrontal cortex damage, potentially impacting their cognitive abilities and performance on intelligence tests.

Regarding delinquency, the work of Shaw and McKay underscores that it is not ethnicity but the socioeconomic environment that plays a key role. When families move out of impoverished neighborhoods, the rate of juvenile delinquency declines, suggesting that the social environment, not ethnic background, is influential.

In a case study featuring Candace, a 14-year-old girl with an IQ score of 68, we see an example of how socioeconomic factors and school environment can mask learning difficulties. Candace's academic and behavioral issues could stem from the challenges posed by a lack of appropriate educational support considering her IQ level and potential learning disabilities, exacerbated by possible stressors related to her SES or experiences with discrimination.

While IQ can be an indicator of cognitive capacity, studies have also found that attributes like grit and perseverance are more predictive of academic success and achievement than raw intelligence. This indicates that personal characteristics and environmental variables can significantly influence educational outcomes.