A nurse and her husband come upon an accident late at night. while her husband stays with the accident victims and calls for help, the nurse breaks the window on the door of a nearby drugstore to get the supplies she needs to help these victims before the ambulance gets there. when the police arrive, she tells them what she did and offers to pay for the window and supplies. which level of moral development is the nurse exhibiting
Snea works as an engineer and her brother is an accountant. according to gardner, they are both most likely strong in _____ intelligence.
Engineers and accountants are typically strong in logical-mathematical intelligence according to Gardner's Multiple Intelligences theory.
Explanation:According to Howard Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences, an engineer and an accountant are both likely strong in logical-mathematical intelligence. This form of intelligence refers to the ability to analyze problems logically, carry out mathematical operations, and investigate issues scientifically. Engineers typically use logical-mathematical intelligence to solve complex problems and design systems, while accountants apply it to manage and analyze financial data.
If a diabolical villain threatened to blow up a city unless you kill one innocent person, what would a kantian say you have to do?
A Kantian would say that even in the face of severe consequences, one must not kill an innocent person as it violates Kant's categorical imperative and the perfect duty not to harm others, which should be upheld at all times.
Explanation:Kantian Ethics and Perfect Duties
From a Kantian ethical perspective, the dilemma presented involves a conflict between perfect duties: the duty not to harm or kill an innocent person and the duty to prevent harm to others. Kant's categorical imperative demands that one acts only according to maxims that could be universalized without contradiction. Thus, according to Kantian ethics, one should never commit an act that couldn't be willed to become a universal law, such as killing an innocent person; even under dire circumstances such as threats to a larger group. Kantian moral theory holds that moral rules are absolute, meaning that some actions are always wrong, regardless of their consequences.
In the scenario where a diabolical villain threatens to blow up a city unless an innocent person is killed, a Kantian would argue against killing the innocent person. This is because Kant believed that taking an innocent life cannot be moral under any circumstances. It is a perfect duty to not kill, one that must be upheld at all times. To do otherwise would contradict the very essence of moral law as per Kant's philosophy. Moreover, such an act would set a precedent that would erode trust and civilized life, as it would make the respect for an individual's right to life conditional and negotiable.
Ultimately, from a Kantian viewpoint, even in the face of severe consequences, committing an immoral act, such as killing an innocent person, cannot be justified. Moral actions must remain consistent with the imperative of universalizability, and no circumstances can justify the infringement of a perfect duty.
What was the crucial innovation that defined the recognition-by-components (rbc) model?
Which country experiences nearly every type of climate?
Stuart hall sees media as ___________ where various forces struggle to shape popular notions about social reality.
The most significant part of a person’s self concept
Freddy has been sucking his thumb for a few weeks. his parents would prefer him to use a pacifier, so they begin to offer one, but freddy rejects it and continues to suck his thumb. freddy is most clearly in stage _____ of piaget's theory of sensorimotor development.
Answer:
Stage Two?
Explanation:my sister is now stage two I think.
How was the geography of the land around Egypt different 9,000 years ago.
A. The Sahara was a savanna
B. The Sahara was larger
C. The Sahara was a rain forest
D. There was no difference
how is the size of a planet related to the thickness of its atmosphere
Does the equator cross the northern or southern part of South America
How does self-control theory explain crime?
Answer:
The self-control theory states that one with no self-control is more likely to commit a crime. People with low self-control want instant gratification causing them not to think about the consequences of their actions. They only think about satisfying their needs instantly, causing them to act recklessly and be drawn to dangerous or risk-taking behaviors. Thus, causing them to be more likely to be criminally inclined.
Re-word it and you should be fine.